生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 24495.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024495  cstr: 32101.14.biods.2024495

• •    下一篇

基于生物多样性保护的我国生态铁路现状和对策研究

田璐瑶1,2, 尹豪1,3*   

  1. 1. 北京林业大学园林学院, 北京 100083;2 济南职业学院, 济南 250103;3 城乡生态环境北京实验室, 北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-12 修回日期:2025-06-21 接受日期:2025-08-11 出版日期:2025-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 尹豪

Research status and strategies for China’s ecological railway development based on biodiversity conservation

Luyao Tian1,2, Hao Yin1,3*   

  1. 1 School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China 

    2 Jinan Vocational College, Jinan 250103, China 

    3 Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing 100083, China

  • Received:2024-11-12 Revised:2025-06-21 Accepted:2025-08-11 Online:2025-08-20
  • Contact: Hao Yin

摘要: 铁路作为重要的交通基础设施之一,具生物多样性方面特殊影响。国外对铁路生物多样性的影响和对策研究相对成熟且已开展大量实践,而我国随生物多样性保护意识和水平的提升,生物多样性保护与铁路交通设施发展矛盾日益突出,亟需系统地借鉴国外经验,探寻基于生物多样性保护的生态铁路建设对策,以期对我国生态铁路发展提供借鉴。因此本文通过分析截止2025年国内外364篇研究文献,挖掘铁路基线特征,比较铁路与公路异同点,将铁路对生物多样性的负面影响分为产生屏障效应,导致生境丧失、退化、碎片化,产生边缘效应和生物入侵,导致野生动物致死,污染和人为干扰五个方面,此外铁路及其周边绿廊因具连通性、异质性、标志性等特性,能为不同野生动物提供不同程度的栖息价值,具有正面的生物多样性影响。最后本文通过总结国外生态铁路策略,即增加铁路横向连通/野生动物通道、改善人工设施降低野生动物列车碰撞、沿线植被管理、生物多样性补偿、定期生物多样性调查制度、资金和政策支持六个方面,结合我国铁路对生物多样性影响及保护研究进展,提出推动系统性体系建设、构建适应性实施框架、加强科学性指导三方面的生态铁路保护策略。

关键词: 野生动物致死/路杀, 阻隔, 生境破碎化, 生境连通, 野生动物通道, 铁路生态学

Abstract

Background & Aims:As a vital component of transportation networks, railways exert profound influences on biodiversity. Internationally, research on railway impacts and mitigation strategies has reached an advanced stage, supported by extensive field-tested solutions. In China, growing commitments to biodiversity conservation have heightened the tension between ecological conservation and railway infrastructure expansion. This paper aims to explore pathways for developing ecological railways grounded in practical frameworks for China’s railway sector. 

Methods & Results:Through a systematic literature review of 364 publications up to 2025, we examine the fundamental characteristics of railways, compare their ecological effects with those of roads, and categorize railway-related biodiversity impacts into five domains: (1) barrier effects; (2) habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation; (3) edge effects and biological invasion; (4) wildlife mortality; and (5) pollution and human disturbance. Importantly, railways and their adjoining green corridors can also serve as wildlife habitats, offering positive contributions to biodiversity through enhanced connectivity, habitat heterogeneity and distinctive ecological features. International ecological railway strategies are summarized into six dimensions: (1) increasing railway lateral connectivity via wildlife passages; (2) improving artificial facilities to reduce train wildlife collisions; (3) vegetation management along railways; (4) biodiversity compensation; (5) regular biodiversity surveys; and (6) financial and policy support. We also review progress in China’s research on railway biodiversity interactions and conservation measures. 

Conclusions: A biodiversity-centered conservation strategy for China’s ecological railway development is proposed, including: promoting systematic system-building, establishing an adaptive implementation framework, and strengthening scientific guidance.

Key words: wildlife mortality/roadkill, barrier effects, habitat fragmentation, habitat connectivity, wildlife crossings, railway ecology