生物多样性 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 431-437. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14082 cstr: 32101.14.SP.J.1003.2014.14082
所属专题: 国家公园建设论坛
收稿日期:
2014-04-16
接受日期:
2014-06-14
出版日期:
2014-07-20
发布日期:
2014-07-24
通讯作者:
刘哲
基金资助:
Min Wang, Zhe Liu*(), Xiangzhao Feng, Chunxiu Tian
Received:
2014-04-16
Accepted:
2014-06-14
Online:
2014-07-20
Published:
2014-07-24
Contact:
Liu Zhe
摘要:
气候变化和生物多样性损失是人类面临的两个严峻的全球性环境挑战, 有关应对气候变化和生物多样性保护国际公约的协作在全球范围内也越来越受重视。本文系统梳理了《联合国气候变化框架公约》下保护生物多样性和《生物多样性公约》下应对气候变化的发展脉络, 探讨了两公约下各缔约方针对相关议题的谈判立场及未来走向, 并对两公约进行了综合评价。《联合国气候变化框架公约》下涉及生物多样性保护的焦点议题主要有土地利用、土地利用变化和林业(Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, LULUCF)、减少毁林和森林退化的碳排放机制(Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, REDD)及损失和损害国际机制, 《生物多样性公约》下涉及应对气候变化的焦点议题主要有协同增效、减少毁林和森林退化的碳排放机制(REDD)和地球工程及相关问题。本文最后还就我国应对气候变化和生物多样性国际谈判及国内履约提出了建议: (1)整合谈判团队力量, 促进两公约协同增效; (2)做好交叉议题的研判和谈判预案, 主动引领谈判进程; (3)为《联合国气候变化框架公约》谈判提供损失和损害风险评估数据; (4)加强《生物多样性公约》下地球工程议题的科学研究与国际交流。
王敏, 刘哲, 冯相昭, 田春秀 (2014) 《联合国气候变化框架公约》与《生物多样性公约》的关系. 生物多样性, 22, 431-437. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14082.
Min Wang, Zhe Liu, Xiangzhao Feng, Chunxiu Tian (2014) Cross-boundary issues under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Convention on Biodiversity. Biodiversity Science, 22, 431-437. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14082.
缔约方 大会 (COPs) | 土地利用、土地利用变化和林业Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) | 减少毁林和森林退化的碳排放 Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) | 损失和损害 Loss and Damage |
---|---|---|---|
1998, COP4 | 首次出现LULUCF议题 Raised a new issue of LULUCF at the first time | - | - |
2000, COP6 | 明确了相关定义, 决定将植树造林和重新造林包括在清洁发展机制(Clean Development Mechanism, CDM)项目下 Defined some terms, took afforestation and reforestation carbon sink projects as a qualified CDM project | - | - |
2001, COP7 | 明确了适用于第一承诺期的LULUCF规则 Clarified LULUCF rules for the first commitment period | - | - |
2003, COP9 | 确认了第一个承诺期CDM下造林和再造林项目活动模式和程序 Confirmed activity patterns and procedures of afforestation and reforestation projects for the first commitment period | - | - |
2005, COP11 | - | 建议在临时议程中增加REDD议题 Advised to increase REDD issue in the Provisional Agenda | - |
2007, COP13 | - | 由REDD扩展到REDD+(在REDD基础上增加了保护和可持续管理森林以增加森林碳汇部分), 有关政策方针和激励办法纳入“巴厘岛行动计划” Broadened REDD to REDD+( “REDD+” goes beyond deforestation and forest degradation, and includes the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks), and related policies and incentive measures were included into Bali Action Plan | 要求缔约方考虑损失和损害的方法与策略 Required parties to consider methods and strategies of loss and damage |
2008, COP14 | - | - | 提出应对气候变化损失和损害的多窗口机制 Raised multi-window mechanism to address Loss and Damage from climate change impacts |
2009, COP15 | - | 首次审议REDD+议题, 通过了“关于REDD+的方法学指导意见” First review of REDD+ issue and adopted the methodological guidance for activities relating to REDD+ | - |
2010, COP16 | 明确了议定书二期减排中的核算活动类型及核算原则 Clarified the accounting activity type and rule in the second commitment period of Kyoto Protocol | 在REDD+行动的具体范围、行动原则和资金支持方面达成共识 Made agreements on the detailed scale, principle and financial support of REDD+ action | 决定建立损失和损害工作计划 Decided to build the work programme on Loss and Damage |
2011, COP17 | 明确了发达国家2012年后二期减排中必须强制和可自行选择纳入核算的活动类型 Confirmed the kind of activity that should be taken by developed countries in a mandate or selectively, in the second commitment period of Kyoto Protocol since 2012 | 在REDD+行动的政策激励机制和技术方法上达成协议 Made agreements on policy incentive mechanism and technology of REDD+ action | 确立了《损失和损害问题工作方案》 Established the work programme on Loss and Damage |
2012, COP18 | - | 决定在2013年执行基于REDD+行动效果进行融资的工作方案 Decided to execute the financing plan in 2013 based on REDD+ action effect | 首次将“损失和损害”问题列入条款, 决定设立应对损失和损害的机构安排 Listed loss and damage on the provisions for the first time, created an institutional arrangement on Loss and Damage |
2013, COP19 | - | 决定建立“REDD+华沙框架” Decided to establish the Warsaw Framework for REDD+ | 建立“华沙损失和损害国际机制” Established the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage |
表1 《联合国气候变化框架公约》下有关生物多样性的谈判焦点及其发展脉络
Table 1 The key issues and its negotiation process related to biodiversity under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
缔约方 大会 (COPs) | 土地利用、土地利用变化和林业Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) | 减少毁林和森林退化的碳排放 Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) | 损失和损害 Loss and Damage |
---|---|---|---|
1998, COP4 | 首次出现LULUCF议题 Raised a new issue of LULUCF at the first time | - | - |
2000, COP6 | 明确了相关定义, 决定将植树造林和重新造林包括在清洁发展机制(Clean Development Mechanism, CDM)项目下 Defined some terms, took afforestation and reforestation carbon sink projects as a qualified CDM project | - | - |
2001, COP7 | 明确了适用于第一承诺期的LULUCF规则 Clarified LULUCF rules for the first commitment period | - | - |
2003, COP9 | 确认了第一个承诺期CDM下造林和再造林项目活动模式和程序 Confirmed activity patterns and procedures of afforestation and reforestation projects for the first commitment period | - | - |
2005, COP11 | - | 建议在临时议程中增加REDD议题 Advised to increase REDD issue in the Provisional Agenda | - |
2007, COP13 | - | 由REDD扩展到REDD+(在REDD基础上增加了保护和可持续管理森林以增加森林碳汇部分), 有关政策方针和激励办法纳入“巴厘岛行动计划” Broadened REDD to REDD+( “REDD+” goes beyond deforestation and forest degradation, and includes the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks), and related policies and incentive measures were included into Bali Action Plan | 要求缔约方考虑损失和损害的方法与策略 Required parties to consider methods and strategies of loss and damage |
2008, COP14 | - | - | 提出应对气候变化损失和损害的多窗口机制 Raised multi-window mechanism to address Loss and Damage from climate change impacts |
2009, COP15 | - | 首次审议REDD+议题, 通过了“关于REDD+的方法学指导意见” First review of REDD+ issue and adopted the methodological guidance for activities relating to REDD+ | - |
2010, COP16 | 明确了议定书二期减排中的核算活动类型及核算原则 Clarified the accounting activity type and rule in the second commitment period of Kyoto Protocol | 在REDD+行动的具体范围、行动原则和资金支持方面达成共识 Made agreements on the detailed scale, principle and financial support of REDD+ action | 决定建立损失和损害工作计划 Decided to build the work programme on Loss and Damage |
2011, COP17 | 明确了发达国家2012年后二期减排中必须强制和可自行选择纳入核算的活动类型 Confirmed the kind of activity that should be taken by developed countries in a mandate or selectively, in the second commitment period of Kyoto Protocol since 2012 | 在REDD+行动的政策激励机制和技术方法上达成协议 Made agreements on policy incentive mechanism and technology of REDD+ action | 确立了《损失和损害问题工作方案》 Established the work programme on Loss and Damage |
2012, COP18 | - | 决定在2013年执行基于REDD+行动效果进行融资的工作方案 Decided to execute the financing plan in 2013 based on REDD+ action effect | 首次将“损失和损害”问题列入条款, 决定设立应对损失和损害的机构安排 Listed loss and damage on the provisions for the first time, created an institutional arrangement on Loss and Damage |
2013, COP19 | - | 决定建立“REDD+华沙框架” Decided to establish the Warsaw Framework for REDD+ | 建立“华沙损失和损害国际机制” Established the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage |
[1] | UNFCCC Secretariat (2011) Synthesis report on views and information on the thematic areas in the implementation of the work programme.. |
[2] | Ma X (马欣), Li YE (李玉娥), He XJ (何霄嘉), Wang WT (王文涛), Liu S (刘硕), Gao QZ (高青竹) (2013) The progress on loss and damage negotiation for addressing climate change under the UNFCCC.Advances in Climate Change Research(气候变化研究进展), 9, 357-361. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[3] | Tan LZ (谭灵芝), Wang GY (王国友) (2011) Research on funds allocation mechanism for the adaptation to climate change.West Forum(西部论坛), 21(3), 49-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Wu J (吴军), Zhang CY (张称意), Xu HG (徐海根) (2011) Climate change issue in Convention on Biological Diversity: negotiations and focuses.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 19, 400-403. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Xue M (雪明), Wu SH (武曙红), An LD (安丽丹), Xu JL (徐基良) (2013) The evolution and outlook of REDD-plus negotiation.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 21, 383-388. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 干靓 刘巷序 鲁雪茗 岳星. 全球生物多样性热点地区大城市的保护政策与优化方向[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24529-. |
[2] | 曾子轩 杨锐 黄越 陈路遥. 清华大学校园鸟类多样性特征与环境关联[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24373-. |
[3] | 臧明月, 刘立, 马月, 徐徐, 胡飞龙, 卢晓强, 李佳琦, 于赐刚, 刘燕. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》下的中国城市生物多样性保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24482-. |
[4] | 祝晓雨, 王晨灏, 王忠君, 张玉钧. 城市绿地生物多样性研究进展与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 25027-. |
[5] | 袁琳, 王思琦, 侯静轩. 大都市地区的自然留野:趋势与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24481-. |
[6] | 胡敏, 李彬彬, Coraline Goron. 只绿是不够的: 一个生物多样性友好的城市公园管理框架[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24483-. |
[7] | 王欣, 鲍风宇. 基于鸟类多样性提升的南滇池国家湿地公园生态修复效果分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24531-. |
[8] | 明玥, 郝培尧, 谭铃千, 郑曦. 基于城市绿色高质量发展理念的中国城市生物多样性保护与提升研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24524-. |
[9] | 谢淦, 宣晶, 付其迪, 魏泽, 薛凯, 雒海瑞, 高吉喜, 李敏. 草地植物多样性无人机调查的物种智能识别模型构建[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 24236-. |
[10] | 褚晓琳, 张全国. 演化速率假说的实验验证研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 25019-. |
[11] | 宋威, 程才, 王嘉伟, 吴纪华. 土壤微生物对植物多样性–生态系统功能关系的调控作用[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 24579-. |
[12] | 卢晓强, 董姗姗, 马月, 徐徐, 邱凤, 臧明月, 万雅琼, 李孪鑫, 于赐刚, 刘燕. 前沿技术在生物多样性研究中的应用现状、挑战与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 24440-. |
[13] | 农荞伊, 曹军, 程文达, 彭艳琼. 不同方法对蜜蜂总科昆虫资源与多样性监测效果的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 25057-. |
[14] | 郭雨桐, 李素萃, 王智, 解焱, 杨雪, 周广金, 尤春赫, 朱萨宁, 高吉喜. 全国自然保护地对国家重点保护野生物种的覆盖度及其分布状况[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24423-. |
[15] | 赵维洋, 王伟, 马冰然. 其他有效的区域保护措施(OECMs)研究进展与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(3): 24525-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn