我国沿海棱鳀属鱼类的物种鉴定与系统发育

doi:10.17520/biods.2016079

生物多样性 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (8): 888-895. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016079

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

我国沿海棱鳀属鱼类的物种鉴定与系统发育

张静^1,⁴, 李渊², 宋娜¹, 林龙山², 高天翔^3,^*()

1 中国海洋大学水产学院, 山东青岛 266003
2 国家海洋局第三海洋研究所海洋生物与生态实验室, 福建厦门 361005
3 浙江海洋大学水产学院, 浙江舟山 316000
4 集美大学水产学院, 福建厦门 361021

收稿日期:2016-03-22 接受日期:2016-05-13 出版日期:2016-08-20 发布日期:2016-09-02
通讯作者: 高天翔
基金资助:
公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303048)、全球变化与海气相互作用专项(GASI-02-SCS-YSWspr, GASI-02-SCS-YSWaut)和国家海洋局海洋国际合作及履约项目(2200207)

Species identification and phylogenetic relationship of Thryssa species in the coastal waters of China

Jing Zhang^1,⁴, Yuan Li², Na Song¹, Longshan Lin², Tianxiang Gao^3,^*()

1 Fisheries College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, Shandong 266003
2 Laboratory of Marine Biology and Ecology, Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Xiamen, Fujian 361005
3 School of Fishery, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan, Zhejiang 316000
4 Fisheries College, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian 361021

Received:2016-03-22 Accepted:2016-05-13 Online:2016-08-20 Published:2016-09-02
Contact: Gao Tianxiang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用DNA条形码技术对中国沿海分布的6种棱鳀属(Thryssa)鱼类样品进行了物种鉴定, 并每种取5尾用于探讨该属系统发育关系。结果显示: 棱鳀属鱼类的主要形态鉴别特征为上颌骨伸达位置和第一鳃耙的下鳃耙数量。在525 bp的目的片段上有175个变异位点, 其中简约信息位点172个, 单一信息位点3个, 无插入缺失现象, 转换数为182, 颠换数为57。A+T含量明显高于G+C含量, 并且表现出明显的反G偏倚。结合GenBank中相关的同源序列进行比较发现, 所有序列明显分为10个组群, 表明已提交的棱鳀属鱼类COI基因序列中仍存在一定的问题。从各组群间的遗传距离和氨基酸遗传差异水平可以看出, 10个组群应为不同的有效种, 但是否存在隐存种还有待于进一步确定。从NJ树上可以看出, 长颌棱鳀(T. setirostris)是最先分化出的物种, 保持着最原始的特征, 而中颌棱鳀(T. mystax)与黄吻棱鳀(T. vitrirostris)聚类到一起, 二者间存在共享单倍型。棱鳀属鱼类最早分化于中新世早期。在今后的研究中仍需要结合更多的分子标记对中颌棱鳀和黄吻棱鳀的分类地位作进一步的探讨。

关键词: 棱鳀属, 系统发育关系, DNA条形码, 遗传距离, 形态学

Abstract

Six Thryssa species were collected from Chinese coastal waters for morphological description and phylogenetic relationships analysis. Results indicated that the position of maxillary extend and number of lower gill rake in the first gill rake were the main morphological characteristics for the identification of six Thryssa species. Mitochondrial COI gene fragments were amplified and sequenced for thirty individuals of Thryssa species. A 525 bp sequence was obtained, containing 175 variable sites, which determines 172 parsimony informative sites, 3 singleton sites, no indels/deletions, 182 transitions, and 57 transversions. An obvious anti-G biasness was noted from the base composition of A and T higher than that of G and C. Comparing homologous sequences from GenBank with our study validates that there are variations among Thryssa species based on the COI sequence. Moreover ten absolute groups were also identified in all sequences based on genetic differences in amino acids and genetic distances between groups. However, this requires further investigation to determine whether there are uncovered cryptic species. The NJ tree indicated that T. setirostris was the first species derived from the genus, and sequences of T. mystax were disorderly clustered with that of T. vitrirostris. The divergence date of Thryssa species presented here is early Miocene. It is suggested that more molecular markers be needed to clarify variations in T. mystax and T. vitrirostris in the future.

Key words: Thryssa, phylogenetic relationship, DNA barcoding, genetic distance, morphology

张静, 李渊, 宋娜, 林龙山, 高天翔 (2016) 我国沿海棱鳀属鱼类的物种鉴定与系统发育. 生物多样性, 24, 888-895. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016079.

Jing Zhang, Yuan Li, Na Song, Longshan Lin, Tianxiang Gao (2016) Species identification and phylogenetic relationship of Thryssa species in the coastal waters of China. Biodiversity Science, 24, 888-895. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016079.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2016079

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2016/V24/I8/888

图/表 6

参考文献 26

[1]	Bermingham E, McCafferty SS, Martin AP (1997) Fish biogeography and molecular clocks: perspectives from the Panamanian Isthmus. In: Molecular Systematics of Fishes (eds Kocher TD, Stepier CA), pp. 113-126. Academic Press, San Diego.
[2]	Bloom DD, Lovejoy NR (2012) Molecular phylogenetics reveals a pattern of biome conservatism in New World anchovies (family Engraulidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25, 701-715.
[3]	Chen WT, Ma XH, Shen YJ, Mao YT, He SP (2015) The fish diversity in the upper reaches of the Salween River, Nujiang River, revealed by DNA barcoding. Scientific Reports, Doi: 10.1038/srep17437.
[4]	Gao TX, Ji DP, Xiao YS, Xue TQ, Yanagimoto T, Setoguma T (2011) Description and DNA barcoding of a new Sillago species, Sillago sinica (Perciformes: Sillaginidae), from coastal waters of China. Zoological Studies, 50, 254-263.
[5]	Guo XW, Tang QS (2000) Consumption and ecological conversion efficiency of Thrissa kammalensis. Journal of Fisheries of China, 24, 422-427. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郭学武, 唐启升 (2000) 赤鼻棱鳀的摄食与生态转换效率. 水产学报, 24, 422-427.]
[6]	Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270, 313-321.
[7]	Hyde JR, Vetter RD (2007) The origin, evolution, and diversification of rockfishes of the genus Sebastes (Cuvier). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 44, 790-811.
[8]	Jia XP, Li YZ, Li CH, Qiu YS, Gan JL (2004) Environment and Fishery Resources in the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf of South China Sea, pp. 339-542. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[贾晓平, 李永振, 李纯厚, 邱永松, 甘居利 (2004) 南海专属经济区和大陆架渔业生态环境与渔业资源, 339-542. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[9]	Ko HL, Wang YT, Chiu TS, Lee MA, Leu MY, Chang KZ, Chen WY, Shao KT (2012) Evaluating the accuracy of morphological identification of larval fishes by applying DNA barcoding. PLoS ONE, 8, e53451.
[10]	Krück NC, Tibbetts IR, Ward RD, Johnson JW, Loh WKW, Ovenden JR (2013) Multi-gene barcoding to discriminate sibling species within a morphologically difficult fish genus (Sillago). Fisheries Research, 143, 39-46.
[11]	Lavoué S, Miya M, Nishida M (2010) Mitochondrial phylogenomics of anchovies (family Engraulidae) and recurrent origins of pronounced miniaturization in the order Clupeiformes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 56, 480-485.
[12]	Li ZY, Jin XS, Zhuang ZM, Su YQ, Tang QS (2007) Food competition of Engraulis japonicus and Thryssa kammalensis from the southern Yellow Sea in spring. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 14, 630-636. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李忠义, 金显仕, 庄志猛, 苏永全, 唐启升 (2007) 南黄海春季鳀和赤鼻棱鳀的食物竞争. 中国水产科学, 14, 630-636.]
[13]	Li Y, Song N, Khan FS, Yanagimoto T, Gao TX (2013) New evidence of morphological characters and DNA barcoding of Pampus argenteus (Euphrasen, 1788). Journal of Fisheries of China, 37, 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李渊, 宋娜, Khan FS, 柳本卓, 高天翔 (2013) 银鲳形态特征与DNA条形码研究. 水产学报, 37, 1-9.]
[14]	Li Y, Zhang LY, Song PQ, Zhong ZH, Zhang R, Gao TX, Lin LS (2014) A new record of Sillago species in Fujian coastal waters—Sillago sinica (Gao and Xue, 2011). Journal of Applied Oceanography, 33, 546-552. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李渊, 张丽艳, 宋普庆, 钟指挥, 张然, 高天翔, 林龙山 (2014) 福建省沿海鱚属(Sillago)鱼类新记录种——中国鱚(Sillago sinica Gao and Xue, 2011). 应用海洋学学报, 33, 546-552.]
[15]	Ma CY, Ma LB, Ni Y, Shen AL, Zhang Y, Zhang FY, Zhao YL (2010) Phylogenetic relationship of Thryssa inferred from morphologic characteristic and mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene sequences. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 17, 471-476. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[马春艳, 马凌波, 倪勇, 沈盎绿, 张永, 张凤英, 赵云龙 (2010) 基于形态特征和线粒体16S rRNA基因序列探讨棱鳀属的系统进化. 中国水产科学, 17, 471-476.]
[16]	Shen YJ, Guan LH, Wang DQ, Gan XN (2016a) DNA barcoding and evaluation of genetic diversity in Cyprinidae fish in the midstream of the Yangtze River. Ecology and Evolution, Doi:10.1002/ece3.2060.
[17]	Shen YJ, Kang JL, Chen WT, He SP (2016b) DNA barcoding for the identification of common economic aquatic products in Central China and its application for the supervision of the market trade. Food Control, 61, 79-91.
[18]	Summerer M, Hanel R, Sturmbauer C (2001) Mitochondrial phylogeny and biogeographic affinities of sea breams of the genus Diplodus (Sparidae). Journal of Fish Biology, 59, 1638-1652.
[19]	Sun DR, Chen Z (2013) Fish Retrieval of South China Sea (Volume I), pp. 120-123. China Ocean Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[孙典荣, 陈铮 (2013) 南海鱼类检索 (上册), 120-123. 海洋出版社, 北京.]
[20]	Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN (2005) DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360, 1847-1857.
[21]	Whitehead PJP, Nelson GJ, Wongratana F (1988) FAO Species Catalogue, Vol. 7: Clupeoid Fishes of the World (suborder Clupeoidei): an Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of the Herrings, Sardines, Pilchards, Sprats, Shads, Anchovies and Wolf-herrings (Part 2): Enggraulidae, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 305-579.
[22]	Zhang H, Zhang Y, Zhang ZH, Gao TX (2013) DNA barcodes of eight species in genus Sebastes. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 48, 45-50.
[23]	Zhang JB, Hanner R (2012) Molecular approach to the identification of fish in the South China Sea. PLoS ONE, 7, e30621.
[24]	Zhang SY (2001) Fauna Sinica: Osteichthyes, Acipenseriformes, Elopiforms, Clupeiformes, Gonorhynchiformes, pp. 137-147. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[张世义 (2001) 中国动物志∙硬骨鱼纲: 鲟形目、海鲢目、鲱形目、鼠鱚目, 137-147. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[25]	Zhou MY, Chen X, Yang SY (2015) Identification of several fish eggs and larvae by DNA barcoding in Xiamen Water. Marine Environmental Science, 34, 120-125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[周美玉, 陈骁, 杨圣云 (2015) 采用DNA条形码技术对厦门海域鱼卵、仔稚鱼种类的鉴定. 海洋环境科学, 34, 120-125.]
[26]	Zhu YD. Wu HL, Jin XB, Meng QW, Liu J, Lian ZS, Shen GY, Huang ST, Chen HX, Zhang QY, Li WD, Wu XH (1984) Fish of Fujian (Vol. I), pp. 140-153. Fujian Science and Technology Publishing House, Fuzhou. (in Chinese)
	[朱元鼎, 伍汉霖, 金鑫波, 孟庆闻, 刘基, 连珍水, 沈根媛, 黄少涛, 陈焕新, 张其永, 李婉端, 吴秀鸿 (1984) 福建鱼类志 (上卷), 140-153. 福建科学技术出版社, 福州.]

种名 Species	本研究 This study			引用序列号 Accession no.
种名 Species	地点 Sampling sites	采样时间 Sampling time	编号 Number	引用序列号 Accession no.
赤鼻棱鳀 T. kammalensis	福建省晋江市 Jinjiang, Fujian	2014.3	CB1-CB5	EF607590-607596, JN813096, JQ738607-738609, KF951618, KP260469, KP260453
中颌棱鳀 T. mystax	山东省东营市 Dongying, Shandong	2009.10	ZH1-ZH5	———
杜氏棱鳀 T. dussumieri	福建省漳州市 Zhangzhou, Fujian	2013.5	DS1-DS5	JX983287-983289
长颌棱鳀 T. setirostris	福建省泉州市 Quanzhou, Fujian	2013.5	CH1-CH5	EF607597-607599, EU541324, JF494684-494688
汉氏棱鳀 T. hamiltonii	福建省晋江市 Jinjiang, Fujian	2013.11	HS1-HS5	EF607588, EF607589, JQ681498, EU148567-148570
黄吻棱鳀 T. vitrirostris	广东省江门市 Jiangmen, Guangdong	2013.3	HW1-HW5	JF494689-494693

种名 Species	本研究 This study			引用序列号 Accession no.
种名 Species	地点 Sampling sites	采样时间 Sampling time	编号 Number	引用序列号 Accession no.
赤鼻棱鳀 T. kammalensis	福建省晋江市 Jinjiang, Fujian	2014.3	CB1-CB5	EF607590-607596, JN813096, JQ738607-738609, KF951618, KP260469, KP260453
中颌棱鳀 T. mystax	山东省东营市 Dongying, Shandong	2009.10	ZH1-ZH5	———
杜氏棱鳀 T. dussumieri	福建省漳州市 Zhangzhou, Fujian	2013.5	DS1-DS5	JX983287-983289
长颌棱鳀 T. setirostris	福建省泉州市 Quanzhou, Fujian	2013.5	CH1-CH5	EF607597-607599, EU541324, JF494684-494688
汉氏棱鳀 T. hamiltonii	福建省晋江市 Jinjiang, Fujian	2013.11	HS1-HS5	EF607588, EF607589, JQ681498, EU148567-148570
黄吻棱鳀 T. vitrirostris	广东省江门市 Jiangmen, Guangdong	2013.3	HW1-HW5	JF494689-494693

种类 Species	碱基组成 Nucleotide composition (%)				单倍型数量 Number of haplotypes
种类 Species	T(U)	C	A	G	单倍型数量 Number of haplotypes
赤鼻棱鳀 T. kammalensis	31.6	25.3	25.5	17.5	1
中颌棱鳀 T. mystax	30.3	26.1	26.1	17.5	2
杜氏棱鳀 T. dussumieri	28.4	26.2	26.6	18.8	2
长颌棱鳀 T. setirostris	28.8	27.1	25.3	18.9	2
汉氏棱鳀 T. hamiltonii	30.3	25.1	25.0	19.6	2
黄吻棱鳀 T. vitrirostris	30.3	26.1	26.1	17.5	3
平均 Average	29.9	26.1	25.5	18.5	-

种类 Species	碱基组成 Nucleotide composition (%)				单倍型数量 Number of haplotypes
种类 Species	T(U)	C	A	G	单倍型数量 Number of haplotypes
赤鼻棱鳀 T. kammalensis	31.6	25.3	25.5	17.5	1
中颌棱鳀 T. mystax	30.3	26.1	26.1	17.5	2
杜氏棱鳀 T. dussumieri	28.4	26.2	26.6	18.8	2
长颌棱鳀 T. setirostris	28.8	27.1	25.3	18.9	2
汉氏棱鳀 T. hamiltonii	30.3	25.1	25.0	19.6	2
黄吻棱鳀 T. vitrirostris	30.3	26.1	26.1	17.5	3
平均 Average	29.9	26.1	25.5	18.5	-

	组群1 Group 1	组群2 Group 2	组群3 Group 3	组群4 Group 4	组群5 Group 5	组群6 Group 6	组群7 Group 7	组群8 Group 8	组群9 Group 9	组群10 Group 10
组群1 Group 1	0.001	2.83	2.75	13.58	15.75	15.25	15.33	15.08	13.92	14.50
组群2 Group 2	0.034	0.001	4.00	14.42	15.17	14.00	14.42	15.00	15.33	15.83
组群3 Group 3	0.033	0.048	-	13.58	14.50	14.92	16.75	16.17	14.83	15.50
组群4 Group 4	0.163	0.173	0.163	0.004	15.50	16.08	17.33	14.75	16.25	16.33
组群5 Group 5	0.189	0.182	0.174	0.186	0.002	16.83	17.83	15.83	15.42	17.00
组群6 Group 6	0.183	0.168	0.179	0.193	0.202	0.001	12.25	15.50	15.50	16.33
组群7 Group 7	0.184	0.173	0.201	0.208	0.214	0.147	0.003	14.25	15.92	16.17
组群8 Group 8	0.181	0.180	0.194	0.177	0.190	0.186	0.171	0.003	17.42	16.08
组群9 Group 9	0.167	0.184	0.178	0.195	0.185	0.186	0.191	0.209	-	13.67
组群10 Group 10	0.174	0.190	0.186	0.196	0.204	0.196	0.194	0.193	0.164	0.001

我国沿海棱鳀属鱼类的物种鉴定与系统发育

Species identification and phylogenetic relationship of Thryssa species in the coastal waters of China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	罗小燕, 李强, 黄晓磊. 戴云山国家级自然保护区访花昆虫DNA条形码数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23236-.
[2]	邢超, 林依, 周智强, 赵联军, 蒋仕伟, 林蓁蓁, 徐基良, 詹祥江. 基于DNA条形码技术构建王朗国家级自然保护区陆生脊椎动物遗传资源数据库及物种鉴定[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22661-.
[3]	吴帆, 刘深云, 江虎强, 王茜, 陈开威, 李红亮. 中华蜜蜂和意大利蜜蜂秋冬期传粉植物多样性比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22528-.
[4]	孙翌昕, 李英滨, 李玉辉, 李冰, 杜晓芳, 李琪. 高通量测序技术在线虫多样性研究中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 22266-.
[5]	佟一杰, 张萌娜, 万霞, 杨星科, 白明. 全球锹甲的几何形态学数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(9): 1159-1164.
[6]	俞正森, 宋娜, 本村浩之, 高天翔. 中国银口天竺鲷属鱼类的分类厘定[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 971-979.
[7]	王楠, 黄菁华, 霍娜, 杨盼盼, 张欣玥, 赵世伟. 宁南山区不同植被恢复方式下土壤线虫群落特征:形态学鉴定与高通量测序法比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(11): 1513-1529.
[8]	王伟, 刘阳. 植物生命之树重建的现状、问题和对策建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(2): 176-188.
[9]	胡芮, 王儒晓, 杜诗雨, 李萌, 邢雨辉, 潘达, 徐海根, 孙红英. 扬州宝应湖底栖大型无脊椎动物的生物多样性及其变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(12): 1558-1569.
[10]	邵昕宁, 宋大昭, 黄巧雯, 李晟, 姚蒙. 基于粪便DNA及宏条形码技术的食肉动物快速调查及食性分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(5): 543-556.
[11]	刘山林. DNA条形码参考数据集构建和序列分析相关的新兴技术[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(5): 526-533.
[12]	陈作艺, 许晓静, 朱素英, 翟梦怡, 李扬. 中国沿海洛氏角毛藻复合群的多样性组成及地理分布[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(2): 149-158.
[13]	侯勤曦, 慈秀芹, 刘志芳, 徐武美, 李捷. 基于DNA条形码评估西双版纳国家级自然保护区对樟科植物进化历史的保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(3): 217-228.
[14]	刘青青, 董志军. 基于线粒体COI基因分析钩手水母的群体遗传结构[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(11): 1204-1211.
[15]	张雪, 王玉蕊, 樊阳波, 罗晓甜, 胡晓钟, 高凤. 小腔游仆虫形态学、个体发育与分子系统学研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(5): 549-560.