生物多样性 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 23307.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023307

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇    下一篇

榕树繁育系统及榕小蜂资源利用塑造了榕小蜂群落

冯志荣1,2, 陈明波1, 杨小芳1,2, 王刚1, 董乙乂1, 彭艳琼1, 陈华燕3, 王波1*   

  1. 1. 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园热带森林生态学重点实验室, 云南勐腊 666303; 2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049; 3. 中国科学院华南植物园保护与可持续利用重点实验室, 广州 510650

  • 收稿日期:2023-08-30 修回日期:2023-11-22 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2023-11-29
  • 通讯作者: 王波

The Ficus breeding system and the resource utilization of fig wasps shape the fig wasp community

Zhirong Feng1,2, Mingbo Chen1, Xiaofang Yang1,2, Gang Wang1, Yiyi Dong1, Yanqiong Peng1, Huayan Chen3, Bo Wang1,*   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla, Yunnan 666303

    2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    3 Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650

  • Received:2023-08-30 Revised:2023-11-22 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2023-11-29
  • Contact: Bo Wang

摘要:

物种–资源利用网络可以呈现不同物种在资源利用上的竞争、共享以及分化, 可为从资源利用角度解释群落的物种多样性提供新的视角。昆虫群落一方面由群落内种间对资源的利用方式决定, 也受寄主植物生态特征的影响。通过寄主生态特征解释物种–资源利用网络指标将深入揭示昆虫群落的组织模式和多样性决定机制。本研究采集榕属(Ficus) 18种榕树的榕小蜂群落, 构建每种榕树上的榕小蜂–榕果资源利用网络, 分析网络指标间的关系。我们重点关注了群落物种数(物种多样性)和群落稳健度指标与其他网络指标间的关系, 并比较不同寄主特征(传粉模式、生活型、繁育系统)对榕小蜂物种数以及榕小蜂–榕果资源利用网络指标的影响。结果显示, 18种榕树上共收集到隶属于5科28属173种榕小蜂。榕小蜂群落物种数与网络的连接度呈负相关, 与分化度呈显著的正相关; 网络稳健度与物种数无显著相关关系, 但与连接度、加权嵌套性、互作Shannon多样性、分布重叠度呈显著正相关关系, 而与互作专化度、分化度呈显著负相关。与雌雄异株榕树相比, 雌雄同株榕树的榕小蜂资源利用的互作专化度高, 种间分布重叠度小, 分化度高(资源利用分化高), 所以雌雄同株榕树比雌雄异株榕树上榕小蜂物种数多。本研究支持资源利用的特异性和分化促进了榕小蜂物种多样性, 支持竞争导致的资源利用分化在促进近缘种多样化过程中发挥重要作用。群落对资源丢失的稳健度与群落的物种数无关, 但是与物种的资源共享程度(由连接度、分布重叠度表示)正相关。此外, 繁育系统间榕小蜂物种数的差异可能与雌雄异株榕树繁殖功能的分化和专化以及对非传粉榕小蜂产卵的防御能力有关。

关键词: 物种-资源利用网络, 昆虫-植物互作网络, 网络指标, 昆虫多样性, 榕小蜂群落

Abstract

Aims: Species–resource utilization networks can illustrate the competition, sharing, and differentiation among different species in resource utilization, providing a novel perspective on understanding species diversity within communities. Insect communities are influenced by both the resource utilization patterns of species within the community and the ecological traits of host plants. Explaining species–resource utilization network metrics in the context of host ecological traits will help reveal the organization and factors that determine species diversity in insect communities.

Methods: In this study, we collected fig wasp communities from 18 Ficus species. Subsequently, we built fig wasp–fig fruit resource utilization networks for each Ficus species, examined the correlations between network metrics, and assessed how various host characteristics (such as pollination type, life form, and breeding system) affected these network metrics.

Results: From the 18 Ficus species, we collected 173 species of fig wasps belonging to 28 genera and 5 different families. The species number of fig wasp community was negatively correlated with connectance of the fig wasp–fig resource utilization networks and positively correlated with C score (a measure of resource utility differentiation). Robustness did not significantly correlation with species number, but it showed a positive correlation with connectence, WNODF (weighted nestedness metric based on overlap and decreasing fill), Shannon diversity for interaction, and distribution overlap. It was, however, significantly negatively correlated with specialization and C score. When compared to dioecious fig trees, monoecious fig trees exhibited a higher level of specialization, lower distribution overlap, and greater C score. Meanwhile, monoecious fig trees hosted more fig wasp species than dioecious fig trees.

Conclusion: All of these findings suggest that the specialization and differentiation (as indicated by the C score) in resource utilization among fig wasps enhance the richness of species within the community. This underscores the essential role of interspecific competition for resources in driving diversification among closely related species. Robustness to resource loss of community is not linked to species richness but is instead correlated with the extent of species coexistence, denoted by connectence and distribution overlap. Additionally, the breeding system also plays a role in the diversification of fig wasps, possibly by restricting the oviposition of non-pollinating fig wasps.


Key words: species-resource network, insect-plant interaction network, network metrics, insect diversity, fig wasp community