生物多样性

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

分形模型与一般性物种多度分布关系的检验解析——以贝类和昆虫群落为例

徐伟强, 苏强*   

  1. 中国科学院大学地球与行星科学学院, 北京 100049

  • 收稿日期:2023-10-31 修回日期:2023-12-12 出版日期:2024-03-06 发布日期:2024-03-06
  • 通讯作者: 苏强

Exploring the interplay of fractal model and species abundance distribution: A case study of shellfish and insect

Weiqiang Xu, Qiang Su*   

  1. College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
  • Received:2023-10-31 Revised:2023-12-12 Online:2024-03-06 Published:2024-03-06
  • Contact: Qiang Su

摘要: 群落物种多度分布(species abundance distribution, SAD)是描述自然界生物群落中各物种间个体数量关系的定量方法, 也是分析群落物种多样性的一项主要研究内容。目前, 已提出了40余种SAD理论模型, 但该如何解读群落物种多样性, 学界内却很难达成一致。研究表明, 各类生物群落通常由极少的优势种和大量的稀有种组成。先前有研究运用SAD分形模型对近两万个群落样本的统计分析发现, 自然群落SAD最容易观测到的分布特征是1 : 1/2 : 1/3……, 并据此提出了SAD的一般性分布关系。虽然后续研究对该项发现进行过验证, 但对一般性分布关系和分形模型的探讨尚不够充分, 特别是对其内在机制的解读, 还要依靠更多学者提供想法, 找出问题, 逐步完善, 并最终形成共识。本文选取大西洋深海双壳类群落和全球农作物授粉昆虫群落为例, 基于拟合优度R2和分形参数p的统计分析(包括平均值、中值和频数分布), 对分形模型和一般性分布关系两方面内容进行更为详细的检验和研究。结果表明: (1)分形模型对两类群落均有较好的拟合效果, 平均近七成样本(具体分别为85.5%和68.2%)的R2 > 0.8; (2)两组群落最常见的SAD都是1 : 1/2 : 1/3……, 这说明一般性分布关系可以得到包括深海贝类与授粉昆虫在内的多种生物群落的支持, 具有较强的普遍性意义。本研究拟通过分形模型和一般性分布关系的验证, 为学界提供值得思考和讨论的学术议题(如, 一般性分布关系的内在机制可能是什么), 更为开拓群落物种多样性研究的新领域找到较为新颖的切入点。

关键词: 群落物种多样性, 物种多度分布, 分形理论, 分形模型, 多样性指数

Abstract

Aims: The species abundance distribution (SAD) intricately portrays the abundance dynamics of each diverse species within ecological systems, constituting a fundamental facet of diversity studies. Various theoretical models have emerged over time in an attempt to encapsulate SAD complexities, yet discerning the most fitting model remains a challenge. Prior investigations revealed a recurrent pattern in SAD characterized by numerous rare species and a handful of dominant ones. Su conducted an extensive analysis, employing a fractal model on approximately 20,000 samples, proposing a distribution pattern of Nr/N1 as 1 : 1/2 : 1/3...... (where Nr and N1 denote the abundance of the r-th and the first species, respectively). While this pattern has been acknowledged, a comprehensive understanding of the general SAD pattern and its connection to the fractal model persists as a research gap. The purpose of this study is to obtain more ideas from researchers that can improve the understanding of underlying mechanisms by testing the fractal model and the general pattern of SAD.  

Methods: This study employs datasets from deep-sea Atlantic Bivalvia communities (242 samples) and crop pollinator insect communities (926 samples) to scrutinize the applicability of the fractal model and enhance insights into the general SAD pattern.

Results: The findings reveal that the fractal model aptly fits both datasets, with R2 ranging from 0.405 to 1.000. Notably, a substantial proportion (85.5% and 68.2%, respectively) of samples exhibit R2 values exceeding 0.8. Furthermore, the predominant SAD pattern observed for both communities aligns with the distribution ration of 1 : 1/2 : 1/3......

Conclusion: Our investigation underscores the generality of the SAD pattern, supported across diverse taxonomic groups, including bivalvia and pollinator communities. The significance lies in introducing an academic inquiry into the inherent mechanisms governing the general SAD pattern. This exploration serves as a catalyst for innovative perspectives in species diversity research, offering a novel entry point for further investigation.

Key words: species diversity, species abundance distribution, fractal theory, fractal model, diversity indices

中图分类号: