Abstract:

Aims: Terrestrial bioacoustics data acquisition equipment plays a pivotal role in the study and conservation of terrestrial biodiversity. These devices enable research into the acoustic characteristics of various biological populations and provide insight into species distribution, behavior, and interactions. Our contribution to the literature is bridging the gap in research between the development and application of terrestrial bioacoustics data acquisition equipment in China. We outline the current development status of these devices and identify the critical factors that influence their selection by conducting a comprehensive review of existing literature and resources. Providing a guide for researchers in the selection process and encouraging the broader application of these devices is an important objective for future biodiversity research and conservation initiatives.

Method: We employ a systematic literature review to assess the current landscape of terrestrial bioacoustics data acquisition equipment. The review includes scholarly articles, technical reports, and relevant websites to synthesize information on the development of these devices. We identify the key factors considered when selecting bioacoustics equipment such as sensitivity, frequency range, durability, and cost. Additionally, we explore various passive acoustic monitoring experimental approaches being used in the field. Based on these analyses, several equipment selection recommendations are made tailored to meet the diverse needs and performance criteria of various research projects.

Results: Our findings indicate a growing interest in the application of terrestrial bioacoustics data acquisition equipment in biodiversity studies. However, there is a need for more comprehensive documentation and understanding of the development and application of these devices. We identify several prominent passive acoustic monitoring experiment schemes effectively used in capturing bioacoustics data. Furthermore, we provide examples of device options well-suited for different research contexts, taking into account specific requirements and constraints of each project. These insights are instrumental in facilitating the adoption and integration of terrestrial bioacoustics data acquisition equipment into biodiversity research and conservation efforts.

Conclusion: Terrestrial bioacoustics data acquisition equipment is crucial in advancing our knowledge of biodiversity and conservation efforts. Our findings contribute to a more informed selection process for researchers and highlight the potential of these devices in enhancing biodiversity research and conservation initiatives. This systematic overview of the current development status and key considerations for selecting bioacoustics equipment, serves as a valuable resource for the scientific community. Further research and development in the field of terrestrial bioacoustics is necessary to ensure these devices remain at the forefront of biodiversity conservation efforts. Terrestrial bioacoustics data acquisition equipment will play an increasingly significant role in the global endeavor to protect and preserve our diverse ecosystems.

Key words: terrestrial bioacoustics, equipment status, equipment selection options, biodiversity conservation