生物多样性

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于公民科学数据的全国地级以上城市公园鸟类群落特征及环境影响因子

周楠, 黄美玲, 谭筱彩, 刘骏杰, 文可, 蒋爱伍*   

  1. 广西森林生态与保育重点实验室,广西大学林学院,南宁 530005
  • 收稿日期:2025-08-27 修回日期:2026-01-09 接受日期:2026-04-03
  • 通讯作者: 蒋爱伍
  • 基金资助:
    广西科技基地与人才专项项目((AD25069066))

The avian community characteristics and environmental influencing factors in Chinese prefecture-level and above urban parks based on citizen science data

Nan Zhou, Meiling Huang, Xiaocai Tan, Junjie Liu, Ke Wen, Aiwu Jiang*   

  1. College of Forest, Guangxi University, Guangxi University 530001,
  • Received:2025-08-27 Revised:2026-01-09 Accepted:2026-04-03
  • Contact: Aiwu Jiang

摘要: 在快速城市化背景下,城市公园作为生物多样性庇护所的功能日益凸显。但全国尺度下公园鸟类群落组成特征及公园空间特征(面积、水体分布)对物种丰富度的影响仍缺乏量化研究。本研究基于中国观鸟记录中心截至2023年12月31日的审核数据,整合175个城市942个公园的标准化记录,解析城市公园鸟类多样性格局及其驱动机制,并编制中国城市公园鸟类名录。主要发现如下:共记录到鸟类751种,隶属于22目91科,占中国鸟类物种数的49.8%,其中,国家一级重点保护野生鸟类26种,二级46种,IUCN极危(CR) 4种,濒危(EN) 8种;公园鸟类以候鸟为主,南方公园留鸟比例显著高于北方,北方候鸟比例高于南方;北方鸟类更倾向于植食/种食;南方更倾向于食虫和食果/食蜜;公园面积(Estimate = 0.1899, P < 0.001)、内部水体(Estimate = 0.2512, P < 0.001)及外部0.5 km缓冲区水体(Estimate = 0.2581, P = 0.004)均显著正向影响鸟类物种多样性,其中水体(尤其外部水体)的影响超过面积效应。鉴于食虫候鸟(40.75%)的主导地位及濒危鸟类对水体的高度依赖,建议优先构建半自然灌丛生境并优化水体-生态廊道系统。

关键词: 城市公园, 水体, 鸟类物种丰富度, 濒危鸟类, 中国城市公园鸟类名录

Abstract

Aim: Against the backdrop of rapid urbanization, urban parks have increasingly served as critical biodiversity refugia. However, quantitative studies on the composition characteristics of park avian communities and the impacts of park spatial features (area, waterbody distribution) on avian species richness remain scarce at the national scale. 

Methods: This study leveraged standardized observational data (verified through December 31, 2023) from the China Birdwatching Records Center (https://www.birdreport.cn/), integrating records from 942 parks across 175 cities in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan. We elucidated national-scale patterns of avian diversity in urban parks, disentangled environmental driving mechanisms, and compiled the Checklist of Birds in Urban Parks of China

Results: A total of 751 bird species (22 orders, 91 families) were documented in urban parks, representing 49.8% of China’s total avian species. This included 26 nationally Class I protected species, 46 Class II protected species, 4 species listed as Critically Endangered (CR) and 8 as Endangered (EN) on the IUCN Red List. Birds in parks are predominantly migratory. The proportion of resident birds in urban parks in southern China is significantly higher than that in northern China. While the proportion of migratory birds is higher in northern China. Bird species in urban parks in northern China are more inclined to herbivory/granivory, whereas those in southern China are more inclined to insectivory and frugivory/nectarivory. Park area (Estimate = 0.1899, P < 0.001), presence of internal waterbodies (Estimate = 0.2512, P < 0.001), and presence of external waterbodies within a 0.5 km buffer (Estimate = 0.2581, P = 0.004) all exerted significantly positive effects on avian species richness. Notably, waterbodies (especially external ones) emerged as a more critical drivers than park area. 

Conclusions: Given the dominance of insectivorous migratory birds (40.75%) and the high dependency of threatened species on waterbody habitats, we recommend prioritizing the creation of semi-natural shrub habitats and optimizing waterbody-ecological corridor networks to enhance the conservation function of urban parks.

Key words: urban park, water bodies, avian species richness, threatened avian species, urban park bird checklist, China