生物多样性 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 24086.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024086  cstr: 32101.14.biods.2024086

• 保护与治理对策 • 上一篇    下一篇

《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》“3030”目标的内涵及实现路径分析

田瑜, 李俊生*()   

  1. 自然资源部中国地质调查局自然资源综合调查指挥中心, 北京 100055
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-07 接受日期:2024-05-09 出版日期:2024-06-20 发布日期:2024-05-16
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: lijunsheng001@mail.cgs.gov.cn
  • 基金资助:
    地质调查项目(DD20243299);地质调查项目(DD20230474)

Analysis of the connotation and implementation path for the 30 by 30 target in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Yu Tian, Junsheng Li*()   

  1. Command Center for Comprehensive Survey of Natural Resources, China Geological Survey Bureau, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100055

摘要:

生物多样性持续丧失已成为全球最严重的环境挑战之一, 未来7年对遏制和扭转生物多样性丧失至关重要。《生物多样性公约》机制下《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》(简称《昆蒙框架》)的达成为全球生物多样性治理带来了新的希望, 为遏制和扭转生物多样性丧失提供了解决途径。作为《昆蒙框架》的核心目标, “3030”目标在国际社会广泛行动和大量科学成果的支持下应运而生。本文从全球发展趋势和国际政策推动两个层面梳理了“3030”目标的由来和发展进程, 分析了其数字目标、空间范围、有效性和包容性管理等关键要素, 保护地的全球目标从10%逐渐增加到30%, 尽管仍未满足科学界的期望, 但促进了全球保护地网络的发展。其他有效的区域保护措施(other effective area-based conservation measures, OECM)、提高保护地质量、利益攸关方参与等, 均可大幅增加对陆地和海洋的保护。结合已有国际进程和科研成果, 探索分析了“3030”目标的实现路径, 包括强有力的国际政策引导、坚定有效的资金保障、深入严谨的科学研究基础、负责任的国家行动以及广泛包容的参与和协作。距离目标完成时限已不足7年, 我们识别了实现目标尚存的诸多问题和阻碍, 并提出建议, 包括更加注重提升保护地质量; 克服保护地调查数据的空缺和有限的监测手段; 提高对海洋保护地的认识, 突破局限; 探索包容性管理模式, 以及全球目标在国家尺度的规划和统筹等。“3030”目标不仅是一项政治驱动的目标, 其研究、磋商和实现过程, 体现了科学、传统知识与国际政策体系相结合的新视角, 反映了不断推陈出新的科学见解、社会价值观和全球挑战, 促使人与自然, 人与人之间关系的阶段性变化, 有助于对保护地网络和其他保护空间的重新认识。

关键词: “3030”目标, 生物多样性, 保护地, 其他有效的区域保护措施, 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》, 全球生物多样性治理

Abstract

Background & Aims: The continuous loss of biodiversity has become one of the most serious environmental challenges in the world, the next 7 years will be the key to halt and reverse biodiversity loss. The achievement of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) mechanism has brought new hope for global biodiversity governance, and provided a pathway to halt and reverse biodiversity loss trends. As the core element of the GBF, the 30 by 30 target successfully adopted with the support of extensive actions of the international community and a large number of scientific researches. This paper reviews the origin and development process of the 30 by 30 target based on its global development trends and international policy promotion, and analyzes the change and development of its key elements such as area proportion, spatial extension, protection effectiveness of the protected area (PA) system, and inclusive management methods in PA. Combined with the successful experience of existing international processes, this paper explores the path to achieve the 30 by 30 target through a large number of scientific research as well.
Results: The gradual increase in the 30 by 30 target from 10% to 30% has not yet met the expectations of the scientific community, but has contributed to the efforts of countries and the expansion of the global network of PA. Other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs), improving the quality of PA, and the involvement of stakeholders, such as indigenous peoples and local communities, can significantly strength the protection of land and sea. The pathway to achieve the 30 by 30 target including strong international policy guidance, firm and effective financial security, in-depth and rigorous scientific research, responsible national action and broad inclusive participation and collaboration of stakeholders. At the same time, we recognize that it has been less than seven years since it was expected to be achieved. To achieve the ambitious 30 by 30 target and truly halt and reverse the biodiversity loss and decline, there are several challenges, including expand the PA system while improving quality; overcome the gap of PA survey data and the limited monitoring measures; the limitations of understanding the marine PA; the exploration of inclusive management methods and the integration of national goals at the global scale. We recommend that the quality of PA should be paid more attention than quantitative targets, strengthen PA monitoring to address data gaps, raise awareness of the importance of marine PA, and explore inclusive management approaches for PA, and strengthen the integration and implementation of the global target at the national scale.
Conclusion & Recommendation: The 30 by 30 target is not only a politically driven goal, but its research, consultation and implementation process also reflect new perspectives on the integration of science, traditional knowledge and international policy systems, reflecting emerging scientific insights, social values and global challenges, prompting a phased change in the relationship between people and nature, and between people, and contributing to a new understanding of PA networks and other protected regions.

Key words: 30 by 30 target, biodiversity, protected area, OECM, Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, global biodiversity governance