Xi Chen, Luo Wang. The role, status quo and China’s action of international development assistance for biodiversity: Based on the implementation of CBD[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(2): 247-258.
Fig. 1 Global total multilateral aid for biodiversity. Source: according to the GEF (https://www.thegef. org/projects-faceted?search_api_views_fulltext=biodiversity) and WBG (https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/projects-list?searchTerm=biodiversity) project database. The project from GEF in WBG project library has been eliminated to avoid double calcu-lation.
Fig. 1 Global total multilateral aid for biodiversity. Source: according to the GEF (https://www.thegef. org/projects-faceted?search_api_views_fulltext=biodiversity) and WBG (https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/projects-list?searchTerm=biodiversity) project database. The project from GEF in WBG project library has been eliminated to avoid double calcu-lation.
Fig. 2 Total annual aid funds for biodiversity conservation of DAC Member States (Source: OECD.Stat Database information, https://stats.oecd.org/)
Fig. 2 Total annual aid funds for biodiversity conservation of DAC Member States (Source: OECD.Stat Database information, https://stats.oecd.org/)
Fig. 3 Annual total funds for biodiversity assistance of the United States, EU institutions, France, Germany and Japan (Source: OECD.Stat Database information, https://stats.oecd.org/)
Fig. 3 Annual total funds for biodiversity assistance of the United States, EU institutions, France, Germany and Japan (Source: OECD.Stat Database information, https://stats.oecd.org/)
Fig. 4 Total fund of global biodiversity aid (Source: the data are collected in this study)
Fig. 4 Total fund of global biodiversity aid (Source: the data are collected in this study)
Fig. 5 total recipient aid funds and global share of China’s biodiversity (Source: the data are collected in this study)
Fig. 5 total recipient aid funds and global share of China’s biodiversity (Source: the data are collected in this study)
AFD (Agency of French development) (2013) Evaluation of the Second Objective of the Biodiversity Cross-cutting Intervention Framework. https://www.afd.fr/en/ressources/evaluation-second-objective-biodiversity-cross-cutting-intervention-framework-2013-2017. (accessed on 2020-09-24)
[2]
BMZ (Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development) (2018) Committed to Biodiversity. http://www.bmz.de/en/issues/biodiversitaet/grundlagen/index.html. (accessed on 2020-09-24)
[3]
European Commission (2020) EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030-Bringing Nature Back into Our Lives. https:// ec.europa.eu/environment/biodiversity/business/news/news-213_en.htm. (accessed on 2020-09-21)
[4]
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) (2015) Societal participatory processes in the Revision of National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs). https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-12/information/cop-12-inf-38-en.pdf. (accessed on 2020-09-25)
[5]
JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) (2017) JICA Cooperation Strategy for Natural Environment Conservation: Working Toward a Sustainable Society that Leaves No One Behind. https://www.jica.go.jp/activities/issues/natural_env/ku57pq00002cubqh-att/position_paper_natural_env_en.pdf. (accessed on 2020-09-14)
[6]
The Executive Secretary of Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (2020) Summary of the Second Global Biodiversity Outlook. https://www.cbd.int/sites/default/files/2020-08/gbo2-summary-en.pdf. (accessed on 2020-09-25)
[7]
USAID (United States Agency for International Development) (2015) USAID Biodiversity Policy. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1865/USAID%20Biodiversity% 20Policy%20-%20June%202015.pdf. (accessed on 2020-09-23)