生物多样性

• • 上一篇    下一篇

我国海洋和沿海地区重点保护野生动物组成、分布和保护状况

张胜楠, 张悦, 窦志国, 李诗菲, 许道艳, 廖国祥   

  1. 国家海洋环境监测中心, 116023
    大连海事大学, 116026
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-21 修回日期:2026-10-02
  • 通讯作者: 廖国祥

A preliminary study on the composition, distribution and conservation of key protected marine and coastal wildlife in China

Zhang Shengnan, Zhang Yue, Dou Zhiguo, Li Shifei, Xu Daoyan, Liao Guoxiang   

  1. , 国家海洋环境监测中心 116023,
    , 大连海事大学 116026,
  • Received:2026-07-21 Revised:2026-10-02
  • Contact: Guoxiang Liao

摘要: 重点保护物种状况对于反映我国海洋和沿海地区生物多样性保护成效具有重要指示作用,因而受到广泛关注。为助力落实《昆明—蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》《美丽中国建设“十五五”规划》等国内外有关行动要求,本研究基于2021版《国家重点保护野生动物名录》,整合文献资料、出版专著和生物多样性数据库等多源数据,分析了我国海洋和沿海地区重点保护野生动物(5门14纲35目88科728种)的物种组成、空间分布和保护状况特征。我国海洋和沿海地区重点保护野生动物以珊瑚纲物种最为丰富,物种数占比71.98%,其次为鸟纲、哺乳纲和硬骨鱼纲。11个沿海省份的重点保护野生动物物种数呈自北向南递增趋势,海南最高,其次为广东和广西,天津最低。国家一级重点保护动物有62种,以鸟纲为主;国家二级重点保护野生动物有666种,珊瑚纲占绝对优势。对比IUCN红色名录,我国海洋和沿海地区重点保护野生动物中易危、濒危和极危的物种数分别占比8.65%、22.53%和1.65%。本研究从大空间尺度上初步揭示了我国海洋和沿海地区重点保护野生动物的基本状况。当前相关研究仍存在保护名录空缺、基础数据不足、数据整合分析不够等问题。建议后续加大调查监测力度,创新监测技术方法,加强各类数据资料的整合共享,及时更新保护名录并评估保护成效,以期为我国海洋生物多样性保护提供科学依据。

关键词: 海洋和沿海地区, 生物多样性, 重点保护野生动物, 空间分布特征, 保护状况

Abstract

Aims: The status of key protected species plays a significant role in reflecting the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation in China's marine and coastal zones, and thus has attracted widespread attention. The main objective of this study is to support the action targets related to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the 15th Five-Year Plan for Building a Beautiful China. 

Methods: Based on the authoritative National List of Key Protected Wild Animals (2021 edition), this study systematically reviewed China's key protected marine and coastal wildlife by integrating data from literature, monographs, and biodiversity databases. It further analyzed the species composition characteristics, spatial distribution patterns, and conservation status of these species. 

Results: This study has recorded a total of 728 species belonging to 5 phyla, 14 classes, 35 orders, and 88 families of key protected marine and coastal wildlife in China. The class Anthozoa had the greatest number of key protected species (71.98%), followed by the classes Aves (9.75%) and Mammalia (6.32%). The biodiversity of key protected marine and coastal wildlife in China showed a gradual increase from north to south, with Hainan recording the highest number of species, followed by Guangdong and Guangxi, while Tianjin had the lowest number. The key protected marine and coastal wildlife species classified as Class I nationally protected accounted for 8.52% of the total (62 species), with Aves constituting the majority; species classified as Class II nationally protected accounted for 91.48% of the total (666 species), with Anthozoa constituting the overwhelming majority. Under the IUCN Red List assessment system, the near threatened, vulnerable, endangered, critically endangered and extinct wildlife accounted for 2.61%, 8.65%, 22.53%, 1.65% and 0.14%, respectively, and others were not evaluated, data deficient, and least concern. 

Conclusion: This study reveals the overall pattern of key protected marine and coastal wildlife in China. It also points out that there are still several issues in the protection of marine and coastal wildlife, such as gaps in conservation lists, insufficient basic data, and inadequate data sharing and integrated analysis. Future efforts should innovate monitoring methods, promote dynamic updates of the list and spatial characteristics of key protected marine and coastal species, thereby providing a scientific basis for marine biodiversity conservation.

Key words: marine and coastal, biodiversity, wildlife, distribution characteristics, conservation status