北京近郊深土层动物群落结构特征

doi:10.17520/biods.2018027

生物多样性 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 248-257. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018027 cstr: 32101.14.biods.2018027

所属专题：土壤生物与土壤健康

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

北京近郊深土层动物群落结构特征

莫畏^1,², 王志良², 李猷², 郭建军^1,^2,^*(), 张润志^2,^3,^*()

1 (贵州大学昆虫研究所, 贵阳 550025)
2 (中国科学院动物研究所, 北京 100101)
3 (中国科学院大学, 北京 100049)

收稿日期:2018-01-29 接受日期:2018-03-23 出版日期:2018-03-20 发布日期:2018-05-05
通讯作者: 郭建军,张润志
作者简介:# 共同第一作者
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31572312)

Faunal communities of deep soil layers in suburban Beijing

Wei Mo^1,², Zhiliang Wang², You Li², Jianjun Guo^1,^2,^*(), Runzhi Zhang^2,^3,^*()

1 Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025
2 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received:2018-01-29 Accepted:2018-03-23 Online:2018-03-20 Published:2018-05-05
Contact: Guo Jianjun,Zhang Runzhi
About author:# Co-first authors

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了解城市近郊深层土壤中动物群落结构组成, 2012年在北京市北四环和北五环之间的中国科学院奥运村科技园区埋设陷阱收集器, 对地下30 cm和55 cm土层活动的动物进行采样。2013-2017年8次调查共捕获动物3门10纲20目10,163头, 优势类群分别是膜翅目(61.0%)、蜱螨目(12.1%)和弹尾目(11.2%)。30 cm土层动物类群数和个体数均高于55 cm, 30 cm土层优势类群为膜翅目(69.4%), 55 cm土层优势类群除膜翅目(45.7%)外还有蜱螨目(21.8%)和弹尾目(16.4%)。夏秋季动物个体数和类群数高于冬春季, 环节动物门仅出现于冬春季, 而缨翅目、啮虫目和革翅目仅出现于夏秋季。不同绿化带类型间动物群落Jaccard相似性指数均高于0.75, Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、Simpson优势度指数和Pielou均匀度指数均不存在显著性差异(P > 0.05)。结果表明: 深层土壤中存在着大量的动物类群, 动物个体数和类群数均随土层加深而减少。不同季节人工绿地土壤中动物结构存在差异, 而不同植被类型下动物群落组成高度相似。

关键词: 土壤动物, 群落结构, 土壤深层, 多样性, 人工绿地

Abstract

In order to reveal composition of faunal communities in deep soil, we investigated soil at 30 and 55 cm at the Olympic Campus of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in a suburb of Beijing using trap collectors. A total of 10,163 individuals representing 20 orders belonging to ten classes and three phyla were captured in eight surveys carried out over five years. The dominant groups were Hymenoptera (61.0%), Acarina (12.1%) and Collembola (11.2%). The individuals and groups in the 30 cm soil layer were greater than at 55 cm. The dominant group of the 30 cm soil layer was Hymenoptera (69.4%) while at 55 cm, Hymenoptera (45.7%), Acarina (21.8%) and Collembola (16.4%) were all dominant. The number of individuals and groups recorded from April to October was greater than October to April of the next year. Annelida appeared only between October to April of the next year, while Thysanoptera, Psocoptera, Dermaptera appeared only between April to October. The lowest Jaccard value of soil faunal communities in different vegetation forms was 0.75. None of Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Simpson dominance index and Pielou evenness index showed significant differences between different vegetation types (P > 0.05). The results showed that there were abundant soil faunal communities in deep soil. The number of individuals and groups decreased with increasing soil depth. Soil faunal community structure was different in different seasons and the composition was highly similar between different vegetation types.

Key words: soil animal, community structure, deep soil, diversity, treelawn

莫畏, 王志良, 李猷, 郭建军, 张润志 (2018) 北京近郊深土层动物群落结构特征. 生物多样性, 26, 248-257. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018027.

Wei Mo, Zhiliang Wang, You Li, Jianjun Guo, Runzhi Zhang (2018) Faunal communities of deep soil layers in suburban Beijing. Biodiversity Science, 26, 248-257. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018027.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2018027

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2018/V26/I3/248

图/表 6

参考文献 33

[1]	Andre HM, Ducarme X, Lebrun P (2002) Soil biodiversity: Myth, reality or conning. Oikos, 96, 3-24. DOI URL
[2]	Bongers T, Ferris H (1999) Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 224-228. DOI URL PMID
[3]	Chen GX, Song DX (2000) A study on soil animal fauna from warm temperate zone in Xiaolongmen forest areas, Beijing. Chinese Biodiversity, 8, 88-94. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[陈国孝, 宋大祥 (2000) 暖温带北京小龙门林区土壤动物的研究. 生物多样性, 8, 88-94.] DOI URL
[4]	Coleman DC, Whitman WB (2005) Linking species richness, biodiversity and ecosystem function in soil system. Pedbiologia, 49, 479-497. DOI URL
[5]	Deca?ns T, Mariani L, Lavelle P (1999) Soil surface macrofaunal communities associated with earthworm casts in grasslands of the eastern plains of Colombia. Applied Soil Ecology, 13, 87-100. DOI URL
[6]	Deca?ns T, Jimenéz JJ, Gioia C, Measey GJ, Lavelle P (2006) The values of soil animals for conservation biology. European Journal of Soil Biology, 42, 23-38. DOI URL
[7]	Fu BQ, Chen W, Dong XH, Xing ZM, Gao W (2002) The composition and structure of the four soil macrofaunas in Songshan Mountain in Beijing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 22, 215-223. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[傅必谦, 陈卫, 董晓晖, 邢忠民, 高武 (2002) 北京松山四种大型土壤动物群落组成和结构. 生态学报, 22, 215-223.] DOI URL
[8]	Gibb H, Hochuli DF (2002) Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: Large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages. Biological Conservation, 106, 91-100. DOI URL
[9]	Huang X, Wen WQ, Zhang J, Yang WQ, Liu Y, Yan BG, Huang YM (2010) Soil faunal diversity under typical alpine vegetation in West Sichuan. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 21, 181-190. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[黄旭, 文维全, 张健, 杨万勤, 刘洋, 闫帮国, 黄玉梅 (2010) 川西高山典型自然植被土壤动物多样性. 应用生态学报, 21, 181-190.]
[10]	Jaccard (1912) The distribution of the flora of the alpine zone. New Phytologist, 11, 37-50. DOI URL
[11]	Jin YL, Li BC, Geng L, Bu Y (2017) Soil fauna community in different natural vegetation types of Dajinshan Island, Shanghai. Biodiversity Science, 25, 304-311. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[靳亚丽, 李必成, 耿龙, 卜云 (2017) 上海大金山岛不同植被类型下土壤动物群落多样性. 生物多样性, 25, 304-311.] DOI URL
[12]	Li W, Cui LJ, Zhao XS, Zhang MY, Gao CJ, Zhang Y, Wang YF (2015) Community structure and diversity of soil animals in the Lake Taihu lakeshore wetland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 944-955. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[李伟, 崔丽娟, 赵欣胜, 张曼胤, 高常军, 张岩, 王义飞 (2015) 太湖岸带湿地土壤动物群落结构与多样性. 生态学报, 35, 944-955.] DOI URL
[13]	Lin YH, Yang DF, Zhang FD, Wang JX, Bai XL, Wang B (2006) Structure of soil anmial community of oakery litter and fluctuation during leaf litter decomposition. Forest Research, 19, 331-336. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[林英华, 杨德付, 张夫道, 王建修, 白秀兰, 王兵 (2006) 栎林凋落层土壤动物群落结构及其在凋落物分解中的变化. 林业科学研究, 19, 331-336.] DOI URL
[14]	Lovei GL, Sunderland KD (1996) Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Review of Entomology, 41, 231-256. DOI URL
[15]	López H, Oromí P (2010) A pitfall trap for sampling the mesovoid shallow substratum (MSS) fauna. Speleobiology Notes, 2, 7-11. DOI URL
[16]	Mckinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 161-176. DOI URL
[17]	Peng T, Ouyang ZY, Wen LZ, Zheng H (2006) Characters of soil arthropod community in Haidian District of Beijing. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25, 389-394. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[彭涛, 欧阳志云, 文礼章, 郑华 (2006) 北京市海淀区土壤节肢动物群落特征. 生态学杂志, 25, 389-394.]
[18]	Petersen H, Luxton M (1982) A comparative analysis of soil fauna populations and their role in decomposition processes. Oikos, 39, 288-388. DOI URL
[19]	Pielou EC (1985) Mathematical Ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
[20]	Powell JR, Craven D, Eisenhauer N (2014) Recent trends and future strategies in soil ecological research: Integrative approaches at Pedobiologia. Pedobiologia, 57, 1-3. DOI URL
[21]	Rebele F (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 4, 173-187. DOI URL
[22]	Rombke J, J?nsch S, Didden W (2005) The use of earthworms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 62, 249-265. DOI URL PMID
[23]	Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbanna. DOI URL
[24]	Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688. DOI URL
[25]	Smith P, Bustamante M, House JI, Sobocka J, Harper R, Pan GX, West P, Clark J, Adhya T, Rumpel C, Paustian K, Kuikman P, Cotrufo MF, Elliott JA, Mcdowell R, Griffiths RI, Asakawa S, Bondeau A, Jain AK, Meersmans J (2015) Global change pressures on soils from land use and management. Global Change Biology, 22, 1008-1028. DOI URL PMID
[26]	Song YS, Li XW, Li F, Li HM (2015) Influence of different types of surface on the diversity of soil fauna in Beijing Olympic Park. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 26, 1130-1136. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[宋英石, 李晓文, 李锋, 李海梅 (2015) 北京市奥林匹克公园不同地表类型对土壤动物多样性的影响. 应用生态学报, 26, 1130-1136.]
[27]	Wall DH, Bardgett RD, Behan PV (2012) Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[28]	Wang Y, Wei W, Yang XZ, Chen LD, Yang L (2010) Interrelationships between soil fauna and soil environmental factors in China: Research advance. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21, 2441-2448. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王移, 卫伟, 杨兴中, 陈利顶, 杨磊 (2010) 我国土壤动物与土壤环境要素相互关系研究进展. 应用生态学报, 21, 2441-2448.]
[29]	Wu T, Ayres E, Bardgett RD (2011) Molecular study of worldwide distribution and diversity of soil animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 17720-17725. DOI URL PMID
[30]	Yin WY (1998) Pictorial Keys to Soil Animals of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[尹文英 (1998) 中国土壤动物检索图鉴. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[31]	Yin XQ (2001) Study on Forest Soil Animals in the Northeast of China. Northeast Normal University Press, Changchun. (in Chinese)
	[殷秀琴 (2001) 东北森林土壤动物研究. 东北师范大学出版社, 长春.]
[32]	Yuan F (2006) Taxonomy of Hexapoda, 2nd edn. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[袁锋 (2006) 昆虫分类学(第二版). 中国农业出版社, 北京.]
[33]	Zhang JE, Qin Z, Li QF (2011) Clustering and ordination of soil animal community under different land-use types. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 30, 2849-2856. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[章家恩, 秦钟, 李庆芳 (2011) 不同土地利用方式下土壤动物群落的聚类与排序. 生态学杂志, 30, 2849-2856.]

	夏秋季 April to October			冬春季 October to April of the next year
	个体数 Individuals	%	优势度 Dominance	个体数 Individuals	%	优势度 Dominance
膜翅目 Hymenoptera	3,719	69.7	+++	1,413	48.7	+++
同翅目 Homoptera	142	2.7	++	114	3.9	++
鞘翅目 Coleoptera	77	1.4	++	83	2.9	++
双翅目 Diptera	154	2.9	++	146	5	++
半翅目 Hemiptera	4	0.1	+	2	0.1	+
直翅目 Orthoptera	38	0.7	+	2	0.1	+
缨翅目 Thysanoptera	2	0	+
啮虫目 Psocoptera	1	0	+
革翅目 Dermaptera	2	0	+
石蜈蚣目 Lithobiomorpha	74	1.4	++	32	1.1	++
地蜈蚣目 Geophilomorpha	7	0.1	+	17	0.6	+
蜱螨目 Acarina	572	10.7	+++	406	14	+++
蜘蛛目 Araneae	42	0.8	+	24	0.8	+
带马陆目 Polydesmida	15	0.3	+	10	0.3	+
弹尾目 Collembola	264	4.9	++	548	18.9	+++
双尾目 Diplura	73	1.4	++	37	1.3	++
等足目 Isopoda	93	1.7	++	51	1.8	++
综合目 Symphyla	16	0.3	+	1	0	+
柄眼目 Stylommatophora	43	0.8	+	12	0.4	+
后孔寡毛目 Opisthopora				1	0	+
总数 Total	5,338			2,899

	夏秋季 April to October			冬春季 October to April of the next year
	个体数 Individuals	%	优势度 Dominance	个体数 Individuals	%	优势度 Dominance
膜翅目 Hymenoptera	3,719	69.7	+++	1,413	48.7	+++
同翅目 Homoptera	142	2.7	++	114	3.9	++
鞘翅目 Coleoptera	77	1.4	++	83	2.9	++
双翅目 Diptera	154	2.9	++	146	5	++
半翅目 Hemiptera	4	0.1	+	2	0.1	+
直翅目 Orthoptera	38	0.7	+	2	0.1	+
缨翅目 Thysanoptera	2	0	+
啮虫目 Psocoptera	1	0	+
革翅目 Dermaptera	2	0	+
石蜈蚣目 Lithobiomorpha	74	1.4	++	32	1.1	++
地蜈蚣目 Geophilomorpha	7	0.1	+	17	0.6	+
蜱螨目 Acarina	572	10.7	+++	406	14	+++
蜘蛛目 Araneae	42	0.8	+	24	0.8	+
带马陆目 Polydesmida	15	0.3	+	10	0.3	+
弹尾目 Collembola	264	4.9	++	548	18.9	+++
双尾目 Diplura	73	1.4	++	37	1.3	++
等足目 Isopoda	93	1.7	++	51	1.8	++
综合目 Symphyla	16	0.3	+	1	0	+
柄眼目 Stylommatophora	43	0.8	+	12	0.4	+
后孔寡毛目 Opisthopora				1	0	+
总数 Total	5,338			2,899

类群 Group	草本型 Lawn			灌木型 Shrubbery			乔木型 Arboreal forest			混合型 Mixed forest			食性 Feeding habit
类群 Group	个体数 Indivi- duals	%	优势度 Domi- nance	个体数 Indivi- duals	%	优势度 Domi- nance	个体数 Indivi- duals	%	优势度 Domi- nance	个体数 Indivi- duals	%	优势度 Domi- nance	食性 Feeding habit
膜翅目 Hymenoptera	778	49.1	+++	1,397	49.7	+++	1,732	66.3	+++	2,288	72.5	+++	O
同翅目 Homoptera	67	4.2	++	129	4.6	++	113	4.3	++	9	0.3	+	O
鞘翅目 Coleoptera	52	3.3	++	60	2.1	++	69	2.6	++	30	1	++	Pr
双翅目 Diptera	24	1.5	++	55	2	++	210	8	++	30	1	++	S
半翅目 Hemiptera	2	0.1	+	2	0.1	+				2	0.1	+	Ph
直翅目 Orthoptera	4	0.3	+	3	0.1	+	16	0.6	+	17	0.5	+	Ph
缨翅目 Thysanoptera										2	0.1	+	Ph
啮虫目 Psocoptera	1	0.1	+										Ph
革翅目 Dermaptera							2	0.1	+				O
石蜈蚣目 Lithobiomorpha	29	1.8	++	65	2.3	++	26	1	++	19	0.6	+	Pr
地蜈蚣目 Geophilomorpha	7	0.4	+	24	0.9	+	3	0.1	+	5	0.2	+	Pr
蜱螨目 Acarina	230	14.5	+++	511	18.2	+++	138	5.3	++	347	11	+++	O
蜘蛛目 Araneae	6	0.4	+	38	1.4	++	27	1	++	10	0.3	+	Pr
带马陆目 Polydesmida	2	0.1	+	14	0.5	+	13	0.5	+	5	0.2	+	Ph
弹尾目 Collembola	283	17.9	+++	282	10	+++	235	9	++	337	10.7	+++	O
双尾目 Diplura	44	2.8	++	83	3	++	15	0.6	+	15	0.5	+	D
等足目 Isopoda	25	1.6	++	100	3.6	++	5	0.2	+	14	0.4	+	S
综合目 Symphyla	16	1	++	4	0.1	+	5	0.2	+	8	0.3	+	Pr
柄眼目 Stylommatophora	13	0.8	+	45	1.6	++	4	0.2	+	14	0.4	+	Ph
后孔寡毛目 Opisthopora				1	0	+				2	0.1	+	S
总数 Total	1,583			2,813			2,613			3,154

类群 Group	草本型 Lawn			灌木型 Shrubbery			乔木型 Arboreal forest			混合型 Mixed forest			食性 Feeding habit
类群 Group	个体数 Indivi- duals	%	优势度 Domi- nance	个体数 Indivi- duals	%	优势度 Domi- nance	个体数 Indivi- duals	%	优势度 Domi- nance	个体数 Indivi- duals	%	优势度 Domi- nance	食性 Feeding habit
膜翅目 Hymenoptera	778	49.1	+++	1,397	49.7	+++	1,732	66.3	+++	2,288	72.5	+++	O
同翅目 Homoptera	67	4.2	++	129	4.6	++	113	4.3	++	9	0.3	+	O
鞘翅目 Coleoptera	52	3.3	++	60	2.1	++	69	2.6	++	30	1	++	Pr
双翅目 Diptera	24	1.5	++	55	2	++	210	8	++	30	1	++	S
半翅目 Hemiptera	2	0.1	+	2	0.1	+				2	0.1	+	Ph
直翅目 Orthoptera	4	0.3	+	3	0.1	+	16	0.6	+	17	0.5	+	Ph
缨翅目 Thysanoptera										2	0.1	+	Ph
啮虫目 Psocoptera	1	0.1	+										Ph
革翅目 Dermaptera							2	0.1	+				O
石蜈蚣目 Lithobiomorpha	29	1.8	++	65	2.3	++	26	1	++	19	0.6	+	Pr
地蜈蚣目 Geophilomorpha	7	0.4	+	24	0.9	+	3	0.1	+	5	0.2	+	Pr
蜱螨目 Acarina	230	14.5	+++	511	18.2	+++	138	5.3	++	347	11	+++	O
蜘蛛目 Araneae	6	0.4	+	38	1.4	++	27	1	++	10	0.3	+	Pr
带马陆目 Polydesmida	2	0.1	+	14	0.5	+	13	0.5	+	5	0.2	+	Ph
弹尾目 Collembola	283	17.9	+++	282	10	+++	235	9	++	337	10.7	+++	O
双尾目 Diplura	44	2.8	++	83	3	++	15	0.6	+	15	0.5	+	D
等足目 Isopoda	25	1.6	++	100	3.6	++	5	0.2	+	14	0.4	+	S
综合目 Symphyla	16	1	++	4	0.1	+	5	0.2	+	8	0.3	+	Pr
柄眼目 Stylommatophora	13	0.8	+	45	1.6	++	4	0.2	+	14	0.4	+	Ph
后孔寡毛目 Opisthopora				1	0	+				2	0.1	+	S
总数 Total	1,583			2,813			2,613			3,154

绿化带类型 Treelawn	灌木型 Shrubbery	乔木型 Arboreal forest	混合型 Mixed forest
草本型 Lawn	0.79	0.83	0.75
灌木型 Shrubbery		0.83	0.75
乔木型 Arboreal forest			0.79

北京近郊深土层动物群落结构特征

Faunal communities of deep soil layers in suburban Beijing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郝泽周, 申小莉, 斯幸峰, 赵岩岩, 魏晨韬, 吴飞, 许晓青, 阙品甲, 董路, 华方圆, 张立勋, 张承云, 刘阳. 中国鸟类被动声学监测规范与建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(5): 25474-.
[2]	贾晓旭, 陈皖强, 唐修君, 樊艳凤, 张静, 王海威, 高玉时. 西南地区家鸡线粒体DNA控制区遗传多样性和基因渗入[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(5): 26003-.
[3]	梁健超, 陈淑甜, 何文祥, 熊春妮, 许镇洲, 黄源欣, 刘源志弘, 张浪, 胡慧建. 广州市陆生野生脊椎动物资源——编目、分布与保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(5): 25422-.
[4]	张海龙, 聂海燕, 刘萌萌, 魏美才, 李泽建. 浙江乌岩岭叶蜂多样性分布及影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(5): 25459-.
[5]	梁竣策, 李开枝, 谭烨辉. 南海翼足类物种多样性与分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(5): 25487-.
[6]	姚可侃, 余卉, 张巧玲, 陈琳. AI声纹监测与人工样线调查在鸟类多样性监测中的差异比较: 以西溪国家湿地公园为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25239-.
[7]	周丽洁, 郝珉辉, 何怀江, 程艳霞, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 小兴安岭森林β多样性格局、组分及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25443-.
[8]	蒋翠憶, 谢致敬, 田中平, 李玥莹, 郑明心, 房帅, 米尔卡米力∙麦麦提, 依里帆∙艾克拜尔江, 高梅香, 张健. 微地形生境异质性对新疆西天山森林土壤跳虫群落分异的塑造作用[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25300-.
[9]	王露红, 李波, 杨攀艳, 黄嘉琴, 谢予婷, 杜鑫, 文毅, 王彬. 四川省繁殖鸟类群落的多维度多样性及其影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25464-.
[10]	彭昀月, 彭奎, 刘昕然, 孙天怡, 张小全. 生物多样性信用的企业参与途径、市场发展障碍与建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 26031-.
[11]	李伯尧, 盛天成, 幸小云. 生物多样性风险对企业财务绩效的影响: 来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25330-.
[12]	张同, 梁力文, 王长剑, 舒服, 王璐, 郭泽光, 卓玛曲珍, 钱芊, 蒋安莉, 敖俊杰, 彭兴文, 伍小刚, 向左甫, 郭克疾, 廖梓延. 基于红外相机的西藏芒康滇金丝猴国家级自然保护区鸟兽多样性及代表性物种的季节性空间利用特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25435-.
[13]	刘昊, 张玉霄, 刘冰, 李飞飞, 马洪峥, 覃海宁, 李德铢, 陈文俐. 中国禾本科植物多样性及其物种名录[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25438-.
[14]	尹翔正, 姜海燕, 张俊, 罗春生, 张元明. 极端干旱区荒漠灌木叶际细菌群落多样性特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25485-.
[15]	孔孜亦, 王德港, 王建涛, 裴志永, 孙晶, 张长春, 张军国. 基于SCD-HRNet模型的野生动物姿态估计及其在生物多样性监测中的应用: 以内蒙古赛罕乌拉地区为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25287-.