On concepts and protection of traditional knowledge

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08256

Abstract

Abstract:

Recently, traditional knowledge (TK) has attracted increasing attention both domestically and internationally, especially the TK associated with conservation and sustainable use of biological resources; this topic has been included in the Convention on Biological Diversity and other international forums. However, no internationally-recognized definition of traditional knowledge exists. Based on analysis of TK concepts in relevant international conventions and instruments, combined with our current research in ethnic areas of China, we propose the following categories for TK associated with biological resources: (1) use of agricultural species and genetic resources; (2) use of medicinal species; (3) technical innovations for use of biological resources and traditional farming and lifestyle practices; (4) traditional cultures and customary laws related to conservation and sustainable use of biological resources; and (5) traditional local marker products. We present suggestions for how to investigate and document TK in order to foster the transfer, development, protection, and popularization of TK. These suggestions will also help to fairly share the benefits produced from the use of TK with indigenous people and local communities.

Key words: traditional knowledge, biological resources, concept, biodiversity, intellectual property, benefit sharing

Dayuan Xue, Luo Guo. On concepts and protection of traditional knowledge[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2009, 17(2): 135-142.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08256

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/EN/Y2009/V17/I2/135

References 18

[1]	Carrizosa S, Brush SB, Wright BD, McGuire PE (translated by Xue DY (薛达元), Qin TB (秦天宝)) (2004) Accessing Biodiversity and Sharing the Benefits: Lessons from Implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity (生物多样性获取与惠益分享——履行《生物多样性公约》的经验). China Environmental Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[2]	Cetinkaya G (2009) Challenges for the maintenance of traditional knowledge in the satoyama ecosystems, Noto Peninsula, Japan. Human Ecology Review, 16, 27-40.
[3]	Damodaran A (2008) Traditional knowledge, intellectual property rights and biodiversity conservation: critical issues and key challenges. Journal of Intellectual Property, 13, 509-513.
[4]	Memory EL (2007) Evolving concepts related to achieving benefit sharing for custodians of traditional knowledge. African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicines, 4, 443-468.
[5]	Mugabe J, Kameri-Mbote P, Mutta D (2001) Traditional knowledge, genetic resources and intellectual property protection: towards a new international regime. International Environmental Law Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland http://www.ielrc.org/content/w0105.pdf()
[6]	Newing H (2005) A summary of case study findings on the implementation of international commitments on traditional forest related knowledge (TFRK). In: Our Knowledge for Our Survival: Regional Case Studies on Traditional Forest Related Knowledge and the Implementation of Related International Commitments. International Alliance of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the Tropical Forests.
[7]	Schüklenk U, Kleinsmidt A (2006) North-south benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: a critical ethical and legal analysis. Developing World Bioethics, 6, 122-134. DOI URL PMID
[8]	Siebenhuner B, Dedeurwaerdere T, Brousseau E (2005) Introduction and overview to the special issue on biodiversity conservation, access and benefit-sharing and traditional knowledge. Ecological Economics, 53, 439-444.
[9]	Soejarto DD, Fong HHS, Tan GT (2005) Ethnobotany/ethnopharmacology and mass bioprospecting: issues on intellectual property and benefit-sharing. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 100, 12-22.
[10]	Swiderska K (2006) Banishing the biopirates: a new approach to protecting traditional knowledge. Gatekeeper Series No 129, International Institute for Environment and Development, Environmental Economics Programme, London.
[11]	Venkataraman K, Swarna SL (2008) Intellectual property rights, traditional knowledge and biodiversity of India. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 13, 326-335.
[12]	Xue DY (薛达元) (2007) Access and benefit sharing of genetic resources: background, progress and challenges. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 15, 563-568. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]	Xue DY (薛达元) (ed.) (2005) Status Quo and Protection of Bio-genetic Resources in China (中国生物遗传资源现状与保护). China Environmental Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[14]	Xue DY (薛达元), Cai L (蔡蕾) (2006) New hotspot of the Convention on Biological Diversity: traditional knowledge protection. Environmental Protection (环境保护), (12B), 72-74. (in Chinese)
[15]	Xue DY (薛达元), Lin YM (林燕梅) (2005) Property right theory on bio-genetic resources and benefit sharing system. In: Patent Law Research (专利法研究) (ed. State Intellectual Property Office of the P.R.China (国家知识产权局)), pp. 31-57. Intellectual Property Right Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[16]	Xue DY (薛达元), Cai L (蔡蕾) (2007) Negotiation progress for the international regime on access and benefit-sharing of genetic resources, Environmental Protection (环境保护), (11B), 72-74. (in Chinese)
[17]	Zhao FW (赵富伟), Xue DY (薛达元) (2008) International trends of and state legislation on access and benefit sharing of genetic resources. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment (生态与农村环境学报), 24(2), 92-96. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Zhu XZ (朱雪忠) (2004) Preliminary study on the legal protection for traditional knowledge. Journal of Huazhong Normal University (Social Science Edition) (华中师范大学学报(社会科学版)), 43, 31-40. (in Chinese with English abstract)