白蚁活动对中亚热带次生林和人工林的危害差异

doi:10.17520/biods.2021324

生物多样性 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 21324. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021324

所属专题：昆虫多样性与生态功能

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

白蚁活动对中亚热带次生林和人工林的危害差异

王定一¹^,², 倪祥银¹^,³, 岳楷¹^,³, 张潇月³, 康自佳³, 朱玲³, 吴福忠¹^,³^,^*()

1.福建师范大学福建省植物生理生态重点实验室, 福州 350007
2.福建师范大学地理科学学院, 福州 350007
3.福建师范大学湿润亚热带山地生态国家重点实验室培育基地, 福州 350007

收稿日期:2021-08-17 接受日期:2022-01-14 出版日期:2022-03-20 发布日期:2022-02-07
通讯作者: 吴福忠
作者简介:*E-mail: wufzchina@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(32001965);国家自然科学基金(32022056)

Effects of termite activities on a secondary forest and plantations in the mid-subtropical zone

Dingyi Wang¹^,², Xiangyin Ni¹^,³, Kai Yue¹^,³, Xiaoyue Zhang³, Zijia Kang³, Ling Zhu³, Fuzhong Wu¹^,³^,^*()

1 Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Eco-physiology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007
2 School of Geographical Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007
3 State Key Laboratory for Subtropical Mountain Ecology of the Ministry of Science and Technology and Fujian Province, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007

Received:2021-08-17 Accepted:2022-01-14 Online:2022-03-20 Published:2022-02-07
Contact: Fuzhong Wu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

中亚热带地区是中国南方重要的木材生产基地, 大量的地带性常绿阔叶林被转换成以杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata)为代表的人工林。白蚁是森林中最主要的社会性昆虫之一, 其取食行为既对森林类型转换后林中的树木产生危害, 也对林间枯枝落叶的分解具有十分重要的意义, 但对二者缺乏统一的认识。本文以中亚热带典型的米槠(Castanopsis carlesii)次生林、米槠人工林和杉木人工林为研究对象, 调查了不同林分白蚁的活动特点及其范围。结果表明, 米槠次生林与杉木、米槠人工林中均普遍存在白蚁取食现象, 但白蚁对次生林的取食高度和面积均远低于人工林。白蚁对生物多样性较高的米槠次生林树干韧皮部的取食面积仅分别为米槠人工林的1.65%和杉木人工林的0.59‰, 取食高度的11.1%和1.2%。同时, 白蚁对杉木韧皮部的取食显著大于米槠, 对杉木的取食面积和高度分别是米槠的27.7倍和9.2倍。每隔0.5 m为一个统计区间, 白蚁对杉木树干2 m以下韧皮部取食面积比例由低往高为4 : 3 : 2 : 1, 对米槠1 m以下高度部位的取食面积比为99 : 1。此外, 白蚁对次生林地表覆盖的凋落枝和凋落叶的平均取食面积分别为51.7%和46.1%, 而人工林对应均值分别为17.5%和29.4%, 均表现为次生林高于人工林。这些结果表明白蚁对生物多样性较高的次生林危害小于杉木人工林, 且在人工林中可见危害主要体现在白蚁对韧皮部的取食, 在次生林主要体现在白蚁对凋落物残体的分解作用, 这为区域森林经营管理提供理论支撑。

关键词: 白蚁, 杉木, 次生林, 人工林, 生物多样性

Abstract

Aims Termites are common forest insects in subtropical forests, however, little attention has been paid to their damage on forests or contribution to soil carbon cycles through their effect on litter and wood decomposition in plantations and secondary forests in subtropical zones. Here, we investigated the range of termite activities in three typical types of forests in subtropical regions, i.e., Cunninghamia lanceolataplantation, Castanopsis carlesii plantation, and C. carlesiisecondary forest.

Methods We surveyed the foraging height and area of termite activities on tree stems in the three forest types to assess the effects of termite damage. We also investigated litter layer characteristics and the degree to which it was affected by termites to evaluate the role of termites in litter decomposition.

Results We found that: (1) termite activities are common in three forest types, while higher foraging preference occurred in plantations than in secondary forests; (2) the foraging area in stems of Castanopsis carlesiisecondary forests was only 1.65% and 0.59‰ of those in Castanopsis carlesii and Cunninghamia lanceolataplantations, respectively, with preference of termites on tree stems in Cunninghamia lanceolatacompared with Castanopsis carlesiiplantations; (3) the foraging area and height of termites in Cunninghamia lanceolataplantation are 27.7 and 9.2 times of those in Castanopsis carlesiiplantation, and the rate of the affected area of 0-50, 50-100, 100-150, 150-200 cm tree stem is 4 : 3 : 2 : 1 in Cunninghamia lanceolata, respectively, but are 99 : 1 in the 1 m height stem of Castanopsis carlesii; (4) termite activities were widely found in foliar litter as well as dead and fallen wood in all secondary forests and plantations, indicating an important role in the process of decomposition.

Conclusion Our results indicate that termites may have higher effects on plantations than secondary forests and have negative effects in damaging tree stems. Termites also likely promote the decomposition of foliar litter and dead wood in secondary forest. These results will provide theoretical support for the management of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in the mid-subtropical zone.

Key words: termite, Cunninghamia lanceolata, secondary forest, plantation, biodiversity

王定一, 倪祥银, 岳楷, 张潇月, 康自佳, 朱玲, 吴福忠 (2022) 白蚁活动对中亚热带次生林和人工林的危害差异. 生物多样性, 30, 21324. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021324.

Dingyi Wang, Xiangyin Ni, Kai Yue, Xiaoyue Zhang, Zijia Kang, Ling Zhu, Fuzhong Wu (2022) Effects of termite activities on a secondary forest and plantations in the mid-subtropical zone. Biodiversity Science, 30, 21324. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021324.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2021324

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2022/V30/I3/21324

图/表 6

表1 试验地杉木人工林、米槠人工林与米槠次生林的样地特征

Table 1 Forest characters of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation, Castanopsis carlesii plantation, and C. carlesii secondary forest in the study plots

林分类型 Forest type	树高 Tree height (m)	胸径 DBH (m)	密度 Density (ind./ha)	林龄 Forest age (yr)
杉木人工林 Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation	11.30	0.15	2,860	9
米槠人工林 Castanopsis carlesii plantation	8.77	0.88	2,400	9
米槠次生林 Castanopsis carlesii secondary forest	7.87	0.51	13,300	9

图1 杉木人工林(CLP)、米槠人工林(CCP)及米槠次生林(CSF)树干白蚁活动痕迹

Fig. 1 Traces of termite activity on the trunks of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation (CLP), Castanopsis carlesii plantation (CCP), and C. carlesii secondary forest (CSF)

图2 杉木人工林、米槠人工林及米槠次生林活立木(A)及枯立木和倒木(B)受白蚁危害比例(平均值 ± 标准差)

Fig. 2 Ratio of termite damaged of the living trees (A), dead standing trees and downed logs (B) of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation (CLP), Castanopsis carlesii plantation (CCP), and C. carlesii secondary forest (CSF) (mean ± SD)

图3 杉木和米槠活树(A, C)及枯立木(B, D)受白蚁危害高度及占树高比值(平均值 ± 标准差)

Fig. 3 Height of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Castanopsis carlesii living trees (A, C) and dead standing trees (B, D) damaged by termites and their proportion (mean ± SD). CLP, Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation; CCP, Castanopsis carlesii plantation; CSF, C. carlesii secondary forest

图4 杉木、米槠韧皮部受白蚁危害总面积及不同高度面积大小和比例(平均值 ± 标准差)。(A)白蚁危害树干区域面积; (B)白蚁危害区域面积占树干比例; (C)树干不同高度受危害区域占比; (D)不同林分0-200 cm树干白蚁危害面积分布。CLP: 杉木人工林; CCP: 米槠人工林; CSF: 米槠次生林。

Fig. 4 The total area of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Castanopsis carlesii damaged by termites and the size and proportion of different height areas (mean ± SD). (A) Termite damaged area in the stem of living trees; (B) Rate of termite damaged area of living trees; (C) Rate of damaged area in 2-meter-height stem of living trees; (D) Termite damaged area in 2-meter-height stem of different heights in different forest. CLP, Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation; CCP, Castanopsis carlesii plantation; CSF, C. carlesii secondary forest.

图5 杉木人工林(CLP)、米槠人工林(CCP)及米槠次生林(CSF)地表凋落物覆盖度及受白蚁影响程度(平均值 ± 标准差)

Fig. 5 The coverage of litter on the surface and the degree of impact by termites in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation (CLP), Castanopsis carlesii plantation (CCP), and C. carlesii secondary forest (CSF) (mean ± SD)

参考文献 34

[1]	Brauman A, Doré J, Eggleton P, Bignell D, Breznak JA, Kane MD (2001) Molecular phylogenetic profiling of prokaryotic communities in guts of termites with different feeding habits. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 35, 27-36. PMID
[2]	Chen BY, Zhang WY (1993) Review on termites damage and control techniques in forest of China. Science and Technology of Termites, 10(2), 1-5, 15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 陈镈尧, 张文艺 (1993) 中国林木白蚁危害及其防治技术. 白蚁科技, 10(2), 1-5, 15.]
[3]	Cheng DB, Ruan GH, Song XG (2014) Research progress of China termite species. Chinese Journal of Hygienic Insecticides & Equipments, 20, 186-190. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 程冬保, 阮冠华, 宋晓钢 (2014) 中国白蚁种类调查研究进展. 中华卫生杀虫药械, 20, 186-190.]
[4]	Cheng SS, Lin CY, Chen YJ, Chung MJ, Chang ST (2014) Insecticidal activities of Cunninghamia konishii Hayata against Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). est Management Science, 70, 1215-1219.
[5]	Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Allison SD, Bauhus J, Eggleton P, Preston CM, Scarff F, Weedon JT, Wirth C, Zanne AE (2009) Plant traits and wood fates across the globe: Rotted, burned, or consumed? Global Change Biology, 15, 2431-2449. DOI URL
[6]	Deng TJ, Zhang YJ, Lu YY, Zhang WJ, Liu LH (2017) Sugarcane damages caused by termite and dominant termite populations in Guangxi. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 48, 1009-1013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 邓铁军, 张永坚, 陆燕燕, 张伟坚, 刘丽辉 (2017) 广西蔗区白蚁发生为害及优势种群调查. 南方农业学报, 48, 1009-1013.]
[7]	Gladstone-Gallagher RV, Pilditch CA, Stephenson F, Thrush SF (2019) Linking traits across ecological scales determines functional resilience. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 34, 1080-1091. DOI PMID
[8]	Guo HR, Wu FZ, Ni XY, Xiong DC, Wei WT, Wu RB, Zhu L, Xu C (2021) Water soluble carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics of twig litter in subtropical secondary and forest plantations. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 5175-5183. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 郭鸿蓉, 吴福忠, 倪祥银, 熊德成, 魏文涛, 吴若冰, 朱玲, 胥超 (2021) 中亚热带次生林和人工林凋落枝水溶性碳氮磷动态特征. 生态学报, 41, 5175-5183.]
[9]	Hong YC, Wang QQ, Huang JT, Meng QY, Qiu MJ, Wang YS, Le FQ (2019) Soil fertility and water conservation capacity of Phoebe bournei plantations. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 47(3), 68-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 洪宜聪, 王启其, 黄健韬, 孟庆银, 邱明镜, 王雨水, 乐发钱 (2019) 闽楠人工林土壤肥力及其涵养水源功能. 东北林业大学学报, 47(3), 68-73.]
[10]	Inward DJG, Vogler AP, Eggleton P (2007) A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of termites (Isoptera) illuminates key aspects of their evolutionary biology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 44, 953-967. DOI URL
[11]	Ives AR, Cardinale BJ (2004) Food-web interactions govern the resistance of communities after non-random extinctions. Nature, 429, 174-177. DOI URL
[12]	Janowiecki M, Vargo EL (2021) Seasonal activity, spatial distribution, and physiological limits of subterranean termites (Reticulitermes species) in an east Texas forest. Insects, 12, 86. DOI URL
[13]	Korb J (2007) Termites. Current Biology, 17, R995-R999.
[14]	Li T, Zhang SX, Qin H, Zhang L (2010) A preliminary reporter on the occurrence and harmfulness of Odontotermes formosanus in Jinqiu Pear. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 26(13), 328-331. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李涛, 张圣喜, 覃皓, 张立 (2010) 黑翅土白蚁在金秋梨上的发生危害调查初报. 中国农学通报, 26(13), 328-331.]
[15]	Liao WB, Wang YJ, Kang J, Jin JH, Cui DF (2005) A synthetical evaluation of ecological environment resources of Bijiashan Park in Shenzhen, Guangdong Province. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 44(S1), 82-91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 廖文波, 王勇军, 康杰, 金建华, 崔大方 (2005) 深圳笔架山公园生态环境资源的综合评价. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 44(S1), 82-91.]
[16]	Lin LP, Chen WH, Liu YZ (2020) Analysis of landscape pattern change and ecological risk assessment in Sanming area. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 15(3), 83-90. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 林莉平, 陈文惠, 刘育圳 (2020) 三明地区景观格局变化分析及生态风险评估. 亚热带资源与环境学报, 15(3), 83-90.]
[17]	Lin W, Chen XM, Xuan ZY, Chen WG, Zhao HJ, Yang H, Xue KN (2019) Damage investigation of termites in Foshan City. Protection Forest Science and Technology, (8), 35-38. (in Chinses with English abstract)
	[ 林玮, 陈雪梅, 玄祖迎, 陈伟光, 赵鸿杰, 杨徽, 薛克娜 (2019) 佛山市白蚁危害调查与分析. 防护林科技, (8), 35-38.]
[18]	Lu CD, Lin JH, Dong WY, Su BC, You FL, Wang GB, Zhou ZZ, Shen QS, Zheng YS, Liang GH (2021) Damage and occurring characteristics of Odontotermes formosanus in the forests of Fokienia hodginsii. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 50, 323-327. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 卢赐鼎, 林建辉, 董万莹, 苏宝川, 尤芬蕾, 汪国彬, 周宗哲, 沈秋水, 郑郁善, 梁光红 (2021) 黑翅土白蚁对福建柏的危害及发生特征. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 50, 323-327.]
[19]	Qin TQ (2012) Threats and treatments of Odontotermes formosanus in Eucalyptus. Tropical Forestry, 40, 40-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 覃天乔 (2012) 桉树林黑翅土白蚁的危害与治理. 热带林业, 40, 40-42.]
[20]	Shi YF, Lu CD, Chen ZH, Liang Y, Lin JH, Li YS, Ye XS, Wu MH, Lin QL, Liang GH (2021) Relationship between Odontotermes formosanus Shiraki infestation and host bark micro-morphology and contents of Fokienia hodginsii Henry. Forest Research, 34, 134-140. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 是雨霏, 卢赐鼎, 陈祯鸿, 梁运, 林建辉, 李渊顺, 叶秀素, 吴木花, 林清兰, 梁光红 (2021) 建柏Fokienia hodginsii Henry幼树树皮形态及内含物与黑翅土白蚁Odontotermes formosanus Shiraki危害的关系. 林业科学研究, 34, 134-140.]
[21]	Silva IS, Lucena EF, Moura FMS, Vasconcellos A (2021) Termite flights seasonally promote nutrient pulses in the Caatinga dry forest in northeastern Brazil. Applied Soil Ecology, 166, 104066. DOI URL
[22]	Sugio K, Miyaguni Y, Yoshimura T (2020) Colony structure and caste distribution in living trees of the Ryukyu drywood termite, Neotermes sugioi (Blattodea: Kalotermitidae) in Okinawa Island. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 23, 853-862. DOI URL
[23]	Sun LB, Yu XX, Chen LH, Jia GD, Chang XM, Liu ZQ (2019) Degradation of litter and soil water conservation function of poplar plantation in Bashang Plateau. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 33, 104-110. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 孙立博, 余新晓, 陈丽华, 贾国栋, 常晓敏, 刘自强 (2019) 坝上高原杨树人工林的枯落物及土壤水源涵养功能退化. 水土保持学报, 33, 104-110.]
[24]	Sun YX, Liu JF (2004) Current situation and control tactics of diseases and insect pests in Eucalyptus. Forest Pest and Disease, 23, 36-38. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 孙云霄, 刘建锋 (2004) 桉树病虫害的发生现状及防治策略. 中国森林病虫, 23, 36-38.]
[25]	Wang YL (2019) Review on China’s plantation development since the reform and opening up. Forest Resources Management, (1), 6-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王云霖 (2019) 我国人工林发展研究. 林业资源管理, (1), 6-11.]
[26]	Wu CS, Ulyshen MD, Shu CJ, Zhang ZJ, Zhang Y, Liu YQ, Wang GG (2021) Stronger effects of termites than microbes on wood decomposition in a subtropical forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 493, 119263. DOI URL
[27]	Xu C, Lin CF, Liu XF, Xiong DC, Lin WS, Chen SD, Xie JS, Yang YS (2017) Effects of forest conversion on concentrations and fluxes of dissolved organic carbon in runoff. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 84-92. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 胥超, 林成芳, 刘小飞, 熊德成, 林伟盛, 陈仕东, 谢锦升, 杨玉盛 (2017) 森林转换对地表径流可溶性有机碳输出浓度和通量的影响. 生态学报, 37, 84-92.]
[28]	Ye SS (2008) Study on damage and control of the forest termites in the Jiufengshan tree park of Nanping City. Wuyi Science Journal, 24, 119-122. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 叶世森 (2008) 南平市九峰山树木园林木白蚁危害及防治研究. 武夷科学, 24, 119-122.]
[29]	Yuan H, Lin XB, Xia SW, Yang XD, Liu SJ (2021) Effects of different planting patterns of rubber forest on termite diversity. Journal of Yunnan University (Natural Sciences Edition), 43, 182-189. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 袁浩, 林小兵, 夏尚文, 杨效东, 刘胜杰 (2021) 不同种植模式的橡胶林对白蚁多样性的影响. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 43, 182-189.]
[30]	Zeb A, Ullah F, Ayaz M, Ahmad S, Sadiq A (2017) Demonstration of biological activities of extracts from Isodon rugosus Wall. Ex Benth: Separation and identification of bioactive phytoconstituents by GC-MS analysis in the ethyl acetate extract. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 17, 284. DOI URL
[31]	Zhang JL (2019) China Forest Resources Report (2014-2018). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 张建龙 (2019) 中国森林资源报告(2014-2018). 中国林业出版社, 北京.]
[32]	Zhang YH (2007) Survey on the occurrence of Odontotermes formosanus in west Anhui Province. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 11(4), 58-59, 61. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张玉厚 (2007) 皖西大别山林区黑翅土白蚁发生类型的调查研究. 河北农业科学, 11(4), 58-59, 61.]
[33]	Zhang ZF, Zhu JH, Chen HM, Zhang HT, Chen GS (2002) Investigation on species, distribution and damage of termites on forest trees in Sanming District of Fujian Province. Entomological Journal of East China, 11, 29-35. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张再福, 朱建华, 陈红梅, 张华庭, 陈国顺 (2002) 三明地区林木白蚁种类、分布及危害的调查. 华东昆虫学报, 11, 29-35.]
[34]	Zhu JH, Chen SL, Chen HM, Fu RS, Zhang SL (2004) Preliminary list of Isoptera (Termitidae) in Fujian Province. Forest Pest and Disease, 23, 15-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 朱建华, 陈顺立, 陈红梅, 傅瑞树, 张思禄 (2004) 福建省等翅目昆虫(白蚁)初步名录的考查. 中国森林病虫, 23, 15-19.]

白蚁活动对中亚热带次生林和人工林的危害差异

Effects of termite activities on a secondary forest and plantations in the mid-subtropical zone

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	郝操, 吴东辉, 莫凌梓, 徐国良. 越冬动物肠道微生物多样性及功能研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23407-.
[2]	马碧玉. 印度《生物多样性法》修订述要及对我国完善生物多样性保护法治的启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23412-.
[3]	刘海鸥, 杜乐山, 刘文慧, 李子圆, 潘丽波, 刘蕾. 全球生物多样性框架基金管理政策分析与启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23334-.
[4]	何智荣, 吴思雨, 时莹莹, 王雨婷, 江艺欣, 张春娜, 赵娜, 王苏盆. 壶菌感染对两栖动物种群影响的研究现状与挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23274-.
[5]	彭昀月, 靳彤, 张小全. 生物多样性信用的概念、原则、交易和挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23300-.
[6]	吴相獐, 雷富民, 单壹壹, 于晶. 上海城市公园苔藓植物多样性分布格局及其环境影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23364-.
[7]	陈进, 杨玺. 关于植物迁地保护若干问题的讨论[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 24064-.
[8]	张乃鹏, 梁洪儒, 张焱, 孙超, 陈勇, 王路路, 夏江宝, 高芳磊. 土壤类型和地下水埋深对黄河三角洲典型盐沼植物群落空间分异的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23370-.
[9]	张飞飞, 杨天凤, 陈莉荣, 刘冬梅, 杨柳园, 杨杜宇, 鞠鹏, 陆露. 被子植物花粉颜色多样性及应用研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23346-.
[10]	刘昱齐, 刘晶岚, 樊晓丽, 胡宜深, 郭鸿筱, 薛凡. 鸟鸣多样性感知与声景感知恢复性: 鸟鸣音频和科普的干预[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23230-.
[11]	韩丽霞, 王永健, 刘宣. 外来物种入侵与本土物种分布区扩张的异同[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23396-.
[12]	陈进. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》与国家植物园体系建设[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23257-.
[13]	冯晨, 张洁, 黄宏文. 统筹植物就地保护与迁地保护的解决方案: 植物并地保护(parallel situ conservation)[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23184-.
[14]	陈慧妹, 李文军, 邱娟, 马占仓, 李波, 杨宗宗, 闻志彬, 孟岩, 曹秋梅, 邱东, 刘丹辉, 金光照. 新疆野生维管植物名录[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23124-.
[15]	罗正明, 刘晋仙, 张变华, 周妍英, 郝爱华, 杨凯, 柴宝峰. 不同退化阶段亚高山草甸土壤原生生物群落多样性特征及驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23136-.