生物多样性 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 23167.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023167

• 保护与治理对策 • 上一篇    下一篇

全球协同落实《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的挑战与出路: 基于SFIC模型的分析

朱旭1,2,*(), 李嘉奇1,2   

  1. 1.西安交通大学马克思主义学院, 西安 710049
    2.西安交通大学亚欧研究中心, 西安 710049
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-25 接受日期:2023-08-23 出版日期:2023-08-20 发布日期:2023-09-06
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: xu_zhu@xjtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金青年项目(18CGJ012)

Global collaborative implementation of Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework: An analysis of challenge and solutions based on the SFIC model

Xu Zhu1,2,*(), Jiaqi Li1,2   

  1. 1. School of Marxism, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049
    2. Center for Aisa-Europe Studies, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049
  • Received:2023-05-25 Accepted:2023-08-23 Online:2023-08-20 Published:2023-09-06
  • Contact: *E-mail: xu_zhu@xjtu.edu.cn

摘要:

《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》(简称《昆蒙框架》)的落实是新阶段全球生物多样性治理的重中之重。本文基于相关文献资料查阅, 引入协同治理模型(Starting conditions-Facilitative leadership-Institutional design-Collaborative process, SFIC模型), 旨在以一种整体性、系统性思路考察《昆蒙框架》落实面临的挑战, 并分析总结应对策略, 以期为《昆蒙框架》落实提供一定参考。首先, 根据《昆蒙框架》落实对全球协同的客观需要, 以及现有研究整体性分析思路缺乏的情况, 引出本文使用的SFIC模型并说明适用性。然后, 根据SFIC模型运行的要素, 结合现实情况, 分析了《昆蒙框架》落实面临的发展中国家与发达国家治理基础、合作关系、参与动机、信息沟通、信任建立、资金筹措、后续协商、制度设计、主体领导等方面的挑战。最后依照SFIC模型, 从推动资源调动和发展中国家能力建设、促进三方援助合作、加强信息沟通共享、强化信任建设、发掘资金潜力、推进协商谈判、寻求制度约束性与激励性的平衡点、提高制度公正合理性、加强联合国责任机构领导力、发挥大国示范担当作用等方面提出了应对策略。

关键词: 全球生物多样性, 昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架, 协同落实, 全球治理, SFIC模型

Abstract

Background & Aims: After the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) was implemented to address global biodiversity priorities. This paper brings in a holistic, systematic thinking path based on the SFIC model to research the challenges faced in the implementation of the Kunming-Montreal GBF, and puts forward corresponding policy priorities that offer suggestions to policy-makers on implementation.
Methods: This paper identifies documents related to Kunming-Montreal GBF, Aichi Targets, CBD, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), as well as global biodiversity governance and analyzes their contents.
Results: Our results indicate that the implementation of Kunming-Montreal GBF needs global collaborative cooperation instead of acting separately and identifies a lack of holistic analysis in current research efforts. We then combine elements in the SFIC model with data on biodiversity governance, and analyze the implementation challenges. These challenges include basic differences between developing and developed countries, cooperating relationships, acting motivations, information communication, trust construction, funds collection, following Kunming-Montreal GBF details, system design, and leadership from the UN branch and major countries.
Conclusion: On analyzing the challenges and the SFIC model structure, we present several policy suggestions, including promoting resource mobilization and capacity building in developing countries, facilitating trilateral assistance and cooperation, strengthening information communication and sharing, consolidating trust construction, accumulating funds, fostering further negotiation, seeking the balance between the constraining force and encouragement of the system, improving the fairness and rationality of the system, strengthening the leadership of UN branch in charge and major countries.

Key words: global biodiversity, Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, collaborative implementation, global governance, SFIC model