生物多样性 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 26157.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2026157  cstr: 32101.14.biods.2026157

• 保护与治理对策 • 上一篇    下一篇

生物多样性投资的底层逻辑、体系架构与运营模式

黎明1*, 朱玉茹1, 秦响玲1, 李乔坤1, 邢伟2   

  1. 1. 湖北工业大学经济与管理学院, 武汉 430068; 2. 湖北工业大学土木建筑与环境学院, 武汉 430068
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-28 修回日期:2026-07-19 出版日期:2026-07-20 发布日期:2026-09-21
  • 通讯作者: 黎明
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32570448); 国家自然科学基金项目(32170375); 中国服务贸易协会项目(CATIS-PR-260201); 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(17YJC790176); 国际合作项目(WWFPO3050); 中华环境保护基金会项目(ZXKY20250044)

Underlying logic, system architecture, and operational models of biodiversity investment

Ming Li1*, Yuru Zhu1, Xiangling Qin1, Qiaokun Li1, Wei Xing2   

  1. 1 School of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China 

    2 School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China

  • Received:2026-04-28 Revised:2026-07-19 Online:2026-07-20 Published:2026-09-21
  • Contact: Ming Li

摘要: 在全球生物多样性持续丧失的严峻形势下, 生物多样性投资已从概念设计逐步发展为全球经济绿色转型的重要驱动力, 面对生物多样性风险日益凸显而投资理论框架尚不系统的现实问题, 本文旨在阐明生物多样性投资的底层逻辑与运行体系, 以期为自然资本与社会经济效益的深度融合提供理论依据。文章通过系统梳理生物多样性风险对企业运营的冲击路径, 明晰了生物多样性风险对企业成本、供应链、合规声誉等方面的传导机制, 形成了以自然价值量化为核心的生物多样性投资运行逻辑与关联生态架构, 同时就生物多样性投资多元化的运营模式及适用场景展开了讨论。通过解析生物多样性风险产生根源, 本文结合生物多样性价值的多维性导致产权界定困难、市场与政府双重失灵阻碍社会资本深度介入、企业认知不足导致评估框架设定难以精准锚定等现实困难, 对中国生物多样性投资实践针对性地从核证体系的制度化建构、额外性验证的管理建构和持续财政的制度化建构3个层面提出了建设路径。

关键词: 生物多样性投资, 体系架构, 运营模式, 自然资本, 风险传导

Abstract

Background & Aims: Biodiversity investment has gradually evolved from a conceptual design into a key driver of the global economy’s green transition against the ongoing global biodiversity loss. In response to the increasingly prominent biodiversity risks and the lack of a systematic investment theory framework, this paper aims to elucidate the underlying logic and operational system of biodiversity investment, thereby providing a theoretical foundation for the deep integration of natural capital with economic and social benefits. 

Results: The study systematically reviewed the impact pathways of biodiversity risks on corporate operations. Following risk identification, it analyzed the theoretical foundations and logic underpinning biodiversity investment, established an integrated ecological architecture, and discussed various operational models and their respective application settings. Based on an analysis of the origin of biodiversity risks, this paper further elucidated the transmission channels through which biodiversity risks impact corporate costs, supply chains, and compliance and reputational standing. Consequently, it established a foundational logic anchored in the quantification of natural value, along with an associated ecological architecture. 

Suggestions: This paper proposes three constructive pathways for biodiversity investment in China, grounded in an analysis of the practical challenges at hand. These challenges include ambiguous property rights arising from the multidimensional nature of biodiversity value, the dual failure of markets and governments that deters social capital, and limited corporate awareness that undermines the precision of assessment frameworks. The proposed pathways consist of institutionalizing a verification system, operationalizing additionality validation management, and establishing a sustained financing framework.

Key words: biodiversity investment, system architecture, operating models, natural capital, risk transmission