Biodiversity Science

Previous Article     Next Article

Comparison of flowering phenology of two species of Ammopiptanthus (Fabaceae) under ex situ conservation in the Turpan Eremophytes Bo-tanical Garden, Xinjiang

Xinrong Li1, Dunyan Tan1 *, Jiang Guo2   

  1. 1 College of Forestry Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052
    2 Soil and Fertilizer Station of Turpan Region, Turpan, Xinjiang 838000
  • Received:2006-01-23 Online:2006-05-20
  • Dunyan Tan

The genus Ammopiptanthus (Fabaceae) , a typical evergreen broadleaf shrub of the northwestern deserts of China, comprises two species: A. mongolicus and A. nanus. Both are semi-endemic and relict species in China. In order to detect the differences between the two species in flowering phenology as well as factors influencing flowering, we investigated and compared flowering in the Turpan Eremophytes Botanical Garden in 2004 and 2005. (1) The two species are similar in terms of flowering frequency, flowering order of inflorescences, flowering amplitude curves, and the mean longevity of individual flowers, but differ consid-erably in the onset, the flowering duration of individuals, flower number per inflorescence, mean and fre-quency distribution of duration, and flowering amplitude. (2) At both individual and population levels, onset was earlier and duration was longer in A. mongolicus than in A. nanus . (3) A. mongolicus bore more flowers and had longer duration of flowering than A. nanus. There were significant differences both in flower number (F=17.51, P<0.01) and duration of inflorescences (F=14.08, P<0.01) between the two species. (4) The flow-ering of both species initiated from near the base spreading to the two ends, presenting a unimodal flowering amplitude, but A. nanus had a relatively higher flowering amplitude. (5) There were obvious differences in the frequency distribution of duration of inflorescences between the two species, but the mean longevities of individual flowers were similar (about seven days). (6) Pearson correlation analysis showed that the fruit number of an inflorescence was positively correlated with its flowering number per day(A. mongolicus, r=0.885, P<0.05; A. nanus, r = 0.827, P<0.01), while the flowering and fruit number of inflorescences per day had different correlations with onset, which may result from the different pollinators and genetic charac-ters of the species. The results showed that the similarity in flowering parameters in two species of Am-mopiptanthus may be explained by their phylogenetic relationships, while the differences, which are heredi-tary, may result from their evolutionary history in heterogeneous habitats. The differences in flower number and the duration of inflorescences in two years may be caused by temperature changes. These results can provide useful information for research on reproductive biology and conservation for the two Ammopiptan-thus species.

Key words: molecular phylogenetics, biodiversity conservation, evolutionary significant units, population proce

[1] Zhang Xiaoling, Li Yichao, Wang Yunyun, Cai Hongyu, Zeng Hui, Wang Zhiheng. (2019) Influence of future climate change in suitable habitats of tea in different countries . Biodiv Sci, 27(6): 595-606.
[2] LIU Xiao-Tong, YUAN Quan, NI Jian. (2019) Research advances in modelling plant species distribution in China . Chin J Plant Ecol, 43(4): 273-283.
[3] Zhao Yang,Wen Yuanyuan. (2019) Development of Convention on Biological Diversity’s Global Platform for Business & Biodiversity: Policy suggestion for China . Biodiv Sci, 27(3): 339-346.
[4] Xiangyu Jia,Bin Bai,Jieqing Zhang,Yi Huang. (2018) The effects of IPBES deliverables on global biodiversity conservation strategy—an analysis based on the U. S. pollinator protection policy . Biodiv Sci, 26(5): 527-534.
[5] Huijie Qiao,Xiaoyi Wang,Wei Wang,Zhenhua Luo,Ke Tang,Yan Huang,Shengnan Yang,Weiwei Cao,Xinquan Zhao,Jianping Jiang,Junhua Hu. (2018) From nature reserve to national park system pilot: Changes of environmental coverage in the Three-River-Source National Park and implications for amphibian and reptile conservation . Biodiv Sci, 26(2): 202-209.
[6] Wumei Xu, Xiuqin Ci, Jie Li. (2017) Parallel effects of environmental properties on genetic diversity and species diversity . Biodiv Sci, 25(5): 481-489.
[7] Xingfeng Si, Yuhao Zhao, Chuanwu Chen, Peng Ren, Di Zeng, Lingbing Wu, Ping Ding. (2017) Beta-diversity partitioning: methods, applications and perspectives . Biodiv Sci, 25(5): 464-480.
[8] Zhishu Xiao,Xueyou Li,Zuofu Xiang,Ming Li,Xuelong Jiang,Libiao Zhang. (2017) Overview of the Mammal Diversity Observation Network of Sino BON . Biodiv Sci, 25(3): 237-245.
[9] Yuan Chen,Zheng Wang,Zuofu Xiang. (2017) Seed dispersal by primates . Biodiv Sci, 25(3): 325-331.
[10] Hang Sun,Tao Deng,Yongsheng Chen,Zhuo Zhou. (2017) Current research and development trends in floristic geography . Biodiv Sci, 25(2): 111-122.
[11] Zaifu Xu. (2015) Conservation of biodiversity and cultural diversity are two sides of a coin: Xishuangbanna Dai’s ecological culture as an example . Biodiv Sci, 23(1): 126-130.
[12] Guanghua Zhao,Yu Tian,Zhiyao Tang,Junsheng Li,Hui Zeng. (2013) Distribution of terrestrial national nature reserves in relation to human activities and natural environments in China . Biodiv Sci, 21(6): 658-665.
[13] Nancai Pei,Bufeng Chen. (2013) DNA barcoding of life: a classification of uses according to function and scale after ten years of development . Biodiv Sci, 21(5): 616-627.
[14] Yanni Zhang,Zhiming Zhang,Yupeng Geng,Xiaokun Ou,Shengjing Peng,Wenli Wang,Xin Feng,Jingwen Guo. (2013) Priority plant communities for conservation in Northwest Yunnan . Biodiv Sci, 21(3): 296-305.
[15] Dayuan Xue, Jianyong Wu, Fuwei Zhao. (2012) Actions, progress and prospects in implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity during the past 20 years in China . Biodiv Sci, 20(5): 623-632.
Full text