生物多样性 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 681-688.doi: 10.17520/biods.2015158

• • 上一篇    下一篇

生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学-政策平台的概念框架和运作模式

兰存子, 田瑜*(), 徐靖, 李俊生   

  1. 中国环境科学研究院生物多样性研究中心, 北京 100012
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-09 接受日期:2015-07-16 出版日期:2015-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 田瑜 E-mail:tianyu@craes.org.cn
  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金(31300458)和环境保护部生物多样性保护专项

Conceptual framework and operational model of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Cunzi Lan, Yu Tian*(), Jing Xu, Junsheng Li   

  1. Biodiversity Research Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012
  • Received:2015-06-09 Accepted:2015-07-16 Online:2015-09-20
  • Contact: Tian Yu E-mail:tianyu@craes.org.cn

生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学-政策平台(Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES)于2012年4月正式成立, 其目标是建立科学与政策之间的联系, 加强生物多样性保护与可持续利用, 确保长期人类福祉和社会可持续发展。为了促进不同学科、知识体系和利益相关方之间的协作, 多学科专家小组组织制定了IPBES概念框架, 并在2013年第二届全体会议上正式通过。本文介绍了IPBES概念框架的基本要素及其相互关系以及IPBES科学和政策互动的运作模式, 讨论了IPBES对政府间气候变化专门委员会(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC)、生物多样性科学知识国际机制(International Mechanism of Scientific Expertise on Biodiversity, IMoSEB)和千年生态系统评估(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, MA)的借鉴和发展。概念框架识别了自然与人类复杂关系中的6个基本要素: (1)自然; (2)自然对人类的福祉; (3)好的生活质量; (4)人类财产; (5)直接驱动力; (6)制度、治理和其他间接驱动力, 并说明了各要素间的相互作用及其在时间和空间尺度上的对应关系。IPBES运作的概念模型展示了科学和政策通过IPBES实现互动的过程: 科学和其他知识体系经过概念框架的过滤持续向平台流动, 并通过IPBES职能和工作方案的实现来影响政策。IPBES将成为今后各国在生物多样性领域对话、博弈、争取利益最大化的舞台, 其多学科、多尺度评估结果将在政策的支持和导向方面对国际社会产生重大影响。我国应积极主动参与IPBES的工作并发挥建设性作用, 确保我国相关科研成果的应用, 同时借鉴IPBES的思路, 改进我国生物多样性保护。

关键词: 生物多样性, 生态系统服务, 人类福祉, 科学, 政策, 评估

The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) was officially established in April 2012 as an independent intergovernmental body, with the goal of strengthening the science-policy interface for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, long-term human well-being and social sustainable development. A conceptual framework for the IPBES, recommended by the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel, was accepted during the 2nd Session of platform’s Plenary, in order to promote cooperation across different disciplines, knowledge systems, and stakeholders. In this paper, IPBES conceptual framework is introduced, including the main elements and their linkages, and the operational conceptual model between science and policy of IPBES, as well as the linkages between IPBES, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), International Mechanism of Scientific Expertise on Biodiversity (IMoSEB) and Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), and the experiences learned from these previous actions. The conceptual framework captures six elements of the relationships between the natural world and humankind: nature; nature’s benefits to people; good quality of life; anthropogenic assets; direct drivers of change; institutions and governance systems and other indirect drivers of change. This framework indicates the interactions of 6 elements at different spatial and temporal scales and the focus for assessment and knowledge generation. The operational model of IPBES demonstrates the dynamics between science and policy through IPBES. A continuous flow of knowledge from science and other knowledge systems filters to the interface after screening the analytical conceptual framework, and decision-making is then impacted through the realization of the functions and the work program of IPBES. The prospects and potential impacts of the conceptual framework and operational model, as well as a proposed corresponding strategy for China are discussed. We argue that IPBES is going to become a platform for nations to communicate, play political game and maximize the benefits, the embracement of different disciplines and knowledge systems in the multi-scaled assessments of the IPBES will have significant impacts on policy guiding and supporting in international community. China should become more proactive in participating and play a constructive role in the IPBES process, in order to ensure the application of the scientific research from China in the assessment, as well as improve the biodiversity conservation in China by incorporating international experience.

Key words: biodiversity, ecosystem services, human wellbeing, science, policy, assessment

图1

生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学-政策平台(IPBES)的概念框架(引自IPBES/2/17(http://ipbes.net/images/doc-uments/plenary/second/working/2_17/Final/IPBES_2_17_en.pdf))"

图2

生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学-政策平台(IPBES)运作的概念模型。双向箭头(粗和细)表示科学-IPBES-政策之间的互动, 单向箭头表示概念框架影响IPBES的进程、职能和交付成果, 虚线箭头表示政策对科学和其他知识体系的影响。(引自IPBES/2/17 (http://www.ipbes.net/images/documents/plenary/second/working/2_17/Final/IPBES_2_17_en.pdf))"

[1] Beck S, Borie M, Chilvers J, Esguerra A, Heubach K, Hulme M, Lidskog R, Lövbrand E, Marquard E, Miller C, Nadim T, Nesshoever C, Settele J, Turnhout E, Vasileiadou E, Goerg C (2014) Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise: the cases of the IPCC and the IPBES.Gaia Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23, 80-87.
[2] Bennet EM, Peterson CD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.Ecology Letters, 12, 1-11.
[3] Breidenich C, Magraw D, Rowley A, Rubin JW (1998) The Kyoto protocol to the United Nation’s framework convention on climate change.American Journal of International Law, 92, 315-331.
[4] Brooks TM, Lamoreux JF, Soberon J (2014) IPBES ≠ IPCC.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 543-545.
[5] Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Diaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte A (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 1305-1312.
[6] Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico Set al., (2015) The IPBES Conceptual Framework—connecting nature and people.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16.
[7] Díaz S, Demissew S, Joly CA, Lonsdale WM, Larigauderie A (2015) A rosetta stone for nature’s benefits to people. PLoS Biology, 13, 1-8.
[8] Duraiappah AK, Asah ST, Brondizio ES, Kosoy N, O’Farrell PJ, Prieur-Richard AH, Subramanian SM, Takeuchi K (2014) Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem services for human well-being: a conceptual framework for understanding the new commons.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 7, 94-100.
[9] Guo ZF (郭正府), Liu JQ (刘嘉麒), Chen XY (陈晓雨) (2007) The influence of volcanism on the biological existence environment in Miocene Shanwang of Shandong.Science in China(中国科学), 37, 1169-1175. (in Chinese)
[10] Hotes S, Opgenoorth L (2014) Trust and control at the science- policy interface in IPBES.BioScience, 64, 277-278.
[11] Hulme M, Mahony M, Beck S, Görg C, Hansjürgens B, Hauck J, Nesshöver C, Paulsch A, Vandewalle M, Wittmer H, Böschen S, Bridgewater P, Diaw MC, Fabre P, Figueroa A, Heong KL, Korn H, Leemans R, Lövbrand E, Hamid MN, Monfreda C, Pielke R, Settele J, Winter M, Vadrot ABM, Hove S, Sluijs JP (2011) Science-policy interface: beyond assessments.Science, 333, 697-698.
[12] Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (2013) IPBES/2/17: Report of the second session of the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
[13] Koetz T, Farrell KN, Bridgewater P (2012) Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics, 12, 1-21.
[14] Larigauderie A, Mooney HA (2010) The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 1-6.
[15] Lavoie M, Paré D, Bergeron Y (2005) Impact of global change and forest management on carbon sequestration in northern forested peatlands.Environmental Reviews, 13, 199-240.
[16] Loreau M, Oteng-Yeboah A, Arroyo MT, Babin D, Barbault R, Donoghue M, Gadgil M, Häuser C, Heip C, Larigauderie A, Ma K, Mace G, Mooney HA, Perrings C, Raven P, Sarukhan J, Schei P, Scholes RJ, Watson RT (2006) Diversity without representation.Nature, 442, 245-246.
[17] Ma KP (马克平) (2012) IPBES: Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES): an IPCC for biodiversity.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 20, 409-410. (in Chinese)
[18] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
[19] Perrings C, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A, Mooney H (2011) The biodiversity and ecosystem services Science-policy interface.Science, 331, 1139-1141.
[20] Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.Science, 325, 419-422.
[21] Rampino MR, Koeberl C (2006) Comparison of Bosumtwi impact crater (Ghana) and Crater Lake volcanic caldera (Oregon, USA): implications for biotic recovery after catastrophic events. In: Biological Processes Associated with Impact Events (eds Cockell CS, Koeberl C, Gilmour I), pp. 101-120. Springer Heidelberg, Berlin.
[22] Scheffer M, Carpenter CS, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems.Nature, 413, 591-596.
[23] Tian Y (田瑜), Li JS (李俊生), Lan CZ (兰存子), Li XS (李秀山) (2015) Interpretation of the work programme of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the period 2014-2018.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 23, 543-549. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] Turnhout E, Bloomfield B, Hulme M, Vogel J, Wynne B (2012) Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience.Nature, 488, 454-455.
[25] Zhang YM (张永民), Zhao SD (赵士洞) (2010) The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Follow-up: a global strategy for turning knowledge into action.Journal of Natural Resources(自然资源学报), 25, 522-528. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 冯兆忠 袁相洋 李品 尚博 平琴 胡廷剑 刘硕. (2020) 地表臭氧浓度升高对陆地生态系统影响的研究进展. 植物生态学报, 44(全球变化与生态系统专辑): 0-0.
[2] 黄林韬 黄晖 江雷. (2020) 中国造礁石珊瑚分类厘定. 生物多样性, 28(4): 515-523.
[3] 左建儒 漆小泉 林荣呈 钱前 顾红雅 陈凡 杨淑华 陈之端 白永飞 王雷 王小菁 姜里文 萧浪涛 种康 王台. (2020) 2019年中国植物科学若干领域重要研究进展. 植物学报, 55(3): 0-0.
[4] 耿宜佳,田瑜,李俊生,徐靖. (2020) “2020年后全球生物多样性框架”进展及展望. 生物多样性, 28(2): 238-243.
[5] 刘海鸥,张风春,赵富伟,杜乐山,薛达元. (2020) 从《生物多样性公约》资金机制战略目标变迁解析生物多样性热点问题. 生物多样性, 28(2): 244-252.
[6] 马亦生,马青青,何念军,朱大鹏,赵凯辉,刘红彩,李帅,孙亮,唐流斌. (2020) 基于红外相机技术调查佛坪国家级自然保护区兽类和鸟类多样性. 生物多样性, 28(2): 226-230.
[7] 刘振元,孟星亮,李正飞,张君倩,徐靖,银森录,谢志才. (2020) 南洞庭湖区软体动物物种多样性评估及保护对策. 生物多样性, 28(2): 155-165.
[8] 王剀,任金龙,陈宏满,吕植桐,郭宪光,蒋珂,陈进民,李家堂,郭鹏,王英永,车静. (2020) 中国两栖、爬行动物更新名录. 生物多样性, 28(2): 189-218.
[9] 何维明. (2020) 生物入侵的影响是否准确可知?. 生物多样性, 28(2): 253-255.
[10] 李熠,唐志尧,闫昱晶,王科,蔡磊,贺金生,古松,姚一建. (2020) 物种分布模型在大型真菌红色名录评估及保护中的应用: 以冬虫夏草为例. 生物多样性, 28(1): 99-106.
[11] 王科,刘冬梅,蔡蕾,吴海军,李熠,魏铁铮,王永会,吴红梅,卫晓丹,李斌斌,李俊生,姚一建. (2020) 中国大型真菌红色名录评估方法和程序. 生物多样性, 28(1): 11-19.
[12] 魏鑫丽,邓红,魏江春. (2020) 中国地衣的濒危等级评估. 生物多样性, 28(1): 54-65.
[13] 王玉冰,孙毅寒,丁威,张恩涛,李文怀,迟永刚,郑淑霞. (2020) 长期氮添加对典型草原植物多样性与初级生产力的影响及途径. 植物生态学报, 44(1): 22-32.
[14] 李小雨,肖凌云,梁旭昶,程琛,冯琛,赵翔,刘炎林,卞晓星,何兵,张常智,Justine Shanti Alexander,邢睿,黄亚慧,阿旺久美,谢然尼玛,宋大昭,黄巧雯,扎西桑俄,彭奎,尹杭,连新明,杨欣,李晟,施小刚,杨创明,吕植. (2019) 中国雪豹的威胁与保护现状. 生物多样性, 27(9): 932-942.
[15] 李永民,吴孝兵. (2019) 安徽省两栖爬行动物名录修订. 生物多样性, 27(9): 1002-1011.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed