生物多样性

• • 上一篇    下一篇

城市蜻蜓生境面临的威胁、需求与生态恢复研究进展

蔡妤1, 张晓川1*, 连梦佳2   

  1. 1. 北京市园林绿化科学研究院,北京 100102; 2. 北京景观园林设计有限公司,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-20 修回日期:2026-07-23
  • 通讯作者: 张晓川
  • 基金资助:
    北京市科技计划项目(Z241100009124001)

Urban dragonfly habitats: Threats, ecological requirements and restoration strategies

Yu Cai1, Xiaochuan Zhang1*, Mengjia Lian2   

  1. 1 Beijing Academy of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Beijing 100102, China 

    2 Beijing Landscape Architecture Design Co., Ltd, Beijing 100029, China

  • Received:2026-03-20 Revised:2026-07-23
  • Contact: Xiaochuan Zhang

摘要: 城市化进程加剧了淡水生态系统退化, 依赖水陆复合生境的蜻蜓目昆虫正面临显著的生物多样性下降风险。尽管近年来城市蜻蜓生境研究快速增长, 但针对其生态胁迫、生境需求与恢复路径之间关系的系统性综述仍相对缺乏。本文基于2005‒2025年Web of Science核心合集数据库相关文献, 采用文献计量与主题分析方法, 系统梳理全球城市蜻蜓生境研究的时空格局、热点演变及主要研究方向。现有研究表明, 城市蜻蜓物种多样性受到生境破碎化、水文过程改变、水体污染及植被结构简化等复合胁迫影响, 而水陆生境连通性、植被异质性及微气候稳定性被反复证实为影响其持续生存的重要因素。在此基础上, 本文从区域尺度与斑块尺度两个层级, 总结了城市蜻蜓生境恢复的关键路径, 包括蓝绿网络连通、生境异质性提升及适应性养护管理等方面。未来研究亟需加强不同城市化梯度下蜻蜓生态响应机制、多尺度生境连通性及长期适应性管理等方面的实证研究, 以推动城市蜻蜓保护从局地生境修复理论走向系统治理实践。

关键词: 城市生态, 生物多样性保护, 蜻蜓目, 生境恢复

Abstract

Aims: Urbanization has increasingly altered freshwater ecosystems and threatens the biodiversity of Odonata, a group highly dependent on coupled aquatic-terrestrial habitats. Although studies on urban dragonfly habitats have expanded rapidly in recent years, a systematic synthesis that links ecological threats, habitat requirements and restoration strategies remains scarce. This study aims to review current knowledge on urban dragonfly habitats within the context of urban ecology, urban biodiversity conservation and ecological restoration. 

Methods: Publications from 2005 to 2025 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection using a bibliometric search strategy and screening methods. Bibliometric and thematic analyses were combined to examine the temporal trends, geographic distribution and major research themes in dragonfly habitat studies. The ecological threats, habitat requirements and restoration approaches identified in previous studies were further synthesized and categorized. 

Review Results: Existing studies indicate that urban dragonfly diversity is jointly constrained by habitat fragmentation, hydrological alteration, water pollution, vegetation simplification and reduced habitat connectivity. Dragonflies rely not only on aquatic environments for larval development, but also on surrounding terrestrial habitats for foraging, dispersal, shelter and reproduction, highlighting the importance of coupled aquatic-terrestrial habitat systems. Habitat heterogeneity, riparian vegetation structure, microclimatic stability and landscape-scale connectivity were repeatedly identified as key determinants of species persistence and assemblage stability. Recent studies increasingly emphasize metacommunity dynamics, regional species pools and blue-green ecological networks in urban dragonfly conservation. 

Conclusion: Based on this synthesis, we summarize restoration strategies at the regional and habitat-patch scales, including enhancement of blue-green connectivity, restoration of habitat heterogeneity and adaptive management of urban freshwater habitats. Future research should strengthen empirical studies on dragonfly responses across urbanization gradients, multi-scale habitat connectivity and long-term adaptive management, in order to facilitate the transition from isolated habitat restoration toward integrated urban freshwater biodiversity governance.

Key words: urban ecology, biodiversity conservation, Odonata, habitat restoration