中国鸟类纬度梯度种域格局及Rapoport法则的检验

doi:10.17520/biods.2025274

生物多样性 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 25274. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025274 cstr: 32101.14.biods.2025274

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

中国鸟类纬度梯度种域格局及Rapoport法则的检验

李世娴, 冯刚^*()()

内蒙古大学生态与环境学院, 蒙古高原生态学与资源利用教育部重点实验室, 内蒙古草地生态学重点实验室, 呼和浩特 010020

收稿日期:2025-08-20 接受日期:2026-01-26 出版日期:2026-03-20 发布日期:2026-02-09
通讯作者: *E-mail: qaufenggang@163.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(2025YFHH0161);内蒙古自治区自然科学基金(2023JQ01);蒙古高原生态学与资源利用教育部重点实验室科研创新能力提升项目(KF2023003)

Latitudinal patterns of species range size of birds in China: A test of Rapoport’s rule

Shixian Li, Gang Feng^*()()

Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau & Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China

Received:2025-08-20 Accepted:2026-01-26 Online:2026-03-20 Published:2026-02-09
Contact: *E-mail: qaufenggang@163.com
Supported by:
Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Plan Project(2025YFHH0161);Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia, China(2023JQ01);Project for Scientific Innovation Capability Development of the Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau, Ministry of Education of China(KF2023003)

1. 附录.pdf(353KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

物种分布范围随环境梯度的变化格局一直是宏生态学和生物地理学的重要议题之一。Rapoport法则最初是关于物种分布的纬度位置与纬度分布宽度关系的假说。此后, 该假说经过多位科学家的研究讨论得以发展。Stevens于1996年提出了一个Rapoport法则的广义定义, 即物种种域宽度会随着某个生物地理梯度(纬度、海拔、水体深度等)的升高而逐渐变宽。目前, 关于Rapoport法则在中国鸟类纬度梯度上种域宽度的适用性检验的相关研究还比较缺乏, 尤其在不同分类阶元和不同性状间的比较。本文基于中国鸟类的分布数据及性状数据, 应用4种常用方法, 在3个维度(不同分类阶元、不同体重、不同食性)上分别验证中国鸟类种域宽度的纬度格局是否支持Rapoport法则。结果表明: (1) Rapoport法则的适用性可能依赖于分类阶元, 即在不同分类阶元(科、属、种)下, 较高分类阶元的种域宽度变化更支持Rapoport法则(Stevens法、Pagel法和逐种法的R²> 0.5)。(2)在不同食性标准下, 植食性鸟类相较于其他食性鸟类, 种域宽度变化对Rapoport法则的支持程度最低(逐种法R²= 0.24), 这可能是由于其与植物物种分布存在较为密切的相关关系。(3)在不同体重标准下, 小体重鸟类相对最符合Rapoport法则预测的种域纬度格局(逐种法R²= 0.42), 这可能是由于其竞争能力较弱、具有较快的生长速度以及更能适应环境变化。本研究发现中国鸟类种域纬度格局对Rapoport法则有较强的适用性, 但不同维度的鸟类对Rapoport法则的适用性有所差别。与此同时, 本文对这些差异形成的原因进行了探讨, 有助于理解宏观尺度上生物分布格局的形成与维持机制。

关键词: 鸟类, 体重, 食性, Rapoport法则, 分类阶元

Abstract

Aims: The variation of species distribution ranges along environmental gradients has long been an important topic in macroecology and biogeography. Rapoport’s rule was initially proposed as a hypothesis concerning the relationship between the latitudinal position of species distributions and their latitudinal range size. In 1996, Stevens provided a broad definition of Rapoport’s rule, stating that the geographic range size of species gradually increases with the rise of a biogeographic gradient (such as latitude, elevation, water depth, etc.). Currently, there is relatively limited research examining the applicability of Rapoport’s rule to latitudinal range breadth of Chinese birds, particularly in terms of comparisons across different taxonomic categories and traits.

Methods: We used distribution and trait data of Chinese birds, and applied four commonly used methods to test whether the latitudinal patterns of species range size of Chinese birds support Rapoport’s rule across three dimensions: taxonomic categories, feeding habits and body mass.

Results: The results showed that: (1) At different taxonomic levels (family, genus and species), higher taxonomic levels exhibited stronger support for Rapoport’s rule (the R² values for Stevens’s method, Pagel’s method and Cross-species method were all greater than 0.5). (2) Among different feeding habits, species range size variation of herbivorous birds exhibited the least support for Rapoport’s rule (Cross-species method: R²= 0.24). (3) Under the criteria of different body mass, small-bodied birds showed the strongest support for Rapoport’s rule (Cross-species method: R²= 0.42).

Conclusion: This study found that birds with different dimensions show varying applicability to Rapoport’s rule. The stronger applicability of small-bodied birds to Rapoport’s rule may be due to their weaker competitive abilities, rapid growth rates and better adaptability to changing environment; the lower applicability of herbivorous birds may be related to their correlation with the distribution of plant species. This study discussed the potential reasons for these differences, which helps to understand the formation and maintenance of biodiversity distribution patterns at a macroscale.

Key words: birds, body mass, feeding habit, Rapoport’s rule, taxonomic category

李世娴, 冯刚 (2026) 中国鸟类纬度梯度种域格局及Rapoport法则的检验. 生物多样性, 34, 25274. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025274.

Shixian Li, Gang Feng (2026) Latitudinal patterns of species range size of birds in China: A test of Rapoport’s rule. Biodiversity Science, 34, 25274. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025274.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2025274

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2026/V34/I3/25274

图/表 3

图1 不同分类阶元鸟类纬度种域宽度的Rapoport法则验证。图1a, b, c, d分别是在种水平上使用Stevens法、Pagel法、逐种法、中点法进行验证; 图1e, f, g, h分别是在属水平上使用4种方法进行验证; 图1i, j, k, l分别是在科水平上使用4种方法进行验证。** P < 0.01。

Fig. 1 Test of Rapoport’s rule for the different taxonomic categories of birds along the latitudinal gradients. Figure 1a, b, c, d showed the validation using Stevens’s method, Pagel’s method, Cross-species method and Mid-point method at the species level respectively; Figure 1e, f, g, h presented the validation using four methods at the genus level respectively; Figure 1i, j, k, l demonstrated the validation using four methods at the family level respectively. ** P < 0.01.

图2 不同食性鸟类纬度种域宽度的Rapoport法则验证。图2a, b, c, d分别是在肉食性鸟类中使用Stevens法、Pagel法、逐种法、中点法进行验证; 图2e, f, g, h分别是在植食性鸟类中使用4种方法进行验证; 图2i, j, k, l分别是在杂食性鸟类中使用4种方法进行验证。** P < 0.01。

Fig. 2 Test of Rapoport’s rule for the different feeding habits of birds along the latitudinal gradients. Figure 2a, b, c, d showed the validation using Stevens’s method, Pagel’s method, Cross-species method and Mid-point method in carnivorous birds respectively; Figure 2e, f, g, h presented the validation using four methods in herbivorous birds respectively; Figure 2i, j, k, l demonstrated the validation using four methods in omnivorous birds respectively. ** P < 0.01.

图3 不同体重鸟类纬度种域宽度的Rapoport法则验证。图3a, b, c, d分别是在小体重鸟类中使用Stevens法、Pagel法、逐种法、中点法进行验证; 图3e, f, g, h分别是在大体重鸟类中使用4种方法进行验证。** P < 0.01。

Fig. 3 Test of Rapoport’s rule for the different body mass of birds along the latitudinal gradients. Figure 3 a, b, c, d showed the validation using Stevens’s method, Pagel’s method, Cross-species method and Mid-point method in small-bodied birds respectively; Figure 3 e, f, g, h presented the validation using four methods in large-bodied birds respectively. ** P < 0.01.

参考文献 73

[1]	Alzate A, Rozzi R, Velasco JA, Robertson DR, Zizka A, Tobias JA, Hill A, Bacon CD, Janzen T, Pellissier L, van der Plas F, Rosindell J, Onstein RE (2025) Evolutionary age correlates with range size across plants and animals. Nature Communications, 16, 7894. DOI
[2]	Barnagaud JY, Kissling WD, Tsirogiannis C, Fisikopoulos V, Villéger S, Sekercioglu CH, Svenning JC (2017) Biogeographical, environmental and anthropogenic determinants of global patterns in bird taxonomic and trait turnover. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26, 1190-1200. DOI URL
[3]	Barnagaud JY, Mazet N, Munoz F, Grenié M, Denelle P, Sobral M, Kissling WD, Şekercioğlu ÇH, Violle C (2019) Functional biogeography of dietary strategies in birds. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 28, 1004-1017. DOI URL
[4]	Barraclough TG, Humphreys AM (2015) The evolutionary reality of species and higher taxa in plants: A survey of post-modern opinion and evidence. New Phytologist, 207, 291-296. DOI PMID
[5]	Bateson W (1923) Age and area: A study in geographical distribution and origin of species. Nature, 111, 39-43. DOI
[6]	Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (1994) The distribution of body sizes of the world’s bird species. Oikos, 70, 127-130. DOI URL
[7]	Boakes EH, McGowan PJK, Fuller RA, Ding CQ, Clark NE, O’Connor K, Mace GM (2010) Distorted views of biodiversity: Spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data. PLoS Biology, 8, e1000385.
[8]	Bonino MF, Cruz FB (2025) Biological and environmental drivers of Liolaemus species distribution: A case story East of the Andes. Zoology, 173, 126303. DOI URL
[9]	Brown JH, Stevens GC, Kaufman DM (1996) The geographic range: Size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 27, 597-623.
[10]	Cardador L, De Cáceres M, Bota G, Giralt D, Casas F, Arroyo B, Mougeot F, Cantero-Martínez C, Moncunill J, Butler SJ, Brotons L (2014) A resource-based modelling framework to assess habitat suitability for steppe birds in semiarid Mediterranean agricultural systems. PLoS ONE, 9, e92790. DOI URL
[11]	Chen KY, Wang B, Chen C, Zhou GY (2024) The relationship between niche breadth and phylogenetic characteristics of eight species of rhubarb on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Asia. Ecology and Evolution, 14, e11040. DOI URL
[12]	Chen W, Wang X, Cai YY, Huang XL, Li P, Liu W, Chang Q, Hu CC (2024) Potential distribution patterns and species richness of avifauna in rapidly urbanizing East China. Ecology and Evolution, 14, e11515. DOI URL
[13]	Chen Y, Wang JF, Zhang H, Ding HL, Tang SX (2012) Observation on feeding habit of dominant birds and forage sites in an evergreen broadleaved forest, Tiantong Forest Park, Zhejiang. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 47(5), 46-53. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[陈宇, 王军馥, 张航, 丁虎林, 唐思贤 (2012) 天童常绿阔叶林样地中优势鸟类食性与采食地点植物的关系. 动物学杂志, 47(5), 46-53.]
[14]	De Bie T, De Meester L, Brendonck L, Martens K, Goddeeris B, Ercken D, Hampel H, Denys L, Vanhecke L, Van der Gucht K, Van Wichelen J, Vyverman W, Declerck SAJ (2012) Body size and dispersal mode as key traits determining metacommunity structure of aquatic organisms. Ecology Letters, 15, 740-747. DOI PMID
[15]	Ding JJ, Liu DZ, Li CW, Jiang ZG (2012) Spatial variation in species richness of birds and mammals in China’s mainland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32, 343-350. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[丁晶晶, 刘定震, 李春旺, 蒋志刚 (2012) 中国大陆鸟类和兽类物种多样性的空间变异. 生态学报, 32, 343-350.]
[16]	Gao W (2006) Studies on Birds and Their Ecology in Northeast China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[高玮 (2006) 中国东北地区鸟类及其生态学研究. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[17]	Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Spicer JI (1998) Rapoport’s rule: Time for an epitaph? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13, 70-74. DOI URL
[18]	Guo QF, Qian H, Liu PC, Zhang J (2024) Macroecological correlates of richness, body size, and species range size in terrestrial vertebrates across the world. Frontiers of Biogeography, 16, e61729.
[19]	Hu JH, Hu HJ, Jiang ZG (2007) Distribution regularities of species diversity at large spatial scale. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 13, 731-735. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[胡军华, 胡慧建, 蒋志刚 (2007) 大空间尺度上物种多样性的分布规律. 应用与环境生物学报, 13, 731-735.]
[20]	Huang JH (1994) The spatial pattern of species diversity and its forming mechanism. Chinese Biodiversity, 2, 103-107. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[黄建辉 (1994) 物种多样性的空间格局及其形成机制初探. 生物多样性, 2, 103-107.]
[21]	Inostroza-Michael O, Hernández CE, Rodríguez-Serrano E, Avaria-Llautureo J, Rivadeneira MM (2018) Interspecific geographic range size-body size relationship and the diversification dynamics of Neotropical furnariid birds. Evolution, 72, 1124-1133. DOI PMID
[22]	Jenkins CN, Pimm SL, Joppa LN (2013) Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, E2602-E2610.
[23]	Jin DM, Yang L, Xu ZP, Xiao C, Luo MF, Ma KP (2023) Effectiveness analysis of the National Specimen Information Infrastructure (NSII) in supporting scientific research on biodiversity. Guihaia, 43, 1501-1515. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[金冬梅, 杨灵, 许哲平, 肖翠, 罗茂芳, 马克平 (2023) 国家标本资源共享平台(NSII)支撑生物多样性科学研究的成效分析. 广西植物, 43, 1501-1515.]
[24]	Laube I, Korntheuer H, Schwager M, Trautmann S, Rahbek C, Böhning-Gaese K (2013) Towards a more mechanistic understanding of traits and range sizes. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22, 233-241. DOI URL
[25]	Lawrence WS (1987) Dispersal: An alternative mating tactic conditional on sex ratio and body size. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 21, 367-373. DOI URL
[26]	Lei FM, Song G, Cai TL, Qu YH, Jia CX, Zhao YF, Zhang DZ (2021) Research progress and prospect on biogeography of birds in China. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 56, 265-289. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[雷富民, 宋刚, 蔡天龙, 屈延华, 贾陈喜, 赵义方, 张德志 (2021) 中国鸟类生物地理学研究回顾与展望. 动物学杂志, 56, 265-289.]
[27]	Letcher AJ, Harvey PH (1994) Variation in geographical range size among mammals of the Palearctic. The American Naturalist, 144, 30-42. DOI URL
[28]	Li DL, Zhang J, Liu Y, Lloyd H, Pagani-Núñez E, Zhang ZW (2020) Differences in dietary specialization, habitat use and susceptibility to human disturbance influence feeding rates and resource partitioning between two migratory Numenius curlew species. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 245, 106990. DOI URL
[29]	Li LP, He SY, Jiang YM, Wang T, Zhao HH, Cui WH, Zheng YM, Hai Y, Wan HW (2019) Species range size patterns and their significance on biodiversity conservation. Scientia Sinica (Vitae), 49, 929-937. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李利平, 何思源, 蒋样明, 王拓, 赵辉辉, 崔伟宏, 郑姚闽, 海鹰, 万华伟 (2019) 物种分布区特征及其对生物多样性保育的意义. 中国科学: 生命科学, 49, 929-937.]
[30]	Li MS, Wu XQ, Zhou YJ, Long SY, Zhang MH, Gu HW, Si XF, Yan ER, Zhang J (2024) Elevational pattern of species range size of vascular plants in Changbai Mountain, China: A test of Rapoport’s rule. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 3329-3338. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[李漫淑, 吴晓晴, 周银佳, 龙诗怡, 张美惠, 顾汉威, 斯幸峰, 阎恩荣, 张健 (2024) 长白山维管植物海拔梯度上种域格局及Rapoport法则的检验. 应用生态学报, 35, 3329-3338.] DOI
[31]	Li YQ, Wang ZH (2023) Functional biogeography of plants: Research progresses and challenges. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 47, 145-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[李耀琪, 王志恒 (2023) 植物功能生物地理学的研究进展与展望. 植物生态学报, 47, 145-169.] DOI
[32]	Liang HZ, Fu TG, Gao H, Li M, Liu JT (2023) Climatic and non-climatic drivers of plant diversity along an altitudinal gradient in the Taihang Mountains of northern China. Diversity, 15, 66. DOI URL
[33]	Liu C, Zheng CY, Zhang T, Zeng FX, Wang YR (2014) Geographic patterns of avian species richness in China and their environmental factors. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 50, 429-438. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[刘澈, 郑成洋, 张腾, 曾发旭, 王逸然 (2014) 中国鸟类物种丰富度的地理格局及其与环境因子的关系. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 50, 429-438.]
[34]	Liu XY, Li JS, Zhao CY, Quan ZJ, Zhao XJ, Gong L (2016) Prediction of potential suitable area of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. in China based on MAXENT and ArcGIS. Journal of Plant Protection, 43, 1041-1048. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[柳晓燕, 李俊生, 赵彩云, 全占军, 赵相健, 宫璐 (2016) 基于MAXENT模型和ArcGIS预测豚草在中国的潜在适生区. 植物保护学报, 43, 1041-1048.]
[35]	Luan L, Jiang YJ, Cheng MH, Dini-Andreote F, Sui YY, Xu QS, Geisen S, Sun B (2020) Organism body size structures the soil microbial and nematode community assembly at a continental and global scale. Nature Communications, 11, 6406. DOI PMID
[36]	Lustenhouwer N, Riddell EA (2025) Range shifts as drivers of niche breadth and dispersal ability in wild populations. Journal of Animal Ecology, 94, 175-178. DOI PMID
[37]	Maurer BA (1998) The evolution of body size in birds. II. The role of reproductive power. Evolutionary Ecology, 12, 935-944. DOI URL
[38]	McCain CM, Knight BK (2013) Elevational Rapoport’s rule is not pervasive on mountains. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22, 750-759. DOI URL
[39]	Morales-Castilla I, Rodríguez MÁ, Kaur R, Hawkins BA (2013) Range size patterns of New World oscine passerines (Aves): Insights from differences among migratory and sedentary clades. Journal of Biogeography, 40, 2261-2273. DOI URL
[40]	Nilsson JA (1989) Causes and consequences of natal dispersal in the marsh tit, Parus palustris. Journal of Animal Ecology, 58, 619-636. DOI URL
[41]	Orkney A, Hedrick BP (2024) Small body size is associated with increased evolutionary lability of wing skeleton proportions in birds. Nature Communications, 15, 4208. DOI PMID
[42]	Pagel MD, May RM, Collie AR (1991) Ecological aspects of the geographical distribution and diversity of mammalian species. The American Naturalist, 137, 791-815. DOI URL
[43]	Qian H, Ricklefs RE (2004) Taxon richness and climate in angiosperms: Is there a globally consistent relationship that precludes region effects? The American Naturalist, 163, 773-779. PMID
[44]	R Core Team (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
[45]	Rapoport EH (1975) Areografía: Estrategias geográficas de las especies. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico City.
[46]	Read QD, Baiser B, Grady JM, Zarnetske PL, Record S, Belmaker J (2018) Tropical bird species have less variable body sizes. Biology Letters, 14, 20170453. DOI URL
[47]	Reif J, Hořák D, Krištín A, Kopsová L, Devictor V (2016) Linking habitat specialization with species’ traits in European birds. Oikos, 125, 405-413. DOI URL
[48]	Rohde K (1992) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: The search for the primary cause. Oikos, 65, 514-527. DOI URL
[49]	Saino N, Romano M, Scandolara C, Rubolini D, Ambrosini R, Caprioli M, Costanzo A, Romano A (2014) Brownish, small and lousy barn swallows have greater natal dispersal propensity. Animal Behaviour, 87, 137-146. DOI URL
[50]	Saupe EE, Myers CE, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Singarayer J, Valdes P, Qiao HJ (2019) Non-random latitudinal gradients in range size and niche breadth predicted by spatial patterns of climate. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 28, 928-942. DOI
[51]	Sax DF (2001) Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species: Implications for biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 139-150. DOI URL
[52]	Seifert CL, Strutzenberger P, Hausmann A, Fiedler K (2022) Dietary specialization mirrors Rapoport’s rule in European geometrid moths. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31, 1161-1171. DOI URL
[53]	Sheard C, Neate-Clegg MHC, Alioravainen N, Jones SEI, Vincent C, MacGregor HEA, Bregman TP, Claramunt S, Tobias JA (2020) Ecological drivers of global gradients in avian dispersal inferred from wing morphology. Nature Communications, 11, 2463. DOI PMID
[54]	Shen ZH, Lu QY (2009) The Rapoport’s rule for the geographic patterns of species range size. Biodiversity Science, 17, 560-567. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[沈泽昊, 卢绮妍 (2009) 物种分布区范围地理格局的Rapoport法则. 生物多样性, 17, 560-567.] DOI
[55]	Si XF, Ding P (2011) History, status of monitoring land birds in Europe and America and countermeasures of China. Biodiversity Science, 19, 303-310. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[斯幸峰, 丁平 (2011) 欧美陆地鸟类监测的历史、现状与我国的对策. 生物多样性, 19, 303-310.] DOI
[56]	Slatyer RA, Hirst M, Sexton JP (2013) Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: A general ecological pattern. Ecology Letters, 16, 1104-1114. DOI PMID
[57]	Stevens GC (1989) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: How so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 133, 240-256. DOI URL
[58]	Stevens GC (1996) Extending Rapoport’s rule to Pacific marine fishes. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 149-154. DOI URL
[59]	Sun W, Pan XY, Liang JC, Ding ZF, Zhou J, Hu HJ (2021) Species range pattern of breeding birds in the middle part of the Himalayas with a test of Rapoport’s rule—Based on data from an altitude gradient of 3600 m. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 56, 358-366. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[孙雯, 潘新园, 梁健超, 丁志锋, 周江, 胡慧建 (2021) 喜马拉雅中段繁殖鸟类种域格局及Rapoport法则检验——基于3600 m海拔梯度范围的数据. 动物学杂志, 56, 358-366.]
[60]	Wang J, Gao ZZ, Jiang YT, Wan DM (2021) Research advances in the intestinal microbes in wild birds with different feeding habits. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 7939-7945. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王娟, 高泽中, 蒋一婷, 万冬梅 (2021) 不同食性野生鸟类肠道微生物研究进展. 生态学报, 41, 7939-7945.]
[61]	Wang YP, Song YF, Zhong YX, Chen CW, Zhao YH, Zeng D, Wu YR, Ding P (2021) A dataset on the life-history and ecological traits of Chinese birds. Biodiversity Science, 29, 1149-1153. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[王彦平, 宋云枫, 钟雨茜, 陈传武, 赵郁豪, 曾頔, 吴亦如, 丁平 (2021) 中国鸟类的生活史和生态学特征数据集. 生物多样性, 29, 1149-1153.] DOI
[62]	Weiss-Lehman C, Shaw AK (2022) Understanding the drivers of dispersal evolution in range expansions and their ecological consequences. Evolutionary Ecology, 36, 181-197. DOI
[63]	Willig MR, Kaufman DM, Stevens RD (2003) Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: Pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 273-309. DOI URL
[64]	Ye YX, Santoro S, Song ZT, Hu CS, Zhang Z, Qing BP, Wang C, Ding CQ (2023) Dispersal patterns of the endangered Crested Ibis suggest high breeding densities drive natal dispersal. Ornithological Applications, 125, duac042. DOI URL
[65]	Zhang WJ, Lu QY, Liang J, Shen ZH (2010) Altitudinal gradients of species richness and range size of vascular plants in Taiwan: A test of Rapoport’s rule. Biodiversity Science, 18, 312-322. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[张婉君, 卢绮妍, 梁军, 沈泽昊 (2010) 台湾维管束植物物种丰富度和种域宽度的海拔格局及对Rapoport法则的检验. 生物多样性, 18, 312-322.] DOI
[66]	Zheng GM (2017) A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[郑光美 (2017) 中国鸟类分类与分布名录. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[67]	Zheng GM (2023) A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China, 4th edn. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[郑光美 (2023) 中国鸟类分类与分布名录(第四版). 科学出版社, 北京.]
[68]	Zheng Z, Gong DJ, Sun CX (2014a) Elevational pattern of species richness and species range size of herpetofauna in Baishuijiang Nature Reserve: A test of Rapoport’s rule. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 33, 537-546. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郑智, 龚大洁, 孙呈祥 (2014a) 白水江自然保护区两栖爬行动物物种丰富度和种域海拔梯度格局及对Rapoport法则的验证. 生态学杂志, 33, 537-546.]
[69]	Zheng Z, Gong DJ, Sun CX, Li XJ, Li WJ (2014b) Altitudinal patterns of species richness and species range size of vascular plants in Xiaolongshan Reserve of Qinling Mountain: A test of Rapoport’s rule. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 2477-2485. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郑智, 龚大洁, 孙呈祥, 李晓军, 李万江 (2014b) 秦岭小陇山保护区维管植物丰富度和种域海拔梯度格局及其对Rapoport法则验证. 应用生态学报, 25, 2477-2485.]
[70]	Zhi YJ, Shao MQ, Li QJ (2020) Wading bird habitat, water depth utilization and niche separation in Poyang Lake, China. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 52, 2243-2250.
[71]	Zhu C, Dalsgaard B, Li WD, Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Simmons BI, Ren P, Zhao YH, Zeng D, Gonçalves F, Zhang X, Chang LX, Ding P, Si XF (2025) Interconnecting fragmented forests: Small and mobile birds are cornerstones in the plant-frugivore meta-network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 122, e2415846122.
[72]	Zimova M, Weeks BC, Willard DE, Giery ST, Jirinec V, Burner RC, Winger BM (2023) Body size predicts the rate of contemporary morphological change in birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 120, e2206971120.
[73]	Zou FS, Ye GF (2016) Distribution List of Terrestrial Vertebrates in Guangdong. Guangdong Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou. (in Chinese)
	[邹发生, 叶冠锋 (2016) 广东陆生脊椎动物分布名录. 广东科技出版社, 广州.]

中国鸟类纬度梯度种域格局及Rapoport法则的检验

Latitudinal patterns of species range size of birds in China: A test of Rapoport’s rule

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 73

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	谢冰, 杨海涛, 曹吉鑫, 李进宇, 王茂良, 张微, 李建强, 徐基良. 应用激光雷达技术探究北京地区乌鸦夜栖地选择机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(5): 26004-.
[2]	郝泽周, 申小莉, 斯幸峰, 赵岩岩, 魏晨韬, 吴飞, 许晓青, 阙品甲, 董路, 华方圆, 张立勋, 张承云, 刘阳. 中国鸟类被动声学监测规范与建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(5): 25474-.
[3]	姚可侃, 余卉, 张巧玲, 陈琳. AI声纹监测与人工样线调查在鸟类多样性监测中的差异比较: 以西溪国家湿地公园为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(4): 25239-.
[4]	朱浩友, 周友兵, 罗怡, 周昭敏. 南充市城区繁殖鸟类群落20年前后的变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2026, 34(3): 24560-.
[5]	柴恩平, 葛苏婷, 王锡茂, 杨州, 向昭宜, 张美惠, 李漫淑, 沈瑶, 斯幸峰. 基于高频监测研究人为干扰对城市夜鹭巢址分布动态及繁殖成功的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(9): 25025-.
[6]	范平, 王欢, 温知新, 宋刚, 雷富民. 气候因子对鸟类遗传多样性与物种分布面积关系的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(8): 25072-.
[7]	徐欢, 辛凤飞, 施宏亮, 袁琳, 薄顺奇, 赵欣怡, 邓帅涛, 潘婷婷, 余婧, 孙赛赛, 薛程. 生态修复技术集成应用对长江口北支生境与鸟类多样性提升效果评估[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(5): 24478-.
[8]	蒋承汛, 张塔星, 权子豪, 刘郢, 柴璐艳, 冉江洪. 青藏高原国家重点保护野生鸟类丰富度空间格局及热点区域[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(11): 25171-.
[9]	廖之锴, 白皓天, 张修瀚, 余上, 凌嘉乐, 刘阳. 海南热带雨林国家公园常见鸟类鸣声数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(11): 25194-.
[10]	王利利, 李珍, 杨昱萍, 刘利, 高丽. 包头南海湿地鲤科鱼类肠道菌群与宿主生理指标的相关性[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(11): 25131-.
[11]	李菡, 董伟, 陆江涛, 吴永杰, 何兴成, 刘林, 木留里哈, 张学林. 四川省甘洛县马鞍山省级自然保护区及周边地区红外相机鸟兽监测数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(10): 25165-.
[12]	贺加贝, 柯可, 孙海明, 胡丽萍, 赵晓伟, 王文豪, 赵强. 基于DNA宏条形码技术分析香螺食性[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(1): 24403-.
[13]	吴琼, 赵梓羲, 孙桃柱, 赵雨梦, 于丛, 祝芹, 李忠秋. 城市道路特征及自然景观对动物路杀的影响: 以南京为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(8): 24141-.
[14]	白皓天, 余上, 潘新园, 凌嘉乐, 吴娟, 谢恺琪, 刘阳, 陈学业. AI辅助识别的鸟类被动声学监测在城市湿地公园中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(8): 24188-.
[15]	王秦韵, 张玉泉, 刘浩, 李明, 刘菲, 赵宁, 陈鹏, 齐敦武, 阙品甲. 成都大熊猫繁育研究基地鸟类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(8): 24066-.