暖温带-北亚热带过渡带落叶阔叶林群落不同径级系统发育结构的变化

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14116

生物多样性 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 574-582. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14116 cstr: 32101.14.SP.J.1003.2014.14116

暖温带-北亚热带过渡带落叶阔叶林群落不同径级系统发育结构的变化

任思远¹, 王婷^1,^*(), 祝燕², 叶永忠¹, 李聪³, 潘娜¹, 叶永忠¹

1 河南农业大学, 郑州 450002
2 中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093
3 河南省新郑市气象局, 河南新郑 451100

收稿日期:2014-06-06 接受日期:2014-09-28 出版日期:2014-09-20 发布日期:2014-10-09
通讯作者: 王婷
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31270493)和中科院植物所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室2012年开放课题(LVEC-2012kf06)

Phylogenetic structure of individuals with different DBH sizes in a deciduous broad-leaved forest community in the temperate-subtropical ecological transition zone, China

Siyuan Ren¹, Ting Wang^1,^*(), Yan Zhu², Yongzhong Ye¹, Zhiliang Yuan¹, Cong Li³, Na Pan¹, Luxin Li¹

1 Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002
2 State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093
3 Xinzheng Meteorological Bureau, Xinzheng, Henan 451100

Received:2014-06-06 Accepted:2014-09-28 Online:2014-09-20 Published:2014-10-09
Contact: Wang Ting

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

群落的系统发育结构能够有效地反映各种生态过程对群落组成的影响, 通过研究群落系统发育结构能推断出其形成的生态过程, 对于揭示群落动态具有重要意义。作者将宝天曼1 ha落叶阔叶林样地分为10 m×10 m、20 m×20 m、25 m×25 m三个尺度的样方, 将样地内乔木个体划分为小径级(1 cm ≤ DBH<5 cm)、中径级 (5 cm ≤ DBH<10 cm)、大径级(DBH ≥ 10 cm)三个径级, 通过比较各个阶段系统发育结构的变化, 来分析其群落系统发育结构的生态过程。不同零模型的比较发现, 宝天曼落叶阔叶林群落的净系统发育亲缘关系指数(net relatedness index, NRI)和最近种间亲缘关系指数(net nearest taxa index, NTI)值都随着研究尺度和径级的增加而降低, 表明该群落在不同时空尺度上都表现出群落系统发育结构发散, 而且系统发育密度制约对大径级个体的系统发育结构的影响大于小径级个体。上述结果说明密度制约是地处暖温带-亚热带过渡带的宝天曼落叶阔叶林群落物种多样性维持的重要机制。

关键词: 落叶阔叶林, 群落系统发育结构, 密度制约, 空间尺度, 径级

Abstract

Phylogenetic structure of a community could effectively reflect underlying ecological processes of a community. Understanding phylogenetic structure of a community will help reveal the ecological processes associated with community dynamics. Data in a 1-ha plot were divided into quadrats at three spatial scales (10 m×10 m, 20 m×20 m, and 25 m×25 m) and three DBH sizes (1 cm ≤ DBH<5 cm, 5 cm ≤ DBH<10 cm, DBH ≥ 10 cm) to compare phylogenetic structures and to infer ecological processes of the community in a deciduous broad-leaved forest in the Baotianman National Nature Reserve. It was shown that NRI (net relatedness index) and NTI (net nearest taxa index) decreased with increasing spatial scales and DBH sizes. These results indicated that, phylogenetic structure of this community were overdispersed at different spatial scales and DBH sizes; and phylogenetic density dependence exerted higher effect on lager DBH classes than smaller ones. Our results suggested that phylogenetic density dependence is an important mechanism in regulating species diversity and shaping community structure of the deciduous broad-leaved forest in the temperate-subtropical ecological transition zone of China.

Key words: deciduous broad-leaved forest, phylogenetic structure, density dependence, spatial scale, DBH sizes

任思远, 王婷, 祝燕, 叶永忠, 李聪, 潘娜, 叶永忠 (2014) 暖温带-北亚热带过渡带落叶阔叶林群落不同径级系统发育结构的变化. 生物多样性, 22, 574-582. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14116.

Siyuan Ren, Ting Wang, Yan Zhu, Yongzhong Ye, Zhiliang Yuan, Cong Li, Na Pan, Luxin Li (2014) Phylogenetic structure of individuals with different DBH sizes in a deciduous broad-leaved forest community in the temperate-subtropical ecological transition zone, China. Biodiversity Science, 22, 574-582. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14116.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14116

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2014/V22/I5/574

图/表 6

图1 宝天曼落叶阔叶林1 ha森林样地58种木本植物的系统发育关系

Fig. 1 Hypothesized phylogenetic relationship among 58 woody species of the deciduous broad-leaved forest in Baotianman National Nature Reserve

表1 宝天曼落叶阔叶林不同零模型和不同尺度下平均成对分类系统发育距离(MPD)和净相关指数(NRI)

Table 1 Mean pairwise phylogenetic distance (MPD) and net relatedness index (NRI) with different null models and different spatial scales in a 1-ha deciduous broad-leaved forest plot in Baotianman National Nature Reserve

尺度 Scale	MPD平均随机值 Mean MPD randomization	MPD平均实际测量值 Mean MPD analysis	标准差 SD	净相关指数 NRI	零模型 Null model
10 m×10 m	178.13	262.55	43.57	-1.97	约束型 Constrained
10 m×10 m	263.58	262.55	84.12	0.03	非约束型 Unconstrained
20 m×20 m	196.36	288.74	41.59	-2.20	约束型 Constrained
20 m×20 m	286.36	288.74	71.55	-0.01	非约束型 Unconstrained
25 m×25 m	201.98	297.13	40.38	-2.27	约束型 Constrained
25 m×25 m	293.39	297.13	68.11	-0.04	非约束型 Unconstrained

表2 宝天曼落叶阔叶林不同零模型和不同尺度下平均最近系统发育距离(MNND)和最近邻体指数(NTI)

Table 2 Mean nearest neighbor phylogenetic distance (MNND) and nearest taxon index (NTI) with different null models and different spatial scales in a 1-ha deciduous broad-leaved forest plot in Baotianman National Nature Reserve

尺度 Scale	MNND平均随机值 Mean MNND randomization	MNND平均实际测量值 Mean MNND analysis	标准差 SD	最近邻体指数 NTI	零模型 Null model
10 m×10 m	172.63	238.72	55.80	-1.110	约束型 Constrained
10 m×10 m	231.88	238.72	89.65	0.007	非约束型 Unconstrained
20 m×20 m	141.09	199.81	49.40	-1.170	约束型 Constrained
20 m×20 m	188.50	199.81	74.82	-0.024	非约束型 Unconstrained
25 m×25 m	133.57	189.81	47.05	-1.180	约束型 Constrained
25 m×25 m	179.78	189.81	69.60	-0.034	非约束型 Unconstrained

图2 不同尺度下不同零模型的宝天曼森林净相关指数(NRI)和平均最近邻体指数(NTI)。A1, A2, A3, a1, a2, a3为约束型零模型, B1, B2, B3, b1, b2, b3为非约束型零模型。

Fig. 2 Net relatedness index (NRI) and nearest taxon index (NTI) with different null models and different spatial scales in a 1-ha deciduous broad-leaved forest plot in Baotianman National Nature Reserve. A1, A2, A3, a1, a2, a3 for unconstrained null models, and B1, B2, B3, b1, b2, b3 for constrained null models.

表3 宝天曼落叶阔叶林群落系统发育结构指数与径级和尺度的关系

Table 3 The relationship of phylogenetic structure and DBH sizes and sample sizes in a 1-ha deciduous broad-leaved forest plot in Baotianman National Nature Reserve

尺度 Scale (m)	模型 Model	χ²	df	P
10 m×10 m	NRI vs. DBH	30.19	2	<0.0010
10 m×10 m	NTI vs. DBH	34.50	2	<0.0010
20 m×20 m	NRI vs. DBH	3.92	2	0.1409
20 m×20 m	NTI vs. DBH	14.78	2	0.0006
25 m×25 m	NRI vs. DBH	7.15	2	0.0280
25 m×25 m	NTI vs. DBH	12.64	2	0.0020
径级 DBH class
A (1 cm≤DBH< 5 cm)	NRI vs. scale	0.93	2	0.6384
A (1 cm≤DBH< 5 cm)	NTI vs. scale	6.51	2	0.0386
B (5 cm≤DBH<10 cm)	NRI vs. scale	3.69	2	0.1574
B (5 cm≤DBH<10 cm)	NTI vs. scale	0.81	2	0.6671
C (DBH≥10 cm)	NRI vs. scale	5.85	2	0.0538
C (DBH≥10 cm)	NTI vs. scale	2.61	2	0.2712

图3 宝天曼落叶阔叶林群落不同径级和不同尺度NRI(a)及NTI(b)的变化。横轴中A: 小径级1 cm ≤ DBH < 5 cm; B: 中径级5 cm ≤ DBH <10 cm; C: 大径级DBH ≥ 10 cm。

Fig. 3 Dynamics of NRI(a) and NTI(b) with different DBH sizes and different spatial scales (10 m×10 m, 20 m×20 m, 25 m×25 m) in a 1-ha deciduous broad-leaved forest plot in Baotianman National Nature Reserve.A, Small DBH class (1cm ≤ DBH < 5 cm); B, Middle DBH class (5 cm≤ DBH < 10 cm); C, Large DBH class (DBH≥10 cm).

参考文献 38

[1]	.APG III (2009) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 161, 105-121.
[2]	.Bin Y, Wang ZG, Wang ZM, Ye WH, Cao HL, Lian JY (2010) The effects of dispersal limitation and topographic heterogeneity on beta diversity and phylobetadiversity in a subtropical forest. Plant Ecology, 209, 237-256.
[3]	.Cavender-Bares J, Keen A, Miles B (2006) Phylogenetic structure of floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology, 87, S109-S122.
[4]	.Chesson PL (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 31, 343-366.
[5]	.Condit R (1995) Research in large, long-term tropical forest plots. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 18-22.
[6]	.Connell JH (1971) On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. In: Dynamics of Populations (eds Boer PJD, Gradwell GR), pp. 298-312. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.
[7]	.Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 61, 1-10.
[8]	.Faith DP (1994) Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 345, 45-58.
[9]	.Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL (2003) Swap algorithms in null model analysis. Ecology, 84, 532-535.
[10]	.Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews, 52, 107-145.
[11]	.Hubbell SP, Ahumada JA, Condit R, Foster RB (2001) Local neighborhood effects on long-term survival of individual trees in a Neotropical forest. Ecological Research, 16, 859-875.
[12]	.Jansen PA, Visser MD, Wright SJ, Rutten G, Muller-Landau HC (2014) Negative density dependence of seed dispersal and seedling recruitment in a Neotropical palm. Ecology Letters, 17,1111-1120.
[13]	.Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. The American Naturalist, 104, 501-528.
[14]	.Kembel SW (2009) Disentangling niche and neutral influences on community assembly: assessing the performance of community phylogenetic structure tests. Ecology Letters, 12, 949-960.
[15]	.Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics, 26, 1463-1464.
[16]	.Kembel SW, Hubbell SP (2006) The phylogenetic structure of a neotropical forest tree community. Ecology, 87, S86-S99.
[17]	.Kraft NJB, Cornwell WK, Webb CO (2007) Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. The American Naturalist, 170, 271-283.
[18]	.Liu XB, Liang M, Etienne RS, Wang Y, Staehelin C, Yu SX (2012) Experimental evidence for a phylogenetic Janzen-Connell effect in a subtropical forest. Ecology Letters, 15, 111-118.
[19]	.Losos JB (1996) Phylogenetic perspectives on community ecology. Ecology, 77, 1344-1354.
[20]	.Niu HY (牛红玉), Wang ZF (王峥峰), Lian JY (练琚愉), Ye WH (叶万辉), Shen H (沈浩) (2011) New progress in community assembly: community phylogenetic structure combining evolution and ecology. Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 19, 275-283. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	.Ricklefs RE (2004) A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 7, 1-15.
[22]	.Ricklefs RE (1987) Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science, 235, 167-171.
[23]	.Song CS (宋朝枢) (1999) Scientific Investigation in the Baotianman Nature Reserve (宝天曼自然保护区科学考察集). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[24]	.Stevens PF (2007) Angiosperm Phylogeny Website, version 8. .(accessed in October 2013
[25]	.Swenson NG, Enquist BJ, Pither J, Thompson J, Zimmerman JK (2006) The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. Ecology, 87, 2418-2424.
[26]	.Swenson NG, Enquist BJ, Thompson J, Zimmerman JK (2007) The influence of spatial and size scale on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities. Ecology, 88, 1770-1780.
[27]	.Taylor DR, Aarssen LW, Loehle C (1990) On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat templet for plant life history strategies. Oikos, 58, 239-250.
[28]	.Tilman D (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 296pp.
[29]	.Wang T (王婷), Ren SY (任思远), Yuan ZL (袁志良), Zhu Y (祝燕), Pan N (潘娜), Li LX (李鹿鑫), Ye YZ (叶永忠) (2014) Effects of density dependence on the spatial patterns of Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata trees in deciduous broad-leaved forest in the Baotianman Nature Reserve, central China. Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 22, 449-457. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	.Webb CO (2000) Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. The American Naturalist, 156, 145-155.
[31]	.Webb CO, Ackerly DD, Kembel SW (2008) Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics, 24, 2098-2100.
[32]	.Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 475-505.
[33]	.Webb CO, Donoghue MJ (2005) Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 181-183.
[34]	.Webb CO, Gilbert GS, Donoghue MJ (2006) Phylodiversity-dependent seedling mortality, size structure, and disease in a Bornean rain forest. Ecology, 87, S123-S131.
[35]	.Webb CO, Pitman NC (2002) Phylogenetic balance and ecological evenness. Systematic Biology, 51, 898-907.
[36]	.Wikström N, Savolainen V, Chase MW (2001) Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,Series B: Biological Sciences, 268, 2211-2220.
[37]	.Wright JS (2002) Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia, 130, 1-14.
[38]	.Yuan ZL (袁志良), Chen Y (陈云), Wei BL (韦博良), Zhang BQ (张斌强), Wang DY (汪东亚), Ye YZ (叶永忠) (2013) Species habitat correlation analysis in temperate-subtropical ecological transition zone. Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 33, 7819-7826. (in Chinese with English abstract)

暖温带-北亚热带过渡带落叶阔叶林群落不同径级系统发育结构的变化

Phylogenetic structure of individuals with different DBH sizes in a deciduous broad-leaved forest community in the temperate-subtropical ecological transition zone, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 38

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐智超, 朱美慧, 毛子昆, 王绪高. 氮添加对东北温带阔叶红松林幼苗动态的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(12): 24255-.
[2]	杨向林, 赵彩云, 李俊生, 种方方, 李文金. 植物入侵导致群落谱系结构更加聚集: 以广西国家级自然保护区草本植物为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(11): 24175-.
[3]	刘向, 刘木, 肖瑶. 叶片病原真菌对植物物种共存的影响: 进展与挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22525-.
[4]	刘文聪, 田希, 杨涛, 饶杰生, 王晓凤, 钱恒君, 涂梦灵, 单子铭, 欧晓昆, 沈泽昊. 云南鸡足山半湿润常绿阔叶林优势树种的种群结构与更新特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23251-.
[5]	杨华林, 程跃红, 周天祥, 冯茜, 胡强, 张贵权, 杨建, 张晋东, 王彬, 周材权. 四川卧龙国家级自然保护区多空间尺度下绿尾虹雉的生境选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 21535-.
[6]	鲁梦珍, 曾馥平, 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 张浩, 苏樑, 刘坤平, 谭卫宁, 杜虎. 喀斯特常绿落叶阔叶林死亡个体空间分布格局及生境关联[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(4): 21340-.
[7]	李帆, 王党军, 林小元, 纪康, 叶露萍, 黄超, 郑勇, Zhun Mao, 左娟. 八大公山亚热带森林木质残体中大型无脊椎动物群落特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 21476-.
[8]	戴冬, 邢华, 杨佳绒, 刘雅静, 蔡焕满, 刘宇. 植物群落稀有种维持机制与土壤反馈的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(12): 1687-1699.
[9]	梁栋栋, 彭杰, 高改利, 洪欣, 周守标, 储俊, 王智. 鹞落坪落叶阔叶林蔷薇科主要树种的空间分布格局及种间关联性[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(8): 1008-1017.
[10]	李远智, 肖俊丽, 刘翰伦, 王酉石, 储诚进. 生物间高阶相互作用研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(11): 1333-1344.
[11]	谢峰淋, 周全, 史航, 舒枭, 张克荣, 李涛, 冯水园, 张全发, 党海山. 秦岭落叶阔叶林25 ha森林动态监测样地物种组成与群落特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(4): 439-448.
[12]	庄鸿飞, 张殷波, 王伟, 任月恒, 刘方正, 杜金鸿, 周越. 基于最大熵模型的不同尺度物种分布概率优化热点分析: 以红色木莲为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(9): 931-940.
[13]	王世彤, 吴浩, 刘梦婷, 张佳鑫, 刘检明, 孟红杰, 徐耀粘, 乔秀娟, 魏新增, 卢志军, 江明喜. 极小种群野生植物黄梅秤锤树群落结构与动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(7): 749-759.
[14]	高梅香, 林琳, 常亮, 孙新, 刘冬, 吴东辉. 土壤动物群落空间格局和构建机制研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(10): 1034-1050.
[15]	陈龙, 秦帅, 旭日, 杨柳, 赵利清. 阴山山脉天然侧柏林的基本特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(1): 66-74.