Biodiv Sci ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 449-455. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020397
• Original Papers: Plant Diversity • Previous Articles Next Articles
Guoping Yang1, Tao Wu2,3,4, Yunfen Geng2,3,4, Xiaoshuang Li2, Jiabo Hao2,3,4, Chunming Yuan2,3,4,*()
Received:
2020-10-12
Accepted:
2021-01-14
Online:
2021-04-20
Published:
2021-04-20
Contact:
Chunming Yuan
About author:
* E-mail: yuanchunming1017@163.comGuoping Yang, Tao Wu, Yunfen Geng, Xiaoshuang Li, Jiabo Hao, Chunming Yuan. Effects of habitat fragmentation on population structure and dynamics of the endangered plant Pterospermum kingtungense[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(4): 449-455.
生境类型 Habitat type | 地理位置 Geographic location | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 土壤类型 Soil type | 林冠高度 Canopy height (m) | 郁闭度 Canopy density | 样方数 No. of plots |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 ha生境片断 5-ha fragmented habitat | 100°41′ E, 24°38′ N | 1,440 | 黄壤 Yellow soil | 20 | 0.85 | 3 |
15 ha生境片断 15-ha fragmented habitat | 101°05′ E, 24°17′ N | 1,352 | 红壤 Red soil | 12 | 0.70 | 3 |
连续森林 Continuous forest | 100°40′ E, 24°38′ N | 1,485 | 黄壤 Yellow soil | 20 | 0.92 | 2 |
100°38′ E, 24°43′ N | 1,430 | 黄壤 Yellow soil | 18 | 0.90 | 1 |
Table 1 Sampling plots of the investigated Pterospermum kingtungense populations in different habitats
生境类型 Habitat type | 地理位置 Geographic location | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 土壤类型 Soil type | 林冠高度 Canopy height (m) | 郁闭度 Canopy density | 样方数 No. of plots |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 ha生境片断 5-ha fragmented habitat | 100°41′ E, 24°38′ N | 1,440 | 黄壤 Yellow soil | 20 | 0.85 | 3 |
15 ha生境片断 15-ha fragmented habitat | 101°05′ E, 24°17′ N | 1,352 | 红壤 Red soil | 12 | 0.70 | 3 |
连续森林 Continuous forest | 100°40′ E, 24°38′ N | 1,485 | 黄壤 Yellow soil | 20 | 0.92 | 2 |
100°38′ E, 24°43′ N | 1,430 | 黄壤 Yellow soil | 18 | 0.90 | 1 |
Fig. 1 Life history model of Pterospermum kingtungense populations. The figures represent the different stages (1, seedling; 2, sapling; 3, small tree; 4, subadult; 5, adult), F, Fertility; Gi,i+1, Probability of survival and growth from a give stage to a large one; Si,i, Probability of surviving and remaining in the same stage over the one-year period (2018-2019).
Fig. 2 Age structure of Pterospermum kingtungense populations in different habitats. (a) 5-ha fragmented habitat; (b) 15-ha fragmented habitat; (c) Continuous forest.
生境 Habitat | 矩阵 Matrix | 特征向量 Eigen vector | 种群增长率 λ | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 ha生境片断 5-ha fragmented habitat | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.9999 | |||||
0.0000 | 0.8750 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0417 | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.50000 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.8889 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.1111 | |||||||
15 ha生境片断 15-ha fragmented habitat | 0.8519 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.1667 | 0.1618 | 1.0000 | |||||
0.1111 | 0.9667 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.5386 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0959 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0599 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.1438 | |||||||
连续森林 Continuous forest | 0.3333 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0909 | 0.0387 | 1.0172 | |||||
0.6667 | 0.9730 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.5837 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0270 | 0.8696 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.1069 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0435 | 0.8750 | 0.0000 | 0.0327 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.1250 | 1.0000 | 0.2381 |
Table 2 Transition matrices of Pterospermum kingtungense populations in different habitats
生境 Habitat | 矩阵 Matrix | 特征向量 Eigen vector | 种群增长率 λ | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 ha生境片断 5-ha fragmented habitat | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.9999 | |||||
0.0000 | 0.8750 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0417 | 0.5000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.50000 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.8889 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.1111 | |||||||
15 ha生境片断 15-ha fragmented habitat | 0.8519 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.1667 | 0.1618 | 1.0000 | |||||
0.1111 | 0.9667 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.5386 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0959 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0599 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.1438 | |||||||
连续森林 Continuous forest | 0.3333 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0909 | 0.0387 | 1.0172 | |||||
0.6667 | 0.9730 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.5837 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0270 | 0.8696 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.1069 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0435 | 0.8750 | 0.0000 | 0.0327 | |||||||
0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.1250 | 1.0000 | 0.2381 |
生境 Habitat | 生活史阶段 Life history stage | 幼苗 Seedling | 幼树 Sapling | 小树 Small tree | 亚成树 Subadult tree | 成树 Adult tree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 ha生境片断 5-ha fragmented habitat | 幼苗 Seedling | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
幼树 Sapling | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
小树 Small tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
亚成树 Subadult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.8889 | 0.0000 | |
成树 Adult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.1111 | |
15 ha生境片断 15-ha fragmented habitat | 幼苗 Seedling | 0.0058 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
幼树 Sapling | 0.0008 | 0.0226 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
小树 Small tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0329 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
亚成树 Subadult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0128 | 0.0000 | |
成树 Adult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.9242 | |
连续森林 Continuous forest | 幼苗 Seedling | 0.0050 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
幼树 Sapling | 0.0102 | 0.2250 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
小树 Small tree | 0.0000 | 0.0102 | 0.0602 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
亚成树 Subadult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0102 | 0.0629 | 0.0000 | |
成树 Adult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0102 | 0.5958 |
Table 3 Elasticity matrices of life history stage’s parameters for Pterospermum kingtungense populations in different habitats
生境 Habitat | 生活史阶段 Life history stage | 幼苗 Seedling | 幼树 Sapling | 小树 Small tree | 亚成树 Subadult tree | 成树 Adult tree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 ha生境片断 5-ha fragmented habitat | 幼苗 Seedling | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
幼树 Sapling | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
小树 Small tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
亚成树 Subadult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.8889 | 0.0000 | |
成树 Adult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.1111 | |
15 ha生境片断 15-ha fragmented habitat | 幼苗 Seedling | 0.0058 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
幼树 Sapling | 0.0008 | 0.0226 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
小树 Small tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0329 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
亚成树 Subadult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0128 | 0.0000 | |
成树 Adult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.9242 | |
连续森林 Continuous forest | 幼苗 Seedling | 0.0050 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
幼树 Sapling | 0.0102 | 0.2250 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
小树 Small tree | 0.0000 | 0.0102 | 0.0602 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | |
亚成树 Subadult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0102 | 0.0629 | 0.0000 | |
成树 Adult tree | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0102 | 0.5958 |
[1] |
Aschero V, Morris WF, Vázquez DP, Alvarez JA, Villagra PE (2016) Demography and population growth rate of the tree Prosopis flexuosa with contrasting grazing regimes in the Central Monte Desert. Forest Ecology and Management, 369,184-190.
DOI URL |
[2] | Bruna EM, Fiske IJ, Trager MD (2009) Habitat fragmentation and plant populations: Is what we know demographically irrelevant? Journal of Vegetation Science, 20,569-576. |
[3] |
Caswell H (1984) Optimal life histories and age-specific costs of reproduction: Two extensions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 107,169-172.
URL PMID |
[4] | Caswell H (1989) Matrix Population Models: Construction Analysis and Interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. |
[5] |
Crone EE, Menges ES, Ellis MM, Bell T, Bierzychudek P, Ehrlén J, Kaye TN, Knight TM, Lesica P, Morris WF, Oostermeijer G, Quintana-Ascencio PF, Stanley A, Ticktin T, Valverde T, Williams JL (2011) How do plant ecologists use matrix population models? Ecology Letters, 14,1-8.
DOI URL PMID |
[6] | Crouse DT, Crowder LB, Caswell H (1987) A stage-based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology, 68,1412-1423. |
[7] | de Kroon H, Plaisier A, van Groenendael J, Caswell H (1986) Elasticity: The relative contribution of demographic parameters to population growth rate. Ecology, 67,1427-1431. |
[8] | de Kroon H, van Groenendael J, Ehrlén J (2000) Elasticities: A review of methods and model limitations. Ecology, 81,607-618. |
[9] |
Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews, 81,117-142.
URL PMID |
[10] | Heppell SS, Pfister CA, de Kroon H (2000) Elasticity analysis in population biology: Methods and applications. Ecology, 81,605-606. |
[11] | Hu YJ, Wang SS (1988) A matrix model of population growth of dominant tropical rain forest species Vatica hainanensis in Hainan Island. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 8,104-110. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 胡玉佳, 王寿松 (1988) 海南岛热带雨林优势种——青梅种群增长的矩阵模型. 生态学报, 8,104-110. ] | |
[12] | Huenneke LF, Marks PL (1987) Stem dynamics of the shrub Alnus incana ssp. rugosa: Transition matrix models. Ecology, 68,1234-1242. |
[13] | Kwit C, Horvitz CC, Platt WJ (2004) Conserving slow-growing, long-lived tree species: Input from the demography of a rare understory conifer, Taxus floridana. Conservation Biology, 18,432-443. |
[14] |
Laurance WF, Delamônica P, Laurance SG, Vasconcelos HL, Lovejoy TE (2000) Rainforest fragmentation kills big trees. Nature, 404,836.
DOI URL PMID |
[15] | Lefkovitch LP (1965) The study of population growth in organisms grouped by stages. Biometrics, 21,1-18. |
[16] | Leslie PH (1945) On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrics, 33,183-212. |
[17] | Lin YH, He XB, Tian QJ, Hu WY, Chen L, He P (2011) Numeric dynamics of endangered plant Euonymus chloranthoides populations after habitat fragmentation. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 31,443-450. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 林永慧, 何兴兵, 田启建, 胡文勇, 陈玲, 何平 (2011) 生境破碎化后濒危植物缙云卫矛种群的数量动态. 植物研究, 31,443-450. ] | |
[18] | Luo ZH, Xie YN, Lu ZJ, Luo YY, Luo Y, Wang BY (2011) Survey on populations and distribution of Pterospermum kingtungense in Jingdong County of Yunnan Province. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 40(4),41-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 罗忠华, 谢有能, 卢宗菊, 罗有勇, 罗尧, 王博轶 (2011) 景东翅子树的居群结构及分布动态研究. 西部林业科学, 40(4),41-47. ] | |
[19] |
Melo FPL, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Fahrig L, Martínez-Ramos M, Tabarelli M (2013) On the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 28,462-468.
URL PMID |
[20] | Morris WF, Doak DF (2002) Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. |
[21] | Paludo GF, Lauterjung MB, dos Reis MS, Mantovani A (2016) Inferring population trends of Araucaria angustifolia (Araucariaceae) using a transition matrix model in an old-growth forest. Southern Forests, 78,137-143. |
[22] | Quitete Portela RdC, Bruna EM, Santos FAM (2010) Demography of palm species in Brazil’s Atlantic forest: A comparison of harvested and unharvested species using matrix models. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19,2389-2403. |
[23] | Silvertown J, Franco M, Pisanty I, Mendoza A (1993) Comparative plant demography—Relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials. Journal of Ecology, 81,465-476. |
[24] | Stubben CJ, Milligan BG (2007) Estimating and analyzing demographic models using the popbio package in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 22(11),1-23. |
[25] | You HM, Koike F (2011) Population dynamics of Oxalis griffithii using the Lefkovitch matrix model. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 28(1),66-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 尤海梅, 小池文人 (2011) 基于Lefkovitch矩阵模型的山酢浆草种群动态分析. 浙江农林大学学报, 28(1),66-71. ] | |
[26] | Yuan CM, Sima YK, Geng YF, Hao JB, Mao YL, Wei DK, He QJ (2011) Population distribution, age structure and its dynamics feature of endangered species Pterospermum kingtungense. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 39(5),15-16, 33. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 袁春明, 司马永康, 耿云芬, 郝佳波, 毛云玲, 魏大坤, 何琪金 (2011) 濒危植物景东翅子树种群的分布、年龄结构及其动态特征. 东北林业大学学报, 39(5),15-16, 33. ] | |
[27] | Yuan CM, Sima YK, Geng YF, Hao JB, Mao YL, Luo ZH, Lu CR, Yuan DC (2012) Sprouting traits of endangered plant Pterospermum kingtungense. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 40(3),113-114, 122. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 袁春明, 司马永康, 耿云芬, 郝佳波, 毛云玲, 罗忠华, 鲁成荣, 袁德财 (2012) 濒危植物景东翅子树的萌生特征. 东北林业大学学报, 40(3),113-114, 122. ] | |
[28] | Yuan CM, Zhang SS, Yang GP, Chen J, Geng YF, Li XS, Yang WZ (2021) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the demography of the critically endangered tree Pterospermum kingtungense (Sterculiaceae) in Yunnan, China. Tropical Ecology, 62,27-33. |
[29] | Zhang DY, Jiang XH (1999) Progress in studies of genetic diversity and conservation biology of endangered plant species. Chinese Biodiversity, 7,31-37. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张大勇, 姜新华 (1999) 遗传多样性与濒危植物保护生物学研究进展. 生物多样性, 7,31-37. ] |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn