海南热带雨林国家公园不同植被类型的大型真菌多样性

doi:10.17520/biods.2022110

生物多样性 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 22110. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022110

• 研究报告: 微生物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

海南热带雨林国家公园不同植被类型的大型真菌多样性

李国华¹, 郭向阳¹, 李霖明², 任明迅¹^,³, 万玲¹, 丁琼¹^,³^,^*(), 李娟玲¹^,^*()

1.热带特色林木花卉遗传与种质创新教育部重点实验室, 海南大学, 海口 570228
2.海南大学生命科学学院, 海口 570228
3.海南大学生态与环境学院, 海口 570228

收稿日期:2022-03-14 接受日期:2022-06-10 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-07-07
通讯作者: 丁琼,李娟玲
作者简介:*E-mail: dingqiong@hainanu.edu.cn;
基金资助:
海南热带雨林国家公园植被与植物资源总体把控与考察下的真菌调查及图鉴(HD-KYH-2020008-5);热带大型真菌资源的DNA条形码数据库构建(Hdcxcyxm201713);海南热带雨林灵芝属食用真菌资源评价与利用研究(321MS0764)

Macrofungal diversity in different vegetation types of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park

Guohua Li¹, Xiangyang Guo¹, Linming Li², Mingxun Ren¹^,³, Ling Wan¹, Qiong Ding¹^,³^,^*(), Juanling Li¹^,^*()

1. Key Laboratory of Genetics and Germplasm Innovation of Tropical Special Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants (Hainan University), Ministry of Education, Haikou 570228
2. School of Life Sciences, Hainan University, Haikou 570228
3. College of Ecology and Environment, Hainan University, Haikou 570228

Received:2022-03-14 Accepted:2022-06-10 Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-07-07
Contact: Qiong Ding,Juanling Li

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为揭示海南热带雨林国家公园大型真菌多样性及不同植被类型对真菌群落的影响, 本研究于2020年和2021年湿季对海南热带雨林国家公园内7个管理局辖区开展了大型真菌多样性调查, 比较了不同植被类型(山地雨林、低地雨林、低地雨林次生林、人工林)的大型真菌生活型(共生型、腐生型)组成差异。从设置的58条1 km长的样带内采集到1,869份子实体标本, 根据子实体形态与ITS rDNA序列分析, 从中鉴定出562种真菌, 涉及17目64科174属, 其中80%以上的物种由伞菌目、牛肝菌目、红菇目、多孔菌目、鸡油菌目、锈革孔菌目和炭角菌目构成。大型真菌的营养型以腐生型(占48.2%物种)和共生型(44.8%)为主。每条样带的平均物种丰富度和多度以中海拔的山地雨林最高, 分别为28 ± 5种和33 ± 6个, 而人工林最低, 分别为11 ± 1种和11 ± 2个。植被类型主要影响共生型大型真菌物种丰富度(P = 0.026)和子实体多度(P = 0.019)及Shannon-Wiener多样性(P = 0.028), 但对腐生型大型真菌的影响并不显著。多响应置换过程(multiple response permutation procedure, MRPP)检验结果表明, 不同植被类型对共生型与腐生型大型真菌群落物种组成均有显著影响(腐生型: P = 0.004, 共生型: P = 0.041)。冗余分析(redundancy analysis, RDA)的结果表明, 植被类型对腐生型和共生型真菌群落物种组成差异的解释度均较低(共生型: R² = 0.068, P = 0.004; 腐生型: R² = 0.067, P = 0.004)。海拔仅对腐生型真菌群落物种组成产生微弱影响(R²= 0.029, P = 0.001), 而对共生型真菌影响不显著(R²= 0.024, P = 0.072)。在不同保护地之间, 共生型(R² = 0.148, P = 0.001)与腐生型(R² = 0.123, P = 0.002)真菌物种组成均具显著差异; 基于样带‒真菌矩阵的网络图显示, 海南热带雨林国家公园内尖峰岭、霸王岭、五指山等国家级自然保护区的山地雨林是共生型大型真菌多样性较高区域, 应作为共生型真菌与宿主的优先保护区域。

关键词: 国家公园, 大型真菌, 腐生型, 共生型, 热带山地雨林, 人工林

Abstract

Aims: To reveal macrofungal diversity and how different vegetation types affect the fungal community, an inventory of macrofungal diversity was carried out in seven management units within the Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park during the wet seasons (June to September) in 2020 and 2021.
Method: Macrofungi were identified based on both morphology and analyses of ITS rDNA sequence data. A total of 562 fungal species belonging to 17 orders, 64 families, and 174 genera were identified from 1869 samples which were collected from 58 transects (ca. 1 km each).
Results: The most common fungal orders were Agaricales, Boletales, Russulales, Polyporales, Cantharellales, Hymenochaetales and Xylariales, accounting for 80% of species in this study. Saprophytic and symbiotic fungi were the most common functional groups, comprising 48.2% and 44.8% of fungal species respectively. Species richness and abundance per transect were the highest (richness: 28 ± 5 and abundance: 33 ± 6) in mountain rainforest and the lowest in forest plantation (11 ± 1 and 11 ± 2). Effects of vegetation type on diversity index, species richness and abundance varied with trophic mode of fungi. Specifically, vegetation type showed significant effect on species richness (P = 0.026), abundance (P = 0.019) and Shannon-Wiener diversity index (P = 0.028) of symbiotic fungi, but not on saprophytic fungi. Multiple response permutation procedure (MRPP) showed that saprophytic (P = 0.004) and symbiotic (P = 0.041) fungal species compositions were significantly different among forest types. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that vegetation types explained only a small portion of variances in species composition of saprophytic (R² = 0.067, P = 0.004) and symbiotic (R² = 0.068, P = 0.004) fungal communities. Elevation showed weak effects on saprophytic fungal community (R²= 0.029, P = 0.001), while this effect on symbiotic fungal community was not significant (R²= 0.024, P = 0.072). Compositional differences among protected lands were significant for both symbiotic (R²= 0.148, P = 0.001) and saprophytic (R² = 0.123, P = 0.002) fungal communities. Interaction network of transect-fungus showed that mountain Rainforests of Jianfengling, Bawangling, and Wuzhishan Nature reserves were characterized by highly diverse symbiotic fungal diversity.
Conclusion: The Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park hosts highly diverse saprophytic and symbiotic macrofungi. The effects of vegetation types on diversity of fungi vary depending on trophic mode of fungi. Mountain rainforests of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park should be treated as conservation priority areas of symbiotic fungi and their host plant.

Key words: national park, macrofungi, saprotroph, symbiotroph, tropical mountain rainforest, plantation forest

李国华, 郭向阳, 李霖明, 任明迅, 万玲, 丁琼, 李娟玲 (2022) 海南热带雨林国家公园不同植被类型的大型真菌多样性. 生物多样性, 30, 22110. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022110.

Guohua Li, Xiangyang Guo, Linming Li, Mingxun Ren, Ling Wan, Qiong Ding, Juanling Li (2022) Macrofungal diversity in different vegetation types of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park. Biodiversity Science, 30, 22110. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022110.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2022110

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2022/V30/I7/22110

图/表 6

图1 海南热带雨林国家公园大型真菌调查区域及植被类型。a-b: 山地雨林; c: 低地雨林; d: 低地雨林次生林; e: 人工林。

Fig. 1 Research area of macrofungi and vegetation types in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park. a-b, Mountain rain forest; c, Lowland rainforest; d, Secondary lowland rainforest; e, Plantation forest.

表1 海南热带雨林国家公园内大型真菌物种丰富度观测值与估计值

Table 1 Observed and estimated richness of macrofungal species in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park

		样带数 No. of transects	物种数 No. of species	物种数估值 Estimate no. of species (Chao1-Jack1)	共有/独有种 Shared/ Unshared species	每样带物种数 No. of species per transect (mean ± SE)	每样带多样性指数 Diversity index per transect	腐生型比例 Proportion of saprotroph (%)	共生型比例 Proportion of symbiotroph (%)	其他 Others (%)
植被类型Vegetation types	山地雨林 Mountain rainforest	12	260	339-872	101/159	28 ± 5	3.0 ± 0.3	40.4	54.6	5.0
	低地雨林 Lowland rainforest	27	290	371-661	117/173	16 ± 2	2.4 ± 0.2	49.8	45.7	4.5
	低地雨林次生林 Secondary lowland rainforest	11	129	169-587	69/60	15 ± 3	2.4 ± 0.3	61.3	30.9	7.7
	人工林 Plantation forest	8	69	90-476	39/30	11 ± 1	2.3 ± 0.1	82.2	12.2	5.6
保护地Protected land	尖峰岭 Jianfengling Mountain	15	207	271-776	99/108	18 ± 4	2.5 ± 0.2	49.5	44.0	6.5
	霸王岭 Bawangling Mountain	7	167	215-522	87/80	30 ± 5	3.3 ± 0.2	43.7	52.8	3.5
	五指山 Wuzhi Mountain	6	127	166-650	60/67	25 ± 7	2.8 ± 0.4	50.0	46.2	3.8
	吊罗山 Diaoluo Mountain	8	98	127-306	46/52	14 ± 3	2.5 ± 0.2	73.2	18.8	8.0
	鹦哥岭 Yinggeling Mountain	4	88	113-316	47/41	25 ± 6	3.0 ± 0.4	48.3	48.3	3.4
	黎母山 Limu Mountain	12	73	95-357	46/27	8 ± 2	1.8 ± 0.2	44.7	48.2	7.1
	毛瑞 Maorui Forest Plantation	5	55	71-202	29/26	13 ± 3	2.5 ± 0.2	68.9	25.7	5.4
	全域 Whole areas	58	562	713-1,185	-	17 ± 2	2.5 ± 0.1	50.9	43.8	5.3

图2 海南热带雨林国家公园大型真菌频度。a: 所有真菌, b: 在10%以上样带中出现的真菌, *代表经Fisher’s检验具有显著植被偏好性的真菌。

Fig. 2 Frequency of macrofungi in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park. a, All species; and b, Species occurred at least in 10% transects, * represents fungi with significant preference to vegetation types by Fisher’s exact test.

图3 不同植被类型中的大型真菌子实体数(a)、物种数(b)及Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(c)比较。误差线上标注Kruskal-Wallis事后分析结果(腐生型检验结果用大写字母表示共生型用小写字母), 不同的字母表示植被类型间差异显著。

Fig. 3 Comparison of macrofungal species richness, abundance and Shannon-Wiener index under different vegetation types. Different letters above error bars indicate significant differences among vegetation types by post-hoc analysis for the Kruskal-Wallis test (letters in upper and lower case represent test results for saprotroph and symbiotroph, respectively).

表2 植被类型、保护地及海拔对大型真菌群落物种组成影响的多变量分析。RDA: 冗余分析; MRPP: 多响应置换过程。

Table 2 Multivariate analysis of the effects of vegetation type, protected land and elevation on the species composition of macrofungal communities in Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park. RDA, Redundancy analysis; MRPP, Multiple response permutation procedure.

	腐生型 Saprotroph				共生型 Symbiotroph
	RDA			MRPP	RDA			MRPP
变量 Variables	R²	F	P	P	R²	F	P	P
植被类型 Vegetation type	0.067	1.270	0.004	0.004	0.068	1.126	0.004	0.041
保护地 Protected land	0.123	1.169	0.005	0.002	0.148	1.244	0.001	0.001
海拔 Elevation	0.029	1.656	0.001	-	0.024	1.181	0.072	-

图4 海南热带雨林国家公园主要保护地的植被类型—真菌营养型的互作网络。饼的大小表示样带内物种数的多寡; 饼的深色扇形对应腐生型, 浅色对应共生型; 饼间的连线代表两条样带间的共有真菌。

Fig. 4 Interaction network between vegetation type and trophic mode of fungi in the major protected lands of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park. Size of the pies are proportional to the number of species in corresponding transect; the dark and light colors in the pie chart correspond to the saprotroph and symbiotroph, respectively; lines connecting two transects indicate shared fungal species.

参考文献 65

[1]	An DY, Liang ZQ, Jiang S, Su MS, Zeng NK (2017) Cantharellus hainanensis, a new species with a smooth hymenophore from tropical China. Mycoscience, 58, 438- 444. DOI URL
[2]	Beissinger SR, Ackerly DD, Doremus HD, Machlis GE (2016) Science, Conservation, and National Parks. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[3]	Buée M, Maurice JP, Zeller B, Andrianarisoa S, Ranger J, Courtecuisse R, Marçais B, le Tacon F (2011) Influence of tree species on richness and diversity of epigeous fungal communities in a French temperate forest stand. Fungal Ecology, 4, 22-31. DOI URL
[4]	Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 345, 101-118.
[5]	Csárdi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. International Journal Complex Systems, 1695.
[6]	Cui BK, Li HJ (2010) Two species of polypores from Hainan new to China. Mycosystema, 29, 824-827.
[7]	Dai YC, Wei YL, Wu XL (2004) Polypores from Hainan Province (1). Journal of Fungal Research, 2, 53-57.
[8]	Dai YC, Yang ZL, Cui BK, Wu G, Yuan HS, Zhou LW, He SH, Ge ZW, Wu F, Wei YL, Yuan Y, Si J (2021) Diversity and systematics of the important macrofungi in Chinese forests. Mycosystema, 40, 770-805. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 戴玉成, 杨祝良, 崔宝凯, 吴刚, 袁海生, 周丽伟, 何双辉, 葛再伟, 吴芳, 魏玉莲, 员瑗, 司静 (2021) 中国森林大型真菌重要类群多样性和系统学研究. 菌物学报, 40, 770-805.]
[9]	Dai YC, Yu CJ, Yuan HS, Wu XL (2009) Polypores from Hainan Province (2). Guizhou Science, 27, 54-58.
[10]	Deng CY, Wu XL (2015) Ecological distribution of Ganodermataceae in Wuzhishan and the neighbor area of Hainan Island. Guizhou Science, 33(5), 12-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 邓春英, 吴兴亮 (2015) 海南岛五指山国家级自然保护区及周边林区灵芝资源生态分布. 贵州科学, 33(5), 12-15.]
[11]	Deng WQ, Li TH, Wang CQ, Li T, Shen YH (2015) A new crepidotoid Entoloma species from Hainan Island (China). Mycoscience, 56, 340-344. DOI URL
[12]	Dighton J, White JF (2017) The Fungal Community. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
[13]	Ferris R, Peace AJ, Newton AC (2000) Macrofungal communities of lowland Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karsten.) plantations in England: Relationships with site factors and stand structure. Forest Ecology and Management, 131, 255-267. DOI URL
[14]	Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes: Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology, 2, 113-118. PMID
[15]	Gong MQ (1988) Investigation report on macrofungi in Jianfengling area of Hainan Island. Forest Research, 1, 90-97. (in Chinese)
	[ 弓明钦 (1988) 海南岛尖峰岭地区大型真菌考察报告. 林业科学研究, 1, 90-97.]
[16]	Gong MQ (1996) Studies on Boletus in the Jianfengling tropical forest area of Hainan Island. Forest Research, 9, 255-260. (in Chinese)
	[ 弓明钦 (1996) 海南岛尖峰岭热带林区牛肝菌类的研究. 林业科学研究, 9, 255-260.]
[17]	Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters, 4, 379-391. DOI URL
[18]	Gou ZH, Qian J, Wu HX, Chen GD (2014) Bolete resource in Hainan Island. Tropical Forestry, 42(3), 11-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 苟志辉, 钱军, 吴海霞, 陈国德 (2014) 海南岛牛肝菌资源概况. 热带林业, 42(3), 11-12.]
[19]	Han XH (1999) Study on Auricularia resource in Hainan Island. Natural Science Journal of Hainan Teachers College, 12(1), 104-109. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 韩向红 (1999) 海南岛木耳资源的研究. 海南师范学院学报(自然科学版), 12(1), 104-109.]
[20]	Héritier MK, Hippolyte NSWM, André DK (2018) Macrofungal diversity in Yangambi Biosphere reserve and Yoko reserve rainforests of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 348-356. DOI URL
[21]	Humphrey JW, Newton AC, Peace AJ, Holden E (2000) The importance of conifer plantations in northern Britain as a habitat for native fungi. Biological Conservation, 96, 241-252. DOI URL
[22]	Jiang S, Mi HX, Xie HJ, Zhang X, Chen Y, Liang ZQ, Zeng NK (2021) Neoboletus infuscatus, a new tropical bolete from Hainan, Southern China. Mycoscience, 62, 205-211. DOI URL
[23]	Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
[24]	Li HL, Guo JY, Karunarathna SC, Ye L, Xu JC, Hyde KD, Mortimer PE (2018) Native forests have a higher diversity of macrofungi than comparable plantation forests in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Forests, 9, 402. DOI URL
[25]	Li LJ (1987) A study of the Auricularia from Hainan Island. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research, 5(1), 43-48. (in Chinese)
	[ 李丽嘉 (1987) 海南岛木耳属的研究. 武汉植物学研究, 5(1), 43-48.]
[26]	Li LM, Tang HN, Lei JR, Song XQ (2022) Spatial autocorrelation in land use type and ecosystem service value in Hainan Tropical Rain Forest National Park. Ecological Indicators, 137, 108727. DOI URL
[27]	Li TH, Deng WQ, Song B, Cao H, Guan SM, Lin WF, Chen XB, Liang SH (2002) Macrofungi from Diaoluoshan Nature Reserve in Hainan Province. Tropical Forestry, 30(3), 37-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李泰辉, 邓旺秋, 宋斌, 曹晖, 关斯明, 林位福, 陈学波, 梁绍华 (2002) 海南吊罗山自然保护区大型菌物. 热带林业, 30(3), 37-44.]
[28]	Liang ZQ, An DY, Jiang S, Su MS, Zeng NK (2016) Butyriboletus hainanensis (Boletaceae, Boletales), a new species from tropical China. Phytotaxa, 267, 256-262. DOI URL
[29]	Lindequist U, Niedermeyer THJ, Jülich WD (2005) The pharmacological potential of mushrooms. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2, 285-299. PMID
[30]	Liu DM, Xu YL, Li Y, Liu WH, Ma HX, Huang MR, He SH (2020) Two new species of Hydnophlebia (Meruliaceae, Polyporales) from China based on morphological and molecular evidence. Phytotaxa, 477, 35-46. DOI URL
[31]	Mueller GM, Bills GF, Foster MS (2004) Biodiversity of Fungi:Inventory and Monitoring Methods. Elsevier Academic Press, Boston.
[32]	Nguyen NH, Song ZW, Bates ST, Branco S, Tedersoo L, Menke J, Schilling JS, Kennedy PG (2016) FUNGuild: An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecology, 20, 241-248. DOI URL
[33]	O’Hanlon R, Harrington TJ (2012) Macrofungal diversity and ecology in four Irish forest types. Fungal Ecology, 5, 499-508. DOI URL
[34]	Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2020) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-7. https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan. (assessed on 2021-12-25)
[35]	Pan XY, Song ZK, Qu Z, Liu TD, Ma HX (2022) Three new Xylaria species (Xylariaceae, Xylariales) on fallen leaves from Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park. MycoKeys, 86, 47-63. DOI URL
[36]	Parlucha JA, Soriano JKR, Yabes MD, Pampolina NM, Tadiosa ER (2021) Species and functional diversity of macrofungi from protected areas in mountain forest ecosystems of Southern Luzon, Philippines. Tropical Ecology, 62, 359-367. DOI URL
[37]	Peay KG, Bruns TD (2014) Spore dispersal of basidiomycete fungi at the landscape scale is driven by stochastic and deterministic processes and generates variability in plant-fungal interactions. New Phytologist, 204, 180-191. DOI URL
[38]	R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/. (assessed on 2021-12-17)
[39]	Rudolf K, Morschhauser T, Pál-Fám F, Botta-Dukát Z (2013) Exploring the relationship between macrofungi diversity, abundance, and vascular plant diversity in semi-natural and managed forests in north-east Hungary. Ecological Research, 28, 543-552. DOI URL
[40]	Smiderle FR, Olsen LM, Carbonero ER, Baggio CH, Freitas CS, Marcon R, Santos ARS, Gorin PAJ, Iacomini M (2008b) A 3-O-methylated mannogalactan from Pleurotus pulmonarius: Structure and antinociceptive effect. Phytochemistry, 69, 2731-2736. DOI URL
[41]	Smiderle FR, Olsen LM, Carbonero ER, Marcon R, Baggio CH, Freitas CS, Santos ARS, Torri G, Gorin PAJ, Iacomini M (2008a) Anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties in a rodent model of a (1→3), (1→6)-linked beta-glucan isolated from Pleurotus pulmonarius. European Journal of Pharmacology, 597, 86-91. DOI URL
[42]	Song B, Li TH, Liang SH (2003) A survey on the macrofungi of Limushan Nature Reserve in Hainan Province. Tropical Forestry, 31(1), 38-39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 宋斌, 李泰辉, 梁绍华 (2003) 海南黎母山大型真菌概况. 热带林业, 31(1), 38-39.]
[43]	Sun YH, Xu YL, Zhang B, Chen SC, Chen J, Su XH, Liang JS (1991) Macrofungi from area of Jianfengling in Hainan Island. Tropical Crops Research, (4), 65-72. (in Chinese)
	[ 孙英华, 徐优良, 张斌, 陈舜长, 陈景, 苏雄辉, 梁静思 (1991) 海南岛尖峰岭地区大型真菌资源名录. 热带作物研究, (4), 65-72.]
[44]	Tuo YL, Rong N, Hu JJ, Zhao GP, Wang Y, Zhang ZH, Qi ZX, Li Y, Zhang B (2022) Exploring the relationships between macrofungi diversity and major environmental factors in Wunvfeng National Forest Park in Northeast China. Journal of Fungi, 8, 98. DOI URL
[45]	Wang WJ, Sun JX, Zhong ZL, Xiao L, Wang YY, Wang HM (2021) Relating macrofungal diversity and forest characteristics in boreal forests in China: Conservation effects, inter-forest-type variations, and association decoupling. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 13268-13282. DOI URL
[46]	Wang XL, Liu GQ, Zhou GY, Zhao Y, Li D (2009) In vitro anti-tumor and antimicrobial activity of acidic triterpenoids from submerged culture of Ganoderma sinense. Mycosystema, 28, 838-845. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 王晓玲, 刘高强, 周国英, 赵艳, 李杜 (2009) 紫芝酸性三萜类化合物体外抑癌和抑菌作用的研究. 菌物学报, 28, 838-845.]
[47]	Wu F, Zhou LW, Ji XH, Tian XM, He SH (2016) Grammothele hainanensis sp. nov. (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) and related species from Hainan, Southern China. Phytotaxa, 255, 160-166. DOI URL
[48]	Wu XL (2019) Macrofungi of Hainan Island, China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 吴兴亮 (2019) 中国海南岛大型真菌. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[49]	Wu XL, Guo JR (2000) A study on Ganodermataceae fungi in Hainan Island. Guizhou Science, 18, 260-266.
[50]	Wu XL, Guo JR Chen HQ, Liao QZ, Xie SH, Xiao M (1999) The resources and ecological distribution of the Family Ganodermataceae in Jianfengling, Hainan Island. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 19(2), 17-21. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 吴兴亮, 郭建荣, 陈焕强, 廖其珍, 谢圣华, 肖敏 (1999) 海南岛尖峰岭灵芝科的种类组成及其生态分布. 生态学报, 19(2), 17-21.]
[51]	Wu XL, Guo JR, Li TH, Shen YH, Song B (1998a) Polypore resources and ecological research in Hainan Island, China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 34(6), 77-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 吴兴亮, 郭建荣, 李泰辉, 沈亚恒, 宋斌 (1998a) 中国海南岛的多孔菌资源及其生态研究. 林业科学, 34(6), 77-84.]
[52]	Wu XL, Li TH, Zhang WM, Zhong QX, Song B, Guo JR (1998b) Polypores in Bawangling Nature Reserve, Hainan Island. Forest Research, 11(2), 48-53. (in Chinese)
	[ 吴兴亮, 李泰辉, 章卫民, 钟琼芯, 宋斌, 郭建荣 (1998b) 海南岛坝王岭自然保护区的多孔菌研究. 林业科学研究, 11(2), 48-53.]
[53]	Wu XL, Li TH, Shen YH, Zhang WM, Song B, Guo JR, Liao QZ, Xiao M (2001) The component and distribution of polypore species in Hainan Island, China. Guizhou Science, 19(1), 27-36. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 吴兴亮, 李泰辉, 沈亚恒, 章卫民, 宋斌, 郭建荣, 廖其珍, 肖敏 (2001) 海南岛的多孔菌种类及其分布特征. 贵州科学, 19(1), 27-36.]
[54]	Xu C, Liang ZQ, Su MS, Jiang S, Chen Y, Fan YG, Zeng NK (2021a) Austroboletus brunneisquamus (Boletaceae, Boletales), a new ectomycorrhizal fungus from a tropical rainforest, China. Forests, 12, 1438. DOI URL
[55]	Xu C, Liang ZQ, Xie HJ, Jiang S, Fu XH, Zeng NK (2021b) Two new species of Chalciporus (Boletaceae, Boletales) from tropical China. Mycological Progress, 20, 1573-1582. DOI URL
[56]	Xue R, Wu LL, Jiang S, Hao YJ, Chai H, Liang ZQ, Zeng NK, Su MS (2019) Two new species of the genus Leccinellum (Boletaceae, Boletales) from the south of China. Phytotaxa, 411, 93-104. DOI URL
[57]	Yang XB, Chen ZZ, Li DH, Chen YK, Chen H (2019) Flora of Hainan. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
	[ 杨小波, 陈宗铸, 李东海, 陈玉凯, 陈辉 (2019) 海南植被志, 科学出版社, 北京.]
[58]	Yuan Y, Ji XH, Wu F, Chen JJ (2017) Ceriporia albomellea (Phanerochaetaceae, Basidiomycota), a new species from tropical China based on morphological and molecular evidences. Phytotaxa, 298, 20-28. DOI URL
[59]	Yusran Y, Erniwati E, Wahyuni D, Ramadhanil R, Khumaidi A (2021) Diversity of macro fungus across three altitudinal ranges in Lore Lindu National Park, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia and their utilization by local residents. Biodiversitas: Journal of Biological Diversity, 22, 199-210.
[60]	Zeng NK, Jiang S (2020) Atlas of Macrofungi from Yinggeling of Hainan, China. Nan Hai Publish Company, Haikou. (in Chinese)
	[ 曾念开, 蒋帅 (2020) 鹦哥岭大型真菌. 南海出版社, 海口.]
[61]	Zhang WM, Bi ZS, Li TH, Zheng GY (1994a) A taxonomic study of the genus Entoloma in Hainan Province (Ⅱ). Acta Mycologica Sinica, 13, 260-263. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 章卫民, 毕志树, 李泰辉, 郑国扬 (1994a) 海南省粉褶蕈属的分类研究(Ⅱ). 真菌学报, 13, 260-263.]
[62]	Zhang WM, Li TH, Bi ZS, Zheng GY (1994b) A taxonomic study of the genus Entoloma in Hainan Province (Ⅰ). Acta Mycologica Sinica, 13, 188-196. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 章卫民, 李泰辉, 毕志树, 郑国扬 (1994b) 海南省粉褶蕈属的分类研究(Ⅰ). 真菌学报, 13, 188-196.]
[63]	Zhang X, Liang ZQ, Jiang S, Xu C, Fu XH, Zeng NK (2021) Baorangia duplicatopora (Boletaceae, Boletales), a new bolete from tropical China. Phytotaxa, 508, 49-58.
[64]	Zhou LW, Dai YC (2012) Wood-inhabiting fungi in Southern China 5. New species of Theleporus and Grammothele (Polyporales, Basidiomycota). Mycologia, 104, 915-924. DOI URL
[65]	Zhou LW, Jia BS (2010) A new species of Phellinus (Hymenochaetaceae) growing on bamboo in tropical China. Mycotaxon, 114, 211-216. DOI URL

海南热带雨林国家公园不同植被类型的大型真菌多样性

Macrofungal diversity in different vegetation types of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 65

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杜宇晨, 刘蓓萌, 陈俊峰, 王浩, 谢屹. 基于结构方程模型的农户保护意愿影响因素分析: 以东北虎豹国家公园珲春片区为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23155-.
[2]	耿云, 寇一祎, 范新卓, 徐姝瑶, 丛丽, 张玉钧. 基于卡诺模型的大熊猫国家公园自然教育需求研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23101-.
[3]	崔国发. 关于自然保护地整合优化工作中几个关键问题的讨论与建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 22447-.
[4]	李世东. 中国和美国国家公园时空发展及驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 23040-.
[5]	段曼微, 李香, 周阳, 赵敏欣, 孙秀玲, 韩冰, 张刚, 权子豪, 李凯. 基于蛾类多样性研究人工林斑块的边缘效应[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 23074-.
[6]	邓昶, 郝杰威, 高德, 任明迅, 张莉娜. 海南受威胁苔藓植物适生热点区域识别与保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22580-.
[7]	龚心语, 黄宝荣. 国家公园全民公益性评估指标体系: 以青藏高原国家公园群为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22571-.
[8]	陈天傲, 李想. 我国国家公园管理体系优化路径: 以中央层面为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22485-.
[9]	杨预展, 余建平, 钱海源, 陈小南, 陈声文, 袁志林. 钱江源国家公园体制试点区水稻田土壤微生物群落的格局及其驱动机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22392-.
[10]	金彦君, 赵龙辉, 覃远玉, 汪继超. 海南国家公园霸王岭片区无尾两栖类鸣声多样性: 基于自动录音技术[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22360-.
[11]	孙翊斐, 王士政, 冯佳伟, 王天明. 东北虎豹国家公园森林声景的昼夜和季节变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22523-.
[12]	颜文博, 莫燕妮, 曾治高, 薛少亮, 王琦, 梁春生, 黄祝礼, 罗文, 刘大业, 莫世琴, 李晓光, 梁路, 杜鹍鹏. 海南尖峰岭中华穿山甲的分布与保护现状[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 22106-.
[13]	王定一, 倪祥银, 岳楷, 张潇月, 康自佳, 朱玲, 吴福忠. 白蚁活动对中亚热带次生林和人工林的危害差异[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21324-.
[14]	赵鑫蕊, 何思源, 苏杨. 生态系统完整性在管理层面的体现方式: 以跨省国家公园统一管理的体制机制为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(3): 21493-.
[15]	王重阳, 赵联军, 孟世勇. 王朗国家级自然保护区滑坡体兰科植物分布格局及其保护策略[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(2): 21313-.