宁夏黄土丘陵区不同生态恢复生境地表甲虫多样性

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13212

生物多样性 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 516-524. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13212

宁夏黄土丘陵区不同生态恢复生境地表甲虫多样性

杭佳¹, 石云^1,², 刘文惠¹, 贺达汉^1,^3,,A;^*()

1 .宁夏大学农学院, 银川 750021
2 .宁夏大学资源与环境学院, 银川 750021
3 .宁夏大学西北退化生态系统恢复与重建国家重点实验室培育基地, 银川 750021

收稿日期:2013-09-30 接受日期:2014-01-14 出版日期:2014-07-20 发布日期:2014-07-24
通讯作者: 贺达汉
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41161081)和教育部高校学校博士学科点科研专项基金(20126401110003)

Diversity of ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera) in restored habitats in the hill and gully area of Loess Plateau, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

Jia Hang¹, Yun Shi^1,², Wenhui Liu¹, Dahan He^1,^3,^*()

1. Agricultural College, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021
2 .College of Resources and Environment, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021
3 .State Key Laboratory for Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystem in North-western China, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021

Received:2013-09-30 Accepted:2014-01-14 Online:2014-07-20 Published:2014-07-24
Contact: He Dahan

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了解宁夏黄土丘陵区不同生境地表甲虫群落多样性变化规律及与环境因子的关系, 并探讨不同生态恢复措施对维持地表甲虫群落多样性的影响, 2013年7-8月, 作者利用陷阱法调查了该区6种生境内的地表甲虫群落多样性。结果表明: 灌草混交林地、乔灌混交林地、生态薪炭林地中地表甲虫物种丰富度和个体数量均较高, 天然封育草地、生态经济林地和水平农田中物种丰富度较低, 生态经济林地和水平农田中甲虫个体数量显著高于天然封育草地。不同生境间, 灌草混交林地、乔灌混交林地与生态薪炭林地之间、生态经济林地与水平农田之间甲虫群落组成相似性较高。多元回归分析表明, 草本层生物量、灌木层盖度及土壤含水量是影响甲虫物种丰富度的决定因素, 林冠层盖度和枯落物厚度是决定地表甲虫个体数量的重要因素。CCA分析表明, 枯落物盖度、枯落物厚度、林冠层盖度及草本层盖度是影响地表甲虫群落组成的重要环境因子。研究表明, 灌草混交林地为地表甲虫群落多样性维持较好的生境类型, 是宁夏黄土丘陵区典型生态恢复的最优模式。

关键词: 灌草混交林地, 地表甲虫, 生态恢复, 物种多样性, 典范对应分析

Abstract

The aim of this study was to probe into changes in diversity of ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera) and their relation to environmental variables within restored habitats in the hill and gully area of Loess Plateau, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. An investigation of ground-dwelling beetle communities was carried out using pitfall traps in six habitats including shrub/grassland, tree/shrub mix, fuel-wood forest, naturally restored grassland, plantation forest, and level terraced field in July and August, 2013. We found that species richness and abundance of individual ground-dwelling beetles was higher (P<0.05) in the shrub/grassland, tree/shrub mix, and fuel-wood forest compared to the other three stands. Species richness of ground-dwelling beetles was markedly lower (P<0.05) in naturally restored grassland, plantation forest and level terraced field, whereas the abundance of individual ground-dwelling beetles were higher in plantation forest and level terraced field than in naturally restored grassland. Jaccard indices revealed a high level of similarity amongst shrub/grassland, tree/shrub mix, and fuel-wood forest stands, and then between plantation forest stands and level terraced fields. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that herbaceous biomass, cover of shrub species and soil water content were the key factors affecting species richness of ground-dwelling beetles, while it was canopy cover and leaf litter depth that most affected total abundance. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) showed that the cover and depth of leaf litter, cover of canopy and herbaceous layers were important determinants of species abundance and composition of beetle communities. In conclusion, conversion to shrub/grasslands may be one option for raising ground-dwelling beetle diversity in the hill and gully area of Loess Plateau, Ningxia.

Key words: shrub/grassland, ground-dwelling beetles, ecological restoration, species diversity, canonical correspondence analysis (CCA)

杭佳, 石云, 刘文惠, 贺达汉 (2014) 宁夏黄土丘陵区不同生态恢复生境地表甲虫多样性. 生物多样性, 22, 516-524. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13212.

Jia Hang, Yun Shi, Wenhui Liu, Dahan He (2014) Diversity of ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera) in restored habitats in the hill and gully area of Loess Plateau, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Biodiversity Science, 22, 516-524. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13212.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13212

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2014/V22/I4/516

图/表 7

参考文献 42

[1]	Antvogel H, Bonn A (2001) Environmental parameters and microspatial distribution of insects: a case study of carabids in an alluvial forest.Ecography, 24, 470-482.
[2]	Benayas JMR, Newton AC, Diaz A, Bullock JM (2009) Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis.Science, 325, 1121-1124.
[3]	Cameron KH, Leather SR (2012) Heathland management effects on carabid beetle communities: the relationship between bare ground patch size and carabid biodiversity.Journal of Insect Conservation, 16, 523-535.
[4]	Christ TO, Wiens JA (1995) Individual movements and estimation of population size in darkling beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae).The Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 733-746.
[5]	Cushman JH, Waller JC, Hoak DR (2010) Shrubs as ecosystem engineers in a coastal dune: influences on plant populations, communities and ecosystems.Journal of Vegetation Science, 21, 821-831.
[6]	Dennis P, Young MR, Howard CL, Gordon IJ (1997) The response of epigeal beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Staphylin- idae) to varied grazing regimes on upland Nardus stricta grasslands.The Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 433-443.
[7]	Diekötter T, Billeter R, Crist TO (2008) Effects of landscape connectivity on the spatial distribution of insect diversity in agricultural mosaic landscapes.Basic and Applied Ecology, 9, 298-307.
[8]	Dong M (董鸣) (1996) Survey, Observation and Analysis of Terrestrial Biocommunities (陆地生物群落调查观测与分析). China Standard Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[9]	Fournier E, Loreau M (2001) Respective roles of recent hedges and forest patch remnants in the maintenance of ground-beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) diversity in an agricultural landscape.Landscape Ecology, 16, 17-32.
[10]	Gao ZN (高兆宁) (1999)Agricultural Insect Fauna of Ningxia (宁夏农业昆虫图志). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[11]	Gardiner MM, Landis DA, Gratton C, Schmidt N, O’Neal M, Mueller E, Chacon J, Heimpel GE, DiFonzo CD (2009) Landscape composition influences patterns of native and exotic lady beetle abundance.Diversity and Distributions, 15, 554-564.
[12]	Hollier JA, McArthur P, Whitehouse D, Mortimer SR (2009) The ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages of chalk grasslands of known age in the Chilterns.British Journal of Entomology and Natural History, 22, 73-80.
[13]	Ikeda H, Homma K, Kubota K (2008) Ground-dwelling beetle community in beech forests of Sado Island, Japan: comparison with the mainland.Journal of Forest Research, 13, 357-364.
[14]	Irmler U, Hoernes U (2003) Assignment and evaluation of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages to sites on different scales in a grassland landscape.Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 1405-1419.
[15]	Jankielsohn A, Scholtz CH, Louw SVDM (2001) Effect of habitat transformation on dung beetle assemblages: a com- parison between a South African nature reserve and neigh- boring farms.Environmental Entomology, 30, 474-483.
[16]	Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR(1995) Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[17]	Kruess A, Tscharntke T (2002) Contrasting responses of plant and insect diversity to variation in grazing intensity.Biological Conservation, 106, 293-302.
[18]	Kubota K, Lee CY, Kim JK (2000) Invertebrates on the forest floor in Kangwon Province, Republic of Korea, with special reference to Japanese red pine forest infested with the pine needle gall-midge (Thecodiplosis japonensis). In: Review of Forestry Culture, vol. 21 (ed. Japan Forestry Culture Association), pp. 137-146. Japan Forestry Culture Association, Tokyo. (in Japanese)
[19]	Larsen KJ, Work TW (2003) Differences in ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of original and reconstructed tallgrass prairies in northeastern Iowa, USA, and impact of 3-year spring burn cycles.Journal of Insect Conservation, 7, 153-166.
[20]	Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G, Reid CAM (2005) Effects of habitats complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups respond consistently?Diversity and Distributions, 11, 73-82.
[21]	Li SB (李生宝), Jiang Q (蒋齐), Li BC (李壁成) (2006) Research and Constructive Technology of Ecological Agricultural System in Southern Mountain in Ningxia (宁夏南部山区生态农业建设技术研究). Ningxia People’s Press, Yinchuan. (in Chinese)
[22]	Liu JL (刘继亮), Li FR (李锋瑞), Liu QJ (刘七军), Niu RX (牛瑞雪) (2010) Seasonal variation in soil fauna community composition and diversity in an arid desert ecosystem of the Heihe Basin.Journal of Desert Research(中国沙漠), 30, 342-349. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	Liu K (刘库), Xie YZ (谢应忠), Li YK (李应科), Li Y (李云), Deng ZZ (邓占钊) (2006) Ecological degradation and restoration in Loess Hilly Area of South Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region: taking Pengyang County as an example.Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation(水土保持通报), 26, 54-56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	Louzada J, Lima AP, Matavelli R, Zambaldi L, Barlow J (2010) Community structure of dung beetles in Amazonian savannas: role of fire disturbance, vegetation and landscape structure.Landscape Ecology, 25, 631-641.
[25]	Lövei GL, Sunderland KD (1996) Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae).Annual Review of Entomology, 41, 231-256.
[26]	Ma KP (马克平), Liu YM (刘玉明) (1994) Measurement of biotic community diversity. I. α diversity (Part 2).Chinese Biodiversity(生物多样性), 2, 231-239. (in Chinese)
[27]	Ma KP (马克平), Liu CR (刘灿然), Liu YM (刘玉明) (1995) Measurement of biotic community diversity. II. β diversity.Chinese Biodiversity(生物多样性), 3, 38-43. (in Chinese)
[28]	Mazía CN, Chaneton EJ, Kitzberger T (2006) Small-scale habitat use and assemblage structure of ground-dwelling beetles in a Patagonian shrub steppe.Journal of Arid Environments, 67, 177-194.
[29]	Sroka K, Finch O-D (2006) Ground beetle diversity in ancient woodland remnants in north-western Germany (Coleoptera: Carabidae).Journal of Insect Conservation, 10, 335-350.
[30]	Stork NE (1993) How many species are there?Biodiversity and Conservation, 2, 215-232.
[31]	Topp W, Kappes H, Kulfan J, Zach P (2006) Litter-dwelling beetles in primeval forests of Central Europe: does dead- wood matter?Journal of Insect Conservation, 10, 229-239.
[32]	Wang XP (王新谱), Yang GJ (杨贵军) (2010)Insects Fauna in Helan Mountain of Ningxia (宁夏贺兰山昆虫). Ningxia People’s Press, Yinchuan. (in Chinese)
[33]	Wang XP, Wang ZN, Berndtsson R, Zhang YF, Pan YX (2011) Desert shrub stemflow and its significance in soil moisture replenishment.Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 561-567.
[34]	Wang Y (王玉), Gao GC (高光彩), Fu BQ (付必谦), Wu Z (吴专) (2009) Composition and spatial distribution pattern of ground-dwelling beetle communities in Yeyahu Wetland, Beijing.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 17, 30-42. (in Chinese)
[35]	Xu ZH (徐正会), Li JG (李继乖), Fu L (付磊), Long QZ (龙启珍) (2001) A study on the ant communities on west slope at different elevation of the Gaoligongshan Mountain Nature Reserve in Yunnan, China. Zoological Research(动物学研究), 22, 58-63. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36]	Yaacobi G, Ziv Y, Rosenzweig ML (2007) Effects of interactive scale-dependent variables on beetle diversity patterns in a semi-arid agricultural landscape.Landscape Ecology, 22, 687-703.
[37]	Yu XD (于晓东), Luo TH (罗天宏), Yang J (杨建), Zhou HZ (周红章) (2006a) Diversity of ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera) in larch plantation with different stages of reforestation in Wolong Natural Reserve, southwestern China.Zoological Research(动物学研究), 27, 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[38]	Yu XD (于晓东), Luo TH (罗天宏), Zhou HZ (周红章) (2002) Composition and seasonal dynamics of litter-layer beetle community in the Dongling Mountain region, North China.Acta Entomologica Sinica(昆虫学报), 45, 785-793. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39]	Yu XD, Luo TH, Zhou HZ (2006) Effects of carabid beetles among regenerating and natural forest types in southwestern China.Forest Ecology and Management, 231, 169-177.
[40]	Yu XD (于晓东), Luo TH (罗天宏), Zhou HZ (周红章), Yang J (杨建) (2006b) Influence of edge effect on diversity of ground-dwelling beetles across a forest-grassland ecotone in Wolong Natural Reserve, southwestern China.Acta Entomologica Sinica(昆虫学报), 49, 277-286. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]	Yu XD, Luo TH, Zhou HZ (2008) Distribution of carabid beetles among 40-year-old regenerating plantations and 100-year-old naturally regenerated forests in southwestern China.Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 2617-2625.
[42]	Yu XD, Luo TH, Zhou HZ (2010) Distribution of ground- dwelling beetle assemblages (Coleoptera) across ecotones between natural oak forests and mature pine plantations in North China.Journal of Insect Conservation, 14, 617-626.

	灌草混交林地 SG	乔灌混交林地 TS	生态薪炭林地 FF	天然封育草地 RG	生态经济林地 PF	水平农田地 TF
林冠层物种数 Species of canopy layer (CS)	0.00±0.00^c	3.33±0.33^a	0.00±0.00^c	0.00±0.00^c	1.00±0.00^b	0.00±0.00^c
林冠层盖度 Cover of canopy layer (CC) (%)	0.00±0.00^c	56.67±6.89^a	0.00±0.00^c	0.00±0.00^c	40.33±2.91^b	0.00±0.00^c
灌木层物种数 Number of shrub species (SN)	3.33±0.33^a	1.33±0.33^b	2.00±0.00^b	0.00±0.00^c	0.00±0.00^c	0.00±0.00^c
灌木层盖度 Cover of shrub species (SC) (%)	33.15±1.15^b	23.21±1.15^c	43.67±0.88^a	0.00±0.00^d	0.00±0.00^d	0.00±0.00^d
草本层物种数 Number of herb species (HN)	6.00±0.58^b	8.00±0.58^a	9.00±0.58^a	6.67±0.33^b	4.33±0.33^c	3.33±0.33^c
草本层盖度 Cover of herb species (HC) (%)	70.33±3.18^a	67.67±1.45^a	60.00±2.89^ab	49.33±2.96^b	23.67±1.33^c	21.35±3.05^c
枯落物盖度 Cover of leaf litter (LC) (%)	60.12±2.89^ab	66.67±1.67^a	56.62±1.68^b	25.43±1.05^c	23.35±1.68^c	6.53±0.92^d
枯落物厚度 Depth of leaf litter (LD) (cm)	0.37±0.02^b	0.55±0.03^a	0.33±0.03^b	0.19±0.01^c	0.11±0.01^d	0.05±0.01^d
草本层生物量 Herbaceous biomass (HB) (g/m²)	156.41±37.68^a	72.40±7.26^b	72.50±3.95^b	51.27±7.90^b	50.21±1.66^b	18.95±2.09^b
土壤含水量 Soil water content (SW) (%)	21.64±0.32^a	20.71±0.35^a	20.15±0.32^a	14.13±0.57^c	18.01±0.14^b	18.13±0.29^b
海拔 Elevation (ELV) (m)	1,775.00	1,783.00	1,808.67	1,728.33	1,726.33	1,833.00
坡向 Slop aspect (SA)	东北坡Northeast	西南坡 Southwest	西坡 West	西南坡 Southwest	东南坡 Southeast	东北坡 Northeast
坡度 Slop gradient (SG)	10°	15°	23°	21°	8°	12°

	灌草混交林地 SG	乔灌混交林地 TS	生态薪炭林地 FF	天然封育草地 RG	生态经济林地 PF	水平农田地 TF
林冠层物种数 Species of canopy layer (CS)	0.00±0.00^c	3.33±0.33^a	0.00±0.00^c	0.00±0.00^c	1.00±0.00^b	0.00±0.00^c
林冠层盖度 Cover of canopy layer (CC) (%)	0.00±0.00^c	56.67±6.89^a	0.00±0.00^c	0.00±0.00^c	40.33±2.91^b	0.00±0.00^c
灌木层物种数 Number of shrub species (SN)	3.33±0.33^a	1.33±0.33^b	2.00±0.00^b	0.00±0.00^c	0.00±0.00^c	0.00±0.00^c
灌木层盖度 Cover of shrub species (SC) (%)	33.15±1.15^b	23.21±1.15^c	43.67±0.88^a	0.00±0.00^d	0.00±0.00^d	0.00±0.00^d
草本层物种数 Number of herb species (HN)	6.00±0.58^b	8.00±0.58^a	9.00±0.58^a	6.67±0.33^b	4.33±0.33^c	3.33±0.33^c
草本层盖度 Cover of herb species (HC) (%)	70.33±3.18^a	67.67±1.45^a	60.00±2.89^ab	49.33±2.96^b	23.67±1.33^c	21.35±3.05^c
枯落物盖度 Cover of leaf litter (LC) (%)	60.12±2.89^ab	66.67±1.67^a	56.62±1.68^b	25.43±1.05^c	23.35±1.68^c	6.53±0.92^d
枯落物厚度 Depth of leaf litter (LD) (cm)	0.37±0.02^b	0.55±0.03^a	0.33±0.03^b	0.19±0.01^c	0.11±0.01^d	0.05±0.01^d
草本层生物量 Herbaceous biomass (HB) (g/m²)	156.41±37.68^a	72.40±7.26^b	72.50±3.95^b	51.27±7.90^b	50.21±1.66^b	18.95±2.09^b
土壤含水量 Soil water content (SW) (%)	21.64±0.32^a	20.71±0.35^a	20.15±0.32^a	14.13±0.57^c	18.01±0.14^b	18.13±0.29^b
海拔 Elevation (ELV) (m)	1,775.00	1,783.00	1,808.67	1,728.33	1,726.33	1,833.00
坡向 Slop aspect (SA)	东北坡Northeast	西南坡 Southwest	西坡 West	西南坡 Southwest	东南坡 Southeast	东北坡 Northeast
坡度 Slop gradient (SG)	10°	15°	23°	21°	8°	12°

	乔灌混交林地 TS	生态薪炭林地 FF	天然封育草地 RG	生态经济林地 PF	水平农田地 TF
灌草混交林地 SG	0.63	0.67	0.46	0.39	0.49
乔灌混交林地 TS	-	0.61	0.50	0.44	0.39
生态薪炭林地 FF	-	-	0.44	0.45	0.42
天然封育草地 RG	-	-	-	0.52	0.50
生态经济林地 PF	-	-	-	-	0.63

	乔灌混交林地 TS	生态薪炭林地 FF	天然封育草地 RG	生态经济林地 PF	水平农田地 TF
灌草混交林地 SG	0.63	0.67	0.46	0.39	0.49
乔灌混交林地 TS	-	0.61	0.50	0.44	0.39
生态薪炭林地 FF	-	-	0.44	0.45	0.42
天然封育草地 RG	-	-	-	0.52	0.50
生态经济林地 PF	-	-	-	-	0.63

	回归模型 Regression model	r²	P
物种丰富度 Species richness	-11.68 + 5.35 SC + 0.78 HB + 1.64 SW	0.83	0.000^**
个体数量 Abundance of individual	76.80 + 12.23 LD + 3.42 CC	0.72	0.000^**

宁夏黄土丘陵区不同生态恢复生境地表甲虫多样性

Diversity of ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera) in restored habitats in the hill and gully area of Loess Plateau, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 42

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

科 Family	物种 Species	灌草混交林地 SG	乔灌混交林地 TS	生态薪炭林地 FF	天然封育草地 RG	生态经济林地 PF	水平农田地 TF	总个体数 Total	百分比 %
步甲科 Carabidae	直角通缘步甲 Pterostichus gebleri	284	333	419	56	144	79	1,315	29.32
	麻步甲 Carabus brandti	137	248	294	43	6	53	781	17.41
	赤胸长步甲 Dolichus halensis	24	16	2	0	290	316	648	14.45
	直角婪步甲 Harpalus corporosus	5	3	13	0	36	19	76	1.69
	蒙古伪葬步甲 Pseudotaphoxenus mongolicus	10	1	34	3	1	20	69	1.54
	婪步甲属一种 Harpalus sp.1	7	1	2	6	38	0	54	1.20
	锯步甲属一种 Pristosia sp.	33	4	10	0	1	1	49	1.09
	双斑猛步甲 Cymindis binotata	25	12	11	0	1	0	49	1.09
	婪步甲属一种 Harpalus sp.2	4	8	2	1	19	14	48	1.07
	半猛步甲 Cymindis daimio	20	3	10	1	2	0	36	0.8
	短翅伪葬步甲 Pseudotaphoxenus brevipennis	4	1	14	3	7	7	36	0.8
	黄鞘婪步甲 Harpalus pallidipennis	18	10	2	1	3	1	35	0.78
	婪步甲属一种 Harpalus sp.3	5	8	3	0	0	10	26	0.58
	婪步甲属一种 Harpalus sp.4	0	0	0	0	4	2	6	0.13
	中华金星步甲 Calosoma chinense	2	0	0	0	0	2	4	0.09
	考氏肉步甲 Broscus kozlovi	1	0	1	0	0	2	4	0.09
金龟科 Scarabaeidae	小驼嗡蜣螂 Onthophagus gibbulus	160	83	10	45	48	56	402	8.96
	中华嗡蜣螂 O. sinicus	150	11	8	5	11	18	203	4.53
	双顶嗡蜣螂 O. bivertex	3	0	1	0	0	0	4	0.09
	大黑蜣螂属一种 Catharsius sp.	0	4	0	0	0	0	4	0.09
虎甲科 Cicindelidae	星斑虎甲 Cicindela kaleea	72	118	37	25	19	44	315	7.02
	云纹虎甲 C. elisae	1	0	0	73	0	0	74	1.65
拟步甲科 Tenebrionidae	克小鳖甲 Microdera kraatzi	0	5	6	47	0	0	58	1.29
	异形琵甲 Blaps variolosa	11	0	2	5	0	2	20	0.45
	条纹琵甲 B. potanini	0	15	0	1	1	3	20	0.45
	扁长琵甲 B. variolaris	1	8	0	0	0	2	11	0.25
象甲科 Curculionidae	暗褐尖筒象 Myllocerus pelidnus	3	13	0	28	0	0	44	0.98
	苜蓿象甲 Hypera postica	4	0	0	0	0	0	4	0.09
	甜菜象甲 Bothynoderse punctiventris	2	1	1	0	0	0	4	0.09
芫菁科 Meloidae	苹斑芫菁 Mylabris calida	6	1	3	11	0	0	21	0.47
	凹胸黑芫菁 Epicauta xantusi	2	2	0	1	0	0	5	0.11
	暗头豆芫菁 Epicauta obscurocephala	2	2	0	0	0	0	4	0.09
鳃金龟科 Melolonthidae	小阔胫玛绢金龟 Maladera ovatula	2	2	3	1	0	1	9	0.20
	福婆鳃金龟 Brahmina faldermanni	2	1	1	0	0	0	4	0.09
粪金龟科 Geotrupidae	戴锤角粪金龟 Bolbotrypes davidis	0	0	4	0	0	0	4	0.09
埋葬甲科 Silphidae	尸葬甲 Necrodes littoralis	2	4	0	2	0	0	8	0.18
	大红斑葬甲 Nicrophorus japonicus	2	0	2	0	0	0	4	0.09
	黄斑葬甲一种 Nicrophorus sp.	0	3	1	0	0	0	4	0.09
瓢虫科 Coccinellidae	七星瓢虫 Coccinella septempunctata	3	0	0	0	0	4	7	0.16
	异色瓢虫 Harmonia axyridis	2	1	1	0	0	0	4	0.09
	多异瓢虫 Hippodamia variegata	0	1	0	0	3	0	4	0.09
	双七瓢虫 Coccinula quatuordecimpustulata	0	0	0	2	0	2	4	0.09
叩甲科 Chrysomelidae	暗色槽缝叩甲 Agrypnus musculus	2	0	2	0	0	0	4	0.09
总计 Total		1,011	923	899	360	634	658	4,485

[1]	钱宏, 张健, 赵静超. 世界上已知维管植物有多少种? 基于多个全球植物数据库的整合[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 22254-.
[2]	李正飞, 蒋小明, 王军, 孟星亮, 张君倩, 谢志才. 雅鲁藏布江中下游底栖动物物种多样性及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21431-.
[3]	王健铭, 曲梦君, 王寅, 冯益明, 吴波, 卢琦, 何念鹏, 李景文. 青藏高原北部戈壁植物群落物种、功能与系统发育β多样性分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21503-.
[4]	袁桃花, 李美君, 任柳伊, 黄榕鑫, 陈益, 白新祥. 中国野生凤仙花属物种多样性和地理分布数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 22019-.
[5]	姜晓燕, 高圣杰, 蒋燕, 田赟, 贾昕, 查天山. 毛乌素沙地植被不同恢复阶段植物群落物种多样性、功能多样性和系统发育多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21387-.
[6]	张敏, 田春坡, 车先丽, 赵岩岩, 陈什旺, 周霞, 邹发生. 广东省鸟类新记录及其与自然和社会经济因素的关联性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(5): 21396-.
[7]	李海萍, 徐竹青, 龙志航. 大兴安岭地区重点保护和珍稀动物保护空缺分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(2): 21294-.
[8]	陈胜仙, 张喜亭, 佘丹琦, 张衷华, 周志强, 王慧梅, 王文杰. 森林植物多样性、树种重要值与土壤理化性质对球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(2): 21115-.
[9]	乔江, 贾国清, 周华明, 龚林, 蒋勇, 肖能文, 高晓奇, 温安祥, 王杰. 四川贡嘎山国家级自然保护区鸟兽多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(2): 20395-.
[10]	王军, 赵超. 中国菌食性管蓟马物种多样性及分布格局[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 22128-.
[11]	林永一, 王永珍, 冯怡琳, 赵文智, 高俊伟, 刘继亮. 河西走廊中部戈壁地表甲虫群落动态变化及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(12): 22343-.
[12]	戴梓潇, 陈国科, 张乃莉, 马克平. 中国森林附生维管植物多样性数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(11): 22332-.
[13]	陈秋菊, 孙智闲, 李雪健, 张睿, 席蕊, 田晨, 王鑫, 邢迎春, 赵亚辉. 武夷山国家公园及其周边鱼类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(11): 22260-.
[14]	雍青措姆, 习新强, 牛克昌. 高寒草甸植物物种丧失对草原毛虫的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(11): 22069-.
[15]	刘山林, 邱娜, 张纾意, 赵竹楠, 周欣. 基因组学技术在生物多样性保护研究中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(10): 22441-.