论国家公园建设的公众参与

doi:10.17520/biods.2016156

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

公众参与是一种提高公众积极性和主动权的新型管理策略, 应用于保护地管理已数十年, 迄今已贯穿于许多国家的国家公园管理环节中, 成为国家公园治理的必然趋势。我国现行的保护地管理体系实行属地管理, 其建设和管理在实际中多为政府行为, 鲜有的公众参与也多为非规范的、被动的。本文梳理并提炼了保护地管理中公众参与的起源、内涵及特征, 在借鉴国外保护地管理公众参与实践经验的基础上, 依照公众参与程度的高低, 将国家公园建设管理的公众参与途径分为信息反馈、咨询、协议与合作4个层次; 提出了我国国家公园的公众参与途径, 旨在为我国国家公园体制的建设管理提供参考。

关键词: 国家公园, 保护地, 公众参与, 利益相关者, 国家公园治理

Abstract

Public participation is an attempt by development partners to broadly consult and involve the public as to where projects should be situated. The clear trend is toward broader and more frequent public involvement and collaboration for national park governance as public participation has been applied in the management of protected areas for several decades. Public participation in the Chinese protected area system presents a passive and non-standardized situation. The preliminary model of public participation in China’s national parks is presented in this paper through synthesizing the background of the construction of China’s national park system. Results obtained in this research indicate that, according to the degree of public participation, there could be four types of public participation in China’s national parks, which include information feedback, consultation, agreement and partnerships. The impacts of our obtained results provide references for a pilot project involving the construction of China’s national park system.

Key words: national park, protected area, public participation, stakeholders, national park governance

张婧雅, 张玉钧 (2017) 论国家公园建设的公众参与. 生物多样性, 25, 80-87. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016156.

Jingya Zhang,Yujun Zhang (2017) On public participation in the construction of national parks. Biodiversity Science, 25, 80-87. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016156.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2016156

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2017/V25/I1/80

图/表 6

参考文献 30

1	Agrawal A, Gibson C (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27, 629-649.
2	Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of The American Planning Association, 35, 216-224.
3	Chambers R (2005) Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: whose map? Who empowered and who disempowered? Who gains and who loses? Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 25(2), 1-11.
4	Connor DM (1988) A new ladder of citizen participation. National Civic Review, 77, 249-257.
5	Dietz T, Stern PC (1998) Science, values and biodiversity. BioScience, 48, 441-444.
6	Edralin JS (1997) The new local governance and capacity building: a strategic approach—examples from Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Regional Development Studies, 3, 109-149.
7	Eneji VCO, Gubo Q, Okpiliya FI, Aniah EJ, Eni DD, Afangide D (2009) Problems of public participation in biodiversity conservation: the Nigerian scenario. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27, 301-307.
8	Fiorino DJ (1990) Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15, 226-243.
9	Gaventa J, Valderrama C (1999) Participation, citizenship and local governance. Strengthening Participation in Local governance, 21, 1-16.
10	Keen M, Mahanty S (2006) Learning in sustainable natural resource management: challenges and opportunities in the Pacific. Society and Natural Resources, 19, 497-513.
11	Liu PF, Liang LK, Liu Y (2011) A comparative study on admission tickets price between national scenic resort in China and national park in the United States. Areal Research and Development, 30(5), 108-122. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘鹏飞, 梁留科, 刘英 (2011) 中美国家风景名胜区门票价格比较研究. 地域研究与开发, 30(5), 108-122.]
12	Liu XM, Bao JG (2005) Analysis on unqualified ecotourism practice: from the point of view of stakeholders. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 24, 348-353. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘雪梅, 保继刚 (2005) 从利益相关者角度剖析国内外生态旅游实践的变形. 生态学杂志, 24, 348-353.]
13	Lynch HJ, Hodge S, Albert C, Dunham M (2008) The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: challenges for regional ecosystem management. Environmental Management, 41, 820-833.
14	Mannigel E (2008) Integrating parks and people: how does participation work in protected area management? Society & Natural Resources, 21, 498-511.
15	Miao H, Ouyang ZY, Wang XK, Song M (2000) Management of communities in natural reserves: challenge and solution. In: Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in China (ed. Chen YY), pp. 37-50. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[苗鸿, 欧阳志云, 王效科, 宋敏 (2000) 自然保护区的社区管理: 问题与对策. 见: 第四届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集(陈宜瑜主编), pp. 37-50. 中国林业出版社, 北京.]
16	Pan ZQ, Liang BE, Wu YH, Lin Y, Cao TT (2014) Community empowerment: an effective way to realize community’s involvement in tourism development. Tourism Forum, 7(6), 43-49. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[潘植强, 梁保尔, 吴玉海, 林琰, 曹婷婷 (2014) 社区增权: 实现社区参与旅游发展的有效路径. 旅游论坛, 7(6), 43-49.]
17	Parks & Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory (2002) Public Participation in Protected Area Management, The Committee on National Parks and Protected Area Management, Benchmarking and Best Practice Program.
18	Schneider H (1999)Participatory Governance:The Missing Link for Poverty Reduction. OECD Publishing , Paris.
19	Seitz V (2001) A new model: participatory planning for sustainable community development. Race Poverty & the Environment, 8(1), 8-11, 38.
20	Selin SW, Chavez D (1995) Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management, 18, 189-195.
21	Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Fraser E, Hubacek K, Prell C, Reed MS (2010) Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society, 11, doi: 10.5751/ES-01896-110239.
22	The United Nations Development Programme (translated by Translating Group of Human Development Report 2003) (2003) Human Development Report 2003—Millennium Development Goals: A Compact Among Nations to End Human Poverty. China Financial and Economic Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[2003年人类发展报告翻译组(2003) 2003年人类发展报告——千年发展目标: 消除人类贫困的全球公约. 中国财政经济出版社, 北京.]
23	Tuler S, Webler T (2000) Public participation: relevance and application in the national park service. Park Science, 20(1), 24-26.
24	WWF (1991) Local Participation in Environmental Assessment of Projects. Working paper No. 2, Washington, DC.
25	Xu SL (2003) The management system reform of China’s cultural and natural heritage. Management World, (6), 63-73. (in Chinese)
	[徐嵩龄 (2003) 中国文化与自然遗产的管理体制改革. 管理世界, (6), 63-73.]
26	Zhang J, Chen SB, Chen B, Du YJ, Huang XL, Pan XB, Zhang Q (2013) Citizen science: integrating scientific research, ecological conservation and public participation. Biodiversity Science, 21, 738-749. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张健, 陈圣宾, 陈彬, 杜彦君, 黄晓磊, 潘绪斌, 张强 (2013) 公众科学: 整合科学研究、生态保护和公众参与. 生物多样性, 21, 738-749.]
27	Zhang X (2005) Analysis on the institutional disadvantages of decentralized administration and management for world heritage and key national park in China. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 21(7), 9-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张晓 (2005) 世界遗产和国家重点风景名胜区分权化(属地)管理体制的制度缺陷. 中国园林, 21(7), 9-16.]
28	Zhang YJ, Yin MF (2006) The latest development: a case of processes of forest policy formation by Kanagawa Prefecture. Environmental Science and Management, 31(9), 8-10. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张玉钧, 殷鸣放 (2006)日本森林管理的最新发展——以日本神奈川县林业政策过程为例. 环境科学与管理, 31(9), 8-10.]
29	Zhang YJ, Zhang YY (2012) Protection of citizens-participating rural landscape: a case study of state-run Satoyama Park (or Kaisho Forest) in Japan. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 20, 838-841. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张玉钧, 张英云 (2012) 市民参与型的乡村景观保护——以日本海上森林国营里山公园建设为例. 中国生态农业学报, 20, 838-841.]
30	Zhang ZW, Yang R (2015) The public involvement mechanism of American national park management planning. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 31(2), 23-27. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张振威, 杨锐 (2015) 美国国家公园管理规划的公众参与制度. 中国园林, 31(2), 23-27.]

Arnstein (1969)	Connor (1988)	澳大利亚保护地^* Australia’s Protected area^*	公众参与程度 Degree of public participation
操控 Manipulation	(政府)决断 Resolution	通知 Inform	低 Low 高 High
治疗 Therapy	(政府)诉讼 Litigation	咨询 Consult
告知 Informing	调解、仲裁 Mediation	合作 Collaborate
征询意见 Consultation	与(政府)联合规划 Joint planning	伙伴 Partner
安抚 Placation	咨询 Consultation	移交 Hand Over
合作关系 Partnership	信息互通 Information
契约授权 Delegated power	教育 Education
公众控制 Citizen control

Arnstein (1969)	Connor (1988)	澳大利亚保护地^* Australia’s Protected area^*	公众参与程度 Degree of public participation
操控 Manipulation	(政府)决断 Resolution	通知 Inform	低 Low 高 High
治疗 Therapy	(政府)诉讼 Litigation	咨询 Consult
告知 Informing	调解、仲裁 Mediation	合作 Collaborate
征询意见 Consultation	与(政府)联合规划 Joint planning	伙伴 Partner
安抚 Placation	咨询 Consultation	移交 Hand Over
合作关系 Partnership	信息互通 Information
契约授权 Delegated power	教育 Education
公众控制 Citizen control

类型 Type	内容 Content	主要参与主体 Main participants	形式 Form	备注 Remark	公众参与程度 Degree of public participation
信息反馈 Information feedback	政府将管理政策等信息通知公众 Govern- ment informs public	公民、社会组织、企业、社区 Citizens, social organizations, enterprises and communities	公众集会、新闻发布会、教育培训、公开出版物、网络等 Public meetings, press releases, education, publication and internet	建立反馈制度, 包括问询、投诉、网页点击率等数量 Feedback system include the numbers of inquiry, complaint and internet hits	低 Low 高 High
咨询 Consult	政府在决策制定时咨询公众 Government consults public for decision-making	社区、社会组织 Communities, social organizations	问卷访谈、利益相关者委员会、咨询会、工作组 Questionare surveys, stakeholder meetings, consultation and workshops	确保利益相关者的多元化 Diversity of stakeholder
协议 Agreement	政府在建设管理过程中雇佣、聘请公众 Government employs public	企业、社区、社会组织、公民 Enterprises, communities, social organizations and citizens	特许经营、协议保护、工作人员、专家聘请、第三方监督、志愿者 Franchise, conservation steward, staff, supervision and volunteer	需构建协议期满后的评估制度 Evaluation scheme
合作 Partner	政府与公众共同分享权责 Government and public (stakeholders) share responsibility	社区、企业 Communities, enterprises	委员会、工作组、社区共管、公私合营等 Committee, work shop, community co-manage- ment and PPP	需依据共同目标和利益确定合作范围、明晰各方权责界限及产出 Outcomes and bound of rights and liabilities based on common aim and interests

类型 Type	内容 Content	主要参与主体 Main participants	形式 Form	备注 Remark	公众参与程度 Degree of public participation
信息反馈 Information feedback	政府将管理政策等信息通知公众 Govern- ment informs public	公民、社会组织、企业、社区 Citizens, social organizations, enterprises and communities	公众集会、新闻发布会、教育培训、公开出版物、网络等 Public meetings, press releases, education, publication and internet	建立反馈制度, 包括问询、投诉、网页点击率等数量 Feedback system include the numbers of inquiry, complaint and internet hits	低 Low 高 High
咨询 Consult	政府在决策制定时咨询公众 Government consults public for decision-making	社区、社会组织 Communities, social organizations	问卷访谈、利益相关者委员会、咨询会、工作组 Questionare surveys, stakeholder meetings, consultation and workshops	确保利益相关者的多元化 Diversity of stakeholder
协议 Agreement	政府在建设管理过程中雇佣、聘请公众 Government employs public	企业、社区、社会组织、公民 Enterprises, communities, social organizations and citizens	特许经营、协议保护、工作人员、专家聘请、第三方监督、志愿者 Franchise, conservation steward, staff, supervision and volunteer	需构建协议期满后的评估制度 Evaluation scheme
合作 Partner	政府与公众共同分享权责 Government and public (stakeholders) share responsibility	社区、企业 Communities, enterprises	委员会、工作组、社区共管、公私合营等 Committee, work shop, community co-manage- ment and PPP	需依据共同目标和利益确定合作范围、明晰各方权责界限及产出 Outcomes and bound of rights and liabilities based on common aim and interests

[1]	张丛林, 褚梦真, 张慧智, 乔海娟, 黄宝荣. 青藏高原国家公园群游憩可持续性管理评估指标体系[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 780-789.
[2]	郝希阳, 贺姹, 楚克林, 申志新, 赵强, 高伟, 潘达, 孙红英. 海南岛淡水蟹类分布格局与多样性保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(5): 605-616.
[3]	曲方圆, 李淑芸, 赵林林, 杨松颖, 万铭扬, 蔡吕彤, 张朝晖. 黄海生态区保护空缺分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 385-393.
[4]	李博炎, 朱彦鹏, 刘伟玮, 李爽, 付梦娣, 任月恒, 蔡譞, 李俊生. 中国国家公园体制试点进展、问题及对策建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 283-289.
[5]	冯斌, 李迪强, 张于光, 薛亚东. 基于爱知生物多样性目标11的我国自然保护地管理有效性评估进展与分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(2): 150-159.
[6]	王伟, 李俊生. 中国生物多样性就地保护成效与展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(2): 133-149.
[7]	田佳, 朱淑怡, 张晓峰, 何礼文, 古晓东, 官天培, 李晟. 大熊猫国家公园的地栖大中型鸟兽多样性现状: 基于红外相机数据的分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(11): 1490-1504.
[8]	江南, 徐卫华, 赵娟娟, 肖燚. 生态系统原真性概念及评价方法: 以长白山地区为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10): 1288-1294.
[9]	赵智聪, 杨锐. 中国国家公园原真性与完整性概念及其评价框架[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10): 1271-1278.
[10]	蒋亚芳, 田静, 赵晶博, 唐小平. 国家公园生态系统完整性的内涵及评价框架: 以东北虎豹国家公园为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10): 1279-1287.
[11]	彭杨靖, 黄治昊, 林乐乐, 王锐锋, 崔国发. 国家公园陆地自然生态系统完整性与原真性评价方法探索: 以钱江源国家公园体制试点为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10): 1295-1307.
[12]	闫颜, 唐芳林, 田勇臣, 金崑. 国家公园最严格保护的实现路径[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 123-128.
[13]	申小莉, 余建平, 李晟, 肖慧芸, 陈小南, 陈声文, 刘鸣章, 马克平. 钱江源国家公园红外相机监测平台进展概述[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(9): 1110-1114.
[14]	李晟, William J. McShea, 王大军, 申小莉, 卜红亮, 官天培, 王放, 古晓东, 张晓峰, 廖灏泓. 西南山地红外相机监测网络建设进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(9): 1049-1058.
[15]	李佳, 王秀磊, 杨明伟, 陈大祥, 王晓菊, 罗平, 刘芳, 薛亚东, 李广良, 张于光, 张宇, 李迪强. 自然保护区生物标本资源共享子平台红外相机数据库建设进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(9): 1081-1089.