Biodiv Sci ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 372-381. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016257
• Original Papers: Plant Diversity • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yao Li1, Xiangming Xiao1,2,*, Xiangping Li1, Jun Ma1, Bangqian Chen1, Yuanwei Qin2, Jinwei Dong3, Bin Zhao1
Received:
2016-09-12
Accepted:
2017-03-29
Online:
2017-04-20
Published:
2017-04-20
Contact:
Xiao Xiangming
Yao Li, Xiangming Xiao, Xiangping Li, Jun Ma, Bangqian Chen, Yuanwei Qin, Jinwei Dong, Bin Zhao. Multi-scale assessments of forest fragmentation in China[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2017, 25(4): 372-381.
类型 Type | 判定标准 Criterion | 说明 Description |
---|---|---|
斑块森林Patch forest | Pf < 0.4 | 森林密度小于40% Forest density is less than 40% |
过渡森林Transitional forest | 0.4 < Pf < 0.6 | 森林密度介于40-60%之间 Forest density is between 40% and 60% |
孔洞森林Perforated forest | Pf > 0.6, Pf - Pff > 0 | 森林密度大于60%且森林密度大于森林连接度 Forest density is greater than 60%, and forest density is greater than forest connectivity |
未确定Undetermined | Pf > 0.6, Pf = Pff | 森林密度大于60%且森林密度等于森林连接度 Forest density is greater than 60%, and forest density is equal to forest connectivity |
边缘森林Edge forest | Pf > 0.6, Pf - Pff < 0 | 森林密度大于60%且森林密度小于森林连接度 Forest density is greater than 60%, and forest density is less than forest connectivity |
内部森林Interior forest | Pf = 1 | 森林密度为100%, 亦可称作完整森林 Forest density is 100%, and also can be known as complete forest |
Table 1 Criteria for forest fragmentation types
类型 Type | 判定标准 Criterion | 说明 Description |
---|---|---|
斑块森林Patch forest | Pf < 0.4 | 森林密度小于40% Forest density is less than 40% |
过渡森林Transitional forest | 0.4 < Pf < 0.6 | 森林密度介于40-60%之间 Forest density is between 40% and 60% |
孔洞森林Perforated forest | Pf > 0.6, Pf - Pff > 0 | 森林密度大于60%且森林密度大于森林连接度 Forest density is greater than 60%, and forest density is greater than forest connectivity |
未确定Undetermined | Pf > 0.6, Pf = Pff | 森林密度大于60%且森林密度等于森林连接度 Forest density is greater than 60%, and forest density is equal to forest connectivity |
边缘森林Edge forest | Pf > 0.6, Pf - Pff < 0 | 森林密度大于60%且森林密度小于森林连接度 Forest density is greater than 60%, and forest density is less than forest connectivity |
内部森林Interior forest | Pf = 1 | 森林密度为100%, 亦可称作完整森林 Forest density is 100%, and also can be known as complete forest |
Fig. 1 The workflow for analyzing forest fragmentation of China. (a) Distribution of forest; (b) Forest density (Pf); (c) Forest connectivity (Pff); (d) Distribution of forest fragmentation.
省/区名 Province/region | 森林面积 Forest area (km2) | 斑块 Patch (%) | 过渡 Transitional (%) | 孔洞 Perforated (%) | 未确定 Undetermined (%) | 边缘 Edge (%) | 内部 Interior (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 278,034.73 | 38.37 | 8.75 | 36.66 | 0.03 | 6.72 | 9.47 |
四川 Sichuan | 248,583.13 | 44.11 | 17.64 | 16.43 | 0.05 | 19.31 | 2.45 |
云南 Yunnan | 230,131.73 | 26.36 | 16.97 | 28.85 | 0.08 | 23.68 | 4.07 |
内蒙古 Inner Mongolia | 203,160.96 | 40.83 | 8.23 | 29.78 | 0.03 | 9.31 | 11.82 |
广西 Guangxi | 143,319.58 | 35.14 | 21.25 | 23.28 | 0.07 | 19.36 | 0.90 |
湖南 Hunan | 129,880.06 | 45.96 | 18.98 | 18.73 | 0.06 | 15.47 | 0.80 |
西藏 Tibet | 129,673.51 | 46.02 | 12.04 | 20.13 | 0.05 | 17.61 | 4.16 |
湖北 Hubei | 112,266.81 | 48.38 | 14.23 | 19.61 | 0.06 | 16.29 | 1.43 |
吉林 Jilin | 110,053.89 | 40.54 | 8.88 | 30.63 | 0.03 | 8.40 | 11.53 |
贵州 Guizhou | 108,704.03 | 42.62 | 23.62 | 15.04 | 0.06 | 18.25 | 0.41 |
广东 Guangdong | 104,709.11 | 42.96 | 17.26 | 23.52 | 0.05 | 14.57 | 1.64 |
河北 Hebei | 100,720.87 | 80.48 | 10.36 | 4.26 | 0.01 | 4.79 | 0.09 |
江西 Jiangxi | 99,898.31 | 41.00 | 16.86 | 26.79 | 0.06 | 14.06 | 1.22 |
河南 Henan | 94,811.72 | 78.71 | 9.11 | 6.68 | 0.02 | 5.20 | 0.28 |
陕西 Shaanxi | 94,132.33 | 37.28 | 15.27 | 23.91 | 0.08 | 21.16 | 2.30 |
新疆 Xinjiang | 92,699.24 | 82.77 | 9.09 | 3.21 | 0.01 | 4.69 | 0.23 |
辽宁 Liaoning | 92,018.43 | 63.95 | 12.83 | 13.19 | 0.03 | 8.41 | 1.59 |
山东 Shandong | 87,139.80 | 86.88 | 8.34 | 2.66 | 0.01 | 1.97 | 0.14 |
安徽 Anhui | 82,906.74 | 64.96 | 11.50 | 15.03 | 0.03 | 7.91 | 0.56 |
福建 Fujian | 75,164.76 | 23.26 | 17.66 | 34.36 | 0.10 | 22.32 | 2.30 |
甘肃 Gansu | 65,808.05 | 64.72 | 11.12 | 10.43 | 0.04 | 12.62 | 1.07 |
浙江 Zhejiang | 63,367.31 | 33.64 | 16.58 | 28.96 | 0.09 | 19.58 | 1.15 |
山西 Shanxi | 60,692.29 | 69.90 | 10.23 | 9.75 | 0.03 | 9.05 | 1.04 |
江苏 Jiangsu | 54,259.88 | 91.24 | 5.78 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 0.09 |
重庆 Chongqing | 52,634.41 | 48.84 | 18.81 | 14.60 | 0.06 | 16.83 | 0.86 |
青海 Qinghai | 31,309.74 | 88.00 | 5.87 | 1.92 | 0.01 | 4.07 | 0.14 |
台湾 Taiwan | 21,229.70 | 29.32 | 12.55 | 32.94 | 0.07 | 19.56 | 5.55 |
海南 Hainan | 19,339.76 | 39.06 | 16.26 | 30.83 | 0.05 | 9.98 | 3.81 |
北京 Beijing | 11,312.26 | 58.65 | 15.41 | 11.62 | 0.04 | 13.48 | 0.80 |
宁夏 Ningxia | 5,206.68 | 89.40 | 4.68 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 0.19 |
天津 Tianjin | 4,805.12 | 92.54 | 4.41 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.39 | 0.08 |
上海 Shanghai | 3,421.85 | 93.68 | 5.66 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
香港 Hong Kong | 627.35 | 38.25 | 16.37 | 18.79 | 0.00 | 20.27 | 6.33 |
Table 2 Forest area and percentage of forest fragmentation types at provincial scale
省/区名 Province/region | 森林面积 Forest area (km2) | 斑块 Patch (%) | 过渡 Transitional (%) | 孔洞 Perforated (%) | 未确定 Undetermined (%) | 边缘 Edge (%) | 内部 Interior (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 278,034.73 | 38.37 | 8.75 | 36.66 | 0.03 | 6.72 | 9.47 |
四川 Sichuan | 248,583.13 | 44.11 | 17.64 | 16.43 | 0.05 | 19.31 | 2.45 |
云南 Yunnan | 230,131.73 | 26.36 | 16.97 | 28.85 | 0.08 | 23.68 | 4.07 |
内蒙古 Inner Mongolia | 203,160.96 | 40.83 | 8.23 | 29.78 | 0.03 | 9.31 | 11.82 |
广西 Guangxi | 143,319.58 | 35.14 | 21.25 | 23.28 | 0.07 | 19.36 | 0.90 |
湖南 Hunan | 129,880.06 | 45.96 | 18.98 | 18.73 | 0.06 | 15.47 | 0.80 |
西藏 Tibet | 129,673.51 | 46.02 | 12.04 | 20.13 | 0.05 | 17.61 | 4.16 |
湖北 Hubei | 112,266.81 | 48.38 | 14.23 | 19.61 | 0.06 | 16.29 | 1.43 |
吉林 Jilin | 110,053.89 | 40.54 | 8.88 | 30.63 | 0.03 | 8.40 | 11.53 |
贵州 Guizhou | 108,704.03 | 42.62 | 23.62 | 15.04 | 0.06 | 18.25 | 0.41 |
广东 Guangdong | 104,709.11 | 42.96 | 17.26 | 23.52 | 0.05 | 14.57 | 1.64 |
河北 Hebei | 100,720.87 | 80.48 | 10.36 | 4.26 | 0.01 | 4.79 | 0.09 |
江西 Jiangxi | 99,898.31 | 41.00 | 16.86 | 26.79 | 0.06 | 14.06 | 1.22 |
河南 Henan | 94,811.72 | 78.71 | 9.11 | 6.68 | 0.02 | 5.20 | 0.28 |
陕西 Shaanxi | 94,132.33 | 37.28 | 15.27 | 23.91 | 0.08 | 21.16 | 2.30 |
新疆 Xinjiang | 92,699.24 | 82.77 | 9.09 | 3.21 | 0.01 | 4.69 | 0.23 |
辽宁 Liaoning | 92,018.43 | 63.95 | 12.83 | 13.19 | 0.03 | 8.41 | 1.59 |
山东 Shandong | 87,139.80 | 86.88 | 8.34 | 2.66 | 0.01 | 1.97 | 0.14 |
安徽 Anhui | 82,906.74 | 64.96 | 11.50 | 15.03 | 0.03 | 7.91 | 0.56 |
福建 Fujian | 75,164.76 | 23.26 | 17.66 | 34.36 | 0.10 | 22.32 | 2.30 |
甘肃 Gansu | 65,808.05 | 64.72 | 11.12 | 10.43 | 0.04 | 12.62 | 1.07 |
浙江 Zhejiang | 63,367.31 | 33.64 | 16.58 | 28.96 | 0.09 | 19.58 | 1.15 |
山西 Shanxi | 60,692.29 | 69.90 | 10.23 | 9.75 | 0.03 | 9.05 | 1.04 |
江苏 Jiangsu | 54,259.88 | 91.24 | 5.78 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 0.09 |
重庆 Chongqing | 52,634.41 | 48.84 | 18.81 | 14.60 | 0.06 | 16.83 | 0.86 |
青海 Qinghai | 31,309.74 | 88.00 | 5.87 | 1.92 | 0.01 | 4.07 | 0.14 |
台湾 Taiwan | 21,229.70 | 29.32 | 12.55 | 32.94 | 0.07 | 19.56 | 5.55 |
海南 Hainan | 19,339.76 | 39.06 | 16.26 | 30.83 | 0.05 | 9.98 | 3.81 |
北京 Beijing | 11,312.26 | 58.65 | 15.41 | 11.62 | 0.04 | 13.48 | 0.80 |
宁夏 Ningxia | 5,206.68 | 89.40 | 4.68 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 2.98 | 0.19 |
天津 Tianjin | 4,805.12 | 92.54 | 4.41 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.39 | 0.08 |
上海 Shanghai | 3,421.85 | 93.68 | 5.66 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
香港 Hong Kong | 627.35 | 38.25 | 16.37 | 18.79 | 0.00 | 20.27 | 6.33 |
县/市名 County/city | 百分比 % |
---|---|
斑块森林 Patch forest | |
陕西省留坝县 Liuba, Shaanxi | 3.80 |
陕西省佛坪县 Foping, Shaanxi | 3.93 |
海南省琼中黎族苗族自治县 Qiongzhong, Hainan | 4.41 |
云南省勐腊县 Mengla, Yunnan | 5.52 |
黑龙江省伊春市市辖区 Yichun, Heilongjiang | 5.62 |
陕西省宁陕县 Ningshan, Shaanxi | 6.43 |
云南省江城哈尼族彝族自治县 Jiangcheng, Yunnan | 6.45 |
海南省五指山市 Wuzhishan, Hainan | 6.73 |
陕西省镇坪县 Zhenping, Shaanxi | 6.85 |
云南省普洱哈尼族彝族自治县 Puer, Yunnan | 7.27 |
过渡森林 Transitional forest | |
四川省简阳市 Jianyang, Sichuan | 41.01 |
四川省乐至县 Lezhi, Sichuan | 40.89 |
安徽省砀山县 Dangshan, Anhui | 37.69 |
四川省安岳县 Anyue, Sichuan | 37.68 |
四川省射洪县 Shehong, Sichuan | 35.99 |
四川省盐亭县 Yanting, Sichuan | 35.53 |
四川省三台县 Santai, Sichuan | 34.71 |
四川省西充县 Xichong, Sichuan | 33.81 |
四川省名山县 Mingshan, Sichuan | 32.87 |
四川省攀枝花市 Panzhihua, Sichuan | 32.65 |
孔洞森林 Perforated forest | |
黑龙江省塔河县 Tahe, Heilongjiang | 66.96 |
海南省琼中黎族苗族自治县 Qiongzhong, Hainan | 59.68 |
黑龙江省伊春市市辖区 Yichun, Heilongjiang | 59.28 |
吉林省安图县 Antu, Jilin | 58.32 |
黑龙江省逊克县 Xunke, Heilongjiang | 57.18 |
黑龙江省呼玛县 Huma, Heilongjiang | 57.04 |
黑龙江省漠河县 Mohe, Heilongjiang | 56.98 |
吉林省抚松县 Fusong, Jilin | 56.84 |
云南省梁河县 Lianghe, Yunnan | 55.34 |
广西省昭平县 Zhaoping, Guangxi | 54.01 |
边缘森林 Edge forest | |
陕西省石泉县 Shiquan, Shaanxi | 36.17 |
广西省天峨县 Tiane, Guangxi | 35.51 |
陕西省略阳县 Lueyang, Shaanxi | 34.46 |
四川省青川县 Qingchuan, Sichuan | 34.45 |
陕西省镇安县 zhen’an, Shaanxi | 33.14 |
陕西省平利县 Pingli, Shaanxi | 33.06 |
湖北省保康县 Baokang, Hubei | 32.86 |
云南省绿春县 Lvchun, Yunnan | 32.63 |
陕西省留坝县 Liuba, Shaanxi | 32.61 |
陕西省镇坪县 Zhenping, Shaanxi | 32.59 |
内部森林 Interior forest | |
吉林省和龙市 Helong, Jilin | 34.66 |
黑龙江省海林市 Hailin, Heilongjiang | 33.62 |
黑龙江省铁力市 Tieli, Heilongjiang | 32.27 |
吉林省珲春市 Hunchun, Jilin | 30.91 |
吉林省敦化市 Dunhua, Jilin | 28.41 |
吉林省汪清县 Wangqing, Jilin | 27.92 |
黑龙江省伊春市市辖区 Yichun, Heilongjiang | 26.42 |
黑龙江省通河县 Tonghe, Heilongjiang | 25.10 |
内蒙古额尔古纳市 Argun, Inner Mongolia | 23.09 |
吉林省安图县 Antu, Jilin | 19.65 |
Table 3 Percentage of forest fragmentation types at county scale. The 10 counties with patch forests are ranked by the lowest percentage, while the other 40 counties are ranked by the highest percentage.
县/市名 County/city | 百分比 % |
---|---|
斑块森林 Patch forest | |
陕西省留坝县 Liuba, Shaanxi | 3.80 |
陕西省佛坪县 Foping, Shaanxi | 3.93 |
海南省琼中黎族苗族自治县 Qiongzhong, Hainan | 4.41 |
云南省勐腊县 Mengla, Yunnan | 5.52 |
黑龙江省伊春市市辖区 Yichun, Heilongjiang | 5.62 |
陕西省宁陕县 Ningshan, Shaanxi | 6.43 |
云南省江城哈尼族彝族自治县 Jiangcheng, Yunnan | 6.45 |
海南省五指山市 Wuzhishan, Hainan | 6.73 |
陕西省镇坪县 Zhenping, Shaanxi | 6.85 |
云南省普洱哈尼族彝族自治县 Puer, Yunnan | 7.27 |
过渡森林 Transitional forest | |
四川省简阳市 Jianyang, Sichuan | 41.01 |
四川省乐至县 Lezhi, Sichuan | 40.89 |
安徽省砀山县 Dangshan, Anhui | 37.69 |
四川省安岳县 Anyue, Sichuan | 37.68 |
四川省射洪县 Shehong, Sichuan | 35.99 |
四川省盐亭县 Yanting, Sichuan | 35.53 |
四川省三台县 Santai, Sichuan | 34.71 |
四川省西充县 Xichong, Sichuan | 33.81 |
四川省名山县 Mingshan, Sichuan | 32.87 |
四川省攀枝花市 Panzhihua, Sichuan | 32.65 |
孔洞森林 Perforated forest | |
黑龙江省塔河县 Tahe, Heilongjiang | 66.96 |
海南省琼中黎族苗族自治县 Qiongzhong, Hainan | 59.68 |
黑龙江省伊春市市辖区 Yichun, Heilongjiang | 59.28 |
吉林省安图县 Antu, Jilin | 58.32 |
黑龙江省逊克县 Xunke, Heilongjiang | 57.18 |
黑龙江省呼玛县 Huma, Heilongjiang | 57.04 |
黑龙江省漠河县 Mohe, Heilongjiang | 56.98 |
吉林省抚松县 Fusong, Jilin | 56.84 |
云南省梁河县 Lianghe, Yunnan | 55.34 |
广西省昭平县 Zhaoping, Guangxi | 54.01 |
边缘森林 Edge forest | |
陕西省石泉县 Shiquan, Shaanxi | 36.17 |
广西省天峨县 Tiane, Guangxi | 35.51 |
陕西省略阳县 Lueyang, Shaanxi | 34.46 |
四川省青川县 Qingchuan, Sichuan | 34.45 |
陕西省镇安县 zhen’an, Shaanxi | 33.14 |
陕西省平利县 Pingli, Shaanxi | 33.06 |
湖北省保康县 Baokang, Hubei | 32.86 |
云南省绿春县 Lvchun, Yunnan | 32.63 |
陕西省留坝县 Liuba, Shaanxi | 32.61 |
陕西省镇坪县 Zhenping, Shaanxi | 32.59 |
内部森林 Interior forest | |
吉林省和龙市 Helong, Jilin | 34.66 |
黑龙江省海林市 Hailin, Heilongjiang | 33.62 |
黑龙江省铁力市 Tieli, Heilongjiang | 32.27 |
吉林省珲春市 Hunchun, Jilin | 30.91 |
吉林省敦化市 Dunhua, Jilin | 28.41 |
吉林省汪清县 Wangqing, Jilin | 27.92 |
黑龙江省伊春市市辖区 Yichun, Heilongjiang | 26.42 |
黑龙江省通河县 Tonghe, Heilongjiang | 25.10 |
内蒙古额尔古纳市 Argun, Inner Mongolia | 23.09 |
吉林省安图县 Antu, Jilin | 19.65 |
Fig. 5 Percentage distribution of forest fragmentation types at provincial and county scale. Province: (a) Patch; (b) Transitional; (c) Perforated; (d) Edge; (e) Interior. County: (f) Patch; (g) Transitional; (h) Perforated; (i) Edge; (j) Interior.
1 | Achard F, Hansen MC (2012) Global Forest Monitoring from Earth Observation. CRC Press, Boca Raton. |
2 | Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 71, 355-366. |
3 | Baur B, Erhardt A (1995) Habitat fragmentation and habitat alterations: principal threats to most animal and plant species. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 4, 221-226. |
4 | Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science, 320, 1444-1449. |
5 | Chen LD, Liu XH, Fu BJ (1999) Evaluation on giant panda habitat fragmentation in Wolong Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 19, 291-297. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[陈利顶, 刘雪华, 傅伯杰 (1999) 卧龙自然保护区大熊猫生境破碎化研究. 生态学报, 19, 291-297.] | |
6 | Dong JW, Xiao XM, Sheldon S, Biradar C, Zhang GL, Duong ND, Hazarika M, Wikantika K, Takeuhci W, Moore III B (2014) A 50-m forest cover map in Southeast Asia from ALOS/PALSAR and its application on forest fragmentation assessment. PLoS ONE, 9, e85801. |
7 | Fang JY, Guo ZD, Hu HF, Kato T, Muraoka H, Son Y (2014) Forest biomass carbon sinks in East Asia, with special reference to the relative contributions of forest expansion and forest growth. Global Change Biology, 20, 2019-2030. |
8 | Fang X, Tang DS, Yang L, Jin WF (2008) Landscape pattern of the experimental forest farm run by Hunan Forestry Academy and its fragmentation analysis. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 28(4), 107-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[方晰, 唐代生, 杨乐, 金文芬 (2008) 湖南省林科院试验林场森林植被景观格局及破碎化分析. 中南林业科技大学学报, 28(4), 107-112.] | |
9 | Groombridge B, Jenkins MD (2002) World Atlas of Biodiversity. University of California Press, Oakland. |
10 | Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Vasconcelos HL, Bruna EM, Didham RK, Stouffer PC, Gascon C, Bierregaard RO, Laurance SG, Sampaio E (2002) Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology, 16, 605-618. |
11 | Li JC, Liu YF, Li MS (2014) Assessing changes in landscape pattern and forest fragmentation based on landscape mosaic model—a case study from the Purple Mountains of Nanjing. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 29, 226-231. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李金臣, 刘云峰, 李明诗 (2014) 基于景观镶嵌模型的景观格局变化及森林破碎化分析——以南京市紫金山风景区为例. 西北林学院学报, 29, 226-231.] | |
12 | Li MS, Ming L, Fan MM, Shen WJ, Sun L (2012) Spatio-temporal patterns and managerial implications of forest fragmentation derived from three national parks in the western United States. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 40(3), 103-107. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李明诗, 明莉, 樊鸣鸣, 沈文娟, 孙力 (2012) 美国西部国有森林破碎化模式及其管理含义. 东北林业大学学报, 40(3), 103-107.] | |
13 | Li YM, Li DM (1994) The effect of human activities on large and middle mammals on the Zhoushan Island—analysis on the cause of their endangerment. Chinese Biodiversity, 2, 187-192. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李义明, 李典谟 (1994) 人为活动对舟山群岛大中型兽的影响——大中型兽受威胁原因分析. 生物多样性, 2, 187-192.] | |
14 | Liu JF, Xiao WF, Jiang ZP, Feng X, Li XY (2005) A study on the influence of landscape fragmentation on biodiversity. Forest Research, 18, 222-226. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘建锋, 肖文发, 江泽平, 冯霞, 李秀英 (2005) 景观破碎化对生物多样性的影响. 林业科学研究, 18, 222-226.] | |
15 | O’Neill RV, Gardner RH, Turner MG (1992) A hierarchical neutral model for landscape analysis. Landscape Ecology, 7, 55-61. |
16 | Pan YD, Birdsey RA, Fang JY, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Pacala SW, McGuire AD, Piao SL, Rautiainen A, Sitch S, Hayes D (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 333, 988-993. |
17 | Pongratz J, Reick CH, Raddatz T, Claussen M (2010) Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical climate response to historical anthropogenic land cover change. Geophysical Research Letters, 37, L08702. |
18 | Qin YW, Xiao XM, Dong JW, Zhang GL, Shimada M, Liu JY, Li CG, Kou WL, Moore B (2015) Forest cover maps of China in 2010 from multiple approaches and data sources: PALSAR, Landsat, MODIS, FRA, and NFI. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 109, 1-16. |
19 | Qin YW, Dong JW, Xiao XM (2015) Difference and uncertainty of forest coverage estimation in China. Biodiversity Science, 23, 830-834. (in Chinese) |
[秦元伟, 董金玮, 肖向明 (2015) 中国森林覆盖度产品的差异性及不确定性分析. 生物多样性, 23, 830-834. ] | |
20 | Ren Y, Wang DR (2012) Temporal and spatial variations of urban forest fragmentation in Xiamen. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 32, 213-219. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[任引, 王大睿 (2012) 厦门城市森林景观破碎化时空演变特征分析. 福建林学院学报, 32, 213-219.] | |
21 | Ribon R, Simon JE, Mattos GT (2003) Bird extinctions in Atlantic forest fragments of the Vicosa region, southeastern Brazil. Conservation Biology, 17, 1827-1839. |
22 | Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB, Smith ER (2000) Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecology, 4, 1924-1925. |
23 | Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB, Smith ER, Coulston JW, Wade TG, Smith JH (2002) Fragmentation of Continental United States Forests. Ecosystems, 5, 815-822. |
24 | Robbins C, Dawson D, Dowell B (1989) Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the middle Atlantic States. Wildlife Monographs, 103, 1-34. |
25 | Shen WJ, Xu T, Li MS (2013) Spatio-temporal changes in forest fragmentation, disturbance patterns over the three giant forested regions of China. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 37(4), 75-79. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[沈文娟, 徐婷, 李明诗 (2013) 中国三大林区森林破碎化及干扰模式变动分析. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 37(4), 75-79.] | |
26 | Shi JJ, Xia CZ, Yan EP, Dang YF (2015) Study on the evolution of forest fragmentation and driving forces in Yunyang County based on MultiMate remote sensing. Forest Resources Management, (4), 59-68. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[史京京, 夏朝宗, 严恩萍, 党永峰 (2015) 基于多期遥感的云阳县域森林景观破碎化演变与驱动力研究. 林业资源管理, (4), 59-68.] | |
27 | Stauffer D (1985) Introduction to Percolation Theory. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. |
28 | Sun F, Chen MX, Mao LJ, Li MS (2011) Assessment of provincial-scale forest fragmentation in Chinese mainland. Journal of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 39(1), 43-51. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[孙飞, 陈敏学, 毛丽君, 李明诗 (2011) 中国大陆省级尺度森林破碎化特征评价. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 39(1), 43-51.] | |
29 | Suo AN, Xiong YC, Wang TM, Kou XJ, Ge JP (2007) Effect of deforestation on watershed hydrological process in Ziwuling on the Loess Plateau. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 43(6), 13-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[索安宁, 熊友才, 王天明, 寇晓军, 葛剑平 (2007) 黄土高原子午岭森林破碎化对流域水文过程的影响. 林业科学, 43(6), 13-19.] | |
30 | Wang ZB, Wang DX, Ren GX (2011) Analysis of forest landscape pattern and fragmentation of Qinling Caiziping forest region. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 39(12), 95-100. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王志彬, 王得祥, 任广鑫 (2011) 秦岭菜子坪林区森林景观格局及破碎化分析. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 39(12), 95-100.] | |
31 | Yang GJ, Xiao DN (2003) Forest landscape pattern and fragmentation: a case study on Xishui Natural Reserve in Qilian Mountain. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 22(5), 56-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[杨国靖, 肖笃宁 (2003) 森林景观格局分析及破碎化评价——以祁连山西水自然保护区为例. 生态学杂志, 22(5), 56-61.] | |
32 | Zhang YX, Yan EP, Xia CZ, Dang YF (2013) Study on evolution of forest landscape fragmentation of Three Gorges Reservoir Area based on multi-remote sensing images. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 33(7), 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张煜星, 严恩萍, 夏朝宗, 党永峰 (2013) 基于多期遥感的三峡库区森林景观破碎化演变研究. 中南林业科技大学学报, 33(7), 1-7.] | |
33 | Zhao AJ, Hu TX, Lai CH, Song XB (2006) Comparative study on fragmentation of forest landscapes in different regions. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 24(2), 187-193. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[赵安玖, 胡庭兴, 赖长鸿, 宋小波 (2006) 区域森林景观破碎化对比分析. 四川农业大学学报, 24(2), 187-193.] |
[1] | Zonggang Hu. China and the United States once planned joint compilation of the “Flora of China” after the victory in the Second Sino-Japanese War [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(6): 24220-. |
[2] | Qiyu Kuang, Liang Hu. Species diversity and geographical distribution of marine benthic shell-bearing mollusks around Donghai Island and Naozhou Island, Guangdong Province [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 24065-. |
[3] | Yujie Chi, Xintian Zhang, Zhixuan Tian, Chengshuai Guan, Xinzhi Gu, Zhihui Liu, Zhanbin Wang, Jinjie Wang. Species diversity of powdery mildew fungi (Erysiphaceae) and their host plants in Northeast Asia [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(4): 23443-. |
[4] | Lin Di, Chen Shuanglin, Du Que, Song Wenlong, Rao Gu, Yan Shuzhen. Investigation of species diversity of myxomycetes in Dabie Mountains [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(2): 23242-. |
[5] | Yuchen Du, Beimeng Liu, Junfeng Chen, Hao Wang, Yi Xie. Analysis of factors influencing farmers’ protection willingness based on structural equation model: Taking the Hunchun area of Northeast China Tiger and Leopard National Park as an example [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(1): 23155-. |
[6] | Hailing Qi, Pengzhen Fan, Yuehua Wang, Jie Liu. Genetic diversity and population structure of Juglans regia from six provinces in northern China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(8): 23120-. |
[7] | Jianguo Zhu, Lin Wang, Guopeng Ren. Exploring the evaluation method for the update of the List of State Key Protected Wild Animals in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(8): 23045-. |
[8] | Jingxuan Chen, Jiajun Zhou, Baoquan Liu. Records and population status of sea turtles in the Zhejiang sea area of China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(6): 23082-. |
[9] | Yujie Xue, Anpeng Cheng, Shan Li, Xiaojuan Liu, Jingwen Li. The effects of environment and species diversity on shrub survival in subtropical forests [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(3): 22443-. |
[10] | Shikun Guo, Mingqiang Wang, Pengfei Guo, Jingting Chen, Zeqing Niu, Arong Luo, Juanjuan Yang, Qingsong Zhou, Chaodong Zhu. Diversity of cavity-nesting Hymenoptera and their parasitoids in subtropical forests, southeastern China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(2): 22060-. |
[11] | Ke Wang, Lei Cai. Annual review on nomenclature novelties of fungi in the world (2022) [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(10): 23176-. |
[12] | Chen Lin, Xiaodong Cai, Liang Wang, Bing Zhang, Qicheng Yang, Yanling Wu, Ding Yang. New taxa of Diptera from China in 2022 [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(10): 23245-. |
[13] | Xuan Zhou, Yiping Luo, Zi Jin, Yuqing Qiao, Yiyao Zhang, Lulu Li, Yuanyuan Lu, Ning Liu, Meike Liu, Ming Bai. The world new taxa for extant Coleoptera in 2022 [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(10): 23202-. |
[14] | Jianping Jiang, Bo Cai, Bin Wang, Weitao Chen, Zhixin Wen, Dezhi Zhang, Lulu Sui, Shun Ma. New vertebrate species discovered in China in 2022 [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(10): 23241-. |
[15] | Huanxi Cao, Wen Jiang, Bolormaa Ganbaatar, Dan Zhang, Qingsong Zhou, Zhulidezi Aishan, Xu Wang, Pu Tang, Arong Luo, Zeqing Niu, Yanzhou Zhang, Hui Xiao, Chaodong Zhu. New taxa of extant Hymenoptera in 2022 [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(10): 23223-. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn