生物多样性 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (7): 796-805. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019394
石江艳1, 杨海2, 华俊钦1, 赵玉泽1, 李建强1, 徐基良1,*()
收稿日期:
2019-12-12
接受日期:
2020-04-22
出版日期:
2020-07-20
发布日期:
2020-09-29
通讯作者:
徐基良
作者简介:
* E-mail: xujiliang@bjfu.edu.cn基金资助:
Jiangyan Shi1, Hai Yang2, Junqin Hua1, Yuze Zhao1, Jianqiang Li1, Jiliang Xu1,*()
Received:
2019-12-12
Accepted:
2020-04-22
Online:
2020-07-20
Published:
2020-09-29
Contact:
Jiliang Xu
摘要:
白冠长尾雉(Syrmaticus reevesii)为我国特有珍稀濒危鸟类, 其面临的人为干扰压力日趋严重。为更好地了解白冠长尾雉对不同人为干扰强度的响应, 我们于2018年3月至2019年4月, 在其东部分布区的河南连康山国家级自然保护区(连康山)、湖北中华山鸟类省级自然保护区(中华山)和湖北平靖关村及三潭风景名胜区(平靖关), 利用红外相机技术研究了其日活动节律, 并借助重叠系数测算了其与人为干扰在时间上的重叠程度以及与人为干扰之间的关系。结果表明, 连康山的人为干扰强度最高, 而中华山和平靖关的人为干扰强度接近且均低于连康山。雄性白冠长尾雉繁殖期和非繁殖期的日活动节律在三地之间的差异均不显著; 雌性白冠长尾雉繁殖期日活动节律在平靖关与连康山之间存在显著差异, 而非繁殖期日活动节律在中华山与连康山之间、平靖关与连康山之间均存在显著差异。各地白冠长尾雉日活动高峰和人为干扰出现的高峰也存在差异, 呈现出较为明显的错峰活动现象, 其中在人为干扰最强的连康山, 白冠长尾雉的活动与人为干扰的重叠程度最低。这些结果表明白冠长尾雉的日活动节律可能受人为干扰的影响, 且在行为方面表现出一定的可塑性, 它们可以通过调整日活动节律来适应人为干扰。
石江艳, 杨海, 华俊钦, 赵玉泽, 李建强, 徐基良 (2020) 利用红外相机研究白冠长尾雉日活动节律与人为干扰的关系. 生物多样性, 28, 796-805. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019394.
Jiangyan Shi, Hai Yang, Junqin Hua, Yuze Zhao, Jianqiang Li, Jiliang Xu (2020) The relationship between the diurnal activity rhythm of Reeves’s pheasant (Syrmaticus reevesii) and human disturbance revealed by camera trapping. Biodiversity Science, 28, 796-805. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019394.
时间范围 Time range | 研究区 Study area | U2 | P |
---|---|---|---|
繁殖期 Breeding season | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.177 | < 0.1 |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.071 | > 0.1 | |
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.141 | > 0.1 | |
非繁殖期 Non-breeding season | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.190 | < 0.05* |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.092 | > 0.1 | |
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.174 | < 0.1 |
表1 白冠长尾雉日活动节律在三个研究区之间的异同
Table 1 Comparison of diurnal activity patterns of Reeves’s pheasants between different study areas
时间范围 Time range | 研究区 Study area | U2 | P |
---|---|---|---|
繁殖期 Breeding season | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.177 | < 0.1 |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.071 | > 0.1 | |
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.141 | > 0.1 | |
非繁殖期 Non-breeding season | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.190 | < 0.05* |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.092 | > 0.1 | |
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.174 | < 0.1 |
时间范围 Time range | 性别 Gender | 研究区 Study area | U2 | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
繁殖期 Breeding season | 雄性 Male | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.148 | > 0.1 |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.133 | > 0.1 | ||
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.183 | < 0.1 | ||
雌性 Female | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.171 | < 0.1 | |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.052 | > 0.1 | ||
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.225 | < 0.05* | ||
非繁殖期 Non-breeding season | 雄性 Male | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.132 | > 0.1 |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.061 | > 0.1 | ||
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.157 | < 0.1 | ||
雌性 Female | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.203 | < 0.05* | |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.046 | > 0.1 | ||
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.203 | < 0.05* |
表2 不同时期内同性别白冠长尾雉日活动节律之间的异同
Table 2 Comparison of diurnal activity patterns of same gender Reeves’s pheasants between different study areas in different time periods
时间范围 Time range | 性别 Gender | 研究区 Study area | U2 | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
繁殖期 Breeding season | 雄性 Male | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.148 | > 0.1 |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.133 | > 0.1 | ||
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.183 | < 0.1 | ||
雌性 Female | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.171 | < 0.1 | |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.052 | > 0.1 | ||
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.225 | < 0.05* | ||
非繁殖期 Non-breeding season | 雄性 Male | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.132 | > 0.1 |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.061 | > 0.1 | ||
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.157 | < 0.1 | ||
雌性 Female | 中华山 vs. 连康山 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.203 | < 0.05* | |
中华山 vs. 平靖关 Zhonghua Mountain vs. Pingjingguan | 0.046 | > 0.1 | ||
平靖关 vs. 连康山 Pingjingguan vs. Liankang Mountain | 0.203 | < 0.05* |
图3 不同研究区域繁殖期与非繁殖期雄性和雌性白冠长尾雉的日活动节律
Fig. 3 Diurnal activity patterns of male and female Reeves’s pheasants in different study areas during breeding and non-breeding seasons
图4 繁殖期和非繁殖期白冠长尾雉的日活动节律与人为干扰的出现规律。1表示繁殖期, 2表示非繁殖期, 阴影部分表示人为干扰出现规律和白冠长尾雉活动节律的重叠值。
Fig. 4 Diurnal activity patterns of Reeves’s pheasants and human disturbance during breeding and non-breeding seasons. 1 represents breeding season, and 2 represents non-breeding season. The shadow areas show the overlap of diurnal activity patterns between Reeves’s pheasants and human disturbance.
图5 繁殖期与非繁殖期雌性和雄性白冠长尾雉日活动节律与人为干扰的出现规律。 1♂表示繁殖期雄性, 1♀表示繁殖期雌性, 2♂表示非繁殖期雄性, 2♀表示非繁殖期雌性, 阴影部分表示人为干扰出现规律和白冠长尾雉活动节律的重叠值。
Fig. 5 Diurnal activity patterns of male and female Reeves’s pheasants and human disturbance during breeding and non-breeding seasons. 1♂ represents the males in breeding season, 1♀ represents the females in breeding season, 2♂ represents the males in non-breeding season, and 2♀ represents the females in non-breeding season. The shadow areas show the overlap of diurnal activity patterns between Reeves’s pheasants and human disturbance.
[1] | Azlan JM, Sharma DSK (2006) The diversity and activity patterns of wild felids in a secondary forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Oryx, 40, 36-41. |
[2] | Brodie JF, Pangau-Adam M (2015) Human impacts on two endemic cassowary species in Indonesian New Guinea. Oryx, 51, 354-360. |
[3] | Chen LJ, Shu ZF, Xiao ZS (2019) Application of camera-trapping data to study daily activity patterns of Galliformes in Guangdong Chebaling National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 27, 266-272. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 陈立军, 束祖飞, 肖治术 (2019) 应用红外相机数据研究动物活动节律——以广东车八岭保护区鸡形目鸟类为例. 生物多样性, 27, 266-272.] | |
[4] | Cheng SL, Lei P, Hu EY, Yuan RB, Zou SC (2015) Diurnal behavior of Cabot’s tragopan (Tragopan caboti) recorded by infrared-triggered cameras in Jiangxi Wuyishan National Nature Reserve, China. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 50, 695-702. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 程松林, 雷平, 胡尔夷, 袁荣斌, 邹思成 (2015) 江西武夷山自然保护区黄腹角雉昼间行为的红外相机监测. 动物学杂志, 50, 695-702.] | |
[5] | CITES (2019) Consideration of Proposals for Amendment of Appendices I and II. https://www.cites.org/eng/app/ appendices.php. (accessed on 2019-12-02) |
[6] | Doherty TS, Dickman CR, Glen AS, Newsome TM, Nimmo DG, Ritchie EG, Vanak AT, Wirsing AJ (2017) The global impacts of domestic dogs on threatened vertebrates. Biological Conservation, 210, 56-59. |
[7] | Fattorini N, Brunetti C, Baruzzi C, Chiatante G, Lovari S, Ferretti F (2019) Temporal variation in foraging activity and grouping patterns in a mountain-dwelling herbivore: Environmental and endogenous drivers. Behavioural Processes, 167, 1-9. |
[8] |
Gaynor KM, Hojnowski CE, Carter NH, Brashares JS (2018) The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science, 360, 1232-1235.
URL PMID |
[9] | Greenberg JR, Holekamp KE (2017) Human disturbance affects personality development in a wild carnivore. Animal Behaviour, 132, 303-312. |
[10] | Hughes J, Macdonald DW (2013) A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation, 157, 341-351. |
[11] | IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) (2019) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species https://www.iucnredlist.org. (accessed on 2019-12-02) |
[12] |
Karanth KU, Srivathsa A, Vasudev D, Puri M, Parameshwaran R, Kumar NS (2017) Spatio-temporal interactions facilitate large carnivore sympatry across a resource gradient. Biological Sciences, 284, 20161860.
DOI URL PMID |
[13] | Kovach WL (2012) Oriana—Circular Statistics for Windows, version. 4.02. Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth, UK. |
[14] | Lee HJ, Ha JW, Park SJ, Kim WY, Cha JY, Park JY, Choi SS, Chung CU, Oh HS (2019) A study on the analysis of mammals’ activity patterns and the effect of human hiker interference using camera trapping. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity, 12, 57-62. |
[15] | Li S, Mcshea WJ, Wang DJ, Shao LK, Shi XG (2010) The use of infrared-triggered cameras for surveying Phasianids in Sichuan Province, China. Ibis, 152, 299-309. |
[16] | Luo G, Yang C, Zhou H, Seitz M, Wu Y, Ran J (2019) Habitat use and diel activity pattern of the Tibetan snowcock (Tetraogallus tibetanus): A case study using camera traps for surveying high-elevation bird species. Avian Research, 10, 23-31. |
[17] |
Markovchick-Nicholls L, Regan HM, Deutschman DH, Widyanata A, Martin B, Noreke L, Hunt TA (2008) Relationships between human disturbance and wildlife land use in urban habitat fragments. Conservation Biology, 22, 99-109.
DOI URL PMID |
[18] | Moretti L, Hentrup M, Kotrschal K, Range F (2015) The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs. Animal Behaviour, 107, 159-173. |
[19] | Ngoprasert D, Lynam AJ, Gale GA (2017) Effects of temporary closure of a national park on leopard movement and behaviour in tropical Asia. Mammalian Biology, 82, 65-73. |
[20] | Nix JH, Howell RG, Hall LK, McMillan BR (2018) The influence of periodic increases of human activity on crepuscular and nocturnal mammals: Testing the weekend effect. Behavioural Processes, 146, 16-21. |
[21] | O’Brien TG, Kinnaird MF, Wibisono HT (2003) Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation, 6, 131-139. |
[22] | O’Connell AF, Nichols JD, Karanth KU (2011) Camera Traps in Animal Ecology: Methods and Analyses. Springer, New York, USA. |
[23] | Oberosler V, Groff C, Iemma A, Pedrini P, Rovero F (2017) The influence of human disturbance on occupancy and activity patterns of mammals in the Italian Alps from systematic camera trapping. Mammalian Biology, 87, 50-61. |
[24] | Reilly ML, Tobler MW, Sonderegger DL, Beier P (2017) Spatial and temporal response of wildlife to recreational activities in the San Francisco Bay ecoregion. Biological Conservation, 207, 117-126. |
[25] | Ridout MS, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics, 14, 322-337. |
[26] | Rowcliffe JM, Kays R, Kranstauber B, Carbone C, Jansen PA (2014) Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 1170-1179. |
[27] | Roy S, Ghoshal A, Bijoor A, Suryawanshi K (2019) Distribution and activity pattern of stone marten Martes foina in relation to prey and predators. Mammalian Biology, 96, 110-117. |
[28] | Shamoon H, Maor R, Saltz D, Dayan T (2018) Increased mammal nocturnality in agricultural landscapes results in fragmentation due to cascading effects. Biological Conservation, 226, 32-41. |
[29] | Sun QH, Zhang ZW, Zheng GM, Zhang KY, Ruan XF, Zhu JG (2003) Ranging behaviour of territorial male Reeves’s pheasants in the breeding season. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 49, 318-324. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 孙全辉, 张正旺, 郑光美, 张可银, 阮祥峰, 朱家贵 (2003) 繁殖期白冠长尾雉占区雄鸟的活动区. 动物学报, 49, 318-324.] | |
[30] | Sun RY (2001) Principles of Animal Ecology, 3rd edn. Beijing Normal University Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 孙儒泳 (2001) 动物生态学 (第三版). 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[31] | Van Doormaal N, Ohashi H, Koike S, Kaji K (2015) Influence of human activities on the activity patterns of Japanese sika deer (Cervus nippon) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Central Japan. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61, 517-527. |
[32] | Wang QY, Zhao YZ, Luo X, Hua JQ, Li Z, Xu JL (2016) Potential nest predators of Syrmaticus reevesii based on camera traps and artificial nests. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27, 1968-1974. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 王秦韵, 赵玉泽, 罗旭, 华俊钦, 李忠, 徐基良 (2016) 基于红外相机技术和人工巢试验分析白冠长尾雉巢潜在捕食者. 应用生态学报, 27, 1968-1974.] | |
[33] | Wang ZX (2017) The Comprehensive Scientific Survey Report in Zhonghua Mountain Birds Nature Reserve. Hubei University Press, Wuhan. (in Chinese) |
[ 汪正祥 (2017) 湖北中华山鸟类自然保护区综合科学考察报告. 湖北大学出版社, 武汉.] | |
[34] | Xue GQ (2016) Scientific Expedition of Liankang Mountain National Nature Reserve in Henan Province. Northeast Normal University Press, Changchun. (in Chinese) |
[ 薛国庆 (2016) 河南连康山国家级自然保护区科学考察集. 东北师范大学出版社, 长春.] | |
[35] | Yu JP, Qian HY, Chen XN, Li S, Shen XL (2017) Daily activity pattern of silver pheasant (Lophura nycthemera) using camera-traps. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 52, 937-944. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 余建平, 钱海源, 陈小南, 李晟, 申小莉 (2017) 基于红外相机技术的白鹇日活动节律研究. 动物学杂志, 52, 937-944.] | |
[36] | Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. |
[37] | Zhang JD, Hull V, Ouyang ZY, Li RG, Connor T, Yang HB, Zhang ZJ, Silet B, Zhang HM, Liu JG (2017) Divergent responses of sympatric species to livestock encroachment at fine spatiotemporal scales. Biological Conservation, 209, 119-129. |
[38] | Zhang SS, Bao YX, Wang YN, Fang PF, Ye B (2012) Activity rhythms of black muntjac (Muntiacus crinifrom) revealed with infrared camera. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 32, 368-372. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 章书声, 鲍毅新, 王艳妮, 方平福, 叶彬 (2012) 基于红外相机技术的黑麂活动节律. 兽类学报, 32, 368-372.] | |
[39] |
Zhao YZ, Wang ZC, Xu JL, Luo X, An LD (2013) Activity rhythm and behavioral time budgets of wild Reeves’s pheasant (Syrmaticus reevesii) using infrared camera. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 6021-6027. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 赵玉泽, 王志臣, 徐基良, 罗旭, 安丽丹 (2013) 利用红外照相技术分析野生白冠长尾雉活动节律及时间分配. 生态学报, 33, 6021-6027.] | |
[40] | Zheng GM (2015) Pheasants in China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 郑光美 (2015) 中国雉类. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[41] | Zheng GM (2017) A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China, 3rd edn. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 郑光美 (2017) 中国鸟类分类与分布名录 (第三版). 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[42] | Zhou CF, Xu JL, Zhang ZW (2015) Dramatic decline of the vulnerable Reeves’s pheasant Syrmaticus reevesii, endemic to central China. Oryx, 49, 529-534. |
[1] | 赵坤明, 陈圣宾, 杨锡福. 基于红外相机技术调查四川都江堰破碎化森林鸟兽多样性及优势种活动节律[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22529-. |
[2] | 唐楚飞, 葛成, 曹烨, 曹弘毅, 宋晓晓, 廖怀建. 城市森林不同林分类型的昆虫多样性: 以南京紫金山南麓为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22357-. |
[3] | 王怡涵, 赵倩倩, 刁奕欣, 顾伯健, 翁悦, 张卓锦, 陈泳滨, 王放. 基于红外相机调查上海市区小灵猫的活动节律、栖息地利用及其对人类活动的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22294-. |
[4] | 杨瑾谕, 朱万龙. 生境差异和人类活动对云南剑川甸南镇小型哺乳动物群落结构和多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23246-. |
[5] | 孔玥峤, 刘炎林, 贺成武, 李天醍, 李全亮, 马存新, 王大军, 李晟. 评估荒漠猫的日活动节律: 基于红外相机与卫星颈圈数据的对比[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22081-. |
[6] | 邓雪琴, 刘统, 刘天时, 徐恺, 姚松, 黄小群, 肖治术. 河南内乡宝天曼国家级自然保护区豹猫及其潜在猎物之间日活动节律的季节性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(9): 22263-. |
[7] | 胡远芳, 李斌强, 梁丹, 李兴权, 刘兰香, 杨家伟, 罗旭. 人为干扰对白腹锦鸡活动节律的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(8): 21484-. |
[8] | 姬云瑞, 韦雪蕾, 张国锋, 向明贵, 王永超, 龚仁琥, 胡杨, 李迪强, 刘芳. 湖北五峰后河国家级自然保护区鸟类多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 21475-. |
[9] | 周天祥, 杨华林, 张贵权, 杨建, 冯茜, 胡强, 程跃红, 张晋东, 王彬, 周材权. 四川卧龙国家级自然保护区三种高山同域鸡形目鸟类的时空生态位比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 22026-. |
[10] | 王博驰, 裴雯, 杨巨才, 色拥军, 李雪竹, 娜尔力玛, 杨海蓉. 甘肃盐池湾黑颈鹤筑巢栖息地偏好及人为干扰的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(1): 21241-. |
[11] | 贺佳云, 张东, 储玲, 严云志. 人为干扰对溪流鱼类功能多样性及其纵向梯度格局的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(7): 927-937. |
[12] | 姚志, 郭军, 金晨钟, 刘勇波. 中国纳入一级保护的极小种群野生植物濒危机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 394-408. |
[13] | 陈思淇, 张玉钧. 乡村景观生物多样性研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10): 1411-1424. |
[14] | 向颖, 刘素群, 黄兴龙, 刘志霄, 张佑祥, 马方舟. 湖南高望界国家级自然保护区及其周边蝶类多样性与影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(8): 940-949. |
[15] | 邓敏, 廖明玮, 王晨彬, 廖承清, 康祖杰, 马方舟, 黄国华. 人为干扰对壶瓶山国家级自然保护区蝴蝶物种多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(8): 931-939. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn