生态工程实施对羌塘和三江源国家级自然保护区植被净初级生产力的影响

doi:10.17520/biods.2015082

生物多样性 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 127-135. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015082

所属专题：生物多样性与生态系统功能；青藏高原生物多样性与生态安全

• 研究报告: 植物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

生态工程实施对羌塘和三江源国家级自然保护区植被净初级生产力的影响

祁威^1,², 摆万奇¹, 张镱锂^1,^2,,A;^*(), 吴雪^1,², 李兰晖^1,², 丁明军^1,³, 周才平¹

1 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所陆地表层格局与模拟院重点实验室, 北京 100101
2 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
3 江西师范大学地理与环境学院鄱阳湖湿地与流域研究教育部重点实验室, 南昌 330022;

收稿日期:2015-04-01 接受日期:2015-09-29 出版日期:2016-02-20 发布日期:2016-03-03
通讯作者: 张镱锂
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41171080)、中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDB03030500) 、国家科技基础性工作专项(2012FY114000)和国家科技支撑项目(2013BAC04B02)

Effects of ecological engineering on net primary production in the Chang Tang and Sanjiangyuan national nature reserves on the Tibetan Plateau

Wei Qi^1,², Wanqi Bai¹, Yili Zhang^1,^2,^*(), Xue Wu^1,², Lanhui Li^1,², Mingjun Ding^1,³, Caiping Zhou¹

1 Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation of CAS, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100101
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
3 Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research of Ministry of Education, School of Geography and Environment, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022;

Received:2015-04-01 Accepted:2015-09-29 Online:2016-02-20 Published:2016-03-03
Contact: Zhang Yili

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了有效评估生态工程建设对青藏高原典型国家级自然保护区的影响, 基于表征生态系统功能状况的植被净初级生产力变化系列数据, 采用样区对比法系统分析了羌塘和三江源两个国家级自然保护区建立及2004/2005年实施的新生态工程的效果。研究表明: (1) 1982-2009年间, 在10组对比样区中有9组保护区内样区的草地净初级生产力呈波动上升的趋势; (2) 2004年后新生态工程的实施效果良好, 有8组对比样区生态状况转好; (3)在所有高寒草地类型中, 新生态工程对高寒草甸类型样区的保护效果最为显著。

关键词: 生态工程, 自然保护区, 净初级生产力, 三江源, 羌塘, 样区对比法

Abstract

Long term series of remotely sensed imagery of net primary production (NPP) data could reflect ecosystem health. In this study, we employed NPP to evaluate the effects of ecological engineering (nature reserve and new ecological engineering in 2004 or 2005 techniques) by the sampling area comparison method in the Chang Tang and Sanjiangyuan national nature reserves on the Tibetan Plateau. The results showed that: (1) among the 10 pairs of sampling areas, annual NPP of 9 pairs tended to increase between 1982 and 2009; (2) the new ecological engineering techniques improved the effectiveness of ecosystem conservation, with NPP in 8 pairs of sampling areas increasing faster than before; and (3) among all alpine grassland types, the new ecological engineering techniques remarkably improved the effectiveness of conserving the meadows.

Key words: ecological engineering, nature reserve, net primary production, Sanjiangyuan, Chang Tang, sampling area comparison method

祁威, 摆万奇, 张镱锂, 吴雪, 李兰晖, 丁明军, 周才平 (2016) 生态工程实施对羌塘和三江源国家级自然保护区植被净初级生产力的影响. 生物多样性, 24, 127-135. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015082.

Wei Qi, Wanqi Bai, Yili Zhang, Xue Wu, Lanhui Li, Mingjun Ding, Caiping Zhou (2016) Effects of ecological engineering on net primary production in the Chang Tang and Sanjiangyuan national nature reserves on the Tibetan Plateau. Biodiversity Science, 24, 127-135. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015082.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2015082

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2016/V24/I2/127

图/表 5

参考文献 31

1	Chang HQ, Xu WY, Yuan J, Lü JZ, Zhang SX (2012) Current situation of grassland resources and grazing capacity in Ali, Tibet. Pratacultural Science, 29, 1660-1664. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[畅慧勤, 徐文勇, 袁杰, 吕继照, 张硕新 (2012) 西藏阿里草地资源现状及载畜量. 草业科学, 29, 1660-1664.]
2	Chen BX, Zhang XZ, Tao J, Wu JS, Wang JS, Shi PL, Zhang YJ, Yu CQ (2014) The impact of climate change and anthropogenic activities on alpine grassland over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 189, 11-18.
3	Crabtree R, Potter C, Mullen R, Sheldon J, Huang S, Harmsen J, Rodman A, Jean C (2009) A modeling and spatio- temporal analysis framework for monitoring environmental change using NPP as an ecosystem indicator. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 1486-1496.
4	Gao QZ, Wan YF, Li YE, Lin ED, Yang K, Jiangcun WZ, Wang BS, Li WF (2007) Grassland net primary productivity and its spatio-temporal distribution in northern Tibet: a study with CASA model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 18, 2526-2532. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[高清竹, 万运帆, 李玉娥, 林而达, 杨凯, 江村旺扎, 王宝山, 李文福 (2007) 基于CASA模型的藏北地区草地植被净第一性生产力及其时空格局. 应用生态学报, 18, 2526-2532.]
5	Lai M, Wu SH, Dai EF, Yin YH, Pan T, Zhao DS (2013) Dynamic valuation on ecosystem services to ecological construction in the Three-River Headwaters Nature Reserve, China. Journal of Mountain Science, 31, 8-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[赖敏, 吴绍洪, 戴尔阜, 尹云鹤, 潘韬, 赵东升 (2013) 生态建设背景下三江源自然保护区生态系统服务价值变化. 山地学报, 31, 8-17.]
6	Li SD (1993) The ecological projects in the world. World Environment, 11, 31-35. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李世东 (1993) 世界生态工程建设综述. 世界环境, 11, 31-35.]
7	Li SD (2001) The construction progress and implications of major forest ecological projects in the world. Forestry Economics, 23(12), 46-50. (in Chinese)
	[李世东 (2001) 世界重点林业生态工程建设进展及其启示. 林业经济, 23(12), 46-50.]
8	Liu JG, Li SX, Ouyang ZY, Tam C, Chen XD (2008a) Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 9477-9482.
9	Liu JY, Shao QQ, Fan JW (2013) Ecological construction achievements assessment and its revelation of ecological project in Three Rivers Headwaters Region. Chinese Journal of Nature, 35(1), 40-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘纪远, 邵全琴, 樊江文 (2013) 三江源生态工程的生态成效评估与启示. 自然杂志, 35(1), 40-46.]
10	Liu JY, Xu XL, Shao QQ (2008b) Grassland degradation in the “Three-River Headwaters” region, Qinghai Province. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 18, 259-273.
11	Liu XF, Ren ZY, Lin ZH, Liu YX, Zhang DH (2013) The spatial-temporal changes of vegetation coverage in the Three-River Headwater Region in recent 12 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68, 897-908. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘宪锋, 任志远, 林志慧, 刘焱序, 张东海 (2013) 2000-2011年三江源区植被覆盖时空变化特征. 地理学报, 68, 897-908.]
12	Luo TY, Long SB, Ren R, He Z (2010) Problems and countermeasures of the wind erosion with desertification control project in Beijing. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 31(7), 30-32. (in Chinese)
	[罗添元, 龙少波, 任认, 何政 (2010) 北京市风沙治理生态工程存在的问题与对策. 中国水土保持, 31(7), 30-32.]
13	Qian S, Fu Y, Pan FF (2010) Climate change tendency and grassland vegetation response during the growth season in Three-River Source Region. Science China: Earth Sciences, 53, 1506-1512.
14	Qin HR (2012) Stronge implement grazing grass and fully implement the strategy for establishing province by ecological. Qinghai Prataculture, 21(1), 34-36. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[秦海蓉 (2012) 认真实施退牧还草, 全面落实生态立省战略. 青海草业, 21(1), 34-36.]
15	Shao QQ, Fan JW (2012) Integrated Monitoring and Assess- ment of Ecosystem in the Three River Source Region. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[邵全琴, 樊江文 (2012) 三江源区生态系统综合监测与评估. 科学出版社, 北京]
16	Shao QQ, Liu JY, Huang L, Fan JW, Xu XL, Wang JB (2013) Integrated assessment on the effectiveness of ecological conservation in Sanjiangyuan National Nature Reserve. Geographical Research, 32, 1645-1656. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[邵全琴, 刘纪远, 黄麟, 樊江文, 徐新良, 王军邦 (2013) 2005-2009年三江源自然保护区生态保护和建设工程生态成效综合评估. 地理研究, 32, 1645-1656.]
17	Shvidenko AZ, Schepashchenko DG, Vaganov EA, Nilsson S (2008) Net primary production of forest ecosystems of Russia: a new estimate. Doklady Earth Science, 421, 1009-1012.
18	Sun HL, Zheng D, Yao TD, Zhang YL (2012) Protection and construction of the national ecological security shelter zone on Tibetan Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67, 3-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[孙鸿烈, 郑度, 姚檀栋, 张镱锂 (2012) 青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设. 地理学报, 67, 3-12.]
19	Wang JS, Zhang XZ, Zhao YP, Qin SG, Wu JS (2010) Spatio-temporal pattern of alpine grassland productivity in Qiangtang Plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21, 1400-1404. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王景升, 张宪洲, 赵玉萍, 秦泗国, 武建双) (2010) 羌塘高原高寒草地生态系统生产力动态. 应用生态学报, 21, 1400-1404.]
20	Wang JS, Zhang XZ, Zhao YP, Shen ZX, Shi PL, Yu CQ (2008) Spatio-temporal pattern of climate changes in northern Tibet’s Qiangtang Plateau. Resources Science, 30, 1852-1859. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王景升, 张宪洲, 赵玉萍, 沈振西, 石培礼, 余成群 (2008) 藏北羌塘高原气候变化的时空格局. 资源科学, 30, 1852-1859.]
21	Xiao T, Liu JY, Shao QQ (2009) A simulation on changes in vegetation productivity in “Three River Sources” Nature Reserve, Qinghai Province over past 20 years. Journal of Geo-information Science, 11, 557-565. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[肖桐, 刘纪远, 邵全琴 (2009) 近20年青海三江源自然保护区植被生产力变化模拟. 地球信息科学学报, 11, 557-565.]
22	Yan JS, Wang RS (2001) Advances of ecological engineering in China in the past decade. Rural Eco-Environment, 17(1), 1-8, 20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[颜京松, 王如松 (2001) 近十年生态工程在中国的进展. 农村生态环境, 17(1), 1-8, 20.]
23	Zhang HZ, Lu HY, Hong JC, Ma PF (2013) Climate change and its effect on steppe animal husbandry in northwest Tibet. Arid Zone Research, 30, 308-314. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张核真, 路红亚, 洪健昌, 马鹏飞 (2013) 藏西北地区气候变化及其对草地畜牧业的影响. 干旱区研究, 30, 308-314.]
24	Zhang L (2012) One of excellent ecological engineering models of Florida, USA—Freedom Park. Wetland Science & Management, 8(4), 56-57. (in Chinese)
	[张立 (2012) 美国佛罗里达生态工程典范之一——佛州西南的湿地公园. 湿地科学与管理, 8(4), 56-57.]
25	Zhang RZ, Li BY, Zhang HX, Liu LS (2012) Regional System of Nature Reserves in China. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[张荣祖, 李炳元, 张豪禧, 刘林山) (2012)中国自然保护区区划系统研究. 中国环境科学出版社, 北京.]
26	Zhang W (2007) Research of Land Use/Cover Classification and Carbon Stocks—A Case Study on Tibetan Plateau . PhD dissertation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing.(in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张玮 (2007) 土地利用/覆被分类与碳储量研究——以青藏高原为例. 博士学位论文, 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京.]
27	Zhang YL, Li BY, Zheng D (2002) A discussion on the boundary and area of the Tibetan Plateau in China. Geographical Research, 21, 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张镱锂, 李炳元, 郑度 (2002) 论青藏高原范围与面积. 地理研究, 21, 1-8.]
28	Zhang YL, Hu ZJ, Qi W, Wu X, Bai WQ, Li LH, Ding MJ, Liu LS, Wang ZF, Zheng D (2015a) Assessment of protection effectiveness of nature reserves on the Tibetan Plateau based on net primary production and the large-sample-comparison method. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70, 1027-1040. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张镱锂, 胡忠俊, 祁威, 吴雪, 摆万奇, 李兰晖, 丁明军, 刘林山, 王兆锋, 郑度 (2015a) 基于NPP数据和样区对比法的青藏高原自然保护区保护成效分析. 地理学报, 70, 1027-1040.]
29	Zhang YL, Qi W, Zhou CP, Ding MJ, Liu LS, Gao JG, Bai WQ, Wang ZF, Zheng D (2013) Spatial and temporal variability in the net primary production (NPP) of alpine grassland on Tibetan Plateau from 1982 to 2009. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68, 1197-1211. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张镱锂, 祁威, 周才平, 丁明军, 刘林山, 高俊刚, 摆万奇, 王兆锋, 郑度 (2013) 青藏高原高寒草地净初级生产力(NPP)时空分异. 地理学报, 68, 1197-1211.]
30	Zhang YL, Wu X, Qi W, Li SC, Bai WQ (2015b) Character- istics and protection effects of the nature reserves in Tibetan Plateau, China. Resources Science, 37, 1455-1464. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张镱锂, 吴雪, 祁威, 李士成, 摆万奇 (2015b) 青藏高原自然保护区特征与保护成效简析. 资源科学, 37, 1455-1464.]
31	Zheng YM, Zhang HY, Niu ZG, Gong P (2012) Protection efficacy of national wetland reserves in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57, 1116-1134.

样区编号 No. of sampling area	自然保护区 Nature reserve	高寒草地类型 Type of alpine grassland	样区内/外有效像元数(个) Number of effective pixels of sampling areas (inside/outside)	样区编号 No. of sampling area	自然保护区 Nature reserve	高寒草地类型 Type of alpine grassland	样区内/外有效像元数(个) Number of effective pixels of l sampling areas (inside/outside)
01	羌塘 Chang Tang	高寒荒漠 Alpine desert	62/66	06	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	115/106
02	羌塘 Chang Tang	高寒草原 Alpine steppe	102/84	07	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	115/145
03	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	70/95	08	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	125/94
04	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	132/98	09	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	77/80
05	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	148/95	10	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草原 Alpine steppe	70/70

样区编号 No. of sampling area	自然保护区 Nature reserve	高寒草地类型 Type of alpine grassland	样区内/外有效像元数(个) Number of effective pixels of sampling areas (inside/outside)	样区编号 No. of sampling area	自然保护区 Nature reserve	高寒草地类型 Type of alpine grassland	样区内/外有效像元数(个) Number of effective pixels of l sampling areas (inside/outside)
01	羌塘 Chang Tang	高寒荒漠 Alpine desert	62/66	06	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	115/106
02	羌塘 Chang Tang	高寒草原 Alpine steppe	102/84	07	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	115/145
03	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	70/95	08	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	125/94
04	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	132/98	09	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	77/80
05	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草甸 Alpine meadow	148/95	10	三江源 Sanjiangyuan	高寒草原 Alpine steppe	70/70

样区 Sampling area		分析时段 Analysis period				第二阶段与第一阶段的NPP变化速率差值(P_2-1)^* The difference of NPP change rate between the second stage and the first stage (P_2-1)^*	第三阶段与第一阶段的NPP变化速率差值(P_3-1)^* The difference of NPP change rate between the third stage and the first stage (P_3-1)^*
编号 No.	样区组 Sampling area pair	全时段^* (1982-2009) Whole period (1982-2009)	第一阶段(K₁)^(1982年至建立自然保护区) First stage (K₁)^(1982 to implementation of nature reserve)	第二阶段(K₂)(建立自然保护区至实施新生态工程) Second stage (K₂) (implementation of nature reserve to new ecological engineering in 2000s)	第三阶段(K₃) (实施新生态工程至2009年) Third stage (K₃) (implementation of new ecological engineering in 2000s to 2009)
01	区内 Inside	0.057	-0.005	-0.222	3.067	-0.163	0.288
01	区外 Outside	-0.004	-0.194	-0.248	2.591	-0.163	0.288
02	区内 Inside	0.108	0.134	0.073	2.454	0.108	-0.640
02	区外 Outside	0.104	0.072	-0.097	3.032	0.108	-0.640
03	区内 Inside	0.095	0.170	-3.709	6.896	-1.529	1.700
03	区外 Outside	0.085	0.096	-2.253	5.122	-1.529	1.700
04	区内 Inside	-0.131	-0.382	-3.768	4.561	-0.872	0.170
04	区外 Outside	0.130	-0.012	-2.527	4.761	-0.872	0.170
05	区内 Inside	0.524	-0.287	-2.619	15.643	-1.303	9.778
05	区外 Outside	0.537	0.320	-0.709	6.472	-1.303	9.778
06	区内 Inside	0.643	0.094	-0.750	2.200	1.119	1.717
06	区外 Outside	0.654	0.479	-1.485	0.868	1.119	1.717
07	区内 Inside	0.721	-0.134	4.287	-2.174	0.934	1.951
07	区外 Outside	0.742	-0.167	3.321	-4.158	0.934	1.951
08	区内 Inside	1.291	1.588	3.770	-9.409	5.422	0.587
08	区外 Outside	1.370	2.075	-1.165	-9.509	5.422	0.587
09	区内 Inside	0.813	0.533	-0.138	-5.442	-0.346	1.390
09	区外 Outside	0.621	0.716	0.390	-6.649	-0.346	1.390
10	区内 Inside	1.104	-0.943	4.482	20.468	-7.384	8.197
10	区外 Outside	1.157	-1.050	11.759	12.165	-7.384	8.197

样区 Sampling area		分析时段 Analysis period				第二阶段与第一阶段的NPP变化速率差值(P_2-1)^* The difference of NPP change rate between the second stage and the first stage (P_2-1)^*	第三阶段与第一阶段的NPP变化速率差值(P_3-1)^* The difference of NPP change rate between the third stage and the first stage (P_3-1)^*
编号 No.	样区组 Sampling area pair	全时段^* (1982-2009) Whole period (1982-2009)	第一阶段(K₁)^(1982年至建立自然保护区) First stage (K₁)^(1982 to implementation of nature reserve)	第二阶段(K₂)(建立自然保护区至实施新生态工程) Second stage (K₂) (implementation of nature reserve to new ecological engineering in 2000s)	第三阶段(K₃) (实施新生态工程至2009年) Third stage (K₃) (implementation of new ecological engineering in 2000s to 2009)
01	区内 Inside	0.057	-0.005	-0.222	3.067	-0.163	0.288
01	区外 Outside	-0.004	-0.194	-0.248	2.591	-0.163	0.288
02	区内 Inside	0.108	0.134	0.073	2.454	0.108	-0.640
02	区外 Outside	0.104	0.072	-0.097	3.032	0.108	-0.640
03	区内 Inside	0.095	0.170	-3.709	6.896	-1.529	1.700
03	区外 Outside	0.085	0.096	-2.253	5.122	-1.529	1.700
04	区内 Inside	-0.131	-0.382	-3.768	4.561	-0.872	0.170
04	区外 Outside	0.130	-0.012	-2.527	4.761	-0.872	0.170
05	区内 Inside	0.524	-0.287	-2.619	15.643	-1.303	9.778
05	区外 Outside	0.537	0.320	-0.709	6.472	-1.303	9.778
06	区内 Inside	0.643	0.094	-0.750	2.200	1.119	1.717
06	区外 Outside	0.654	0.479	-1.485	0.868	1.119	1.717
07	区内 Inside	0.721	-0.134	4.287	-2.174	0.934	1.951
07	区外 Outside	0.742	-0.167	3.321	-4.158	0.934	1.951
08	区内 Inside	1.291	1.588	3.770	-9.409	5.422	0.587
08	区外 Outside	1.370	2.075	-1.165	-9.509	5.422	0.587
09	区内 Inside	0.813	0.533	-0.138	-5.442	-0.346	1.390
09	区外 Outside	0.621	0.716	0.390	-6.649	-0.346	1.390
10	区内 Inside	1.104	-0.943	4.482	20.468	-7.384	8.197
10	区外 Outside	1.157	-1.050	11.759	12.165	-7.384	8.197

[1]	李雪萌, 蒋际宝, 张曾鲁, 刘晓静, 王亚利, 吴宜钊, 李银生, 邱江平, 赵琦. 宝天曼国家级自然保护区蚯蚓物种多样性及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23352-.
[2]	王启蕃, 刘小慧, 朱紫薇, 刘磊, 王鑫雪, 汲旭阳, 周绍春, 张子栋, 董红雨, 张明海. 黑龙江北极村国家级自然保护区鸟类与兽类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 24024-.
[3]	所翟, 俞渃茜, 李媛辉, 徐基良. 基于实证分析中国自然保护区地方立法问题检视和优化路径[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23287-.
[4]	刘啸林, 吴友贵, 张敏华, 陈小荣, 朱志成, 陈定云, 董舒, 李步杭, 丁炳扬, 刘宇. 浙江百山祖25 ha亚热带森林动态监测样地群落组成与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23294-.
[5]	黄小龙, 蒙秉顺, 李海波, 冉伟, 杨伟, 王丞, 谢波, 张旭, 冉景丞, 张明明. 基于红外相机的黔金丝猴及其同域分布物种种间关联[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23402-.
[6]	崔国发. 关于自然保护地整合优化工作中几个关键问题的讨论与建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 22447-.
[7]	邢超, 林依, 周智强, 赵联军, 蒋仕伟, 林蓁蓁, 徐基良, 詹祥江. 基于DNA条形码技术构建王朗国家级自然保护区陆生脊椎动物遗传资源数据库及物种鉴定[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22661-.
[8]	陈本平, 陈建武, 凌征文, 杨旭, 陈鑫, 李生强, 杨彪. 四川老君山国家级自然保护区林下鸟兽多样性及动态变化数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22566-.
[9]	姚雪, 陈星, 戴尊, 宋坤, 邢诗晨, 曹宏彧, 邹璐, 王健. 采集策略对叶附生苔类植物发现概率及物种多样性的重要性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22685-.
[10]	赵梦乔, 陈友, 徐正会, 王戌勃, 赵忠良, 徐文川, 何宗辉, 王文华. 云南哀牢山国家级自然保护区东坡垂直带蚂蚁物种多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23168-.
[11]	胡远芳, 李斌强, 梁丹, 李兴权, 刘兰香, 杨家伟, 罗旭. 人为干扰对白腹锦鸡活动节律的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(8): 21484-.
[12]	李海萍, 徐竹青, 龙志航. 大兴安岭地区重点保护和珍稀动物保护空缺分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(2): 21294-.
[13]	秦乐, 朱彦鹏, 任月恒, 李博炎, 付梦娣, 李俊生. 青藏高原国家级自然保护区管理能力差异及其对保护成效的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(11): 22419-.
[14]	王伟, 周越, 田瑜, 李俊生. 自然保护地生物多样性保护研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(10): 22459-.
[15]	邢诗晨, 唐录艳, 戴尊, 涂淑雯, 陈星, 张建行, 李宏庆, 彭涛, 王健. 安徽石台县与青阳县苔藓植物多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(1): 21186-.

生态工程实施对羌塘和三江源国家级自然保护区植被净初级生产力的影响

Effects of ecological engineering on net primary production in the Chang Tang and Sanjiangyuan national nature reserves on the Tibetan Plateau

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价