古田山10种主要森林群落类型的α和β多样性格局及影响因素

doi:10.17520/biods.2018171

生物多样性 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 33-41. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018171

所属专题：钱江源国家公园生物多样性保护与管理

古田山10种主要森林群落类型的α和β多样性格局及影响因素

翁昌露^1,²,张田田²,巫东豪²,陈声文³,金毅²,任海保⁴,于明坚²,罗媛媛^1,^*()

1 中国计量大学生命科学学院, 杭州 310018
2 浙江大学生命科学学院, 杭州 310058
3 钱江源国家公园生态资源保护中心, 浙江开化 324300
4 中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2018-06-20 接受日期:2019-01-31 出版日期:2019-01-20 发布日期:2019-03-15
通讯作者: 罗媛媛
基金资助:
浙江省科技计划(2015C02016);科技部基础性工作专项专题(2015FY210200-17);国家自然科学基金(31361123001)

Drivers and patterns of α- and β-diversity in ten main forest community types in Gutianshan, eastern China

Weng Changlu^1,²,Zhang Tiantian²,Wu Donghao²,Chen Shengwen³,Jin Yi²,Ren Haibao⁴,Yu Mingjian²,Luo Yuanyuan^1,^*()

1 College of Life Sciences,China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018
2 College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058
3 Center of Ecology and Resources, Qianjiangyuan National Park, Kaihua, Zhejiang 324300
4 State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093

Received:2018-06-20 Accepted:2019-01-31 Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-03-15
Contact: Luo Yuanyuan

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

古田山国家级自然保护区地处中亚热带, 地形复杂, 森林群落类型丰富。我们在保护区内10种主要森林群落类型中网格化布置并调查了79个20 m × 20 m样地, 分析了不同群落类型内及相互间的α (Shannon-Wiener指数)、β (Horn-Morisita相异性指数)多样性分布格局及其影响因素。结果表明: (1) α多样性主要受到群落类型、海拔和坡向的影响。α多样性在不同群落类型间差异显著, 并且随海拔升高、坡向从南到北, α多样性增大。(2) β多样性主要受到群落类型和海拔的影响, 受空间距离的影响不显著。不同群落类型间的β多样性显著大于同一群落类型内部, 并且随海拔升高β多样性增大。总体而言, 群落类型和海拔是古田山森林群落α和β多样性的主要影响因子, 表明生境过滤等机制对该区域的森林物种多样性格局起着主要作用。

关键词: 群落构建, 亚热带森林, α多样性;, β多样性;, 海拔, 坡向, 森林群落类型

Abstract

Located in the subtropical zone of China, Gutianshan National Nature Reserve (GNNR) contains a variety of forest community types and is rugged in terrain. Here, we established 79 forest plots, each 20 m × 20 m in area, within the ten main community types of GNNR. Based on this, we analyzed the α- (Shannon- Wiener index) and β- (Horn-Morisita dissimilarity index) diversity patterns of and between these community types and their underlying driving factors. We found that: (1) Community type, elevation and aspect were the most important determinants of α-diversity. α-diversity showed significant differences between community types, and increased with elevation and northness. (2) Community type and elevation, but not spatial distance significantly affected β-diversity. β-diversity between community types was higher than within community type, and β-diversity also increased with increasing elevation. These results show that community type and elevation are the main influencing factors of the α- and β-diversity patterns in GNNR forests, and further suggest the importance of drivers, such as habitat filtering, on the assembly of GNNR forests.

Key words: community assembly, subtropical forests, α diversity;, β diversity;, elevation, aspect, community type

翁昌露,张田田,巫东豪,陈声文,金毅,任海保,于明坚,罗媛媛 (2019) 古田山10种主要森林群落类型的α和β多样性格局及影响因素. 生物多样性, 27, 33-41. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018171.

Weng Changlu,Zhang Tiantian,Wu Donghao,Chen Shengwen,Jin Yi,Ren Haibao,Yu Mingjian,Luo Yuanyuan (2019) Drivers and patterns of α- and β-diversity in ten main forest community types in Gutianshan, eastern China. Biodiversity Science, 27, 33-41. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018171.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2018171

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2019/V27/I1/33

图/表 10

图1 79个森林群落样地分布图。EBLF、EDBLF、PTF、PTBLF、DBLF、PMF、PMBLF、CLP、CLBLF和COP的含义见表1。

Fig. 1 The locations of 79 forest community plots. EBLF, EDBLF, PTF, PTBLF, DBLF, PMF, PMBLF, CLP, CLBLF and COP are the same as in Table 1.

表1 各森林群落类型面积及样地个数、取样面积

Table 1 The area of each forest community type, the number of each plot and sample area

群落类型 Community type	群落面积 Community area (ha)	样地个数 Number of plots	取样面积 Sample area (ha)
常绿阔叶林 Evergreen broad-leaved forest (EBLF)	4,778.9	24	0.96
常绿落叶阔叶混交林 Evergreen and deciduous broad-leaved mixed forest (EDBLF)	444.1	11	0.44
黄山松林 Pinus taiwanensis forest (PTF)	14.3	2	0.08
黄山松针阔叶混交林 Pinus taiwanensis and broad-leaved trees mixed forest (PTBLF)	152.7	4	0.16
落叶阔叶林 Deciduous broad-leaved forest (DBLF)	18.5	2	0.08
马尾松林 Pinus massoniana forest (PMF)	217.8	4	0.16
马尾松针阔叶混交林 Pinus massoniana and broad-leaved trees mixed forest (PMBLF)	329.6	12	0.48
杉木林 Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation (CLP)	549.8	9	0.36
杉木针阔叶混交林 Cunninghamia lanceolata and broad-leaved trees mixed forest (CLBLF)	30	2	0.08
油茶林 Camellia oleifera plantation (COP)	1,516.1	9	0.36

图2 古田山国家级自然保护区不同类型群落α多样性的差异。柱形上方的英文字母不同表示柱形间有显著差异(P < 0.05, Holm法修正), 否则无显著差异。EBLF、EDBLF、PTF、PTBLF、DBLF、PMF、PMBLF、CLP、CLBLF和COP的含义见表1。

Fig. 2 The difference of α diversity in different community types in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. The different letter on the top of the column shows that there is significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05, Holm method correction), otherwise there is no significant difference. EBLF, EDBLF, PTF, PTBLF, DBLF, PMF, PMBLF, CLP, CLBLF and COP are the same as in Table 1.

图3 古田山国家级自然保护区森林群落α多样性(Shannon- Wiener指数)随海拔梯度的变化。圆圈为实际观测值; 实线为拟合值; 阴影为95%置信区间。

Fig. 3 The forest community α diversity (Shannon-Wiener index) along an altitudinal gradient in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. The circles are actual observations; the solid line is the fitted value; the shadow is 95% confidence intervals.

图4 古田山国家级自然保护区森林群落α多样性(Shannon- Wiener指数)随南北向的变化。圆圈为实际观测值; 实线为拟合值; 阴影为95%置信区间。

Fig. 4 The forest community α diversity (Shannon-Wiener index) along the north direction in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. The circles are actual observations; the solid line is the fitted value; the shadow is 95% confidence intervals.

表2 地形和群落类型对古田山国家级自然保护区森林群落α多样性(Shannon-Wiener指数)影响的方差分析结果

Table 2 Variance analysis results of the effects of topography and forest community type on forest community α diversity (Shannon-Wiener index) in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve

	自由度 Degree of freedom	总方差 Total variance	均方差 Mean variance	F	P
海拔 Elevation	1	15.716	15.716	91.393	< 0.001
坡度 Slope	1	0.550	0.550	3.200	0.078
东西向 East-west	1	0.414	0.414	2.407	0.126
南北向 South-north	1	0.828	0.828	4.817	0.032
群落类型 Community type	9	42.872	4.764	27.702	< 0.001
残差 Residuals	65	11.177	0.172

图5 古田山国家级自然保护区不同类型群落物种组成的非度量多维尺度分析排序结果。EBLF、EDBLF、PTF、PTBLF、DBLF、PMF、PMBLF、CLP、CLBLF和COP的含义见表1。

Fig. 5 Non-metric Multidimensional scaling (NMDS) result of species composition of the different community types in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. EBLF, EDBLF, PTF, PTBLF, DBLF, PMF, PMBLF, CLP, CLBLF and COP are the same as in Table 1.

图6 同种群落类型内部和不同群落类型间β多样性(Horn-Morisita相异性指数)的比较。柱形图上方的英文字母不同表示柱形间有显著差异(P < 0.05, t-检验), 否则无显著差异。

Fig. 6 Comparison of β diversity (Horn-Morisita dissimilarity idex) within the same community type and between different community types. The different letter on the top of the column shows that there is significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05, t-test), otherwise there is no significant difference.

图7 古田山国家级自然保护区森林群落β多样性(Horn-Morisita相异性指数)随海拔梯度的变化。圆点为实际观测值; 实线为拟合值; 阴影为95%置信区间。

Fig. 7 The forest community β diversity (Horn-Morisita dissimilarity index) along an altitudinal gradient in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. The circles are actual observations; the solid line is the fitted value; the shadow is 95% confidence intervals.

表3 空间距离、地形和群落类型对古田山国家级自然保护区森林群落β多样性(Horn-Morisita指数)的影响(R2 = 0.262)

Table 3 Effects of geographical distance, topography and community type on forest community β diversity (Horn-Morisita index) in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve (R2 = 0.262)

	效应 Effect	t	P
空间距离 Spatial distance	0.002	1.497	0.415
海拔 Elevation	0.066	15.148	0.001
坡度 Slope	-0.006	-1.635	0.391
南北向 North-South	0.0052	1.370	0.347
东西向 East-West	0.0035	0.836	0.635
群落类型 Community type	0.2393	25.415	0.001

参考文献 46

[1]	Baruch Z ( 1984) Ordination and classification of vegetation along an altitudinal gradient in the Venezuelan Páramos. Vegetatio, 55, 115-126. DOI URL
[2]	Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S ( 2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. . ( accessed on 2018-12-08)
[3]	Blundo C, González-Espinosa M, Malizia LR ( 2016) Relative contribution of niche and neutral processes on tree species turnover across scales in seasonal forests of NW Argentina. Plant Ecology, 217, 359-368. DOI URL
[4]	Chen LZ, Chen QL, Liu WH ( 1997) Forest diversity and its geographical distribution in Chinax. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 陈灵芝, 陈清朗, 刘文华 ( 1997) 中国森林多样性及其地理分布. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[5]	Condit R ( 2005) Tropical tree α-diversity: Results from a worldwide network of large plots. Journal of Surgical Research, 25, 61-69. DOI URL
[6]	Gallardo-Cruz JA, Pérez-García EA, Meave JA ( 2009) β-diversity and vegetation structure as influenced by slope aspect and altitude in a seasonally dry tropical landscape. Landscape Ecology, 24, 473-482. DOI URL
[7]	Gatti RC, Castaldi S, Lindsell JA, Marchetti M, Maesano M, Paola AD, Paparella F, Valentini R ( 2015) The impact of selective logging and clearcutting on forest structure, tree diversity and above-ground biomass of African tropical forests. Ecological Research, 30, 119-132. DOI URL
[8]	Guillem C, Jér?me C, Richard C, Salomon A, Suzanne L, Rolando P ( 2006) Determinants and spatial modeling of tree β-diversity in a tropical forest landscape in Panama. Journal of Vegetation Science, 17, 83-92. DOI URL
[9]	Hubbell SP ( 2001) The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[10]	Itow S ( 1991) Species turnover and diversity patterns along an elevation broad-leaved forest coenocline. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2, 477-484. DOI URL
[11]	Legendre P, Mi XC, Ren HB, Ma KP, Yu MJ, Sun F, He FL ( 2009) Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broad- leaved forest of China. Ecology, 90, 663-674. DOI URL PMID
[12]	López-Martínez JO, Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Dupuy JM, Meave JA ( 2012) Partitioning the variation of woody plant β-diversity in a landscape of secondary tropical dry forests across spatial scales. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24, 33-45. DOI URL
[13]	Li YC, Liang YL, Zhang DB ( 2006) Prelimarily discussion the influence factor and protection of forest biodiversity. Journal of Henan Forestry Science and Technology, 26(4), 31-33. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 李亚藏, 梁彦兰, 张东斌 ( 2006) 浅谈森林生物多样性的影响因素及其保护. 河南林业科技, 26(4), 31-33.] DOI URL
[14]	Lu XL, Hu N, Ding SY, Fan YL, Liao BH, Zhai YJ, Liu J ( 2010) The pattern of plant species diversity of Funiu Mountain Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 5790-5798. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 卢训令, 胡楠, 丁圣彦, 范玉龙, 廖秉华, 翟元杰, 柳静 ( 2010) 伏牛山自然保护区物种多样性分布格局. 生态学报, 30, 5790-5798.]
[15]	Ma DW, Zhang G, Wang YH, Wang DM ( 2002) Studies on species diversity of forest vegetation on Qingcheng Mountain. Journal of Sichuan University (Natural Science Edition), 39, 115-123. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 马丹炜, 张果, 王跃华, 王道模 ( 2002) 青城山森林植被物种多样性的研究. 四川大学学报(自然科学版), 39, 115-123.] DOI URL
[16]	Ma KP ( 1994) Measurement of biotic community diversity. I. The measurement of α diversity. Chinese Biodiversity, 2, 162-168. (in Chinese)
	[ 马克平 ( 1994) 生物群落多样性的测度方法. I. α多样性的测度方法(上). 生物多样性, 2, 162-168.]
[17]	Ma KP, Liu CR, Liu YM ( 1995) Measurement of biotic community diversity. II. The measurement of β diversity. Chinese Biodiversity, 3, 38-43. (in Chinese)
	[ 马克平, 刘灿然, 刘玉明 ( 1995) 生物群落多样性的测度方法. II. β多样性的测度方法. 生物多样性, 3, 38-43.]
[18]	Meng Y, Qiu Y, Zhang L, Wang CL, Zang ZH, Zhang XY, Shen GZ, Yan CF, Chen QS ( 2017) Effects of geographical distance and differences in climate and altitude on species dissimilarity of vascular plant communities in the Dulongjiang River Watershed Area. Biodiversity Science, 25, 1313-1320. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 蒙洋, 邱月, 张亮, 王翠玲, 臧振华, 张学耀, 申国珍, 闫彩凤, 陈全胜 ( 2017) 地理距离、海拔和气候差异对独龙江流域维管植物群落物种空间相异性的影响. 生物多样性, 25, 1313-1320.]
[19]	Myers SC, Clarkson BR, Reeves PN, Clarkson BD ( 2013) Wetland management in New Zealand: Are current approaches and policies sustaining wetland ecosystems in agricultural landscapes? Ecological Engineering, 56, 107-120. DOI URL
[20]	Niu KC, Liu YN, Shen ZH, He FL, Fang JY ( 2009) Community assembly: The relative importance of neutral theory and niche theory. Biodiversity Science, 17, 579-593. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 牛克昌, 刘怿宁, 沈泽昊, 何芳良, 方精云 ( 2009) 群落构建的中性理论和生态位理论. 生物多样性, 17, 579-593.] DOI URL
[21]	Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H ( 2016) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package Version 2.0-4. . ( accessed on 2018-12-08)
[22]	Peet RK ( 1981) Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range: Patterns of species diversity. Vegetatio, 45, 3-75. DOI URL
[23]	Qian H, Hao ZQ, Zhang J ( 2014) Phylogenetic structure and phylogenetic diversity of angiosperm assemblages in forests along an elevational gradient in Changbaishan, China. Journal of Plant Ecology, 7, 154-165. DOI URL
[24]	Qian H, Shimono A ( 2012) Effects of geographic distance and climatic dissimilarity on species turnover in alpine meadow communities across a broad spatial extent on the Tibetan Plateau. Plant Ecology, 213, 1357-1364. DOI URL
[25]	Qian HY, Zhang TT, Chen SW, Wu DH, Wu CP, Yuan WG, Jin Y, Yu MJ ( 2018) Community structures and biodiversities of broad-leaved forest and two types of plantations in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve, Zhejiang Province. Guihaia, 38, 1371-1381. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 钱海源, 张田田, 陈声文, 巫东豪, 吴初平, 袁位高, 金毅, 于明坚 ( 2018) 古田山自然保护区阔叶林与两种人工林的群落结构和生物多样性. 广西植物, 38, 1371-1381.]
[26]	Rahbek C ( 1977) The relationship among area, elevation, and regional species richness in neotropical birds. The American Naturalist, 149, 875-902.
[27]	Revell LJ ( 2012) Phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology & Evolution, 3, 217-223. DOI URL
[28]	R Core Team ( 2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. . ( accessed on 2018-12-08)
[29]	Song YC ( 1999) Perspective of the vegetation zonation of forest region in eastern China. Acta Botanica Sinica, 41, 541-552. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 宋永昌 ( 1999) 中国东部森林植被带划分之我见. 植物学报, 41, 541-552.] DOI URL
[30]	Shen ZH, Zhang XS, Jin YX ( 2000) Spatial pattern analysis and topographical interpretation of species diversity in the forests of Dalaoling in the region of the Three Gorges. Acta Botanica Sinica, 42, 620-627. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 沈泽昊, 张新时, 金义兴 ( 2000) 三峡大老岭森林物种多样性的空间格局分析及其地形解释. 植物学报, 42, 620-627.] DOI URL
[31]	Tang ZY, Fang JY ( 2004) A review on the elevational patterns of plant species diversity. Biodiversity Science, 12, 20-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 唐志尧, 方精云 ( 2004) 植物物种多样性的垂直分布格局. 生物多样性, 12, 20-28.] DOI URL
[32]	Tello JS, Myers JA, Macía MJ, Fuentes AF, Cayola L, Arellano G, Loza IM, Torrez V, Cornejo M, Miranda T, J?rgensen PM ( 2015) Elevational gradients in β-diversity reflect variation in the strength of local community assembly mechanicsms across spatial scales. PLoS ONE, 10, 1371. DOI URL
[33]	Vazquez GJA, Givnish TJ ( 1998) Altitudinal gradients in tropical forest composition, structure, and diversity in the Sierra de Manantlan. Journal of Ecology, 86, 999-1020. DOI URL
[34]	Wang GH, Zhou GS, Yang LM, Li ZQ ( 2002) Distribution, species diversity and life-form spectra of plant communities along an altitudinal gradient in the northern slopes of Qilianshan Mountains, Gansu, China. Plant Ecology, 165, 169-181. DOI URL
[35]	Wang ZH, Chen AP, Piao SL, Fang JY ( 2004) Pattern of species richness along an altitudinal gradient on Gaoligong Mountains, Southwest China. Biodiversity Science, 12, 82-88. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 王志恒, 陈安平, 朴世龙, 方精云 ( 2004) 高黎贡山种子植物物种丰富度沿海拔梯度的变化. 生物多样性, 12, 82-88.] DOI URL
[36]	Wang YX, Jin Y, Wu CP, Weng DM, Ye LX, Chen DL, Yu JP, Liu JL, Zhong L, Yu MJ ( 2016) Taxonomic and phylogenetic α and β diversities of major subtropical forest community types in Zhejiang Province. Biodiversity Science, 24, 863-874. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 王月霞, 金毅, 吴初平, 翁东明, 叶立新, 陈德良, 余建平, 刘金亮, 仲磊, 于明坚 ( 2016) 浙江省主要亚热带森林群落类型物种和谱系水平的α和β多样性比较. 生物多样性, 24, 863-874.] DOI URL
[37]	Whittaker RH ( 1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21, 213-251. DOI URL
[38]	Whittaker RH, Niering WA ( 1965) Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: A gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology, 46, 429-452. DOI URL
[39]	Wilson J, Gitay H ( 1995) Limitations to species coexistence: Evidence for competition from field observations, using a patch model. Journal of Vegetation Science, 6, 369-376. DOI URL
[40]	Wolda H ( 1983) Diversity, diversity indices and tropical cockroaches. Oecologia, 58, 290-298. DOI URL PMID
[41]	Wu H ( 2017) Species richness and environmental interpretation of pine and oak forest community in Qinling Mountains. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 26, 931-938. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 吴昊 ( 2017) 秦岭松栎林群落物种丰富度特征及其环境解释. 生态环境学报, 26, 931-938.] DOI URL
[42]	Wu ZY ( 1980) Vegetation of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 吴征镒 ( 1980) 中国植被. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[43]	Ye MS, Guan WB, Tan H, Ma KM, Liu GH, Wang XL ( 2004) The α diversity of shrubs community in the arid valley of the Minjiang River. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24, 1123-1130. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 冶民生, 关文彬, 谭辉, 马克明, 刘国华, 汪西林 ( 2004) 岷江干旱河谷灌丛α多样性分析. 生态学报, 24, 1123-1130.] DOI URL
[44]	Yu MJ, Hu ZH, Yu JP, Ding BY, Fang T ( 2001) Forest vegetation types in Gutianshan Natural Reserve in Zhejiang. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Sciences), 27(4), 23-28. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 于明坚, 胡正华, 余建平, 丁炳扬, 方腾 ( 2001) 浙江古田山自然保护区森林植被类型. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 27(4), 23-28.] DOI URL
[45]	Yu MJ, Qian HY, Yu JP ( 2019) Research of Biodiversity in Gutianshan. Zhejiang Science and Technology Press, Hangzhou
	(in press). (in Chinese) [ 于明坚, 钱海源, 余建平 ( 2019) 古田山生物多样性研究. 浙江科学技术出版社, 杭州(排版中).]
[46]	Zheng JK, Wei TX, Zheng LK, Da LZ, Chen ZF, Zhao J, Zhu WD, Sun H ( 2009) Effects of landforms on α biodiversity in slope scale. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 18, 2254-2259. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 郑江坤, 魏天兴, 郑路坤, 大林直, 陈致富, 赵健, 朱文德, 孙慧 ( 2009) 坡面尺度上地貌对α生物多样性的影响. 生态环境学报, 18, 2254-2259.] DOI URL

古田山10种主要森林群落类型的α和β多样性格局及影响因素

Drivers and patterns of α- and β-diversity in ten main forest community types in Gutianshan, eastern China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 46

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	艾妍雨, 胡海霞, 沈婷, 莫雨轩, 杞金华, 宋亮. 附生维管植物多样性及其与宿主特征的相关性: 以哀牢山中山湿性常绿阔叶林为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 24072-.
[2]	张瑶, 孙君瑶, 李伟. 雅鲁藏布江流域不同海拔梯度下消落区植被NDVI的时空变化趋势及驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(5): 23432-.
[3]	郑梦瑶, 李媛, 王雪蓉, 张越, 贾彤. 芦芽山不同植被类型土壤原生动物群落构建机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23419-.
[4]	曲锐, 左振君, 王有鑫, 张良键, 吴志刚, 乔秀娟, 王忠. 基于元素组的生物地球化学生态位及其在不同生态系统中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23378-.
[5]	李斌, 宋鹏飞, 顾海峰, 徐波, 刘道鑫, 江峰, 梁程博, 张萌, 高红梅, 蔡振媛, 张同作. 昆仑山青海片区鸟类群落多样性格局及其驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23406-.
[6]	李雪萌, 蒋际宝, 张曾鲁, 刘晓静, 王亚利, 吴宜钊, 李银生, 邱江平, 赵琦. 宝天曼国家级自然保护区蚯蚓物种多样性及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23352-.
[7]	刘啸林, 吴友贵, 张敏华, 陈小荣, 朱志成, 陈定云, 董舒, 李步杭, 丁炳扬, 刘宇. 浙江百山祖25 ha亚热带森林动态监测样地群落组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23294-.
[8]	罗小燕, 李强, 黄晓磊. 戴云山国家级自然保护区访花昆虫DNA条形码数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23236-.
[9]	刘志发, 王新财, 龚粤宁, 陈道剑, 张强. 基于红外相机监测的广东南岭国家级自然保护区鸟兽多样性及其垂直分布特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 22689-.
[10]	杨胜娴, 杨清, 李晓东, 巢欣, 刘惠秋, 魏蓝若雪, 巴桑. 确定性过程主导高原典型河流浮游植物地理分布格局和群落构建[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 23092-.
[11]	楼晨阳, 任海保, 陈小南, 米湘成, 童冉, 朱念福, 陈磊, 吴统贵, 申小莉. 钱江源国家公园森林群落的物种多样性、结构多样性及其对黑麂出现概率的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22518-.
[12]	陈星, 涂淑雯, 戴尊, 高爽, 王幼芳, 邢诗晨, 魏博嘉, 唐录艳, 师瑞萍, 王晓蕊, 刘永英, 赵东平, 唐霞, 姚雪, 赵明水, 吴晗星, 祁祥斌, 张健, 李敏, 王健. 浙江天目山国家级自然保护区苔藓植物多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22649-.
[13]	薛玉洁, 程安鹏, 李珊, 刘晓娟, 李景文. 亚热带森林中环境和物种多样性对灌木存活的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22443-.
[14]	姚仁秀, 陈燕, 吕晓琴, 王江湖, 杨付军, 王晓月. 海拔及环境因子影响杜鹃属植物的表型特征和化学性状[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22259-.
[15]	侯东敏, 辉洪, 张栋儒, 肖能文, 饶定齐. 云岭山脉云南地区两栖爬行类动物多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22316-.