钱江源国家公园体制试点区功能分区对黑麂保护的有效性评估

doi:10.17520/biods.2018246

生物多样性 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 5-12.DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018246

所属专题：钱江源国家公园生物多样性保护与管理

钱江源国家公园体制试点区功能分区对黑麂保护的有效性评估

余建平¹,申云逸²,宋小友¹,陈小南¹,李晟²,申小莉^3,^*()

1 钱江源国家公园生态资源保护中心, 浙江开化 324300
2 北京大学生命科学学院, 北京 100871
3 中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2018-09-13 接受日期:2019-01-02 出版日期:2019-01-20 发布日期:2019-03-15
通讯作者: 申小莉
基金资助:
科技部重点研发项目(2017YFC0503802)

Evaluating the effectiveness of functional zones for black muntjac (Muntiacus crinifrons) protection in Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot site

Yu Jianping¹,Shen Yunyi²,Song Xiaoyou¹,Chen Xiaonan¹,Li Sheng²,Shen Xiaoli^3,^*()

1 Center of Ecology and Resources, Qianjiangyuan National Park, Kaihua, Zhejiang 324300
2 School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871
3 State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093

Received:2018-09-13 Accepted:2019-01-02 Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-03-15
Contact: Shen Xiaoli

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

功能分区是统一协调国家公园不同保护管理目标的主要措施, 对于国家公园的有效管理有重要意义。钱江源国家公园是我国首批国家公园体制试点区之一, 被分为核心保护区、生态保育区、游憩展示区和传统利用区4个部分, 对应不同的保护管理措施。本研究分析了钱江源国家公园体制试点区现有功能分区与其首要保护对象黑麂(Muntiacus crinifrons)的适宜栖息地之间的空间关系。在红外相机调查获取的94个黑麂分布点的基础上, 结合海拔、地形、植被特征、人为活动干扰等15个环境特征变量, 采用MaxEnt模型预测国家公园内黑麂适宜栖息地的空间分布。结果表明, 黑麂倾向于出现在森林较为原始和道路密度较低的区域, 其适宜栖息地面积42.5 km ², 占国家公园总面积的16.9%。其中, 69.3%的黑麂适宜栖息地位于核心保护区, 30.4%位于生态保育区, 表明国家公园现有功能分区能很好地满足黑麂栖息地保护的需求。此结果也证明黑麂可以作为其分布范围内保存较好的亚热带森林生态系统的指示性物种。通过生境恢复、廊道建设和跨省共建促进黑麂栖息地的完整性保护, 是加强该区域黑麂栖息地保护的关键措施。

关键词: 国家公园, 功能分区, 黑麂, 物种分布模型, 廊道

Abstract

Functional zoning is a method of classifying areas to define human use and is of great significance for the effective management of protected areas. Qianjiangyuan National Park is one of the ten national park pilot sites in China and is divided into four functional zones, the core protection zone, ecological conservation zone, recreation zone and traditional utilization zone. Each zone is assigned a different level of protection and corresponding management measures. This study examined the spatial overlap of existing functional zones in Qianjiangyuan and suitable habitats for its target conservation species, the endangered black muntjac (Muntiacus crinifrons). We constructed distribution models based on 94 occurrence locations obtained from camera-trapping surveys from 2014-2018 using MaxEnt. Fifteen covariates related to altitude, topography, vegetative characteristics and human disturbance were used in the MaxEnt models to predict suitable habitats for the black muntjac. The results showed that the black muntjac tended to inhabit areas with intact forest and low road density. We identified 42.5 km ² of suitable habitat, which accounted for 16.9% of the land in Qianjiangyuan National Park. Of this suitable habitat, 69.3% and 30.4% were located in the core protection zone and ecological conservation zone, respectively, which indicated that the existing zone designations can protect black muntjac habitat appropriately. These results also indicated that the black muntjac may serve as an indicator species of the subtropical primary forests where it lives. Promoting habitat integrity for the black muntjac by restoring habitat, constructing corridors and managing across provinces will be key to strengthening the protection of the black muntjac in the region.

Key words: national park, functional zones, black muntjac, species distribution model, corridor

余建平, 申云逸, 宋小友, 陈小南, 李晟, 申小莉 (2019) 钱江源国家公园体制试点区功能分区对黑麂保护的有效性评估. 生物多样性, 27, 5-12. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018246.

Yu Jianping, Shen Yunyi, Song Xiaoyou, Chen Xiaonan, Li Sheng, Shen Xiaoli (2019) Evaluating the effectiveness of functional zones for black muntjac (Muntiacus crinifrons) protection in Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot site. Biodiversity Science, 27, 5-12. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018246.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2018246

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2019/V27/I1/5

图/表 5

参考文献 23

[1]	Ball IR, Possingham H ( 2000) Marxan (V1.8.2): Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing. 2000) Marxan (V1.8.2): Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing. . (accessed on 2019-01-01)
[2]	Bao YX, Zheng X, Ge BM ( 2006) An assessment and protective strategy of black muntjac (Muntiacus crinifrons) habitat in Zhejiang Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26, 2425-2431. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 鲍毅新, 郑祥, 葛宝明 ( 2006) 浙江黑麂栖息地评价及保护对策. 生态学报, 26, 2425-2431.] DOI URL
[3]	Chen LD, Fu BJ, Liu XH ( 2000) Landscape pattern design and wildlife conservation in nature reserve—Case study of Wolong Nature Reserve. Journal of Nature Resources, 15, 164-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 刘雪华 ( 2000) 自然保护区景观结构设计与物种保护——以卧龙自然保护区为例. 自然资源学报, 15, 164-169.] DOI URL
[4]	Chen SW, Yu JP, Chen XN, Shen XL, Li S, Ma KP ( 2016) Camera-trapping survey on the diversity of mammal and pheasant species in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve, Zhejiang Province. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 36, 292-301. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 陈声文, 余建平, 陈小南, 申小莉, 李晟, 马克平 ( 2016) 利用红外相机网络调查古田山自然保护区的兽类及雉类多样性. 兽类学报, 36, 292-301.] DOI URL
[5]	Huyan JQ, Xiao J, Yu BW, Xu WH ( 2014) Research progress in function zoning of nature reserves in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 6391-6396. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 呼延佼奇, 肖静, 于博威, 徐卫华 ( 2014) 我国自然保护区功能分区研究进展. 生态学报, 34, 6391-6396.] DOI URL
[6]	Li S, Wang DJ, Xiao ZS, Li XH, Wang TM, Feng LM, Wang Y ( 2014) Camera-trapping in wildlife research and conservation in China: Review and outlook. Biodiversity Science, 22, 685-695. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 李晟, 王大军, 肖治术, 李欣海, 王天明, 冯利民, 王云 ( 2014) 红外相机技术在我国野生动物研究与保护中的应用与前景. 生物多样性, 22, 685-695.] DOI URL
[7]	Li WJ, Wang ZJ, Ma ZJ, Tang HX ( 1999) Designing the core zone in a biosphere reserve based on suitable habitats: Yancheng Biosphere Reserve and the red crowned crane (Grus japonensis). Biological Conservation, 90, 167-173. DOI URL
[8]	Liu XH, Li JH ( 2008) Scientific solutions for the functional zoning of nature reserves in China. Ecological Modelling, 215, 237-246. DOI URL
[9]	Liu XJ, Trogisch S, He JS, Niklaus PA, Bruelheide H, Tang ZR, Erfmeier A, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Pietsch KA, Yang B, Kuhn P, Scholten T, Huang YY, Wang C, Staab M, Leppert KN, Wirth C, Schmid B, Ma KP ( 2018) Tree species richness increases ecosystem carbon storage in subtropical forests. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285, 20181240. DOI URL
[10]	McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E ( 2002) FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. . ( accessed on 2019-01-01)
[11]	Phillips SJ, Dudík M ( 2008) Modeling of species distributions with MaxEnt: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31, 161-175. DOI URL
[12]	Riley SJ ( 1999) Index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain Journal of Sciences, 5, 23-27.
[13]	Sheng HL ( 1987) China’s endemic species: Black muntjac. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 52(2), 48-51. (in Chinese)
	[ 盛和林 ( 1987) 中国特产动物——黑麂. 动物学杂志, 52(2), 48-51.]
[14]	Shi JY, Ma LS, Yang KL, Fan JC, Shi RH ( 1998) Fuzzy division of functional areas in Wolong Nature Reserve. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 19, 6-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 史军义, 马丽莎, 杨克珞, 范继才, 史蓉红 ( 1998) 卧龙自然保护区功能区的模糊划分. 四川林业科技, 19, 6-16.]
[15]	Tang FL, Wang MJ, Li GQ ( 2017) Discussion on zoning for national park function. Forest Construction, ( 6), 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 唐芳林, 王梦君, 黎国强 ( 2017) 国家公园功能分区探讨. 林业建设, ( 6), 1-7.]
[16]	Tao J, Zang RG, Hua CL, Wen QZ ( 2012) Discussion on the functional zoning of forest ecosystem nature reserve. Forest Resources Management, ( 6), 47- 50, 56. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI
	[ 陶晶, 臧润国, 华朝朗, 温庆忠 ( 2012) 森林生态系统类型自然保护区功能区划探讨. 林业资源管理, ( 6), 47- 50, 56..] DOI
[17]	Wang Y ( 2017) Practice and innovation for overarching institution design of China’s national park. Biodiversity Science, 25, 1037-1039. (in Chinese) DOI URL
	[ 王毅 ( 2017) 中国国家公园顶层制度设计的实践与创新. 生物多样性, 25, 1037-1039.] DOI URL
[18]	Watts ME, Ball IR, Stewart RS, Klein CJ, Wilson K, Steinback C, Lourival R, Kircher L, Possingham HP ( 2009) Marxan with Zones: Software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning. Environmental Modelling and Software, 24, 1513-1521. DOI URL
[19]	Xu WH, Luo C, Ouyang ZY, Zhang L ( 2010) Designing regional nature reserves group: The case study of Qinling Mountain Range, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 1648-1654. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 徐卫华, 罗翀, 欧阳志云, 张路 ( 2010) 区域自然保护区群规划——以秦岭山系为例. 生态学报, 30, 1648-1654.]
[20]	Xu WH, Vina A, Qi ZX, Ouyang ZY, Liu JG, Liu W, Wan H ( 2014) Evaluating conservation effectiveness of nature reserves established for surrogate species: Case of a giant panda nature reserve in Qinling Mountains, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 24, 60-70. DOI URL
[21]	Yang R ( 2017) Conservation first, national representative, and commonwealth: The three concepts of China’s National Park System Construction. Biodiversity Science, 25, 1040-1041. (in Chinese) DOI URL
	[ 杨锐 ( 2017) 生态保护第一、国家代表性、全民公益性——中国国家公园体制建设的三大理念. 生物多样性, 25, 1040-1041.] DOI URL
[22]	Yu H, Chen T, Zhong LS, Zhou R ( 2017) Functional zoning of the Qianjiangyuan National Park System Pilot Area. Resources Science, 39, 20-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 虞虎, 陈田, 钟林生, 周睿 ( 2017) 钱江源国家公园体制试点区功能分区研究. 资源科学, 39, 20-29.] DOI URL
[23]	Zheng X, Bao YX, Ge BM, Zheng RQ ( 2006) Seasonal changes in habitat use of black muntjac (Muntiacus crinifrons) in Zhejiang. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 26, 201-205. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 郑祥, 鲍毅新, 葛宝明, 郑荣泉 ( 2006) 黑麂栖息地利用的季节变化. 兽类学报, 26, 201-205.] DOI URL

变量 Variables	代码 Code	变量类型 Data type	范围/类型 Range/Content
海拔 Elevation (m)	ELE	连续 Continuous	170-1,260
坡度 Slope (o)	Slope	连续 Continuous	0-53.2
坡向 Aspect	Aspect	分类 Categorical	阳坡/阴坡 Warm/cold aspect
地表崎岖度 Ruggedness (m)	TRI	连续 Continuous	0-52.7
土地利用类型 Land use type	LU	分类 Categorical	乔木林、竹林、疏林、特殊灌木林地、苗圃等13类 Forest, bamboo forest, shrub, special shrub land, nursery etc.
森林类型 Forest type	FOR_type	分类 Categorical	针叶林、阔叶林、针阔混交林、非林地 Conifer, broadleaf, conifer and broadleaf mixed forest, and non-forest
森林完整性 Forest intactness	FOR_int	分类 Categorical	无干扰的原始林、轻度干扰的天然林、重度干扰的天然林或人工林 Primary forest, natural forest with light disturbance, natural forest with heavy disturbance/planted forests
林龄 Age of stand	FOR_age	分类 Categorical	幼龄林、中龄林、近熟林、成熟林、过熟林、非林地 Young forest, middle-aged forest, near-mature forest, mature forest, over-ripe forest, non-forest land
优势树种 Dominant species	FOR_spp	分类 Categorical	马尾松, 黄山松, 池杉等共60类 Pinus massoniana, Pinus taiwanensis, Taxodium ascendens, etc.
主干道密度 Density of large roads (m/km²)	LRD_den	连续 Continuous	0-2.01
总道路密度 Density of all roads (m/km²)	TRD_den	连续 Continuous	0.04-4.37
与最近道路距离 Distance to nearest road (m)	TRD_dist	连续 Continuous	0-3,750
居民点密度 House density (m²/km²)	HOU_den	连续 Continuous	0-75,100
与最近居民点距离 Distance to nearest house (m)	HOU_dist	连续 Continuous	0-2,650
河流密度 River density (m/km²)	RIV_den	连续 Continuous	0.40-2.22
与最近河流距离 Distance to nearest river (m)	RIV_dist	连续 Continuous	0-1,150

变量 Variables	代码 Code	变量类型 Data type	范围/类型 Range/Content
海拔 Elevation (m)	ELE	连续 Continuous	170-1,260
坡度 Slope (o)	Slope	连续 Continuous	0-53.2
坡向 Aspect	Aspect	分类 Categorical	阳坡/阴坡 Warm/cold aspect
地表崎岖度 Ruggedness (m)	TRI	连续 Continuous	0-52.7
土地利用类型 Land use type	LU	分类 Categorical	乔木林、竹林、疏林、特殊灌木林地、苗圃等13类 Forest, bamboo forest, shrub, special shrub land, nursery etc.
森林类型 Forest type	FOR_type	分类 Categorical	针叶林、阔叶林、针阔混交林、非林地 Conifer, broadleaf, conifer and broadleaf mixed forest, and non-forest
森林完整性 Forest intactness	FOR_int	分类 Categorical	无干扰的原始林、轻度干扰的天然林、重度干扰的天然林或人工林 Primary forest, natural forest with light disturbance, natural forest with heavy disturbance/planted forests
林龄 Age of stand	FOR_age	分类 Categorical	幼龄林、中龄林、近熟林、成熟林、过熟林、非林地 Young forest, middle-aged forest, near-mature forest, mature forest, over-ripe forest, non-forest land
优势树种 Dominant species	FOR_spp	分类 Categorical	马尾松, 黄山松, 池杉等共60类 Pinus massoniana, Pinus taiwanensis, Taxodium ascendens, etc.
主干道密度 Density of large roads (m/km²)	LRD_den	连续 Continuous	0-2.01
总道路密度 Density of all roads (m/km²)	TRD_den	连续 Continuous	0.04-4.37
与最近道路距离 Distance to nearest road (m)	TRD_dist	连续 Continuous	0-3,750
居民点密度 House density (m²/km²)	HOU_den	连续 Continuous	0-75,100
与最近居民点距离 Distance to nearest house (m)	HOU_dist	连续 Continuous	0-2,650
河流密度 River density (m/km²)	RIV_den	连续 Continuous	0.40-2.22
与最近河流距离 Distance to nearest river (m)	RIV_dist	连续 Continuous	0-1,150

斑块编号 Patch ID	斑块面积 Area (ha)	核心栖息地面积 Core area (ha)	核心栖息地数量 Number of core area	核心栖息地面积比例 Core area percentage (%)
所有斑块 All patches	4,254	1,992	92	46.8
1	52	10	2	19.4
2	68	13	5	20.0
3	262	171	1	65.2
4	273	92	13	33.9
5	660	195	14	34.9
6	2,395	1,457	28	60.8

斑块编号 Patch ID	斑块面积 Area (ha)	核心栖息地面积 Core area (ha)	核心栖息地数量 Number of core area	核心栖息地面积比例 Core area percentage (%)
所有斑块 All patches	4,254	1,992	92	46.8
1	52	10	2	19.4
2	68	13	5	20.0
3	262	171	1	65.2
4	273	92	13	33.9
5	660	195	14	34.9
6	2,395	1,457	28	60.8

钱江源国家公园体制试点区功能分区对黑麂保护的有效性评估

Evaluating the effectiveness of functional zones for black muntjac (Muntiacus crinifrons) protection in Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot site

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张丛林, 褚梦真, 张慧智, 乔海娟, 黄宝荣. 青藏高原国家公园群游憩可持续性管理评估指标体系[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 780-789.
[2]	郝希阳, 贺姹, 楚克林, 申志新, 赵强, 高伟, 潘达, 孙红英. 海南岛淡水蟹类分布格局与多样性保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(5): 605-616.
[3]	李博炎, 朱彦鹏, 刘伟玮, 李爽, 付梦娣, 任月恒, 蔡譞, 李俊生. 中国国家公园体制试点进展、问题及对策建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 283-289.
[4]	江南, 徐卫华, 赵娟娟, 肖燚. 生态系统原真性概念及评价方法: 以长白山地区为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10): 1288-1294.
[5]	赵智聪, 杨锐. 中国国家公园原真性与完整性概念及其评价框架[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10): 1271-1278.
[6]	蒋亚芳, 田静, 赵晶博, 唐小平. 国家公园生态系统完整性的内涵及评价框架: 以东北虎豹国家公园为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10): 1279-1287.
[7]	彭杨靖, 黄治昊, 林乐乐, 王锐锋, 崔国发. 国家公园陆地自然生态系统完整性与原真性评价方法探索: 以钱江源国家公园体制试点为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10): 1295-1307.
[8]	闫颜, 唐芳林, 田勇臣, 金崑. 国家公园最严格保护的实现路径[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 123-128.
[9]	申小莉, 余建平, 李晟, 肖慧芸, 陈小南, 陈声文, 刘鸣章, 马克平. 钱江源国家公园红外相机监测平台进展概述[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(9): 1110-1114.
[10]	余元钧, 罗火林, 刘南南, 熊冬金, 罗毅波, 杨柏云. 气候变化对中国大黄花虾脊兰及其传粉者适生区的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(7): 769-778.
[11]	张机, 李鑫. 国家公园的属性结构及其对中国本土实践的启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(6): 759-768.
[12]	唐小平. 国家公园规划制度功能定位与空间属性[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(10): 1246-1254.
[13]	陈东军, 钟林生. 国外国家公园教育利用研究进展与启示[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(10): 1266-1275.
[14]	李熠,唐志尧,闫昱晶,王科,蔡磊,贺金生,古松,姚一建. 物种分布模型在大型真菌红色名录评估及保护中的应用: 以冬虫夏草为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(1): 99-106.
[15]	史晓昀,施小刚,胡强,官天培,付强,张剑,姚蒙,李晟. 四川邛崃山脉雪豹与散放牦牛潜在分布重叠与捕食风险评估[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(9): 951-959.