生物多样性 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 21357. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021357
• 中国猫科动物研究与保护专题 • 下一篇
杨剑焕1,*(), 李敬华1, 杨浩炫1, 欧梓键1, 郑玺1, Anthony J. Giordano2, 陈辈乐1
收稿日期:
2021-09-05
接受日期:
2021-11-22
出版日期:
2022-09-20
发布日期:
2021-12-30
通讯作者:
杨剑焕
作者简介:
* E-mail: jhyang@kfbg.orgJianhuan Yang1,*(), King Wa Li1, Ho Yuen Yeung1, Tsz Kin Au1, Xi Zheng1, Anthony J. Giordano2, Bosco Pui Lok Chan1
Received:
2021-09-05
Accepted:
2021-11-22
Online:
2022-09-20
Published:
2021-12-30
Contact:
Jianhuan Yang
摘要:
可靠的种群密度数据对野生动物的保护和管理十分重要。豹猫(Prionailurus bengalensis)是中国分布最广且常见的猫科动物, 但野生种群密度估算的研究并不多。本研究于2020年6月至2021年5月在香港新界嘉道理农场暨植物园开展红外相机调查, 利用空间标记-重捕法估算当地豹猫的种群密度并用核密度估计方法分析其活动节律。本次调查以网格方式布置红外相机, 在约1.5 km2的研究范围之内设置了19个相机位点, 每个位点安装2台相机以获取豹猫身体两侧花纹来进行个体识别。连续12个月调查共捕获113次有效的豹猫拍摄事件, 当中仅61次事件的照片足够清晰以进行个体识别。基于种群封闭的要求, 我们以2个月为单位将12个月的数据分为6个采样期去分析豹猫种群密度, 结果显示仅两个采样期的估算值最为准确, 分别为0.64 ± 0.31 (0.26-1.55)只/km2和0.87 ± 0.48 (0.31-2.40)只/km2, 是已知全球豹猫密度最高的地点之一。结果还发现, 雨季研究地点的豹猫并无明显的日活动节律, 在旱季则偏夜行-晨昏行性多一些, 但也有一定的日间活动; 雨季和旱季的日活动节律无显著差异。本研究是首次以个体识别配以空间标记-重捕模型对中国大陆地区豹猫种群密度调查的研究; 我们也提出一些关于红外相机架设方法的建议, 以提高照片个体识别的准确度并增加重捕次数, 最后提高密度估算的准确度。本研究也进一步证明豹猫适应性极强, 在活动节律上表现出极高的可塑性, 在严格保护下可以恢复健康的种群。
杨剑焕, 李敬华, 杨浩炫, 欧梓键, 郑玺, Anthony J. Giordano, 陈辈乐 (2022) 基于红外相机数据评估华南地区豹猫的种群密度和活动节律. 生物多样性, 30, 21357. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021357.
Jianhuan Yang, King Wa Li, Ho Yuen Yeung, Tsz Kin Au, Xi Zheng, Anthony J. Giordano, Bosco Pui Lok Chan (2022) Population density and activity patterns of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in southern China: Estimates based on camera-trapping data. Biodiversity Science, 30, 21357. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021357.
图1 本次调查地点嘉道理农场暨植物园在香港特别行政区的位置(A), 以及嘉道理农场暨植物园的航拍图和红外相机位点分布(B)
Fig. 1 Location of Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden in Hong Kong (A); Aerial photo of Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden with camera traps layout (B)
采样期 Sampling period | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
采样天数 No. of sampling days | 2 Jun 2020-31 Jul 2020, 60 days | 1 Aug 2020-30 Sept 2020, 61 days | 1 Oct 2020-30 Nov 2020, 61 days | 1 Dec 2020-31 Jan 2021, 62 days | 1 Feb 2021-31 Mar 2021, 59 days | 1 Apr 2021-31 May 2021, 61 days |
有效拍摄事件次数 No. of capture events | 18 | 17 | 25 | 17 | 19 | 17 |
可识别个体的拍摄事件 No. of capture events of identified individuals | 15 | 9 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 8 |
豹猫个体数 No. of identified individuals of leopard cat | 4 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
表1 2020年6月至2021年5月各采样期所拍摄的豹猫事件结果统计
Table 1 Capture history of leopard cats for each sampling period between June 2020 and May 2021
采样期 Sampling period | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
采样天数 No. of sampling days | 2 Jun 2020-31 Jul 2020, 60 days | 1 Aug 2020-30 Sept 2020, 61 days | 1 Oct 2020-30 Nov 2020, 61 days | 1 Dec 2020-31 Jan 2021, 62 days | 1 Feb 2021-31 Mar 2021, 59 days | 1 Apr 2021-31 May 2021, 61 days |
有效拍摄事件次数 No. of capture events | 18 | 17 | 25 | 17 | 19 | 17 |
可识别个体的拍摄事件 No. of capture events of identified individuals | 15 | 9 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 8 |
豹猫个体数 No. of identified individuals of leopard cat | 4 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
图3 两只豹猫个体LC-2 (A1, A2)和LC-3 (B1, B2)在两次不同拍摄事件的影像
Fig. 3 Two distinct individuals of leopard cat, LC-2 (A1, A2) and LC-3 (B1, B2) as part of two different camera-trap capture events
采样期 Sampling period | 探测函数模型 Detection model | 赤池信息量准则 AIC | 估计值 Estimates | 密度 Population density (inds./km2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
标准误差 SE | 95%置信区间 95% CI | ||||
采样期1 Sampling period 1 | 风险率 Hazard rate | 189.9 | 0.64 | 0.31 | 0.26-1.55 |
指数 Exponential | 190.7 | 0.66 | 0.36 | 0.24-1.79 | |
半正态 Half normal | 193.6 | 0.54 | 0.24 | 0.23-1.24 | |
采样期5 Sampling period 5 | 半正态 Half normal | 155.2 | 0.87 | 0.48 | 0.31-2.40 |
指数 Exponential | 155.5 | 0.82 | 0.42 | 0.32-2.10 | |
风险率 Hazard rate | 157.3 | 0.86 | 0.49 | 0.30-2.45 |
表2 基于空间标记-重捕模型的嘉道理农场暨植物园豹猫种群密度估算
Table 2 Population density estimates for leopard cats in Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden following likelihood-based spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR) modelling
采样期 Sampling period | 探测函数模型 Detection model | 赤池信息量准则 AIC | 估计值 Estimates | 密度 Population density (inds./km2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
标准误差 SE | 95%置信区间 95% CI | ||||
采样期1 Sampling period 1 | 风险率 Hazard rate | 189.9 | 0.64 | 0.31 | 0.26-1.55 |
指数 Exponential | 190.7 | 0.66 | 0.36 | 0.24-1.79 | |
半正态 Half normal | 193.6 | 0.54 | 0.24 | 0.23-1.24 | |
采样期5 Sampling period 5 | 半正态 Half normal | 155.2 | 0.87 | 0.48 | 0.31-2.40 |
指数 Exponential | 155.5 | 0.82 | 0.42 | 0.32-2.10 | |
风险率 Hazard rate | 157.3 | 0.86 | 0.49 | 0.30-2.45 |
研究地点 Location | 分析模型 Model selection | 密度估算(只/km2) Density estimate (inds./km2) | 资料来源 Sources |
---|---|---|---|
香港嘉道理农场暨植物园, 采样期1 KFBG, Hong Kong, China, Sampling period 1 | SECR | 0.64 ± 0.31 (0.26-1.55) | 本研究 This study |
香港嘉道理农场暨植物园, 采样期5 KFBG, Hong Kong, China, Sampling period 5 | SECR | 0.87 ± 0.48 (0.31-2.40) | 本研究 This study |
台湾南投县南中寮 South of Zhongliao Township in Nantou County, Taiwan, China | CR | 0.34-0.39 | 刘建男, 2020①(① 刘建男 (2020) 108-109年度石虎保育行动纲领研拟与密度估算研究案成果报告书. 农业委员会特有生物研究保育中心, 台湾.) |
台湾南投县北中寮 North of Zhongliao Township in Nantou County, Taiwan, China | CR | 0.38-0.57 | 刘建男, 2020① |
Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve, Thailand | SECR | 0.18 ± 0.04 (0.12-0.27) | Petersen et al, |
Pulau Tekong, Singapore | CR | 0.89 ± 0.17 | Chua et al, |
Bhadra Tiger Reserve, India | SECR | 0.10 ± 0.03 (0.05-0.17) | Srivathsa et al, |
Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple Tiger Reserve, India | SECR | 0.05 ± 0.01 (0.02-0.07) | Srivathsa et al, |
Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve, India | SECR | 0.17 ± 0.05 (0.09-0.31) | Bashir et al, |
CR | 0.18-0.22 | Bashir et al, | |
Tangkulap-Pinangah Forest Reserve, Malaysian Borneo | SECR | 0.12 ± 0.02 (0.10-0.16) | Mohamed et al, |
Segaliud Lokan Forest Reserve, Malaysian Borneo | SECR | 0.17 ± 0.02 (0.13-0.21) | Mohamed et al, |
Deramakot Forest Reserve, Malaysian Borneo | SECR | 0.10 ± 0.02 (0.07-0.13) | Mohamed et al, |
表3 不同地区利用红外相机数据和标记-重捕模型进行豹猫种群密度估算的比较
Table 3 Comparison of our population density estimates for leopard cats in KFBG and other studies using capture-recapture models constructed from camera trap data
研究地点 Location | 分析模型 Model selection | 密度估算(只/km2) Density estimate (inds./km2) | 资料来源 Sources |
---|---|---|---|
香港嘉道理农场暨植物园, 采样期1 KFBG, Hong Kong, China, Sampling period 1 | SECR | 0.64 ± 0.31 (0.26-1.55) | 本研究 This study |
香港嘉道理农场暨植物园, 采样期5 KFBG, Hong Kong, China, Sampling period 5 | SECR | 0.87 ± 0.48 (0.31-2.40) | 本研究 This study |
台湾南投县南中寮 South of Zhongliao Township in Nantou County, Taiwan, China | CR | 0.34-0.39 | 刘建男, 2020①(① 刘建男 (2020) 108-109年度石虎保育行动纲领研拟与密度估算研究案成果报告书. 农业委员会特有生物研究保育中心, 台湾.) |
台湾南投县北中寮 North of Zhongliao Township in Nantou County, Taiwan, China | CR | 0.38-0.57 | 刘建男, 2020① |
Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve, Thailand | SECR | 0.18 ± 0.04 (0.12-0.27) | Petersen et al, |
Pulau Tekong, Singapore | CR | 0.89 ± 0.17 | Chua et al, |
Bhadra Tiger Reserve, India | SECR | 0.10 ± 0.03 (0.05-0.17) | Srivathsa et al, |
Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple Tiger Reserve, India | SECR | 0.05 ± 0.01 (0.02-0.07) | Srivathsa et al, |
Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve, India | SECR | 0.17 ± 0.05 (0.09-0.31) | Bashir et al, |
CR | 0.18-0.22 | Bashir et al, | |
Tangkulap-Pinangah Forest Reserve, Malaysian Borneo | SECR | 0.12 ± 0.02 (0.10-0.16) | Mohamed et al, |
Segaliud Lokan Forest Reserve, Malaysian Borneo | SECR | 0.17 ± 0.02 (0.13-0.21) | Mohamed et al, |
Deramakot Forest Reserve, Malaysian Borneo | SECR | 0.10 ± 0.02 (0.07-0.13) | Mohamed et al, |
[1] | Ades G, Chan BPL (2021) Checklist of Selected Wildlife at Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden, 3rd edn. Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden, Hong Kong. (in Chinese and in English) |
[艾加里, 陈辈乐 (2021) 嘉道理农场暨植物园野生动物名录(第三版). 嘉道理农场暨植物园, 香港.] | |
[2] | AFCD Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (2021) Checklist of Terrestrial Mammals of Hong Kong. https://www.afcd.gov.hk/english/conservation/hkbiodiversity/speciesgroup/speciesgroup_mammals.html. (accessed on 2021-08-18) |
[3] |
Alexander JS, Zhang CC, Shi K, Riordan P (2016) A granular view of a snow leopard population using camera traps in Central China. Biological Conservation, 197, 27-31.
DOI URL |
[4] | Austin SC, Tewes ME, Grassman LI, Silvy NJ (2007) Ecology and conservation of the leopard cat Prionailurus bengalensis and clouded leopard Neofelis nebulosa in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 53, 1-14. |
[5] |
Bashir T, Bhattacharya T, Poudyal K, Sathyakumar S, Qureshi Q (2013) Estimating leopard cat Prionailurus bengalensis densities using photographic captures and recaptures. Wildlife Biology, 19, 462-472.
DOI URL |
[6] |
Borchers DL, Efford MG (2008) Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies. Biometrics, 64, 377-385.
PMID |
[7] |
Chen LJ, Shu ZF, Xiao ZS (2019a) Application of camera- trapping data to study daily activity patterns of Galliformes in Guangdong Chebaling National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 27, 266-272. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[陈立军, 束祖飞, 肖治术 (2019a) 应用红外相机数据研究动物活动节律——以广东车八岭保护区鸡形目鸟类为例. 生物多样性, 27, 266-272.] | |
[8] |
Chen LJ, Xiao WH, Xiao ZS (2019b) Limitations of relative abundance indices calculated from camera-trapping data. Biodiversity Science, 27, 243-248. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[陈立军, 肖文宏, 肖治术 (2019b) 物种相对多度指数在红外相机数据分析中的应用及局限. 生物多样性, 27, 243-248.] | |
[9] |
Chen MT, Liang YJ, Kuo CC, Pei KJC (2016) Home ranges, movements and activity patterns of leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) and threats to them in Taiwan. Mammal Study, 41, 77-86.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Chua MAH, Sivasothi N, Meier R (2016) Population density, spatiotemporal use and diet of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in a human-modified succession forest landscape of Singapore. Mammal Research, 61, 99-108.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Crooks KR, Soulé ME (1999) Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature, 400, 563-566.
DOI URL |
[12] | Dudgeon D, Corlett RT translated by Chan WC (2004) The Ecology and Biodiversity of Hong Kong. Friends of the Country Parks, Joint Publishing (Hong Kong) Company Ltd, Hong Kong. (in Chinese) |
[陈慧聪 译 (2004) 香港生态情报. 郊野公园之友会, 三联书店(香港)有限公司, 香港.] | |
[13] | Efford MG (2012) DENSITY 5.0: Software for Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture. University of Otago, Dunedin. |
[14] | Efford MG, Dawson DK, Robbins CS (2004) DENSITY: Software for analysing capture-recapture data from passive detector arrays. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 27, 217-228. |
[15] |
Grassman LI, Tewes ME, Silvy NJ, Kreetiyutanont K (2005) Spatial organization and diet of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in north-central Thailand. Journal of Zoology, 266, 45-54.
DOI URL |
[16] | Han DM, Hu XL, Gu CM, Wang BZ (1995) A investigating on leopard cat in Anhui Province. Journal of Anhui University (Natural Science Edition), 19(4), 82-88. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[韩德民, 胡小龙, 顾长明, 王保洲 (1995) 安徽省豹猫的分布和数量. 安徽大学学报(自然科学版), 19(4), 82-88.] | |
[17] | Ikeda T, Uchida K, Matsuura Y, Takahashi H, Yoshida T, Kaji K, Koizumi I (2016) Seasonal and diel activity patterns of eight sympatric mammals in northern Japan revealed by an intensive camera-trap survey. PLoS ONE, 11, e0163602. |
[18] | Jiang ZG (2021) China’s Red List of Biodiversity•Vertebrates (Vol. I):Mammals (I). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[蒋志刚 (2021) 中国生物多样性红色名录•脊椎动物(第一卷): 哺乳动物(上册). 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[19] |
Jiang ZG, Jiang JP, Wang YZ, Zhang E, Zhang YY, Li LL, Xie F, Cai B, Cao L, Zheng GM, Dong L, Zhang ZW, Ding P, Luo ZH, Ding CQ, Ma ZJ, Tang SH, Cao WX, Li CW, Hu HJ, Ma Y, Wu Y, Wang YX, Zhou KY, Liu SY, Chen YY, Li JT, Feng ZJ, Wang Y, Wang B, Li C, Song XL, Cai L, Zang CX, Zeng Y, Meng ZB, Fang HX, Ping XG (2016) Red List of China’s Vertebrates. Biodiversity Science, 24, 500-551. (in Chinese and in English)
DOI URL |
[蒋志刚, 江建平, 王跃招, 张鹗, 张雁云, 李立立, 谢锋, 蔡波, 曹亮, 郑光美, 董路, 张正旺, 丁平, 罗振华, 丁长青, 马志军, 汤宋华, 曹文宣, 李春旺, 胡慧建, 马勇, 吴毅, 王应祥, 周开亚, 刘少英, 陈跃英, 李家堂, 冯祚建, 王燕, 王斌, 李成, 宋雪琳, 蔡蕾, 臧春鑫, 曾岩, 孟智斌, 方红霞, 平晓鸽 (2016) 中国脊椎动物红色名录. 生物多样性, 24, 500-551.]
DOI |
|
[20] |
Karanth KU, Nichols JD (1998) Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology, 79, 2852-2862.
DOI URL |
[21] | Koopmans M, Stokes EJ, Opepa CK, Mouele AM, Abea G, Strindberg S, Brncic TM (2021) Wild bongo density estimation and population viability analysis improves conservation management. Global Ecology and Conservation, 28, e01661. |
[22] | Lynam AJ, Jenks KE, Tantipisanuh N, Chutipong W, Ngoprasert D, Gale GA, Steinmetz R, Sukmasuang R, Bhumpakphan N, Grassman LI, Cutter P, Kitamura S, Reed DH, Baker MC, McShea W, Songsasen N, Leimgruber P (2013) Terrestrial activity patterns of wild cats from camera-trapping. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 61, 407-415. |
[23] | Maffei L, Noss AJ (2008) How small is too small? Camera trap survey areas and density estimates for ocelots in the Bolivian Chaco. Biotropica, 40, 71-75. |
[24] |
Mohamed A, Sollmann R, Bernard H, Ambu LN, Lagan P, Mannan S, Hofer H, Wilting A (2013) Density and habitat use of the leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis) in three commercial forest reserves in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Journal of Mammalogy, 94, 82-89.
DOI URL |
[25] | Molles MC (2002) Ecology: Concepts and Applications, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Education, IOWA. |
[26] |
Moreno RS, Kays RW, Samudio R (2006) Competitive release in diets of ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and puma (Puma concolor) after jaguar (Panthera onca) decline. Journal of Mammalogy, 87, 808-816.
DOI URL |
[27] | Noss A, Polisar J, Maffei L, Garcia R, Silver S (2013) Evaluating Jaguar Densities with Camera Traps. Wildlife Conservation Society, New York. |
[28] |
Nouvellet P, Rasmussen GSA, MacDonald DW, Courchamp F (2012) Noisy clocks and silent sunrises: Measurement methods of daily activity pattern. Journal of Zoology, 286, 179-184.
DOI URL |
[29] |
Park H, Lim A, Choi TY, Baek SY, Song EG, Park YC (2019) Where to spot: Individual identification of leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis euptilurus) in South Korea. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 43, 1-5.
DOI URL |
[30] | Pei KJC, Lai YC, Corlett RT, Suen KY (2010) The larger mammal fauna of Hong Kong: Species survival in a highly degraded landscape. Zoological Studies, 49, 253-264. |
[31] |
Petersen WJ, Savini T, Steinmetz R, Ngoprasert D (2019) Estimating leopard cat Prionailurus bengalensis Kerr, 1792 (Carnivora: Felidae) density in a degraded tropical forest fragment in northeastern Thailand. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 11, 13448-13458.
DOI URL |
[32] |
Rabinowitz A (1990) Notes on the behavior and movements of leopard cats, Felis bengalensis, in a dry tropical forest mosaic in Thailand. Biotropica, 22, 397-403.
DOI URL |
[33] |
Ridout MS, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 14, 322-337.
DOI URL |
[34] | Ritchie EG, Johnson CN (2009) Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation. Ecology Letters, 12, 982-998. |
[35] |
Rodgers TW, Giacalone J, Heske EJ, Janečka JE, Phillips CA, Schooley RL (2014) Comparison of noninvasive genetics and camera trapping for estimating population density of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Tropical Conservation Science, 7, 690-705.
DOI URL |
[36] | Ross J, Brodie J, Cheyne S, Hearn A, Izawa M, Loken B, Lynam A, McCarthy J, Mukherjee S, Phan C, Rasphone A, Wilting A (2015) Prionailurus bengalensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T18146A50661611. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T18146A50661611.en. (accessed on 2021-08-20) |
[37] | Royle JA, Chandler RB, Sollmann R, Gardner B (2014) Spatial Capture-Recapture. Academic Press, Waltham. |
[38] | Shek CT (2006) A Field Guide to the Terrestrial Mammals of Hong Kong. Friends of the Country Parks, Cosmos Books Ltd, Hong Kong. (in Chinese and in English) |
[石仲堂 (2006) 香港陆上哺乳动物图鉴. 郊野公园之友会, 天地图书有限公司, 香港.] | |
[39] | Silmi M, Putra K, Amran A, Huda M, Fanani AF, Galdikas BM, Anggara SP, Traeholt C (2021) Activity and ranging behavior of leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) in an oil palm landscape. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 651939. |
[40] | Sollmann R, Gardner B, Belant JL (2012) How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture- recapture models? PLoS ONE, 7, e34575. |
[41] |
Srivathsa A, Parameshwaran R, Sharma S, Karanth KU (2015) Estimating population sizes of leopard cats in the Western Ghats using camera surveys. Journal of Mammalogy, 96, 742-750.
DOI URL |
[42] |
Tobler MW, Powell GVN (2013) Estimating jaguar densities with camera traps: Problems with current designs and recommendations for future studies. Biological Conservation, 159, 109-118.
DOI URL |
[43] |
Wang SW, MacDonald DW (2009) The use of camera traps for estimating tiger and leopard populations in the high altitude mountains of Bhutan. Biological Conservation, 142, 606-613.
DOI URL |
[44] |
Wang TM, Feng LM, Yang HT, Han BY, Zhao YH, Juan L, Lü XY, Zou L, Li T, Xiao WH, Mou P, Smith JLD, Ge JP (2017) A science-based approach to guide Amur leopard recovery in China. Biological Conservation, 210, 47-55.
DOI URL |
[45] | Wang YX, Jiang XL, Feng Q, Chen ZP, Wang WM (1997) Abundance, sustainable utilization and conservation of leopard cat in Yunnan. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 17, 31-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王应祥, 蒋学龙, 冯庆, 陈志平, 王为民 (1997) 云南豹猫资源量的可持续利用与保护. 兽类学报, 17, 31-42.] | |
[46] | White GC, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Otis DL (1982) Capture-Recapture Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Population. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico. |
[47] |
Xiao WH, Feng LM, Mou P, Miquelle DG, Hebblewhite M, Goldberg JF, Robinson HS, Zhao XD, Zhou B, Wang TM, Ge JP (2016) Estimating abundance and density of Amur tigers along the Sino-Russian border. Integrative Zoology, 11, 322-332.
DOI PMID |
[48] |
Xiao WH, Hu L, Huang XQ, Xiao ZS (2019) Using capture- recapture models in wildlife camera-trapping monitoring and the study case. Biodiversity Science, 27, 257-265. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[肖文宏, 胡力, 黄小群, 肖治术 (2019) 基于标记-重捕模型开展野生动物红外相机种群监测的方法及案例. 生物多样性, 27, 257-265.]
DOI |
|
[49] |
Xiao ZS (2019) Application of camera trapping to species inventory and assessment of wild animals across China’s protected areas. Biodiversity Science, 27, 235-236. (in Chinese)
DOI |
[肖治术 (2019) 红外相机技术在我国自然保护地野生动物清查与评估中的应用. 生物多样性, 27, 235-236.]
DOI |
|
[50] |
Zimmermann F, Breitenmoser-Würsten C, Molinari-Jobin A, Breitenmoser U (2013) Optimizing the size of the area surveyed for monitoring a Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) population in the Swiss Alps by means of photographic capture-recapture. Integrative Zoology, 8, 232-243.
DOI PMID |
[1] | 张明军, 王合升, 颜文博, 符运南, 王琦, 曾治高. 海南大田国家级自然保护区小灵猫的活动节律与栖息地选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 23420-. |
[2] | 任嘉隆, 王永珍, 冯怡琳, 赵文智, 严祺涵, 秦畅, 方静, 辛未冬, 刘继亮. 基于陷阱法采集的河西走廊戈壁荒漠甲虫数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23375-. |
[3] | 申昊, 佟一杰, 赵淑哲, 韩永金, 史晓旭, 滕备, 王新谱, 白明. 香港马鞍山基于三种被动式采集方法采集的甲虫标本数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 23021-. |
[4] | 赵坤明, 陈圣宾, 杨锡福. 基于红外相机技术调查四川都江堰破碎化森林鸟兽多样性及优势种活动节律[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22529-. |
[5] | 李珍珍, 杜梦甜, 朱原辛, 王大伟, 李治霖, 王天明. 基于红外相机的不可个体识别动物种群密度估算方法[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22422-. |
[6] | 王怡涵, 赵倩倩, 刁奕欣, 顾伯健, 翁悦, 张卓锦, 陈泳滨, 王放. 基于红外相机调查上海市区小灵猫的活动节律、栖息地利用及其对人类活动的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22294-. |
[7] | 李飞, 黄湘元, 张兴超, 欧梓键, 陈辈乐. 基于红外相机对云南腾冲高黎贡山云猫的调查[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22089-. |
[8] | 孔玥峤, 刘炎林, 贺成武, 李天醍, 李全亮, 马存新, 王大军, 李晟. 评估荒漠猫的日活动节律: 基于红外相机与卫星颈圈数据的对比[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22081-. |
[9] | 邓雪琴, 刘统, 刘天时, 徐恺, 姚松, 黄小群, 肖治术. 河南内乡宝天曼国家级自然保护区豹猫及其潜在猎物之间日活动节律的季节性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22263-. |
[10] | 初漠嫣, 梁书洁, 李沛芸, 贾丁, 阿卜杜赛麦提·买尔迪亚力, 李雪阳, 姜楠, 赵翔, 李发祥, 肖凌云, 吕植. 三江源国家级自然保护区内云塔村雪豹种群动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22157-. |
[11] | 胡远芳, 李斌强, 梁丹, 李兴权, 刘兰香, 杨家伟, 罗旭. 人为干扰对白腹锦鸡活动节律的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(8): 21484-. |
[12] | 周天祥, 杨华林, 张贵权, 杨建, 冯茜, 胡强, 程跃红, 张晋东, 王彬, 周材权. 四川卧龙国家级自然保护区三种高山同域鸡形目鸟类的时空生态位比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 22026-. |
[13] | 吴运佳, 程芸, 袁磊, 张诗, 张烁, 刘少创. 库木塔格沙漠地区野骆驼活动节律与家域特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(9): 1206-1214. |
[14] | 韩雪松, 董正一, 赵格, 赵翔, 史湘莹, 吕植, 李宏奇. 基于视频监控系统的欧亚水獭活动节律初报及红外相机监测效果评估[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 770-779. |
[15] | 李月辉. 大中型兽类种群数量估算的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(12): 1700-1717. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn