青藏高原高寒草地植物多样性测定的最小样地面积

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.07095

生物多样性 ›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 651-657. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.07095

所属专题：青藏高原生物多样性与生态安全

青藏高原高寒草地植物多样性测定的最小样地面积

董世魁^1,^*(), 汤琳¹, 王学霞¹, 刘颖慧², 刘世梁¹, 刘全儒³, 吴娱¹, 李媛媛¹, 苏旭坤¹, 赵晨¹

1 北京师范大学环境学院, 北京 100875
2 北京师范大学资源学院, 北京 100875
3 北京师范大学生命科学学院, 北京 100875

收稿日期:2013-04-11 接受日期:2013-09-05 出版日期:2013-11-20 发布日期:2013-12-02
通讯作者: 董世魁
基金资助:
国家“十二五”科技支撑项目(2012BAC01B02);环保部环保公益项目(201209033)

Minimum plot size for estimating plant biodiversity of the alpine grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Shikui Dong^1,^*(), Lin Tang¹, Xuexia Wang¹, Yinghui Liu², Shiliang Liu¹, Quanru Liu², Yu Wu¹, Yuanyuan Li¹, Xukun Su¹, Chen Zhao¹

1 School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
2 College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
3 College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875

Received:2013-04-11 Accepted:2013-09-05 Online:2013-11-20 Published:2013-12-02
Contact: Dong Shikui

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为科学设定青藏高原地区草地植物多样性研究的样地面积, 提高研究结果的精确性, 本研究拟合研究了7种模型, 分别筛选出高寒草甸、高寒草原和高寒荒漠3种草地类型的最优拟合模型, 并基于种-面积曲线计算各类草地植物多样性估测的适宜样地面积。结果表明: (1)非饱和曲线模型较适宜拟合青藏高原地区的种-面积关系; (2)3类高寒草地健康样地的最小面积均大于退化样地; (3)对于高寒草甸, 健康样地和退化样地的最小面积分别为108 m²和82 m²; 对于高寒草原, 健康样地和退化样地的最小面积分别为130 m²和81 m² ; 对于高寒荒漠, 健康样地和退化样地的最小面积分别为60 m²和41 m²。

关键词: 青藏高原, 高寒草地, 种-面积曲线, 最小样地面积

Abstract

To determine the appropriate plot size for estimating plant diversity of different types of alpine grassland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP), i.e. alpine meadow, alpine steppe and alpine desert, seven models were applied in the examination of species-area relationships. Depending on the optimal species-area relationship curves, the minimum sizes of sampling plot for each type of grassland under healthy and degraded conditions were obtained. The findings were as follows: (1) Non-saturation curve models were most suitable for describing species-area relationships of alpine grasslands on the QTP; (2) For all three types of alpine grassland, the minimum plot size for healthy grasslands was larger than that for degraded ones; (3) Minimum plot sizes for estimating plant diversity were 108 m² and 82 m², respectively, for healthy and degraded alpine meadow, 130 m² and 81 m², respectively, for healthy and degraded alpine steppe, and 60 m²and 41 m², respectively, for healthy and degraded alpine desert.

Key words: Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, alpine grasslands, species-area relationship, minimum plot size

董世魁, 汤琳, 王学霞, 刘颖慧, 刘世梁, 刘全儒, 吴娱, 李媛媛, 苏旭坤, 赵晨 (2013) 青藏高原高寒草地植物多样性测定的最小样地面积. 生物多样性, 21, 651-657. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.07095.

Shikui Dong,Lin Tang,Xuexia Wang,Yinghui Liu,Shiliang Liu,Quanru Liu,Yu Wu,Yuanyuan Li,Xukun Su,Chen Zhao (2013) Minimum plot size for estimating plant biodiversity of the alpine grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Biodiversity Science, 21, 651-657. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.07095.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.07095

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2013/V21/I6/651

图/表 5

参考文献 37

1	Bai YF (白永飞), Li LH (李凌浩), Huang JH (黄建辉), Chen ZZ (陈佐忠) (2001) The influence of plant diversity and functional composition on ecosystem stability of four Stipa communities in the Inner Mongolia Plateau.Acta Botanica Sinica(植物学报), 43, 280-287. (in Chinese with English abstract)
2	Chu CJ, Maestre FT, Xiao S, Weiner J, Wang YS, Duan ZH, Wang G (2008) Balance between facilitation and resource competition determines biomass-density relationships in plant populations.Ecology Letters, 11, 1189-1197.
3	Dong M (董鸣) (1997) Survey, Observation and Analysis of Terrestrial Biocommunities (陆地生物群落调查观测与分析). China Standard Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
4	Guo ZG (郭正刚), Cheng GD (程国栋), Wang GX (王根绪) (2004a) Plant diversity of alpine Kobresia meadow in the northern region of the Tibetan Plateau.Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology(冰川冻土), 26, 95-100. (in Chinese with English abstract)
5	Guo ZG (郭正刚), Liang TG (梁天刚), Liu XY (刘兴元), Zhang HJ (张洪江) (2003) Species diversity of grassland communities in the Aletai region of the northern Xinjiang Province.Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica(西北植物学报), 23, 1719-1724. (in Chinese with English abstract)
6	Guo ZG (郭正刚), Wang GX (王根绪), Shen YY (沈禹颖), Cheng GD (程国栋) (2004b) Plant species diversity of grassland plant communities in permafrost regions of the Northern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 24, 149-155. (in Chinese with English abstract)
7	Huang Y (黄莹), Wang J (王娟) (2008) The research on determination of the minimum sampling area of community.Shandong Forestry Science and Technology(山东林业科技), (1), 97-98. (in Chinese with English abstract)
8	Hutchings MJ (1983) Plant diversity in four chalk grassland sites with different aspects.Vegetatio, 53, 179-187.
9	Kallimanis AS, Halley JM, Vokou D, Sgardelis SP (2008) The scale of analysis determines the spatial pattern of woody species diversity in the Mediterranean environment.Plant Ecology, 196, 143-151.
10	Kazakis G, Ghosn D, Vogiatzakis IN, Papanastasis VP (2007) Vascular plant diversity and climate change in the alpine zone of the Lefka Ori, Crete.Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 1603-1615.
11	Li DS (李东胜), Guo WJ (郭万军), Xu ZQ (许中旗), Wang Y (王妍), Xu CL (徐成立), Huang XR (黄选瑞), Ji XL (纪晓林) (2008) The impact of sample area and sample amount on the results of community species diversity measure: a case study with the shrub community in the west region of Yanshan Mountain.Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis(江西农业大学学报), 30, 1079-1084. (in Chinese with English abstract)
12	Li FX (李凤霞), Zhang DG (张德罡) (2005) Indicators and recovery approaches of degenerated grassland in China.Grassland and Turf(草原与草坪), (1), 24-28. (in Chinese with English abstract)
13	Li X (李霞), Tang J (唐金), Wan HM (万红梅) (2011) Minimum sampling area for desert riparian forest community in lower reaches of Tarim River.Journal of Desert Research(中国沙漠), 31, 1221-1225. (in Chinese with English abstract)
14	Liu XN (柳小妮), Sun JL (孔九林), Zhang DG (张德罡), Pu XP (蒲小鹏), Xu GP (徐广平) (2008) A study on the community structure and plant diversity of alpine meadow under different degrees of degradation in the Eastern Qilian Mountains.Acta Prataculturae Sinica(草业学报), 17, 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
15	Ma SL (马生林) (2008) It is urgent to protect the biodiversity of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. In: National Biodiversity Conservation and Exotic Harmful Species Prevention Seminar (全国生物多样性保护及外来有害物种防治交流研讨会论文集), pp. 76-78. , accessed on April 10, 2013. (in Chinese)
16	Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China (中华人民共和国农业部) (1997) Grassland Resources in China (中国草地资源). China Science and Technology Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
17	Namgail T, Rawat GS, Mishra C, Wieren SE, Prins HHT (2012) Biomass and diversity of dry alpine plant communities along altitudinal gradients in the Himalayas.Journal of Plant Research, 125, 93-101.
18	Ren XM (任学敏), Yang GH (杨改河), Wang DY (王得祥), Qin XW (秦晓威), Liu ZX (刘振学), Zhao SX (赵双喜), Bai Y (白宇) (2011) Minimum sampling areas for shrub and herb layers of several types of plant communities in Taibai Mountain.Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica(西北植物学报), 31, 1024-1031. (in Chinese with English abstract)
19	Stohlgren TJ, Bull KA, Otsuki Y (1998) Comparison of rangeland vegetation sampling techniques in the Central Grasslands.Journal of Rangeland Management, 51, 164-172.
20	Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW, Kalkhan MA, Schell LD (1997a) Multiscale sampling of plant diversity: effects of minimum mapping unit size.Ecological Applications, 7, 1064-1074.
21	Stohlgren TJ, Coughenour MB, Chong GW, Binkley D, Kalkhan MA, Schell LD, Buckley DJ, Berry JK (1997b) Landscape analysis of plant diversity.Landscape Ecology, 12, 155-170.
22	Tang L (唐龙), Hao WF (郝文芳), Sun HG (孙洪罡), Liang ZS (梁宗锁) (2005) Fitting and assessment of species-area curves of four native pasture communities on Loess Plateau.Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas(干旱地区农业研究), 23(4), 83-88. (in Chinese with English abstract)
23	Wang CT (王长庭), Long RJ (龙瑞军), Ding LM (丁路明) (2004) The effects of differences in functional group diversity and composition on plant community productivity in four types of alpine meadow communities.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 12, 403-409. (in Chinese with English abstract)
24	Wang CT (王长庭), Long RJ (龙瑞军), Wang QL (王启兰), Cao GM (曹广民), Shi JJ (施建军), Du YG (杜岩功) (2008) Response of plant diversity and productivity to soil resources changing under grazing disturbance on an alpine meadow.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 28, 4144-4152. (in Chinese with English abstract)
25	Wang SP, Duan JC, Xu GP, Wang YF, Zhang ZH, Rui YC, Luo CY, Xu B, Zhu XX, Chang XF, Cui XY, Niu HS, Zhao XQ, Wang WY (2012) Effects of warming and grazing on soil N availability, species composition, and a NPP in an alpine meadow.Ecology, 93, 2365-2376.
26	Wang WY, Wang QJ, Wang HC (2006) The effect of land management on plant community composition, species diversity, and productivity of alpine Kobersia steppe meadow.Ecological Research, 21, 181-187.
27	Wang ZG (王志高), Ye WH (叶万辉), Cao HL (曹洪麟), Lian JY (练琚愉) (2008) Spatial distribution of species diversity indices in a monsoon evergreen broadleaved forest at Dinghushan Mountain.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 16, 454-461. (in Chinese with English abstract)
28	Wen L (温璐), Dong SK (董世魁), Zhu L (朱磊), Shi JJ (施建军), Liu DM (刘德梅), Wang YL (王彦龙), Ma YS (马玉寿) (2011) The effect of natural factors and disturbance intensity on spacial heterogeneity of plant diversity in alpine meadow.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 31, 1844-1854. (in Chinese with English abstract)
29	Xing XJ (星学军) (2009) Investigation and analysis of grassland characteristics on degraded alpine meadow in the Three River Source Region. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine (Science and Technology) (黑龙江畜牧兽医(科技版)), 9, 50-51. (in Chinese)
30	Xu YF (许岳飞), Yixi-Cuomu (益西措姆), Fu JJ (付娟娟), Chen H (陈浩), Miao YJ (苗彦军), Chen J (陈俊), Hu TM (呼天明), Shan JG (镡建国) (2012) Response of plant diversity and soil nutrient to grazing intensity in Kobresia pygmaea meadow of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Acta Agrestia Sinica(草地学报), 20, 1026-1032. (in Chinese with English abstract)
31	Yang C (杨持), Bao R (宝荣) (1986) Optimum sampling area for the studies of distribution pattern in Aneurolepidium chinensis steppe community.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 6, 324-329. (in Chinese with English abstract)
32	Yang DL (杨殿林), Han GD (韩国栋), Hu YG (胡跃高), Wuyun-gerile (乌云格日勒) (2006) Effects of grazing intensity on plant diversity and aboveground biomass of Stipa baicalensis grassland.Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 25, 1470-1475. (in Chinese with English abstract)
33	Yang ZL, Powell JR, Zhang CH, Du GZ (2012) The effect of environmental and phylogenetic drivers on community assembly in an alpine meadow community.Ecology, 93, 2321-2328.
34	Yang ZS (杨子松), Li YX (黎云祥), Liu W (刘伟), Wu TD (吴天德), Wang ZG (王中国) (2010) Fitting of species-area relationship and determination of minimum sampling area for plant communities on barren hillsides of arid valley in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River.Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment(生态与农村环境学报), 26, 227-230. (in Chinese with English abstract)
35	Zhang JZ (张忠华), Hu G (胡刚), Zhu JD (祝介东), Ni J (倪健) (2012) Scale-dependent spatial variation of species abundance and richness in two mixed evergreen-deciduous broad-leaved karst forests.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 32, 5663-5672. (in Chinese with English abstract)
36	Zhou HK (周华坤), Zhao XQ (赵新全), Wen J (温军), Chen Z (陈哲), Yao BQ (姚步青), Yang YW (杨元武), Xu WX (徐维新), Duan JC (段吉闯) (2012) The characteristics of soil and vegetation of degenerated alpine steppe in the Yellow River Source Region.Acta Prataculturae Sinica(草业学报), 21(5), 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
37	Zhu JM (朱锦懋), Jiang ZL (姜志林) (1999) The modifiable areal unit problem of species diversity in the forest community of northern Fujian Province.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 19, 304-311. (in Chinese with English abstract)

草地类型 Grassland type	健康状况 Health status	方程 Function	a	b	c	F	P_r>F	R²
高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	健康 Healthy	1	3.441	24.946	-	651.257	<0.0001	0.875
		2	6.272	40.071	0.876	423.507	<0.0001	0.871
		3	3.451	1,364.587	-	650.831	<0.0001	0.875
		4	23.342	0.113	-	482.725	<0.0001	0.832
		5	26.939	0.278	41.808	274.171	<0.0001	0.804
		6	1.680	0.466	41.638	259.646	<0.0001	0.793
		7	217.283	5.588	-	271.118	<0.0001	0.708
	退化 Degraded	1	2.769	21.515	-	1,540.854	<0.0001	0.937
		2	11.953	69.405	0.732	1,100.360	<0.0001	0.941
		3	2.770	2,353.238	-	1,532.933	<0.0001	0.937
		4	20.307	0.106	-	846.787	<0.0001	0.886
		5	21.343	0.385	34.407	380.051	<0.0001	0.832
		6	1.478	0.529	34.447	348.447	<0.0001	0.818
		7	238.525	7.376	-	422.309	<0.0001	0.776
高寒草原 Alpine steppe	健康 Healthy	1	1.862	12.181	-	1,427.120	<0.0001	0.947
		2	2.991	17.420	0.881	941.193	<0.0001	0.946
		3	1.871	658.661	-	1,418.386	<0.0001	0.947
		4	11.255	0.124	-	747.963	<0.0001	0.900
		5	14.171	0.490	20.504	264.256	<0.0001	0.814
		6	2.277	1.836	19.771	240.815	<0.0001	0.797
		7	93.693	4.730	-	393.353	<0.0001	0.813
	退化 Degraded	1	2.015	13.200	-	353.851	<0.0001	0.870
		2	3.554	18.528	0.243	226.514	<0.0001	0.865
		3	2.023	670.840	-	352.227	<0.0001	0.870
		4	12.174	0.124	-	266.130	<0.0001	0.829
		5	15.700	1.006	21.505	110.500	<0.0001	0.730
		6	2.280	1.912	21.357	104.383	<0.0001	0.715
		7	104.588	4.889	-	171.842	<0.0001	0.740
高寒荒漠 Alpine desert	健康 Healthy	1	0.911	4.119	-	113.059	<0.0001	0.776
		2	0.039	1.206	6.395	99.742	<0.0001	0.827
		3	1.062	29.764	-	128.208	<0.0001	0.801
		4	3.298	0.189	-	156.035	<0.0001	0.834
		5	8.207	0.023	10.542	71.423	<0.0001	0.764
		6	3.284	0.112	9.667	63.087	<0.0001	0.735
		7	2.141	0.221	-	70.931	<0.0001	0.659
	退化 Degraded	1	0.367	1.876	-	70.169	<0.0001	0.545
		2	0.448	1.911	0.929	44.850	<0.0001	0.527
		3	0.387	108.802	-	71.025	<0.0001	0.550
		4	1.644	0.156	-	67.907	<0.0001	0.533
		5	2.858	0.680	3.477	38.833	<0.0001	0.468
		6	4.215	2.275	3.399	38.392	<0.0001	0.463
		7	6.695	1.886	-	60.357	<0.0001	0.487

草地类型 Grassland type	健康状况 Health status	方程 Function	a	b	c	F	P_r>F	R²
高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	健康 Healthy	1	3.441	24.946	-	651.257	<0.0001	0.875
		2	6.272	40.071	0.876	423.507	<0.0001	0.871
		3	3.451	1,364.587	-	650.831	<0.0001	0.875
		4	23.342	0.113	-	482.725	<0.0001	0.832
		5	26.939	0.278	41.808	274.171	<0.0001	0.804
		6	1.680	0.466	41.638	259.646	<0.0001	0.793
		7	217.283	5.588	-	271.118	<0.0001	0.708
	退化 Degraded	1	2.769	21.515	-	1,540.854	<0.0001	0.937
		2	11.953	69.405	0.732	1,100.360	<0.0001	0.941
		3	2.770	2,353.238	-	1,532.933	<0.0001	0.937
		4	20.307	0.106	-	846.787	<0.0001	0.886
		5	21.343	0.385	34.407	380.051	<0.0001	0.832
		6	1.478	0.529	34.447	348.447	<0.0001	0.818
		7	238.525	7.376	-	422.309	<0.0001	0.776
高寒草原 Alpine steppe	健康 Healthy	1	1.862	12.181	-	1,427.120	<0.0001	0.947
		2	2.991	17.420	0.881	941.193	<0.0001	0.946
		3	1.871	658.661	-	1,418.386	<0.0001	0.947
		4	11.255	0.124	-	747.963	<0.0001	0.900
		5	14.171	0.490	20.504	264.256	<0.0001	0.814
		6	2.277	1.836	19.771	240.815	<0.0001	0.797
		7	93.693	4.730	-	393.353	<0.0001	0.813
	退化 Degraded	1	2.015	13.200	-	353.851	<0.0001	0.870
		2	3.554	18.528	0.243	226.514	<0.0001	0.865
		3	2.023	670.840	-	352.227	<0.0001	0.870
		4	12.174	0.124	-	266.130	<0.0001	0.829
		5	15.700	1.006	21.505	110.500	<0.0001	0.730
		6	2.280	1.912	21.357	104.383	<0.0001	0.715
		7	104.588	4.889	-	171.842	<0.0001	0.740
高寒荒漠 Alpine desert	健康 Healthy	1	0.911	4.119	-	113.059	<0.0001	0.776
		2	0.039	1.206	6.395	99.742	<0.0001	0.827
		3	1.062	29.764	-	128.208	<0.0001	0.801
		4	3.298	0.189	-	156.035	<0.0001	0.834
		5	8.207	0.023	10.542	71.423	<0.0001	0.764
		6	3.284	0.112	9.667	63.087	<0.0001	0.735
		7	2.141	0.221	-	70.931	<0.0001	0.659
	退化 Degraded	1	0.367	1.876	-	70.169	<0.0001	0.545
		2	0.448	1.911	0.929	44.850	<0.0001	0.527
		3	0.387	108.802	-	71.025	<0.0001	0.550
		4	1.644	0.156	-	67.907	<0.0001	0.533
		5	2.858	0.680	3.477	38.833	<0.0001	0.468
		6	4.215	2.275	3.399	38.392	<0.0001	0.463
		7	6.695	1.886	-	60.357	<0.0001	0.487

草地类型 Grassland type	健康状况 Health status	最优拟合模型 Optimal function	不同精度下的样地面积 Plot areas under different accuracy (m²)
草地类型 Grassland type	健康状况 Health status	最优拟合模型 Optimal function	ρ= 60%	ρ= 70%	ρ= 80%	ρ= 84%	ρ= 90%
高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	健康 Healthy	S = 24.956 + 3.441* lnA	5	24	108	197	481
高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	退化 Degraded	S = (69.405+11.952* lnA)^0.732	6	33	210	455	1477
高寒草原 Alpine steppe	健康 Healthy	S = 12.181 + 1.862 * lnA	13	61	279	514	1280
高寒草原 Alpine steppe	退化 Degraded	S = 13.200 + 2.015 * lnA	17	81	386	720	1841
高寒荒漠 Alpine desert	健康 Healthy	S = 3.298*A^0.189	39	88	178	231	332
高寒荒漠 Alpine desert	退化 Degraded	S = 0.387ln(108.802A+1)	8	23	72	113	220

草地类型 Grassland type	健康状况 Health status	最优拟合模型 Optimal function	不同精度下的样地面积 Plot areas under different accuracy (m²)
草地类型 Grassland type	健康状况 Health status	最优拟合模型 Optimal function	ρ= 60%	ρ= 70%	ρ= 80%	ρ= 84%	ρ= 90%
高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	健康 Healthy	S = 24.956 + 3.441* lnA	5	24	108	197	481
高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	退化 Degraded	S = (69.405+11.952* lnA)^0.732	6	33	210	455	1477
高寒草原 Alpine steppe	健康 Healthy	S = 12.181 + 1.862 * lnA	13	61	279	514	1280
高寒草原 Alpine steppe	退化 Degraded	S = 13.200 + 2.015 * lnA	17	81	386	720	1841
高寒荒漠 Alpine desert	健康 Healthy	S = 3.298*A^0.189	39	88	178	231	332
高寒荒漠 Alpine desert	退化 Degraded	S = 0.387ln(108.802A+1)	8	23	72	113	220

草地类型 Grassland type	健康状况 Health status	平均总物种数 Average numbers of plant species	占总物种比例 Proportions of total species numbers	最小样地面积 Minimum area of sampling plots	最小面积处曲线斜率 Slope at the minimum plot size
高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	健康 Healthy	51.33	80%	108	0.03
高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	退化 Degraded	45.00	75%	82	0.03
高寒草原 Alpine steppe	健康 Healthy	28.33	75%	130	0.01
高寒草原 Alpine steppe	退化 Degraded	31.50	70%	81	0.02
高寒荒漠 Alpine desert	健康 Healthy	11.00	65%	60	0.02
高寒荒漠 Alpine desert	退化 Degraded	4.33	75%	41	0.01

青藏高原高寒草地植物多样性测定的最小样地面积

Minimum plot size for estimating plant biodiversity of the alpine grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈嘉珈, 蒲真, 黄中鸿, 于凤琴, 张建军, 许东华, 徐俊泉, 尚鹏, 地里木拉提∙帕尔哈提, 李耀江, Jigme Tshering, 郭玉民. 全球黑颈鹤越冬种群分布与数量[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22400-.
[2]	张鹤露, 赵美红, 孙世春, 刘晓收. 西藏那曲市高原盐湖自由生活线虫群落多样性与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22533-.
[3]	陈晓澄, 张鹏展, 康斌, 刘林山, 赵亮. 基于中国科学院西北高原生物研究所馆藏标本分析青藏高原雀形目鸟类物种和功能多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22638-.
[4]	龚心语, 黄宝荣. 国家公园全民公益性评估指标体系: 以青藏高原国家公园群为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22571-.
[5]	王晓凤, 米湘成, 王希华, 江明喜, 杨涛, 张健, 沈泽昊. 中国中亚热带常绿阔叶林群落木本植物多样性比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23296-.
[6]	王健铭, 曲梦君, 王寅, 冯益明, 吴波, 卢琦, 何念鹏, 李景文. 青藏高原北部戈壁植物群落物种、功能与系统发育β多样性分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21503-.
[7]	沈国平, 韩睿, 缪增强, 邢江娃, 李永臻, 王嵘, 朱德锐. 青藏高原4类典型水化学特征湖泊的细菌多样性差异及影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(4): 21420-.
[8]	赵仁生, 许诗嘉, 宋鹏飞, 周翔, 张亚洲, 袁燕. 青藏高原药用植物分布格局及保护优先区[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(4): 21385-.
[9]	秦乐, 朱彦鹏, 任月恒, 李博炎, 付梦娣, 李俊生. 青藏高原国家级自然保护区管理能力差异及其对保护成效的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(11): 22419-.
[10]	张丛林, 褚梦真, 张慧智, 乔海娟, 黄宝荣. 青藏高原国家公园群游憩可持续性管理评估指标体系[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 780-789.
[11]	张军, 彭焕文, 夏富才, 王伟. 青藏高原高山区和泛北极地区种子植物多倍体比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(11): 1470-1480.
[12]	刘旻霞, 李全弟, 蒋晓轩, 夏素娟, 南笑宁, 张娅娅, 李博文. 甘南亚高寒草甸稀有种对物种多样性和物种多度分布格局的贡献[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(2): 107-116.
[13]	邓亨宁, 鞠文彬, 高云东, 张君议, 李诗琦, 高信芬, 徐波. 新建川藏铁路(雅安-昌都段)沿线外来入侵植物种类及分布特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(10): 1174-1181.
[14]	土艳丽,王力平,王喜龙,王林林,段元文. 利用昆虫携带的花粉初探西藏入侵植物印加孔雀草在当地传粉网络中的地位[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(3): 306-313.
[15]	张中华, 周华坤, 赵新全, 姚步青, 马真, 董全民, 张振华, 王文颖, 杨元武. 青藏高原高寒草地生物多样性与生态系统功能的关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(2): 111-129.