生态系统原真性概念及评价方法: 以长白山地区为例

doi:10.17520/biods.2020490

生物多样性 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 1288-1294. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020490

• 生态系统原真性和完整性专题 • 上一篇下一篇

生态系统原真性概念及评价方法: 以长白山地区为例

江南¹^,², 徐卫华¹^,^*(), 赵娟娟³, 肖燚¹

1.中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085
2.中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
3.西南大学园艺园林学院, 重庆 400715

收稿日期:2020-12-31 接受日期:2021-06-25 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-10-20
通讯作者: 徐卫华
作者简介:* E-mail: xuweihua@rcees.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(XDA23080104);国家林草局-中国科学院国家公园研究院研究专项

Concept and assessment method of ecosystem authenticity: The case of Changbai Mountains area

Nan Jiang¹^,², Weihua Xu¹^,^*(), Juanjuan Zhao³, Yi Xiao¹

1 State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
3 College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715

Received:2020-12-31 Accepted:2021-06-25 Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-10-20
Contact: Weihua Xu

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

我国建立国家公园的主要目的是保护自然生态系统的原真性、完整性, 然而原真性的概念尚不明确, 评估方法亟待建立。本文尝试厘清原真性的概念, 讨论其在保护实践中的价值, 探究生态系统原真性的评价方法, 以期提升国家公园体制建设和自然保护地规划管理的科学性; 并以长白山地区为例, 基于森林清查数据, 从植被角度选取起源方式、优势树种、林龄和单位蓄积4项指标构建森林生态系统原真性评价指标体系, 建立权重系数、原真性值计算公式和等级划分标准。评价结果显示, 研究区域森林生态系统原真性值为0.69, 和龙市、安图县、抚松县、临江市和长白朝鲜族自治县分别为0.70、0.71、0.67、0.60和0.63。原真性从高到低5个等级的面积之比为9 : 44 : 33 : 11 : 3, 原真性高与极高的森林面积比例占53%, 空间分布呈现以长白山主峰为中心向东、北、西逐渐降低的趋势。建议基于对区域生态系统原生状态的全面了解, 加强不同尺度、组成要素的原真性指标体系及评价方法研究。

关键词: 原真性, 森林生态系统, 长白山, 国家公园

Abstract

Aims: National parks have recently been listed as protected areas in China's official documents to protect the authenticity and integrity of natural ecosystems. However, it is unclear how ecosystem authenticity is defined, let alone how to protect it. In this paper, we tried to define the concept of ecosystem authenticity, discuss its significance to conservation, and explore the assessment method to provide a scientific guide for the management and planning of protected areas.
Method: The study area is located in the center of Changbai Mountains where the most typical and well-preserved temperate mountain forest develops in Eastern Eurasia. We evaluated the forest ecosystems authenticity from the perspective of vegetation using forest inventory data of Jilin Province. Four indicators—forest origin, dominant tree, age of stand, unit stock volume—were selected to construct the authenticity assessment index system for forest ecosystems. At the same time, we established the weight coefficient, authenticity value calculation formula and grading standard.
Results: The forest ecosystem authenticity value of the whole study area was 0.69. The ecosystem authenticity values for Helong City, Antu County, Fusong County, Linjiang City and Korean Autonomous County of Changbai were 0.70, 0.71, 0.67, 0.60 and 0.63, respectively. Ecosystem authenticity is divided into five levels with an area ratio of 9 : 44 : 33 : 11 : 3 in order of authenticity from highest to lowest, indicating 53% are in very high and high levels. In general, the highest level of authenticity for the forest was in the main peak of Changbai Mountains, and gradually decreased going north, west, and south.
Conclusion: Ecosystem authenticity refers to the degree that an ecosystem from a particular region maintains its native state after various natural and human disturbances. It is convenient and generalizable to evaluate the authenticity of the forest ecosystem by using forest inventory data from the perspective of vegetation. Further research should give attention to the authenticity index system and the assessment method of different scales and components based on a comprehensive understanding of the primitive status of the ecosystem.

Key words: authenticity, forest ecosystem, Changbai Mountains, national park

江南, 徐卫华, 赵娟娟, 肖燚 (2021) 生态系统原真性概念及评价方法: 以长白山地区为例. 生物多样性, 29, 1288-1294. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020490.

Nan Jiang, Weihua Xu, Juanjuan Zhao, Yi Xiao (2021) Concept and assessment method of ecosystem authenticity: The case of Changbai Mountains area. Biodiversity Science, 29, 1288-1294. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020490.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2020490

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2021/V29/I10/1288

图/表 4

表1 森林生态系统原真性评价指标权重

Table 1 Weight of evaluation index for authenticity of forest ecosystem

内容 Content	指标 Index	说明 Introduction	权重 Weight
森林起源 Forest origin	起源方式 Mode of origin	森林的主要生成方式 The main ways of forest formation	0.3
演替阶段 Succession stage	优势树种 Dominant tree	森林小班内蓄积量占比最大的树种 The tree with the largest volume in forest sub-compartment	0.3
演替阶段 Succession stage	龄组 Age group	根据优势树种平均年龄划分 Classification by mean age of dominant tree	0.3
生长状况 Growth status	单位蓄积 Unit stock volume	单位面积活立木材积总量 Total volume of living standing trees per unit area	0.1

表2 原真性评价指标属性及定量赋值

Table 2 Attribute and quantitative assignment of evaluation index for authenticity

指标 Index	属性 Attribute	赋值 Value
起源方式 Mode of origin	天然更新 Natural regeneration	1.0
	飞播造林 Aerial seeding	0.6
	人工造林 Artificial afforestation	0.2
优势树种 Dominant tree species	顶级种组 Climax species group	1.0
	过渡种组 Developing species group	0.6
	先锋种组 Pioneer species group	0.4
	经济树种 Benefit-oriented species	0.2
龄组 Age group	成过熟林 Mature forest	1.0
	近熟林 Near mature forest	0.8
	中龄林 Middle forest	0.4
	幼龄林 Young forest	0.2

图1 长白山地区森林生态系统不同原真性等级主要植被类型面积比例。Mn: 针叶混交林; Mb: 阔叶混交林; Md: 针阔混交林; N1: 红松林; N2: 云冷杉林; N3: 落叶松林; B1: 椴树林; B2: 栎林; B3: 白桦林; B4: 杨树林; OT: 其他。

Fig. 1 Proportion of major vegetation types with different authenticity levels of forest ecosystem in the Changbai Mountains. Mn, Coniferous mixed forest; Mb, Broad-leaved mixed forest; Md, Coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest; N1, The forest with Pinus koraiensis as dominant tree; N2, The forest with Picea spp. and Abies spp. as dominant tree; N3, The forest with Larix spp. as dominant tree; B1, The forest with Tilia spp. as dominant tree; B2, The forest with Quercus spp. as dominant tree; B3, The forest with Betula platyphylla as dominant tree; B4, The forest with Populus spp. as dominant tree; OT: Others.

图2 长白山地区森林生态系统原真性值空间分布图。a: 和龙市; b: 安图县; c: 抚松县; d: 临江市; e: 长白朝鲜族自治县。

Fig.2 Spatial distribution of the authenticity value of forest ecosystem in the Changbai Mountains. a, Helong City; b, Antu County; c, Fusong County; d, Linjiang City; e, Korean Autonomous County of Changbai.

参考文献 25

[1]	Anderson JE (1991) A conceptual framework for evaluating and quantifying naturalness. Conservation Biology, 5, 347-352. DOI URL
[2]	Chen G, Deng HB, Dai LM, Wu G (2005) Health assessment on forest ecosystem by using integrated compose index (ICI). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25, 1725-1733. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[陈高, 邓红兵, 代力民, 吴钢 (2005) 综合构成指数在森林生态系统健康评估中的应用. 生态学报, 25, 1725-1733.]
[3]	Clewell AF (2000) Restoring for natural authenticity. Ecological Restoration, 18, 216-217. DOI URL
[4]	Dai YC, Xue YD, Zhang YY, Li DQ (2019) Summary comments on assessment methods of ecosystem integrity for national parks. Biodiversity Science, 27, 104-113. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[代云川, 薛亚东, 张云毅, 李迪强 (2019) 国家公园生态系统完整性评价研究进展. 生物多样性, 27, 104-113.] DOI
[5]	Du A, Cui T, Song TY, Ouyang ZY (2020) International experiences of national park selection criteria and the inspirations to China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40, 7231-7237. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[杜傲, 崔彤, 宋天宇, 欧阳志云 (2020) 国家公园遴选标准的国际经验及对我国的启示. 生态学报, 40, 7231-7237.]
[6]	Fan XH (2018) The Assembly and Development Mechanisms of Typical Natural Forest Community in Changbai Mountains. PhD dissertation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[范秀华 (2018) 长白山典型天然林群落形成与演变机制研究. 博士学位论文, 北京林业大学, 北京.]
[7]	Hao ZQ, Li BH, Zhang J, Wang XG, Ye J, Yao XL (2008) Broad-leaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) mixed forest plot in Changbaishan (CBS) of China: Community composition and structure. Journal of Plant Ecology, 32, 238-250. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郝占庆, 李步杭, 张健, 王绪高, 叶吉, 姚晓琳 (2008) 长白山阔叶红松林样地(CBS): 群落组成与结构. 植物生态学报, 32, 238-250.] DOI
[8]	He SY, Su Y (2019) Authenticity, integrity, connectivity and coordination-conceptual analysis and practical significance for the establishment of the national park system. Environmental Protection, 47(Z1), 28-34. (in Chinese)
	[何思源, 苏杨 (2019) 原真性、完整性、连通性、协调性概念在中国国家公园建设中的体现. 环境保护, 47(Z1), 28-34.]
[9]	Huang BR, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Wang XK, Miao H (2006) Connotation of ecological integrity and its assessment methods: A review. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 17, 2196-2202. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[黄宝荣, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 王效科, 苗鸿 (2006) 生态系统完整性内涵及评价方法研究综述. 应用生态学报, 17, 2196-2202.]
[10]	Li MH, Kruchi N, Yang J (2002) Hemeroby: A method to assess the naturalness of vegetation. Progress in Geography, 21, 450-458. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李迈和, Norbert Kruchi, 杨健 (2002) 生态干扰度: 一种评价植被天然性程度的方法. 地理科学进展, 21, 450-458.]
[11]	Ma KM, Kong HM, Guan WB, Fu BJ (2001) Ecosystem health assessment: Methods and directions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 21, 2106-2116. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[马克明, 孔红梅, 关文彬, 傅伯杰 (2001) 生态系统健康评价: 方法与方向. 生态学报, 21, 2106-2116.]
[12]	Ouyang ZY, Xu WH, Du A, Lei GC, Zhu CQ, Chen S (2018) Research on Overall Spatial Planning for China's National Park System. China Environment Publishing Group, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[欧阳志云, 徐卫华, 杜傲, 雷光春, 朱春全, 陈尚 (2018) 中国国家公园总体空间布局研究. 中国环境出版集团, 北京.]
[13]	Ruan YS, Lin L (2003) Authenticity in relation to the conservation of cultural heritage. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Section), 14(2), 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[阮仪三, 林林 (2003) 文化遗产保护的原真性原则. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 14(2), 1-5.]
[14]	Saldarriaga JG, West DC, Tharp ML, Uhl C (1988) Long-term chronosequence of forest succession in the upper Rio Negro of Colombia and Venezuela. The Journal of Ecology, 76, 938. DOI URL
[15]	Sprugel DG (1991) Disturbance, equilibrium and environmental variability: What is ‘Natural' vegetation in a changing environment? Biological Conservation, 58, 1-18. DOI URL
[16]	Steiner CJ, Reisinger Y (2006) Understanding existential authenticity. Annals of Tourism Research, 33, 299-318. DOI URL
[17]	Tveit M, Ode Å, Fry G (2006) Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31, 229-255. DOI URL
[18]	Wang SX, Xu JW, Meng QF (2020) Forest Ecosystem Evaluation of Changbai Mountain National Nature Reserve in Jilin Province. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	王绍先, 许嘉巍, 孟庆繁 (2020) 吉林省长白山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统评价. 中国林业出版社, 北京.]
[19]	Wehenkel C, Corral-Rivas JJ, Castellanos-Bocaz HA, Pinedo-Alvarez A (2009) Is there a positive relationship between naturalness and genetic diversity in forest tree communities? Investigación Agraria: Sistemasy Recursos Forestules, 18, 20-27.
[20]	Winter S, Fischer HS, Fischer A (2010) Relative quantitative reference approach for naturalness assessments of forests. Forest Ecology & Management, 259, 1624-1632.
[21]	Wu YL, Li JZ, Yang YP, Zhou ZX (2010) Research advances in assessment of forest naturalness. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 29, 2065-2071. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[吴银莲, 李景中, 杨玉萍, 周志翔 (2010) 森林自然度评价研究进展. 生态学杂志, 29, 2065-2071.]
[22]	Yang R (2018) Study on setting standards for national parks in China. Forestry Construction, 36(5), 103-112. (in Chinese)
	[杨锐 (2018) 中国国家公园设立标准研究. 林业建设, 36(5), 103-112.]
[23]	Yu LQ, Li JW, Zhao XH, Ma L, Wu S, Bai XQ (2014) Ecologically critical areas of broad-leaved Korean pine mixed forest in Changbai Mountains, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 1250-1258. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[于琳倩, 李景文, 赵秀海, 马琳, 吴尚, 白雪琪 (2014) 长白山阔叶红松林生态保护关键区的确定. 应用生态学报, 25, 1250-1258.]
[24]	Yu QG (2007) Temporal and Spatial Differentiation of Forest Landscape in Relation to Naturalness. PhD dissertation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[喻庆国 (2007) 基于自然度的森林景观时空分异研究. 博士学位论文, 北京林业大学, 北京.]
[25]	Zhao ZH (2009) Evaluating Forest Naturalness Based on Stand State Characteristics. PhD dissertation, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[赵中华 (2009) 基于林分状态特征的森林自然度评价研究. 博士学位论文, 中国林业科学研究院, 北京.]

生态系统原真性概念及评价方法: 以长白山地区为例

Concept and assessment method of ecosystem authenticity: The case of Changbai Mountains area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杜宇晨, 刘蓓萌, 陈俊峰, 王浩, 谢屹. 基于结构方程模型的农户保护意愿影响因素分析: 以东北虎豹国家公园珲春片区为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23155-.
[2]	耿云, 寇一祎, 范新卓, 徐姝瑶, 丛丽, 张玉钧. 基于卡诺模型的大熊猫国家公园自然教育需求研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23101-.
[3]	崔国发. 关于自然保护地整合优化工作中几个关键问题的讨论与建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 22447-.
[4]	李世东. 中国和美国国家公园时空发展及驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 23040-.
[5]	邓昶, 郝杰威, 高德, 任明迅, 张莉娜. 海南受威胁苔藓植物适生热点区域识别与保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22580-.
[6]	龚心语, 黄宝荣. 国家公园全民公益性评估指标体系: 以青藏高原国家公园群为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22571-.
[7]	陈天傲, 李想. 我国国家公园管理体系优化路径: 以中央层面为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22485-.
[8]	杨预展, 余建平, 钱海源, 陈小南, 陈声文, 袁志林. 钱江源国家公园体制试点区水稻田土壤微生物群落的格局及其驱动机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22392-.
[9]	金彦君, 赵龙辉, 覃远玉, 汪继超. 海南国家公园霸王岭片区无尾两栖类鸣声多样性: 基于自动录音技术[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22360-.
[10]	孙翊斐, 王士政, 冯佳伟, 王天明. 东北虎豹国家公园森林声景的昼夜和季节变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22523-.
[11]	李国华, 郭向阳, 李霖明, 任明迅, 万玲, 丁琼, 李娟玲. 海南热带雨林国家公园不同植被类型的大型真菌多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 22110-.
[12]	颜文博, 莫燕妮, 曾治高, 薛少亮, 王琦, 梁春生, 黄祝礼, 罗文, 刘大业, 莫世琴, 李晓光, 梁路, 杜鹍鹏. 海南尖峰岭中华穿山甲的分布与保护现状[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 22106-.
[13]	赵鑫蕊, 何思源, 苏杨. 生态系统完整性在管理层面的体现方式: 以跨省国家公园统一管理的体制机制为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21493-.
[14]	王重阳, 赵联军, 孟世勇. 王朗国家级自然保护区滑坡体兰科植物分布格局及其保护策略[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(2): 21313-.
[15]	陈秋菊, 孙智闲, 李雪健, 张睿, 席蕊, 田晨, 王鑫, 邢迎春, 赵亚辉. 武夷山国家公园及其周边鱼类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(11): 22260-.