Biodiv Sci ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 22513. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022513
• Original Papers: Animal Diversity • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yimei Zhang1, Yanyi Wang1, Yan He2, Bing Zhou1, Miao Tian1, Canwei Xia1,*()
Received:
2022-09-06
Accepted:
2022-12-16
Online:
2023-01-20
Published:
2023-01-31
Contact:
*Canwei Xia, E-mail: xiacanwei@bnu.edu.cn
Yimei Zhang, Yanyi Wang, Yan He, Bing Zhou, Miao Tian, Canwei Xia. Characteristics and applications of beta acoustic indices[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(1): 22513.
声学指数 Acoustic index | 计算公式 Computing formula | 公式中符号的含义 Meaning of symbols in the formula | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|
交互信息指数 Mutual information index (MI) | H1, H2, | 2004 | |
相对频谱差异指数 Relative frequency dissimilarity index (RF) | xi, yi分别为两段声音各自频段的相对音强 xi, yi are the relative sound intensity in each frequency band of each sound | 2006 | |
时间差异指数 Temporal dissimilarity index (TD) | si, ti分别为两段声音各自时段的相对音强 si, ti are the relative sound intensity in each time period of each sound | 2008 | |
频谱差异指数 Spectral dissimilarity index (SD) | 同RF Same as in the formula of RF | 2008 | |
声音差异指数 Acoustic dissimilarity index (AD) | TD和SD的乘积 Product of TD and SD | 2008 | |
Kolmogorov-Smirnov距离指数 Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance index (KS) | Xi, Yi分别为两段声音每个频率的累积音强 Xi, Yi are the cumulative sound intensity in each frequency of each sound | 2013a | |
Kullback-Leibler距离指数 Kullback-Leibler distance index (KL) | 同RF Same as in the formula of RF | 2013a | |
累积频谱差异指数 Cumulative spectral dissimilarity index (CS) | 同KS Same as in the formula of KS | 2014 | |
相关差异指数 Correlation-based dissimilarity index (CB) | 同RF Same as in the formula of RF | 2014 | |
Itakura-Saito距离指数 Itakura-Saito distance index (IS) | 同RF Same as in the computing of RF | 2018 | |
对数频谱距离指数 Log-spectral distance index (LS) | 同RF Same as in the formula of RF | 2018 |
Table 1 Description of the commonly used beta acoustic indices
声学指数 Acoustic index | 计算公式 Computing formula | 公式中符号的含义 Meaning of symbols in the formula | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|
交互信息指数 Mutual information index (MI) | H1, H2, | 2004 | |
相对频谱差异指数 Relative frequency dissimilarity index (RF) | xi, yi分别为两段声音各自频段的相对音强 xi, yi are the relative sound intensity in each frequency band of each sound | 2006 | |
时间差异指数 Temporal dissimilarity index (TD) | si, ti分别为两段声音各自时段的相对音强 si, ti are the relative sound intensity in each time period of each sound | 2008 | |
频谱差异指数 Spectral dissimilarity index (SD) | 同RF Same as in the formula of RF | 2008 | |
声音差异指数 Acoustic dissimilarity index (AD) | TD和SD的乘积 Product of TD and SD | 2008 | |
Kolmogorov-Smirnov距离指数 Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance index (KS) | Xi, Yi分别为两段声音每个频率的累积音强 Xi, Yi are the cumulative sound intensity in each frequency of each sound | 2013a | |
Kullback-Leibler距离指数 Kullback-Leibler distance index (KL) | 同RF Same as in the formula of RF | 2013a | |
累积频谱差异指数 Cumulative spectral dissimilarity index (CS) | 同KS Same as in the formula of KS | 2014 | |
相关差异指数 Correlation-based dissimilarity index (CB) | 同RF Same as in the formula of RF | 2014 | |
Itakura-Saito距离指数 Itakura-Saito distance index (IS) | 同RF Same as in the computing of RF | 2018 | |
对数频谱距离指数 Log-spectral distance index (LS) | 同RF Same as in the formula of RF | 2018 |
声学指数Acoustic index* | 非负性 Non-negativity | 同一性 Self-identity | 对称性 Symmetry | 直递性 Triangle inequality | 有限性 Finiteness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MI | 否 No | 否 No | 是 Yes | 否 No | 是 Yes |
RF | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes |
TD | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No |
SD | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No |
AD | 是 Yes | 否 No | 是 Yes | 否 No | 否 No |
KS | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes |
KL | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No | 否 No |
CS | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes |
CB | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No | 是 Yes |
IS | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No | 否 No |
LS | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No |
Table 2 Mathematical properties of beta acoustic indices
声学指数Acoustic index* | 非负性 Non-negativity | 同一性 Self-identity | 对称性 Symmetry | 直递性 Triangle inequality | 有限性 Finiteness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MI | 否 No | 否 No | 是 Yes | 否 No | 是 Yes |
RF | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes |
TD | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No |
SD | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No |
AD | 是 Yes | 否 No | 是 Yes | 否 No | 否 No |
KS | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes |
KL | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No | 否 No |
CS | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes |
CB | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No | 是 Yes |
IS | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No | 否 No |
LS | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 是 Yes | 否 No |
声学指数 Acoustic index* | 生物学意义 Biological significance | 文献 Reference |
---|---|---|
AD | 反映物种(鸟类、两栖类、昆虫)组成不同 Difference in species (birds, amphibians, insects) composition | 2008 |
AD | 反映生境差异(成熟森林、幼林、林地-农田交错带的比较) Difference in habitat comparison among mature forest, young forest, and forest-cropland ecotone | 2012 |
SD | 反映日节律 Daily rhythm | 2013a |
SD, KS, KL, CB | 反映鸟类物种数量不同 Difference in the number of bird species | 2013b |
CB, KL, SD, KS, CS | 反映鸟类物种数量不同 Difference in the number of bird species | 2014 |
SD | 反映日节律、生境差异(林下层和树冠层的比较) Daily rhythm, difference in habitat comparison between understory and canopy | 2014 |
AD | 反映生境差异(清除、再生、残留植被的比较) Difference in habitat comparison among cleared, regrowth and remnant vegetation conditions | 2018 |
SD, CS | 反映月相变化、生境差异(有无入侵生物啮齿类和狐狸) Lunar rhythm, difference in habitat have or not have invasive species rats and foxes | 2020 |
SD, CS | 反映日节律、生境差异(油棕种植园和周围森林的比较) Daily rhythm, difference in habitat comparison between oil palm plantation and surrounding forests | 2020 |
AD | 反映日节律和季节变化 Daily rhythm, seasonal variation | 2022 |
SD, TD, CS, AD, KS, CB, MI, LS, RF | 反映生境差异(混交林、落叶林的比较) Difference in habitat comparison between mixed-use corridor and deciduous forest | 2022 |
Table 3 The application of beta acoustic indices
声学指数 Acoustic index* | 生物学意义 Biological significance | 文献 Reference |
---|---|---|
AD | 反映物种(鸟类、两栖类、昆虫)组成不同 Difference in species (birds, amphibians, insects) composition | 2008 |
AD | 反映生境差异(成熟森林、幼林、林地-农田交错带的比较) Difference in habitat comparison among mature forest, young forest, and forest-cropland ecotone | 2012 |
SD | 反映日节律 Daily rhythm | 2013a |
SD, KS, KL, CB | 反映鸟类物种数量不同 Difference in the number of bird species | 2013b |
CB, KL, SD, KS, CS | 反映鸟类物种数量不同 Difference in the number of bird species | 2014 |
SD | 反映日节律、生境差异(林下层和树冠层的比较) Daily rhythm, difference in habitat comparison between understory and canopy | 2014 |
AD | 反映生境差异(清除、再生、残留植被的比较) Difference in habitat comparison among cleared, regrowth and remnant vegetation conditions | 2018 |
SD, CS | 反映月相变化、生境差异(有无入侵生物啮齿类和狐狸) Lunar rhythm, difference in habitat have or not have invasive species rats and foxes | 2020 |
SD, CS | 反映日节律、生境差异(油棕种植园和周围森林的比较) Daily rhythm, difference in habitat comparison between oil palm plantation and surrounding forests | 2020 |
AD | 反映日节律和季节变化 Daily rhythm, seasonal variation | 2022 |
SD, TD, CS, AD, KS, CB, MI, LS, RF | 反映生境差异(混交林、落叶林的比较) Difference in habitat comparison between mixed-use corridor and deciduous forest | 2022 |
[1] | Baraty S, Simovici DA, Zara C (2011) The impact of triangular inequality violations on medoid-based clustering. In: International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (eds Kryszkiewicz M, Rybinski H, Skowron A, Raś ZW), pp. 280-289. Springer, Heidelberg. |
[2] |
Borker AL, Buxton RT, Jones IL, Major HL, Williams JC, Tershy BR, Croll DA (2020) Do soundscape indices predict landscape-scale restoration outcomes? A comparative study of restored seabird island soundscapes. Restoration Ecology, 28, 252-260.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Bradfer-Lawrence T, Gardner N, Bunnefeld L, Bunnefeld N, Willis SG, Dent DH (2019) Guidelines for the use of acoustic indices in environmental research. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 1796-1807.
DOI |
[4] | Budka M, Jobda M, Szałański P, Piórkowski H (2022) Acoustic approach as an alternative to human-based survey in bird biodiversity monitoring in agricultural meadows. PLoS ONE, 17, e0266557. |
[5] |
Cazelles B (2004) Symbolic dynamics for identifying similarity between rhythms of ecological time series. Ecology Letters, 7, 755-763.
DOI URL |
[6] | Cha SH (2007) Comprehensive survey on distance/similarity measures between probability density. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Science, 1, 300-307. |
[7] | Clement P, Desch W (2008) An elementary proof of the triangle inequality for the Wasserstein metric. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 136, 333-339. |
[8] |
Deecke VB, Janik VM (2006) Automated categorization of bioacoustic signals: Avoiding perceptual pitfalls. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 645-653.
DOI URL |
[9] |
Depraetere M, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, Gasc A, Duvail S, Sueur J (2012) Monitoring animal diversity using acoustic indices: Implementation in a temperate woodland. Ecological Indicators, 13, 46-54.
DOI URL |
[10] | Deza E, Deza MM (2006) Dictionary of Distances. Elsevier, Amsterdam. |
[11] | Elkan C (2003) Using the triangle inequality to accelerate k-means. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-03), pp. 147-153. Washington, DC. |
[12] |
Farina A (2019) Ecoacoustics: A quantitative approach to investigate the ecological role of environmental sounds. Mathematics, 7, 21.
DOI URL |
[13] |
Févotte C, Bertin N, Durrieu JL (2009) Nonnegative matrix factorization with the Itakura-Saito divergence: With application to music analysis. Neural Computation, 21, 793-830.
DOI PMID |
[14] |
Gasc A, Francomano D, Dunning JB, Pijanowski BC (2017) Future directions for soundscape ecology: The importance of ornithological contributions. The Auk, 134, 215-228.
DOI URL |
[15] |
Gasc A, Sueur J, Jiguet F, Devictor V, Grandcolas P, Burrow C, Depraetere M, Pavoine S (2013a) Assessing biodiversity with sound: Do acoustic diversity indices reflect phylogenetic and functional diversities of bird communities? Ecological Indicators, 25, 279-287.
DOI URL |
[16] | Gasc A, Sueur J, Pavoine S, Pellens R, Grandcolas P (2013b) Biodiversity sampling using a global acoustic approach: Contrasting sites with microendemics in New Caledonia. PLoS ONE, 8, e65311. |
[17] | Hayashi K, Erwinsyah, Lelyana VD, Yamamura K (2020) Acoustic dissimilarities between an oil palm plantation and surrounding forests: Analysis of index time series for beta-diversity in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Ecological Indicators, 112, 106086. |
[18] | Hou YN, Zhang X, Guo Y, Yu XW, Ouyang X, Yang ML (2022) Analysis of soundscape components and influencing spatial factors in the Shennongjia National Park, China. Journal of Forest and Environment, 42, 29-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[侯亚男, 张旭, 郭颖, 于新文, 欧阳萱, 杨铭伦 (2022) 神农架声景构成及空间影响因素. 森林与环境学报, 42, 29-37.] | |
[19] | Krause B (1993) The niche hypothesis. Soundscape Newsletter, 6, 6-10. |
[20] | Kryszkiewicz M, Lasek P (2010) Ti-dbscan:Clustering with dbscan by means of the triangle inequality. In: In: International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (eds Szczuka M, Kryszkiewicz M, Ramanna S, Jensen R, Hu Q), pp. 60-69. Springer, Heidelberg. |
[21] | Lawrence BT, Hornberg J, Haselhoff T, Sutcliffe R, Ahmed S, Moebus S, Gruehn D (2022) A widened array of metrics (WAM) approach to characterize the urban acoustic environment: A case comparison of urban mixed-use and forest. Applied Acoustics, 185, 108387. |
[22] |
Lellouch L, Pavoine S, Jiguet F, Glotin H, Sueur J (2014) Monitoring temporal change of bird communities with dissimilarity acoustic indices. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 495-505.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Lun KH, Zhang YY, Xia CW (2017) Bird diversity monitoring based on sound index. Bulletin of Biology, 52(11), 1-5. (in Chinese)
DOI URL |
[伦可环, 张雁云, 夏灿玮 (2017) 基于声音指数的鸟类多样性监测. 生物学通报, 52(11), 1-5.] | |
[24] | Moore AW (2000) The anchors hierarchy: Using the triangle inequality to survive high dimensional data. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (eds Boutilier C, Goldszmidt M), pp. 397-405. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco. |
[25] |
Ng ML, Butler N, Woods N (2018) Soundscapes as a surrogate measure of vegetation condition for biodiversity values: A pilot study. Ecological Indicators, 93, 1070-1080.
DOI URL |
[26] |
Pan JS, McInnes FR, Jack MA (1996) Fast clustering algorithms for vector quantization. Pattern Recognition, 29, 511-518.
DOI URL |
[27] |
Pieretti N, Farina A, Morri D (2011) A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: The acoustic complexity index (ACI). Ecological Indicators, 11, 868-873.
DOI URL |
[28] |
Rodriguez A, Gasc A, Pavoine S, Grandcolas P, Gaucher P, Sueur J (2014) Temporal and spatial variability of animal sound within a neotropical forest. Ecological Informatics, 21, 133-143.
DOI URL |
[29] | Sueur J (2018) Sound Analysis and Synthesis with R. Springer. |
[30] |
Sueur J, Farina A, Gasc A, Pieretti N, Pavoine S (2014) Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 100, 772-781.
DOI URL |
[31] | Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, Duvail S (2008) Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS ONE, 3, e4065. |
[32] |
Szulga A (1983) On minimal metrics in the space of random- variables. Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 27, 424-430.
DOI URL |
[33] |
Wang DP, Forstmeier W, Farine DR, Maldonado-Chaparro AA, Martin K, Pei YF, Alarcón-Nieto G, Klarevas-Irby JA, Ma SW, Aplin LM, Kempenaers B (2022) Machine learning reveals cryptic dialects that explain mate choice in a songbird. Nature Communications, 13, 1630.
DOI PMID |
[34] |
Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecological Monographs, 30, 279-338.
DOI URL |
[35] |
Wiley RH, Richards DG (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 3, 69-94.
DOI URL |
[36] | Wilford DC, Miksis-Olds JL, Martin SB, Howard DR, Lowell K, Lyons AP, Smith MJ (2021) Quantitative soundscape analysis to understand multidimensional features. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 672336. |
[37] |
Zhao Y, Shen XL, Li S, Zhang YY, Peng RH, Ma KP (2020) Progress and outlook for soundscape ecology. Biodiversity Science, 28, 806-820. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI |
[赵莹, 申小莉, 李晟, 张雁云, 彭任华, 马克平 (2020) 声景生态学研究进展和展望. 生物多样性, 28, 806-820.]
DOI |
[1] | Yihui Jiang, Yue Liu, Xu Zeng, Zheying Lin, Nan Wang, Jihao Peng, Ling Cao, Cong Zeng. Fish diversity and connectivity in six national marine protected areas in the East China Sea [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(6): 24128-. |
[2] | Yu Tian, Junsheng Li. Analysis of the connotation and implementation path for the 30 by 30 target in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(6): 24086-. |
[3] | Biyu Ma. Summary of amendments to India’s Biological Diversity Act and enlightenments for improving China’s legal system of biodiversity conservation [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 23412-. |
[4] | Yingli Cai, Hongge Zhu, Jiaxin Li. Biodiversity conservation in China: Policy evolution, main measures and development trends [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 23386-. |
[5] | Yanyu Ai, Haixia Hu, Ting Shen, Yuxuan Mo, Jinhua Qi, Liang Song. Vascular epiphyte diversity and the correlation analysis with host tree characteristics: A case in a mid-mountain moist evergreen broad-leaved forest, Ailao Mountains [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 24072-. |
[6] | Dekui Yan. Common elements, deficiencies, and optimization suggestions of biodiversity conservation policies in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 23293-. |
[7] | Fuwei Zhao, Yingshuo Li, Hui Chen. Reflections on biodiversity legislation in China’s new era [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 24027-. |
[8] | Jingzhou Liu, Yixin Qian, Yanxuedan Zhang, Feng Cui. Research progress and implications of flagship species paradigms based on latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(4): 23439-. |
[9] | Lejie Wu, Zekang Liu, Xing Tian, Qun Zhang, Bo Li, Jihua Wu. Effects of genotypic diversity on vegetative growth and reproductive strategies of Scirpus mariqueter population [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(4): 23478-. |
[10] | Xuemeng Li, Jibao Jiang, Zenglu Zhang, Xiaojing Liu, Yali Wang, Yizhao Wu, Yinsheng Li, Jiangping Qiu, Qi Zhao. Earthworm biodiversity and its influencing factors in Baotianman National Nature Reserve [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(4): 23352-. |
[11] | Zhirong Feng, Mingbo Chen, Xiaofang Yang, Gang Wang, Yiyi Dong, Yanqiong Peng, Huayan Chen, Bo Wang. The Ficus breeding system and the resource utilization of fig wasps shape the fig wasp community [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(3): 23307-. |
[12] | Cao Hao, Donghui Wu, Lingzi Mo, Guoliang Xu. A review on gut microbial diversity and function of overwintering animals [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(3): 23407-. |
[13] | Haiou Liu, Leshan Du, Wenhui Liu, Ziyuan Li, Libo Pan, Lei Liu. Analysis and enlightenment on Global Biodiversity Framework Fund management policy [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(3): 23334-. |
[14] | Jiaxin Wei, Zhiguo Jiang, Linsen Yang, Huanhuan Xiong, Jiaojiao Jin, Fanglin Luo, Jiehua Li, Hao Wu, Yaozhan Xu, Xiujuan Qiao, Xinzeng Wei, Hui Yao, Huiliang Yu, Jingyuan Yang, Mingxi Jiang. Community composition and structure in a 25 ha mid-subtropical mountain deciduous broad-leaved forest dynamics plot in Shennongjia, Hubei, China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(3): 23338-. |
[15] | He Zhirong, Wu Siyu, Shi Yingying, Wang Yuting, Jiang Yixin, Zhang Chunna, Zhao Na, Wang Supen. Current status and challenges on the effects of chytrid infection on amphibian populations [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(2): 23274-. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn