生物多样性 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 102-107. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015256 cstr: 32101.14.biods.2015256
所属专题: 数据论文
周喜乐1, 张宪春2, 孙久琼2, 严岳鸿1,,A;*
收稿日期:
2015-09-18
接受日期:
2015-12-29
出版日期:
2016-01-20
发布日期:
2016-06-12
通讯作者:
严岳鸿
基金资助:
Xile Zhou1, Xianchun Zhang2, Jiuqiong Sun2, Yuehong Yan1,*
Received:
2015-09-18
Accepted:
2015-12-29
Online:
2016-01-20
Published:
2016-06-12
Contact:
Yan Yuehong
摘要:
物种编目及其科属系统排列是了解生物多样性的基础, 本文采用Flora of China使用的分类系统, 结合最新分子分类学研究成果以及近几年发表的新资料, 对中国石松类和蕨类植物多样性和地理分布数据进行了统计和分析。结果表明中国共有石松类和蕨类植物40科178属2,147种5个亚种118个变种, 其中特有种839个, 占总种数的39.08%。种数最多的5个科依次为鳞毛蕨科(505种, 含种下单位, 下同)、蹄盖蕨科(323种)、水龙骨科(280种)、凤尾蕨科(266种)和金星蕨科(209种); 种数最多的5个属依次为耳蕨属(Polystichum, 209种)、鳞毛蕨属(Dryopteris, 176种)、蹄盖蕨属(Athyrium, 137种)、双盖蕨属(Diplazium, 98种)和凤尾蕨属(Pteris, 97种)。在地理分布上, 种数排名前5的省份为云南(1,365种)、四川(875种)、贵州(838种)、广西(785种)和台湾(779种)。含中国特有石松类和蕨类植物的科属中, 排前3位的科分别为鳞毛蕨科(257种)、蹄盖蕨科(169种)和凤尾蕨科(113种); 排前3位的属为耳蕨属(140种)、蹄盖蕨属(82种)和鳞毛蕨属(61种)。
周喜乐, 张宪春, 孙久琼, 严岳鸿 (2016) 中国石松类和蕨类植物的多样性与地理分布. 生物多样性, 24, 102-107. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015256.
Xile Zhou, Xianchun Zhang, Jiuqiong Sun, Yuehong Yan (2016) Diversity and distribution of lycophytes and ferns in China. Biodiversity Science, 24, 102-107. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015256.
省(市、自治区) Province | 种 Species | 属 Genus | 科 Family | 中国特有种Number of Chinese endemic species (CES) | 占本地区种数比例 Ratio of CES in each province | 仅产本地区 Number of local endemic species (LES) | 占本地区中国特有种比例 Ratio of LES/CES | 国内仅产本地区且国外有分布 Number of species distrbute only in this province and abroad |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云南 Yunnan | 1,365 (60.13%) | 148 (83.15%) | 40 (100.00%) | 414 | 30.33 | 181 | 43.72 | 77 |
四川 Sichuan | 875 (38.55%) | 116 (65.17%) | 36 (90.00%) | 284 | 32.46 | 54 | 19.01 | 1 |
贵州 Guizhou | 838 (36.92%) | 119 (66.85%) | 36 (90.00%) | 227 | 27.09 | 31 | 13.66 | 1 |
广西 Guangxi | 785 (34.58%) | 125 (70.22%) | 36 (90.00%) | 157 | 20.00 | 23 | 14.65 | 5 |
台湾 Taiwan | 779 (34.32%) | 145 (81.46%) | 39 (97.50%) | 107 | 13.74 | 59 | 55.14 | 89 |
湖南 Hunan | 663 (29.20%) | 110 (61.80%) | 35 (87.50%) | 180 | 27.15 | 6 | 3.33 | 0 |
西藏 Tibet | 579 (25.51%) | 104 (58.43%) | 33 (82.50%) | 121 | 20.90 | 49 | 40.50 | 14 |
广东 Guangdong | 566 (24.93%) | 117 (65.73%) | 32 (80.00%) | 95 | 16.78 | 9 | 9.47 | 2 |
重庆 Chongqing | 535 (23.57%) | 93 (52.25%) | 33 (82.50%) | 154 | 28.79 | 9 | 5.84 | 0 |
海南 Hainan | 451 (19.87%) | 113 (63.48%) | 33 (82.50%) | 62 | 13.75 | 33 | 53.23 | 19 |
江西 Jiangxi | 442 (19.47%) | 96 (53.93%) | 33 (82.50%) | 85 | 19.23 | 2 | 2.35 | 0 |
浙江 Zhejiang | 431 (18.99%) | 98 (55.06%) | 35 (87.50%) | 88 | 20.42 | 7 | 7.95 | 3 |
福建 Fujian | 409 (18.02%) | 100 (56.18%) | 31 (77.50%) | 67 | 16.38 | 4 | 5.97 | 1 |
湖北 Hubei | 372 (16.39%) | 80 (44.94%) | 29 (72.50%) | 102 | 27.42 | 5 | 4.90 | 0 |
甘肃 Gansu | 254 (11.19%) | 64 (35.96%) | 25 (62.50%) | 65 | 25.59 | 3 | 4.62 | 0 |
安徽 Anhui | 237 (10.44%) | 69 (38.76%) | 26 (65.00%) | 39 | 16.46 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 |
陕西 Shaanxi | 231 (10.18%) | 56 (31.46%) | 22 (55.00%) | 62 | 26.84 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
河南 Henan | 218 (9.60%) | 62 (34.83%) | 25 (62.50%) | 46 | 21.10 | 1 | 2.17 | 0 |
香港 Hongkong | 212 (9.34%) | 77 (43.26%) | 29 (72.50%) | 16 | 7.55 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
江苏 Jiangsu | 151 (6.65%) | 59 (33.15%) | 26 (65.00%) | 18 | 11.92 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
河北 Hebei | 112 (4.93%) | 39 (21.91%) | 18 (45.00%) | 26 | 23.21 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
辽宁 Liaoning | 110 (4.85%) | 41 (23.03%) | 19 (47.50%) | 10 | 9.09 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 |
吉林 Jilin | 107 (4.71%) | 38 (21.35%) | 17 (42.50%) | 6 | 5.61 | 2 | 33.33 | 1 |
山西 Shanxi | 99 (4.36%) | 35 (19.66%) | 17 (42.50%) | 24 | 24.24 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
山东 Shandong | 97 (4.27%) | 38 (21.35%) | 19 (47.50%) | 19 | 19.59 | 2 | 10.53 | 0 |
黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 89 (3.92%) | 34 (19.10%) | 17 (42.50%) | 4 | 4.49 | 1 | 25.00 | 3 |
澳门 Macao | 76 (3.35%) | 46 (25.84%) | 24 (60.00%) | 2 | 2.63 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
内蒙古 Inner Mongolia | 72 (3.17%) | 25 (14.04%) | 15 (37.50%) | 11 | 15.28 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
北京 Beijing | 71 (3.13%) | 27 (15.17%) | 17 (42.50%) | 15 | 21.13 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
新疆 Xinjiang | 57 (2.51%) | 22 (12.36%) | 14 (35.00%) | 3 | 5.26 | 0 | 0.00 | 6 |
青海 Qinghai | 52 (2.29%) | 20 (11.24%) | 13 (32.50%) | 11 | 21.15 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
上海 Shanghai | 51 (2.25%) | 31 (17.42%) | 17 (42.50%) | 2 | 3.92 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
宁夏 Ningxia | 40 (1.76%) | 19 (10.67%) | 12 (30.00%) | 7 | 17.50 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
天津 Tianjin | 29 (1.28%) | 15 (8.43%) | 12 (30.00%) | 5 | 17.24 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
表1 中国各省(市、自治区)石松类和蕨类植物多样性及特有种统计
Table 1 The diversity and endemism of lycophytes and ferns in each province of China
省(市、自治区) Province | 种 Species | 属 Genus | 科 Family | 中国特有种Number of Chinese endemic species (CES) | 占本地区种数比例 Ratio of CES in each province | 仅产本地区 Number of local endemic species (LES) | 占本地区中国特有种比例 Ratio of LES/CES | 国内仅产本地区且国外有分布 Number of species distrbute only in this province and abroad |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云南 Yunnan | 1,365 (60.13%) | 148 (83.15%) | 40 (100.00%) | 414 | 30.33 | 181 | 43.72 | 77 |
四川 Sichuan | 875 (38.55%) | 116 (65.17%) | 36 (90.00%) | 284 | 32.46 | 54 | 19.01 | 1 |
贵州 Guizhou | 838 (36.92%) | 119 (66.85%) | 36 (90.00%) | 227 | 27.09 | 31 | 13.66 | 1 |
广西 Guangxi | 785 (34.58%) | 125 (70.22%) | 36 (90.00%) | 157 | 20.00 | 23 | 14.65 | 5 |
台湾 Taiwan | 779 (34.32%) | 145 (81.46%) | 39 (97.50%) | 107 | 13.74 | 59 | 55.14 | 89 |
湖南 Hunan | 663 (29.20%) | 110 (61.80%) | 35 (87.50%) | 180 | 27.15 | 6 | 3.33 | 0 |
西藏 Tibet | 579 (25.51%) | 104 (58.43%) | 33 (82.50%) | 121 | 20.90 | 49 | 40.50 | 14 |
广东 Guangdong | 566 (24.93%) | 117 (65.73%) | 32 (80.00%) | 95 | 16.78 | 9 | 9.47 | 2 |
重庆 Chongqing | 535 (23.57%) | 93 (52.25%) | 33 (82.50%) | 154 | 28.79 | 9 | 5.84 | 0 |
海南 Hainan | 451 (19.87%) | 113 (63.48%) | 33 (82.50%) | 62 | 13.75 | 33 | 53.23 | 19 |
江西 Jiangxi | 442 (19.47%) | 96 (53.93%) | 33 (82.50%) | 85 | 19.23 | 2 | 2.35 | 0 |
浙江 Zhejiang | 431 (18.99%) | 98 (55.06%) | 35 (87.50%) | 88 | 20.42 | 7 | 7.95 | 3 |
福建 Fujian | 409 (18.02%) | 100 (56.18%) | 31 (77.50%) | 67 | 16.38 | 4 | 5.97 | 1 |
湖北 Hubei | 372 (16.39%) | 80 (44.94%) | 29 (72.50%) | 102 | 27.42 | 5 | 4.90 | 0 |
甘肃 Gansu | 254 (11.19%) | 64 (35.96%) | 25 (62.50%) | 65 | 25.59 | 3 | 4.62 | 0 |
安徽 Anhui | 237 (10.44%) | 69 (38.76%) | 26 (65.00%) | 39 | 16.46 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 |
陕西 Shaanxi | 231 (10.18%) | 56 (31.46%) | 22 (55.00%) | 62 | 26.84 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
河南 Henan | 218 (9.60%) | 62 (34.83%) | 25 (62.50%) | 46 | 21.10 | 1 | 2.17 | 0 |
香港 Hongkong | 212 (9.34%) | 77 (43.26%) | 29 (72.50%) | 16 | 7.55 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
江苏 Jiangsu | 151 (6.65%) | 59 (33.15%) | 26 (65.00%) | 18 | 11.92 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
河北 Hebei | 112 (4.93%) | 39 (21.91%) | 18 (45.00%) | 26 | 23.21 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
辽宁 Liaoning | 110 (4.85%) | 41 (23.03%) | 19 (47.50%) | 10 | 9.09 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 |
吉林 Jilin | 107 (4.71%) | 38 (21.35%) | 17 (42.50%) | 6 | 5.61 | 2 | 33.33 | 1 |
山西 Shanxi | 99 (4.36%) | 35 (19.66%) | 17 (42.50%) | 24 | 24.24 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
山东 Shandong | 97 (4.27%) | 38 (21.35%) | 19 (47.50%) | 19 | 19.59 | 2 | 10.53 | 0 |
黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 89 (3.92%) | 34 (19.10%) | 17 (42.50%) | 4 | 4.49 | 1 | 25.00 | 3 |
澳门 Macao | 76 (3.35%) | 46 (25.84%) | 24 (60.00%) | 2 | 2.63 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
内蒙古 Inner Mongolia | 72 (3.17%) | 25 (14.04%) | 15 (37.50%) | 11 | 15.28 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
北京 Beijing | 71 (3.13%) | 27 (15.17%) | 17 (42.50%) | 15 | 21.13 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
新疆 Xinjiang | 57 (2.51%) | 22 (12.36%) | 14 (35.00%) | 3 | 5.26 | 0 | 0.00 | 6 |
青海 Qinghai | 52 (2.29%) | 20 (11.24%) | 13 (32.50%) | 11 | 21.15 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
上海 Shanghai | 51 (2.25%) | 31 (17.42%) | 17 (42.50%) | 2 | 3.92 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
宁夏 Ningxia | 40 (1.76%) | 19 (10.67%) | 12 (30.00%) | 7 | 17.50 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
天津 Tianjin | 29 (1.28%) | 15 (8.43%) | 12 (30.00%) | 5 | 17.24 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 |
1 | Chapman AD (2009) Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World, 2nd edn. A Report for the Australian Biological Resources Study. Australian Biodiversity Information Services, Toowoomba, Australia. |
2 | Ching RC (1978a) The Chinese fern families and genera: systematic arrangement and historical origin. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 16(3), 1-19. (in Chinese) |
[秦仁昌 (1978) 中国蕨类植物科属的系统排列和历史来源. 植物分类学报, 16(3), 1-19.] | |
3 | Ching RC (1978b) The Chinese fern families and genera: systematic arrangement and historical origin (cont.). Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 16(4), 16-37. (in Chinese) |
[秦仁昌 (1978) 中国蕨类植物科属的系统排列和历史来源(续). 植物分类学报, 16(4), 16-37.] | |
4 | Ching RC, Wu SK (1980) The floristic characteristics of the Xizang (Tibet) pteridophyte flora in relation to the upheaval of the Himalayas. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 2, 382-389. (in Chinese) |
[秦仁昌, 武素功 (1980) 西藏蕨类植物区系的特点及其与喜马拉雅隆升的关系. 云南植物研究, 2, 382-389.] | |
5 | Christenhusz M, Zhang XC, Schneider H (2011) A linear sequence of extant families and genera of lycophytes and ferns. Phytotaxa, 19, 7-54. |
6 | Christenhusz M, Schneider H (2011) Corrections to phytotaxa 19: linear sequence of lycophytes and ferns. Phytotaxa, 28, 50-52. |
7 | Delecti Florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Agendae Academiae Sinicae(1959-2000) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Tomus 2-6. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[《中国植物志》编辑委员会(1959-2000) 中国植物志, 2-6卷. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
8 | Kong XX (1984) The phytogeographical features of pteridophytes of Sichuan, China with some remarks on the “polysticho-dryopteris flora”. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 6, 27-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[孔宪需 (1984) 四川蕨类植物地理特点兼论“耳蕨—鳞毛蕨类植物区系’’. 云南植物研究, 6, 27-38.] | |
9 | Liu HM, Jiang RH, Guo J, Hovenkamp P, Perrie LR, Shepherd L, Hennequin S, Schneider H (2013) Towards a phylogenetic classification of the climbing fern genus Arthropteris. Taxon, 62, 688-700. |
10 | Pryer KM, Schneider H, Smith AR, Cranfill R, Wolf PG, Hunt JS, Sipes SD (2001) Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants. Nature, 409, 618-622. |
11 | Shrestha N, Xing FW, Qi XP, Yan YH, Zhang XC (2014) Huperziana nlingensis (Lycopodiaceae), a new terrestrial firmoss from southern China. Phytotaxa, 173, 73-79. |
12 | Shrestha N, Zhang XC (2015a) On the presence of north American clubmoss Huperzia lucidula (Lycopodiaceae) in China: an intercontinental disjunction or misidentification. Phytotaxa, 219, 243-252. |
13 | Shrestha N, Zhang XC (2015b) Recircumscription of Huperzia serrata complex in China using morphological and climatic data. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 53, 88-103. |
14 | Smith AR, Pryer KM, Schuettpelz E, Korall P, Schneider H, Wolf PG (2006) A classification for extant ferns. Taxon, 55, 705-731. |
15 | Tan YH, Wei R, Li JW, Zhang XC (2015) Didymochlaena Desv. (Hypodematiaceae): a newly recorded fern genus to China. Plant Diversity and Resources, 37, 135-138. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[谭运洪, 卫然, 李剑武, 张宪春 (2015) 中国肿足蕨科一新记录属——翼囊蕨属. 植物分类与资源学报, 37, 135-138.] | |
16 | Wang W, Yang WL, Mao XX, Zhao RR, Dou P, Zhang GM (2015) The phylogenetic affinities of Pellaea connectens, a rare endemic Chinese fern. Phytotaxa, 220, 30-42. |
17 | Wei R, Zhang XC (2014) Rediscovery of Cystoathyrium chinense Ching (Cystopteridaceae): phylogenetic placement of the critically endangered fern species endemic to China. Journal of Systematics and Evolution, 52, 450-457. |
18 | Wu SH, Ching RC (1991) Fern Families and Genera of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[吴兆洪, 秦仁昌 (1991) 中国蕨类植物科属志. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
19 | Wu ZY, Raven P, Hong DY (2013) Flora of China.. Vol. 2-3 |
(Pteridophytes). Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis. | |
20 | Yan YH, Zhang XC, Ma KP (2013) Pteridophytes in China: Diversity and Distribution. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[严岳鸿, 张宪春, 马克平 (2013) 中国蕨类植物多样性与地理分布. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
21 | Zhang LB, Zhang L (2015) Didymochlaenaceae: a new fern family of Eupolypods I (Polypodiales). Taxon, 64, 27-38. |
22 | Zhang XC (2012) Lycophytes and Ferns of China. Peking University Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[张宪春 (2012) 中国石松类和蕨类植物. 北京大学出版社, 北京.] | |
23 | Zhang XC, Wei R, Liu HM, He LJ, Wang L, Zhang GM (2013) Phylogeny and classification of the extant lycophytes and ferns from China. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 48, 119-137. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张宪春, 卫然, 刘红梅, 何丽娟, 王丽, 张钢民 (2013) 中国现代石松类和蕨类的系统发育与分类系统. 植物学报, 48, 119-137.] |
[1] | 干靓 刘巷序 鲁雪茗 岳星. 全球生物多样性热点地区大城市的保护政策与优化方向[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24529-. |
[2] | 曾子轩 杨锐 黄越 陈路遥. 清华大学校园鸟类多样性特征与环境关联[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24373-. |
[3] | 臧明月, 刘立, 马月, 徐徐, 胡飞龙, 卢晓强, 李佳琦, 于赐刚, 刘燕. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》下的中国城市生物多样性保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24482-. |
[4] | 祝晓雨, 王晨灏, 王忠君, 张玉钧. 城市绿地生物多样性研究进展与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 25027-. |
[5] | 袁琳, 王思琦, 侯静轩. 大都市地区的自然留野:趋势与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24481-. |
[6] | 胡敏, 李彬彬, Coraline Goron. 只绿是不够的: 一个生物多样性友好的城市公园管理框架[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24483-. |
[7] | 王欣, 鲍风宇. 基于鸟类多样性提升的南滇池国家湿地公园生态修复效果分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24531-. |
[8] | 明玥, 郝培尧, 谭铃千, 郑曦. 基于城市绿色高质量发展理念的中国城市生物多样性保护与提升研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24524-. |
[9] | 谢淦, 宣晶, 付其迪, 魏泽, 薛凯, 雒海瑞, 高吉喜, 李敏. 草地植物多样性无人机调查的物种智能识别模型构建[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 24236-. |
[10] | 褚晓琳, 张全国. 演化速率假说的实验验证研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 25019-. |
[11] | 宋威, 程才, 王嘉伟, 吴纪华. 土壤微生物对植物多样性–生态系统功能关系的调控作用[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 24579-. |
[12] | 卢晓强, 董姗姗, 马月, 徐徐, 邱凤, 臧明月, 万雅琼, 李孪鑫, 于赐刚, 刘燕. 前沿技术在生物多样性研究中的应用现状、挑战与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 24440-. |
[13] | 农荞伊, 曹军, 程文达, 彭艳琼. 不同方法对蜜蜂总科昆虫资源与多样性监测效果的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 25057-. |
[14] | 郭雨桐, 李素萃, 王智, 解焱, 杨雪, 周广金, 尤春赫, 朱萨宁, 高吉喜. 全国自然保护地对国家重点保护野生物种的覆盖度及其分布状况[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24423-. |
[15] | 赵维洋, 王伟, 马冰然. 其他有效的区域保护措施(OECMs)研究进展与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24525-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn