生物多样性 ›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 383-388.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.06023

• • 上一篇    下一篇

REDD+议题的谈判进展与展望

雪明1, 武曙红2, *(), 安丽丹1, 3, 徐基良2, *()   

  1. 1 北京林业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083
    2 北京林业大学自然保护区学院, 北京 100083
    3 国家林业局野生动植物保护与自然保护区管理司, 北京 100714
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-28 接受日期:2013-04-16 出版日期:2013-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 武曙红,徐基良 E-mail:wshuhong@126.com;xujiliang@bjfu.edu.en
  • 基金项目:
    环境保护部环境保护对外合作中心《生物多样性公约》履约项目

The evolution and outlook of REDD-plus negotiation

Ming Xue1, Shuhong Wu2, *(), Lidan An1, 3, Jiliang Xu2, *()   

  1. 1 School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083
    2 College of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083
    3 Department of Wild Fauna and Flora Conservation and Nature Reserve Management, State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100714
  • Received:2013-01-28 Accepted:2013-04-16 Online:2013-05-20
  • Contact: Wu Shuhong,Xu Jiliang E-mail:wshuhong@126.com;xujiliang@bjfu.edu.en

通过对《联合国气候变化框架公约》和《生物多样性公约》历次缔约方会议中REDD+议题谈判的跟踪, 分析了自制定“巴厘路线图”以来, REDD+议题谈判的焦点、取得的进展、各缔约方的主要分歧以及未来的谈判趋势, 提出了我国参与REDD+议题谈判和履行相关国际公约的对策。历经5年的谈判, 各缔约方目前在REDD+行动的激励机制、技术方法的优先顺序及实施规模方面已基本达成共识, 谈判的焦点和分歧主要集中在REDD+的资金分配机制、森林参考排放水平、REDD+行动效果的可测量性、可报告性和可核实性, 以及REDD+行动的保障措施等方面, REDD+行动非碳效益的激励机制及核查方法将成为REDD+议题未来谈判的新焦点。我国应对国际公约REDD+行动要求的战略计划时, 应充分考虑REDD+在气候、生物多样性及社区方面的多重效益, 并从能力建设、示范活动及效果的监测核查体系等方面分阶段实施。

关键词: REDD+, 谈判, 应对策略, 中国

Based on the development of the negotiations on REDD-plus in Conferences of the Parties of United Nations Framework Convention on Climate (UNFCCC) and Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), we analyzed the status of REDD-plus negotiations since the formulation of Bali Road Map in 2007. We examined the progress, the divergences of the Parties, future trends, some countermeasures for future negotiations on REDD-plus and the implementation of relevant international conventions for China. Our results indicate that all Parties from UNFCCC and CBD have reached a consensus on the priorities of incentive measures and technologies and methodologies, and the implementation level in relation to REDD-plus, and that REDD-plus should be implemented at the national level rather than at subnational levels. Consensus between Parties have not yet been reached on the financial mechanism, the forest reference emission level, the implementation of REDD-plus safeguard and whether the results based REDD-plus activities be measurable, reportable and verifiable at international/national level. Negotiations on REDD-plus in the future will focus on the issues of incentive measures and verification methodologies in relation to non-carbon benefits resulting from the implementation of REDD-plus activities. As a result, we recommend that multiple benefits to climate, biodiversity and community should be considered when national strategy plans for REDD-plus are formulated in China, and that the implementation of REDD-plus activities in China should be engaged in three phases, i.e. capacity building, demonstration activities and monitoring.

Key words: REDD-plus, negotiation, strategy, China

1 CBD (2012) Biodiversity and Climate Change Relate Issues: Advice on the Application of Relevant Safeguards for Biodiversity with Regard to Policy Approaches and Positive Incentives on Issues Relation to Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries; and the Role of Conservation, Sustainable Management of Forests and Enhancement of Forest Carbon Stock in Development Countries. UNEP/CBD/COP/11/19..
2 CBD (2010) Biodiversity and Climate Change. UNEP/CBD/ COP/DEC/X/33..
3 CBD (2008) Forest Biodiversity. UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/IX/5..
4 Louis V, Elena P (2010) The State of REDD Negotiations: Consensus Points, Options for Moving Forward and Research Needs to Support the Process. CIFOR (the Center for International Forestry Research). Bogor Barat, Indonesia. P17.
5 Parker C, Michell A (2009) The Little REDD+ Book. Global Canopy Programme, John Krebs Field Station, Oxford.
6 UNFCCC (2012a) Agreed Outcome Pursuant to the Bali Action Plan. .
7 UNFCCC (2012b) Views on Modalities and Procedures for Financing Results-based Actions and Considering Activities Related to Decision 1/CP.16, paragraphs 68-70 and 72. P2. FCCC/AWGLCA/2012/MISC.3. .
8 UNFCCC (2011a) Outcome of the Work of the ad hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1. .
9 UNFCCC (2011b) Views on Methodological Guidance for Activities Relating to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and the Role of Conservation, Sustainable Forest Management and Enhancement of Forest Carbon Stocks in Developing Countries. FCCC/SBSTA/ 2011/MISC.7. .
10 UNFCCC (2010) The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the Work of the ad hoc Working Group on Long-term Coopera- tive Action under the Convention. FCCC/CP/ 2010/7/Add.1..
11 UNFCCC (2009) Copenhagen Accord. P6. FCCC/CP/2009/ 11/Add.1..
12 UNFCCC (2007) Bali Action Plan. P1. FCCC/CP/2007/6/ Add.1..
13 Xue M (雪明), An LD (安丽丹), Wu SH (武曙红), Xu JL (徐基良) (2013) REDD+ activities and its potential impacts on biodiversity conservation.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 21, 238-244. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 蒋凯文, 潘勃, 田斌. 近年来中国国产豆科的属级分类学变动[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(6): 689-697.
[2] 顾菡娇, 张参参, 汪金松, 施雪文, 夏瑞雪, 刘斌, 陈伏生, 卜文圣. 中国竹类植物基本形态学功能性状的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(6): 585-594.
[3] 范靖宇, 李汉芃, 杨琢, 朱耿平. 基于本土最优模型模拟入侵物种水盾草在中国的潜在分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(2): 140-148.
[4] 陈作艺, 许晓静, 朱素英, 翟梦怡, 李扬. 中国沿海洛氏角毛藻复合群的多样性组成及地理分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(2): 149-158.
[5] 陈凡, 钱前, 王台, 董爱武, 漆小泉, 左建儒, 杨淑华, 林荣呈, 萧浪涛, 顾红雅, 陈之端, 姜里文, 白永飞, 孔宏智, 种康. 2017年中国植物科学若干领域重要研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2018, 53(4): 391-440.
[6] 孙元丰, 万宏伟, 赵玉金, 陈世苹, 白永飞. 中国草地生态系统根系周转的空间格局和驱动因子[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 337-348.
[7] 付瑞玉, 苏宏新, 张忠华, 胡刚. 中国森林生物多样性监测网络(CForBio)的研究态势与热点: 基于文献计量分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(12): 1255-1267.
[8] 苟小林, 周青平, 陈有军, 魏小星, 涂卫国. 青藏高原不同气候区高寒沙地两种优势植物及其根际土壤的养分特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(1): 133-142.
[9] 张敬怀, 高阳, 时小军, 吕向立. 大亚湾底拖网海洋生物种类组成及物种多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(9): 1019-1030.
[10] 叶俊伟, 张阳, 王晓娟. 中国-日本植物区系中的谱系地理间断及其形成机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(9): 1003-1019.
[11] 何强, 贾渝. 中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则和评估结果[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(7): 774-780.
[12] 毕国志, 周俭民. 厚积薄发: 我国植物-微生物互作研究取得突破[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(6): 685-688.
[13] 李瑶, 肖向明, 李香萍, 马俊, 陈帮乾, 秦元伟, 董金玮, 赵斌. 中国森林破碎化多尺度评价[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(4): 372-381.
[14] . 2016年中国植物科学若干领域重要研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(4): 394-452.
[15] 陈权, 马克明. 互花米草入侵对红树林湿地沉积物重金属累积的效应与潜在机制[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(4): 409-417.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed