Biodiversity Science ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 89-95.doi: 10.17520/biods.2017228

• Forum • Previous Article     Next Article

Methodological assessment on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services and impacts on China within the IPBES framework

Yuxue Pan, Yu Tian*(), Jing Xu, Boya Zhang, Junsheng Li   

  1. Biodiversity Research Center, Chinese Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012
  • Received:2017-08-28 Accepted:2017-11-05 Online:2018-05-05
  • Tian Yu E-mail:tianyu@craes.org.cn
  • About author:

    # Co-first authors

With increasing international concern for biodiversity conservation, biodiversity and ecosystem services-related scenarios and models have become the foci of international processes and treaties. The Methodological Assessment on Scenarios and Models of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services was included in the 2014-2018 Work Program of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) as one of the first rounds of rapid assessment activities. The assessment report and its Summary for Policymakers were adopted at the Fourth Session of the IPBES Plenary. This research summarizes the assessment report through its main contents and conclusions based on the IPBES framework, and also explores the relationship between IPBES deliverables and other international processes, and possible impacts on policy making in China. The report provided a comprehensive analysis of the existing scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services, and also provided corresponding solutions for coping with data and knowledge gaps, as well as guidance for the development, use, and optimization of scenarios and models. IPBES assessments have been ushering in the development of biodiversity science and ecosystem services, offering an efficient platform for countries to undertake communication, and provide trade-offs and gains in the field of biodiversity to maximize their own interests. As a developing country with rich biodiversity, China is bound to actively participate in activities of IPBES and use its own voice, which would be an ideal way to deal with the future development of IPBES.

Key words: biodiversity, ecosystem services, scenarios, models, IPBES

Table 1

Application practices of scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services (adopted from Ferrier et al, 2016)"

不同空间尺度的应用
Application at different spatial scales
全球 Global 国家: 英国
National: United Kingdom
区域: 涵盖柬埔寨、中国、老挝、泰国和越南
Regional: analysis covers Cambodia, China, Laos, Thailand and Viet Nam
国家: 南非
National: Coastal fisheries of South Africa
使用情景和模型解决的问题
Issues addressed using scenarios and models
爱知目标能否在2020年前完成?达成2050年《生物多样性公约》的战略远景需要什么?
Are the Aichi Biodiversity Targets likely to be attained by 2020? What is needed to achieve the strategic vision for 2050 of the Convention on Biological Diversity?
50年后, 英国的生态系统、生态系统服务和服务价值将会出现怎样的变化?
What changes might occur in ecosystems, ecosystem services and the values of these services over the next 50 years in the United Kingdom?
评估大坝工程, 特别是湄公河干流的工程造成的社会和环境影响
Evaluating social and environmental impacts of dam construction, especially in the main stream of the Mekong River
可持续渔业管理政策的实施
Implementation of policy on sustainable management of fisheries
开展的项目
Projects
《全球生物多样性展望第四版(2014)》
Global Biodiversity Outlook 4 (2014)
《英国国家生态系统评估(2011)》
United Kingdom National Ecosystem Assessment (2011)
《湄公河干流水电建设战略性环境评估》
Strategic Environmental Assessment of Hydropower on the Mekong Mainstream
《南非渔业管理》
South African Fisheries Management
时间范围
Time horizons
至2020年、2050年
Present-2020, 2050
2060年 2060 2030年 2030 至2034年, 每2-4年更新一次
Present-2034, updated every 2-4 years
决策支持工具
Decision-support tools
无 None 无, 但正在开发工具
None, but tools are being developed
战略性环境评估方法
Strategic environmental assessment methods
管理战略评估
Management strategy evaluation
优势 Strengths (1)在短期项目中创造性使用推断方法 ;
(2) 清晰的决策背景和授权环境。
(1) Novel use of extrapolations for nearterm projections;
(2) Clear decision context and authorizing environment
重点关注生态系统服务之间的协同增效和权衡取舍以及价值评估
Focusing on synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services and on monetary evaluation
(1)清晰的决策背景和授权环境;
(2)利益攸关方的大力参与(1) Clear decision context and authorizing environment;
(2) Strong involvement of stakeholders
(1)清晰的决策背景和授权环境;
(2)政策和管理建议清晰, 且定期更新
(1) Clear decision context and authorizing environment;
(2) Policy and management advice clear and updated regularly
劣势 Weaknesses (1)重点关注全球尺度评估, 不适于国家和地方决策背景;
(2)缺乏普适性的情景和驱动因素模型, 难以开展跨目标分析
(1) Focusing on global scale limits applicability to many national and local decision contexts;
(2) Lack of common scenarios and models of drivers makes analysis across targets difficult
(1)严重依赖驱动因素影响的定性评估;
(2)未充分体现物种水平上的生物多样性(仅有鸟类)
(1) Heavy reliance on qualitative estimates of impacts of drivers;
(2) Biodiversity at species level weakly represented (only birds)
(1)情景过于特殊, 尤其是使用的经验模型, 因此很难推广或外推到更大尺度;
(2)湄公河委员会的建议不具备约束力
(1) Highly context-specific, especially the empirical models used, and therefore difficult to generalize or extrapolate to larger scales;
(2) Mekong River Commission recommendations non-binding
(1)情景过于特殊;
(2)未考虑若干关键驱动因素(如气候变化)
(1) Highly context-specific;
(2) Several key drivers (e.g., climate change) not considered
1 Christensen V, Walters CJ, Pauly D (2005) Ecopath with Ecosim: A User’s Guide. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
2 Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J (2015a) The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16.
3 Díaz S, Demissew S, Joly C, Lonsdale WM, Larigauderie A (2015b) A Rosetta Stone for nature’s benefits to people. PLoS Biology, 13, e1002040.
4 Ferrier S, Ninan KN, Leadley P, Alkemade R, Acosta LA, Akcakaya HR, Brotons L, Cheung WWL, Christensen V, Harhash KA, Kabubo-Mariara J, Lundquist C, Obersteiner M, Pereira HM, Peterson G, Pichs-Madruga R, Ravindranath N, Rondinini C, Wintle BA (2016) The Methodological Assessment Report on Scenarios and Models of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany.
5 Fu BJ, Yu DD, Lü N (2017) An indicator system for biodiversity and ecosystem services evaluation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 341-348.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[傅伯杰, 于丹丹, 吕楠 (2017) 中国生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标体系. 生态学报, 37, 341-348.]
6 Hotes S, Opgenoorth L (2014) Trust and control at the Science-Policy Interface in IPBES. BioScience, 64, 277-278.
7 Hove SVD, Chabason L (2009) The Debate on an Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Exploring Gaps and Needs. Institut Du Développement Durable Et Des Relations Internationales,
8 O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Riahi K, Ebi KL, Hallegatte S, Carter TR, Mathur R, Vuuren DPV (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change, 122, 401-414.
9 Peh KSH, Balmford A, Bradbury RB, Brown C, Butchart SHM, Hughes FMR, Stattersfield A, Thomas DHL, Walpole M, Bayliss J, Gowing D, Jones JPG, Lewis SL, Mulligan M, Pandeya B, Stratford C, Thompson JR, Turner K, Vira B, Willcock S, Birch JC (2013) TESSA: a toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosystem Services, 5, 51-57.
10 Sharp R, Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N, Vigerstol K, Pennington D, Mendoza G, Aukema J, Foster J, Forrest J, Cameron D, Arkema K, Lonsdorf E, Kennedy C, Verutes G, Kim CK, Guannel G, Papenfus M, Toft J, Marsik M, Bernhardt J, Griffin R, Glowinski K, Chaumont N, Perelman A, Lacayo M, Mandle L, Hamel P, Vogl AL (2015) InVEST + VERSION + User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.
11 Stehfest E, Vuuren D, Kram T, Bouwman A, Alkemade R, Bakkenes M, Biemans H, Bouwman A, Elzen M, Janse J, Lucas P, van Minnen J, Müller M, Prins A (2014) Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change With IMAGE 3.0: Model Description and Policy Applications. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague.
12 Thaman R, Lyver P, Mpande R, Perez E, Cariño J, Takeuchi K (2013) The Contribution of Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems to IPBES: Building Synergies With Science. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.
13 Tian Y, Lan CZ, Xu J, Li XS, Li JS (2016), Assessment of pollination and China’s implementation strategies within the IPBES framework. Biodiversity Science, 24, 1084-1090.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[田瑜, 兰存子, 徐靖, 李秀山, 李俊生 (2016) IPBES框架下的全球传粉评估及我国对策. 生物多样性, 24, 1084-1090.]
14 Tian Y, Li JS, Lan CZ, Li XS (2015) Interpretation of the work programme of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the period 2014-2018. Biodiversity Science, 23, 543-549.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[田瑜, 李俊生, 兰存子, 李秀山 (2015) 生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学-政策平台2014-2018年工作方案解析. 生物多样性, 23, 543-549.]
15 Trisurat Y (2013) Ecological Assessment: Assessing Conditions and Trends of Ecosystem Services of Thadee Watershed, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. Final Report Submitted to the ECO-BEST Project. Bangkok, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University. (in Thai with English abstract)
16 Tucker GM, Mcconville AJ, Mccoy K, Brink P, Braat LC, Arets E, Bräuer I, Gerdes H, Grunig M (2009) Scenarios and models for exploring future trends of biodiversity and ecosystem services changes. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Environment on Contract. Nuclear Fusion, 16, 16-17.
17 Villa F, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B, Johnson GW, Portela R, Honzák M, Batker D (2014) A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PLoS ONE, 9, e91001.
18 Villarreal ML, Norman LM, Boykin KG, Wallace CSA (2013) Biodiversity losses and conservation trade-offs: assessing future urban growth scenarios for a North American trade corridor. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 9, 90-103.
19 Yu DD, Lü N, Fu BJ (2017) Indicator systems and methods for evaluating biodiversity and ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 349-357.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[于丹丹, 吕楠, 傅伯杰 (2017) 生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标与方法. 生态学报, 37, 349-357.]
20 Yue TX (2017) Principles and Methods for Simulating Earth’s Surface Systems. Science Press, Beijing.(in Chinese)
[岳天祥 (2017) 地球表层系统模拟分析原理与方法. 科学出版社, 北京.]
21 Yue TX, Liu Y, Zhao MW, Du ZP, Zhao N (2016) A fundamental theorem of Earth’s surface modelling. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 751.
22 Yue TX, Wang YF, Du ZP, Zhao MW, Zhang LL, Zhao N, Lou M, Larocqued GR, Wilson J (2016) Analyzing the uncertainty of estimating forest carbon stocks in China. Biogeosciences, 13, 3991-4004.
[1] Wenying Zhuang Yi Li Huandi Zheng Zhaoqing Zeng Xincun Wang. (2020) Threat status of macro-ascomycetes in China and analysis of its threatening factors . Biodiv Sci, 28(1): 0-0.
[2] Yi Li Zhiyao Tang Yujing Yan Ke Wang Lei Cai Jinsheng He Song Gu Yijian Yao. (2020) Incorporating species distribution modelling into the red list assessment and conservation of macrofungi: A case study with Ophiocordyceps sinensis . Biodiv Sci, 28(1): 0-0.
[3] Yongmin Li, Xiaobing Wu. (2019) A revised species list of amphibians and reptiles in the Anhui Province . Biodiv Sci, 27(9): 1002-1011.
[4] Shun Li, Liang Zou, Yinan Gong, Haitao Yang, Tianming Wang, Limin Feng, Jianping Ge. (2019) Advances in LiDAR technology in the field of animal ecology . Biodiv Sci, 27(9): 1021-1031.
[5] Xiaoyun Shi, Xiaogang Shi, Qiang Hu, Tianpei Guan, Qiang Fu, Jian Zhang, Meng Yao, Sheng Li. (2019) Evaluating the potential habitat overlap and predation risk between snow leopards and free-range yaks in the Qionglai Mountains, Sichuan . Biodiv Sci, 27(9): 951-959.
[6] Rui Yang, Qinyi Peng, Yue Cao, Le Zhong, Shuyu Hou, Zhicong Zhao, Cheng Huang. (2019) Transformative changes and paths toward biodiversity conservation in China . Biodiv Sci, 27(9): 1032-1040.
[7] Junning Li, Tong Li, Yulian Wei. (2019) Relationship between diversity of wood-decaying fungi and their host wood in the Fenglin National Nature Reserve . Biodiv Sci, 27(8): 880-886.
[8] Yang Yunhui, Bai Keyu, Jarvis Devra, Long Chunlin. (2019) Xishuangbanna cucumber landraces and associated traditional knowledge . Biodiv Sci, 27(7): 743-748.
[9] Sun Beibei, Yu Cungen, Liu Hui, Yan Wenchao, Zhang Wenjun, Dai Dongxu. (2019) Spring and autumn shrimp and crab biodiversity in the east Nanji Islands . Biodiv Sci, 27(7): 787-795.
[10] Ding Lubin, Ma Nan, Wang Guoping, He Siyuan, Min Qingwen. (2019) Visual analysis of hotspots and emerging trends in traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity . Biodiv Sci, 27(7): 716-727.
[11] Kong Jiaxin, Zhang Zhaochen, Zhang Jian. (2019) Classification and identification of plant species based on multi-source remote sensing data: Research progress and prospect . Biodiv Sci, 27(7): 796-812.
[12] Zhang Yuanyuan. (2019) China’s strategy for incorporating traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity into international multi-lateral agreements . Biodiv Sci, 27(7): 708-715.
[13] Cao Ning, Xue Dayuan. (2019) On biodiversity conservation by Zhuang traditional culture: A case study in Jingxi City of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region . Biodiv Sci, 27(7): 728-734.
[14] Liu Yan, Yang Yushuang. (2019) Importance of conservation priority areas for bryophyte biodiversity in Chongqing . Biodiv Sci, 27(6): 677-682.
[15] Gui Xujun, Lian Juyu, Zhang Ruyun, Li Yanpeng, Shen Hao, Ni Yunlong, Ye Wanhui. (2019) Vertical structure and its biodiversity in a subtropical evergreen broad- leaved forest at Dinghushan in Guangdong Province, China . Biodiv Sci, 27(6): 619-629.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed