Biodiv Sci

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Feeding nutrition strategies of Sika deer in Taohongling, Jiangxi

Jun Liu1, Tianxiang Zhang1, Yixuan Zhang1, Xiaofeng Huang1, Weijie Han1, Wenguo Wu2, Xiaofei Huang3, Lizheng Huang4, Yang Zhang1*   

  1. 1 Jiangxi Academy of Forestry, Nanchang 330013, China 

    2 Jiangxi Taohongling Sika Deer National Nature Reserve Administration, Jiujiang, Jiangxi 332700, China 

    3 Forestry Bureau of Jiujiang, Jiujiang, Jiangxi 332000, China 

    4 Jiujiang Institute of Forestry Science Research, Jiujiang, Jiangxi 332006, China

  • Received:2025-06-06 Revised:2025-10-31 Accepted:2026-03-03
  • Contact: Yang Zhang
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province(20232BAB215018); Jiangxi Academy of Forestry Sciences Special Project for Basic Research and Scientific Talent(2023521606)

Abstract:

Aims: Nutritional resources underpin wildlife survival, reproduction, and environmental adaptation, and are a critical determinant of population persistence and viability. The Taohongling sika deer, the only extant wild population in Jiangxi Province, holds significant ecological value. However, its seasonal foraging ecology and nutritional strategies remain unclear. 

Methods: Fresh fecal samples were collected at the Jiangxi Taohongling Sika Deer National Nature Reserve in autumn (October 2022), winter (January 2023), spring (April 2023), and summer (July 2023). Seasonal dietary composition and nutritional characteristics were analyzed using high-throughput sequencing and physicochemical assays. 

Results: The Taohongling sika deer consumed plants from 31 families, 37 genera, and 37 species. Primary forage plants varied seasonally: in spring, the main food sources were Rubus spp. (32.56%) and Quercus fabri (13.13%); in summer, Dalbergia hupeana (30.20%), Rubus spp. (12.45%), and Persicaria hastatosagittata (12.04%) predominated; in autumn, Loropetalum chinense (65.21%) and Rubus spp. (11.19%) were dominant; and in winter, Rubus spp. (53.21%) and Carex spp. (18.92%) were the primary forages. Dietary diversity differed significantly among seasons: the summer diversity index was highest, while autumn and winter indices were relatively low. Analysis of food nutrition and estimated nutrient intake showed higher intake in summer and winter and lower intake in autumn. Furthermore, the nutritional content of available food did not appear to be the primary factor influencing the deer’s food selection. 

Conclusions: These findings clarify the seasonal foraging and nutritional strategies of the Taohongling sika deer and provide an evidence-based foundation for developing targeted conservation measures for the South China sika deer population.

Key words: sika deer, Jiangxi Taohongling Sika Deer National Nature Reserve, DNA metabarcoding, diet composition, nutritional strategy