生物多样性 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 22396.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022396

所属专题: 青藏高原生物多样性与生态安全

• 中国猫科动物研究与保护专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

荒漠猫的演化遗传、分类和保护研究进展

刘珂1,2, 韩思成1,2, 遇赫1, 罗述金1,2,*()   

  1. 1.北京大学生命科学学院蛋白质与植物基因研究国家重点实验室, 北京 100871
    2.北京大学前沿交叉学科研究院北京大学-清华大学生命科学联合中心, 北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-12 接受日期:2022-09-22 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-09-27
  • 通讯作者: 罗述金
  • 作者简介:* E-mail: luo.shujin@pku.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(32070598)

The evolutionary genetics, taxonomy, and conservation of the Chinese mountain cat

Ke Liu1,2, Sicheng Han1,2, He Yu1, Shu-Jin Luo1,2,*()   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871
    2. Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871
  • Received:2022-07-12 Accepted:2022-09-22 Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-09-27
  • Contact: Shu-Jin Luo

摘要:

荒漠猫(Felis bieti)是中国特有的野生猫科动物, 也是世界上最鲜为人知的猫科动物之一, 在IUCN濒危物种红色名录中列为易危(Vulnerable, VU), 在我国被列为国家一级重点保护野生动物。本文对荒漠猫的野外分布现状、分类学地位、遗传多样性、演化史以及致危因素等近期研究进展进行了综述和展望, 以期为荒漠猫的保护提供科学依据。荒漠猫定名于1892年, 其分类学地位长期存在争议。形态学证据支持其独立物种的划分, 但分子遗传学研究则表明荒漠猫与亚洲野猫(Felis silvestris ornata)等野猫亚种之间的演化距离相当, 建议将其归为野猫亚种(F. s. bieti)。然而研究也表明包括荒漠猫在内的各野猫支系之间的分歧时间已有100万年以上, 因此解决野猫类群分类学争议的另一种可能是将所有野猫亚种提升为物种水平, 从而维持荒漠猫的独立物种地位, 不过这需要对所有野猫类群在全基因组层面深入全面地分析。最新的基因组学研究揭示荒漠猫与亚洲野猫(F. s. ornata)存在着古老的基因交流, 与青藏高原同域家猫之间存在近期且广泛的基因渗透。该遗传杂交信号以荒漠猫到家猫为主并局限于荒漠猫分布区, 时间尺度对应于20世纪中叶, 可能与藏区社会经济的发展以及家猫种群在当地的增长有关。该发现也意味着青藏高原增长的家猫种群对于同域分布的野猫产生的遗传影响将是亟需关注的问题。IUCN最新评估结果显示, 荒漠猫明确分布区域仅限于青藏高原东部, 包括青海东部、四川西北部、甘肃西南部以及紧邻青海的西藏东南部局部区域。荒漠猫当前面临着包括鼠药施用造成的二次毒害、毛皮贸易、开发建设造成的栖息地的丧失和碎片化、路撞以及与同域家猫杂交等在内的直接或潜在威胁。对荒漠猫开展更全面的调查和深入的研究以及评估并制定有效的保护管理措施, 是保护我国唯一的特有猫科动物的重要举措。

关键词: 荒漠猫, 遗传演化, 基因交流, 分类, 野外分布, 致危因素, 保护

Abstract

Background & Aims The Chinese mountain cat (Felis bieti) is the only wild felid endemic to China, and it is one of the world’s least studied felids. It is listed as Vulnerable in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and is listed as a nationally first-class protected species in China. Here, we reviewed recent advances in the distribution, range, taxonomy, genetic diversity, evolutionary history, and conservation threats to the Chinese mountain cat to provide a much needed scientific basis for conservation efforts.
Review Results Scientists have not reached a unanimous agreement on the taxonomic status of the Chinese mountain cat (Felis bieti) since its inception as a species in 1892. Morphological distinctiveness supports its independent species status, yet recent genetic studies revealed that it is equidistant with other currently recognized wildcat subspecies and hence should be considered a wildcat conspecific (Felis silvestris bieti). However, because of the divergent evolution that occurred over one million years between the wildcat subspecies, an alternative approach to resolve the dispute over the Chinese mountain cat’s taxonomy would be to elevate all F. silvestris lineages to the species level, thus retaining the Chinese mountain cat as F. bieti. Nevertheless, this proposition would require a comprehensive analysis of the entirety of the genome data from all wildcat taxa. In addition, a complex admixture scenario was depicted, including an ancient introgression from the Asiatic wildcat (F. s. ornata) to the Chinese mountain cat, as well as a widespread signal of contemporary genetic introgression from F. s. bieti to domestic cats across, but not beyond, the range of F. s. bieti. Regional socioeconomic change in the Tibetan region since the mid-20th century may have facilitated an expansion of domestic cats that had likely recently arrived to the plateau, setting the stage for their close contact, frequent interaction, and interbreeding with sympatric Chinese mountain cats. This raises concern for conservationists about the opposite direction of gene flow that may pose a threat to the Chinese mountain cat and jeopardize its genetic integrity as well as its evolutionary adaptation to high altitude, an issue with profound conservation implications. The IUCN Red List assessment confirmed the Chinese mountain cat’s range to be restricted to the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, encompassing the eastern Qinghai, north-western Sichuan, south-western Gansu, and a small area in south-eastern Tibet adjacent to Qinghai. The free-ranging population of the Chinese mountain cat is likely threatened by indirect poisoning by rodenticide, illegal trade, poaching for furs, habitat loss, fragmentation, and road kills caused by grazing and infrastructure development, as well as potential introgression from local domestic cats.
Conclusion: There is an urgent need to assess the efficacy of current conservation measures in place for the protection of the Chinese mountain cat, including the effectiveness of the management of current protected areas, to safeguard China’s only endemic felid.

Key words: Chinese mountain cat, evolution, genetic introgression, taxonomy, distribution, threats, conservation