生物多样性 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 437-442. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.06022 cstr: 32101.14.SP.J.1003.2012.06022
所属专题: 传粉生物学; 昆虫多样性与生态功能
收稿日期:
2012-01-16
接受日期:
2012-04-11
出版日期:
2012-07-20
发布日期:
2012-09-12
通讯作者:
杨大荣
作者简介:
*E-mail: yangdr@xtbg.ac.cn基金资助:
Pei Yang1, Zongbo Li2, Yanqiong Peng1, Darong Yang1,*()
Received:
2012-01-16
Accepted:
2012-04-11
Online:
2012-07-20
Published:
2012-09-12
Contact:
Darong Yang
摘要:
榕树与其传粉榕小蜂的共生关系常被认为是专一性的, 但该系统中有些榕小蜂可在不同种榕树或者同种榕树的不同亚种、变种和地理型上产卵和传粉。探讨榕小蜂在不同寄主中的繁殖和传粉特征, 有利于理解非专性榕蜂系统形成的过程及稳定机制。本研究中, 作者分别对比分析了传粉榕小蜂Ceratosolen emarginatus在木瓜榕(Ficus auriculata)的两种地理型auriculata-form和oligodon-form上的产卵和传粉特征。结果显示, 进蜂量为1, 2, 3只时, 相同寄主上的榕小蜂后代和种子数量均随进蜂量的增加而增加, 且平均单只繁殖雌蜂的后代及种子数量均无差异。这可能是由于进蜂量较低时, 两寄主可被利用的繁殖资源较充足, 榕小蜂间不存在干扰竞争, 可最大化地利用雌花资源。另一方面, 进蜂量相同时, 同一寄主上产生的种子数量明显多于榕小蜂后代数量, 说明榕树的繁殖利益更占优势。榕小蜂在auriculata-form上产生的后代总量和平均单只雌蜂后代数量与oligodon-form均无差异, 但后者产生的种子数量明显多于前者, 说明当繁殖资源充足时寄主不影响榕小蜂的繁殖, 然而寄主差异影响种子产生, 即auriculata-form和oligodon-form的繁殖能力已发生分化。
杨培, 李宗波, 彭艳琼, 杨大荣 (2012) 同种榕小蜂在木瓜榕两种地理型上的繁殖及传粉特征. 生物多样性, 20, 437-442. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.06022.
Pei Yang, Zongbo Li, Yanqiong Peng, Darong Yang (2012) Reproductive and pollination characteristics of conspecific fig wasps in two geographic types of Ficus auriculata. Biodiversity Science, 20, 437-442. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.06022.
进蜂量 Number of foundresses | Auriculata-form | Oligodon-form | P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Mean ± SE | n | Mean ± SE | |||
1 | 79 | 578.49 ± 25.8 | 37 | 412.14 ± 19.14 | P < 0.01 | |
2 | 84 | 528.67 ± 20.67 | 32 | 495.88 ± 54.57 | P = 0.50 | |
3 | 84 | 543.64 ± 24.33 | 32 | 501.66 ± 17.00 | P = 0.16 |
表1 平均每只繁殖雌蜂后代数量比较
Table 1 Comparison on mean number of offspring per foundress
进蜂量 Number of foundresses | Auriculata-form | Oligodon-form | P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Mean ± SE | n | Mean ± SE | |||
1 | 79 | 578.49 ± 25.8 | 37 | 412.14 ± 19.14 | P < 0.01 | |
2 | 84 | 528.67 ± 20.67 | 32 | 495.88 ± 54.57 | P = 0.50 | |
3 | 84 | 543.64 ± 24.33 | 32 | 501.66 ± 17.00 | P = 0.16 |
进蜂量 Number of foundresses | Auriculata-form | Oligodon-form | P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Mean ± SE | n | Mean ± SE | |||
1 | 26 | 697.04 ± 32.46 | 25 | 1,192.00 ± 71.74 | P < 0.01 | |
2 | 25 | 713.80 ± 35.19 | 24 | 990.73 ± 38.15 | P < 0.01 | |
3 | 26 | 759.87 ± 35.99 | 33 | 1,030.43 ± 48.28 | P < 0.01 |
表2 平均每只繁殖雌蜂传粉产生的榕树种子数量比较
Table 2 Comparison on mean number of seeds per foundress
进蜂量 Number of foundresses | Auriculata-form | Oligodon-form | P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Mean ± SE | n | Mean ± SE | |||
1 | 26 | 697.04 ± 32.46 | 25 | 1,192.00 ± 71.74 | P < 0.01 | |
2 | 25 | 713.80 ± 35.19 | 24 | 990.73 ± 38.15 | P < 0.01 | |
3 | 26 | 759.87 ± 35.99 | 33 | 1,030.43 ± 48.28 | P < 0.01 |
[1] | Anstett MC, Bronstein JL, Hossaert-McKey M (1996) Resource allocation: a conflict in the fig/fig wasp mutualism? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 9, 417-428. |
[2] | Berg CC, Corner EGH (2005) Moraceae—Ficus. In: Flora Malesiana (ed. Nooteboom HP), pp. 340-347. National Herbarium Nederland, Leiden. |
[3] | Compton SG, Grehan K, van Noort S (2009) A fig crop pollinated by three or more species of agaonid fig wasps. African Entomology, 17, 215-222. |
[4] | Cook JM, Rasplus JY (2003) Mutualists with attitude: coevolving fig wasps and figs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 241-248. |
[5] | Cook JM, Segar ST (2010) Speciation in fig wasps. Ecological Entomology, 35, 54-66. |
[6] | Herre EA (1989) Coevolution of reproductive characteristics in 12 species of New World figs and their pollinator wasps. Experientia, 45, 637-647. |
[7] | Herre EA (1996) An overview of studies on a community of Panamanian figs. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 593-607. |
[8] | Kjellberg F, Jousselin E, Hossaert-McKey M, Rasplus JY, (2005) Biology, ecology and evolution of fig-pollinating wasps (Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae). In: Biology, Ecology, and Evolution of Gall-inducing Arthropods (eds Raman A, Schaefer CW, Withers TM), pp. 539-572. Science Publishers Inc., Plymouth. |
[9] | Lin R-C, Yeung CKL, Fong JJ, Tzeng H-Y, Li S-H (2011) The lack of pollinator specificity in a dioecious fig tree: sympatric fig-pollinating wasps of Ficus septica in southern Taiwan. Biotropica, 43, 200-207. |
[10] | Ma WJ, Peng YQ, Yang DR, Guan JM (2009) Coevolution of reproductive characteristics in three dioecious fig species and their pollinator wasps. Symbiosis, 49, 87-94. |
[11] | Machado CA, Robbins N, Gilbert MTP, Herre EA (2005) Critical review of host specificity and its coevolutionary implications in the fig/fig-wasp mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 6558-6565. |
[12] | Michaloud G, Carriere S, Kobbi M (1996) Exceptions to the one﹕one relationship between African fig trees and their fig wasp pollinators: possible evolutionary scenarios. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 513-520. |
[13] | Moe AM, Rossi DR, Weiblen GD (2011) Pollinator sharing in dioecious figs (Ficus: Moraceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 103, 546-558. |
[14] | Nefdt RJC, Compton SG (1996) Regulation of seed and pollinator production in the fig-fig wasp mutualism. Journal of Animal Ecology, 65, 170-182. |
[15] | Patel A, Hossaert-McKey M (2000) Components of reproductive success in two dioecious fig species, Ficus exasperata and Ficus hispida. Ecology, 81, 2850-2866. |
[16] | Rasplus JY (1996) The one-to-one species specificity of the Ficus-Agaoninae mutualism: how casual. In: The Biodiversity of African Plants (eds van der Maesen LJG, van der Burgt XM, van MedenbachdeRooy JM), pp. 639-649. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Wageningen. |
[17] |
Wang RW, Ridley J, Sun BF, Zheng Q, Dunn DW, Cook J, Shi L, Zhang YP, Yu DW (2009) Interference competition and high temperatures reduce the virulence of fig wasps and stabilize a fig-wasp mutualism. PLoS ONE, 4, e7802.
DOI URL PMID |
[18] | Wang RW, Sun BF, Zheng Q, Shi L, Zhu LX (2011) Asymmetric interaction and indeterminate fitness correlation between cooperative partners in the fig-fig wasp mutualism. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 8, 1487-1496. |
[19] | Ware AB, Compton SG (1992) Breakdown of pollinator specificity in an African fig tree. Biotropica, 24, 544-549. |
[20] | Wiebes JT (1989) Agaonidae (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea) and Ficus (Moraceae): fig wasp and their figs IV (African Ceratosolen). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series C, 92, 251-266. |
[21] | Yang DR (杨大荣), Peng YQ (彭艳琼), Wang QY (王秋艳), Xu L (徐磊), Wei ZD (魏作东) (2003) The structure of insect communities and the ecological characteristics of the functional groups in syconia of three fig trees species in Xishuangbanna, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 23, 1798-1806. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Yang P (杨培) (2010) Research on Mutualism of Three Ficus Species in Subsection Neomorphe and Their Pollinators (大果榕亚组三种榕树榕—蜂互惠共生关系的研究). PhD dissertation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[23] |
Yang P, Li ZB, Peng YQ, Yang DR (2012) Exchange of hosts: can agaonid fig wasps reproduce successfully in the figs of non-host Ficus? Naturwissenschaften, 99, 199-205.
DOI URL PMID |
[24] | Zhou ZK, Gilbert MG (2003) Moraceae. In: Flora of China (eds Wu ZY, Hong DY, Raven P), Volume 5. Science Press, Beijing. |
[25] | Zhu H (朱华), Cai L (蔡琳) (2005) The biogeography of tropical rainforest in Yunnan Province and its suggestions to the geological history. Advances in Earth Sciences (地球科学进展), 20(Suppl.), 1-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 王顺雨, 李杨, 吕晓琴, 李欣, 范权秀, 王晓月. 熊蜂盗蜜的花色偏好及对长距忍冬繁殖适合度的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 24554-. |
[2] | 张婵, 赵苏雅, 张欣然, 王依凡, 王林林. 外来传粉者对本地植物‒传粉者相互作用的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(2): 24443-. |
[3] | 丁翔, 余元钧, 宋希强, 罗毅波. 具有泛化访花者的海芋特化传粉系统[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24069-. |
[4] | 巴苏艳, 赵春艳, 刘媛, 方强. 通过虫体花粉识别构建植物‒传粉者网络: 人工模型与AI模型高度一致[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24088-. |
[5] | 谢华, 杨培, 李宗波. 鸡嗉子榕传粉榕小蜂表皮碳氢化合物的性二型及季节变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24001-. |
[6] | 舒为杰, 何花, 曾罗, 谷志容, 谭敦炎, 杨晓琛. 雌雄异株物种一把伞南星雌雄株空间分布及性别二态性[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24084-. |
[7] | 吴乐婕, 刘泽康, 田星, 张群, 李博, 吴纪华. 海三棱藨草基因型多样性对种群营养生长和繁殖策略的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23478-. |
[8] | 冯志荣, 陈明波, 杨小芳, 王刚, 董乙乂, 彭艳琼, 陈华燕, 王波. 榕树繁育系统及榕小蜂资源利用塑造了榕小蜂群落[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23307-. |
[9] | 热依拉穆·麦麦提吐尔逊, 艾沙江·阿不都沙拉木. 石榴花瓣和雄蕊对其传粉过程与繁殖成功的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22633-. |
[10] | 何远思, 张轶宣, 王代平. 配偶行为相容性对动物繁殖的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22534-. |
[11] | 黄曼娟, 汪雪敏, 苗白鸽, 彭艳琼. 栉颚榕小蜂在雌花期榕果内产卵及主动传粉行为的多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 23060-. |
[12] | 赵秋杰, 郭辉军, 孟广涛, 钟明川, 尹俊, 刘倬橙, 李品荣, 陈力, 陶毅, 秋生, 王红, 赵延会. 放牧对蜜蜂的影响及其生态修复建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 23037-. |
[13] | 高欣, 赵亚辉, 田菲, 王晓爱, 黎明政, 林鹏程, 常涛, 俞丹, 刘焕章. 中国内陆水体鱼类多样性监测专项网的监测和研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(12): 23427-. |
[14] | 罗韶凡, 蒋凯, 黄卫昌. 植物花距表型趋同进化和发育机制多样化的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23249-. |
[15] | 史丹阳, 廖书跃, 朱磊, 李彬彬. 鸟撞建筑现象概述及系统性调查案例分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21321-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn