生物多样性 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 66-73.doi: 10.17520/biods.2019178

• 编者按 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国大型真菌红色名录评估中存在的问题及今后的对策

李熠1, 2#, 刘冬梅3#, 王科2, 4, 吴海军2, 蔡蕾5, 蔡磊2, 李俊生3, *(), 姚一建2, *()   

  1. 1. 扬州大学食品科学与工程学院, 江苏扬州 225127
    2. 中国科学院微生物研究所真菌学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
    3. 中国环境科学研究院国家环境保护区域生态过程与功能评估重点实验室, 北京 100012
    4. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
    5. 生态环境部自然生态保护司, 北京 100035
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-27 接受日期:2019-07-09 出版日期:2020-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 李俊生,姚一建 E-mail:lijsh@craes.org.cn;yaoyj@im.ac.cn
  • 基金项目:
    生态环境部生物多样性调查评估项目(2019HJ2096001006)

Red list assessment of macrofungi in China: Challenges and measures

Yi Li1, 2#, Dongmei Liu3#, Ke Wang2, 4, Haijun Wu2, Lei Cai5, Lei Cai2, Junsheng Li3, *(), Yijian Yao2, *()   

  1. 1. School of Food Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225127
    2. State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
    3. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-process and Function Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012
    4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
    5. Department of Nature and Ecology Conservation, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100035
  • Received:2019-05-27 Accepted:2019-07-09 Online:2020-01-20
  • Contact: Junsheng Li,Yijian Yao E-mail:lijsh@craes.org.cn;yaoyj@im.ac.cn

2018年5月22日国际生物多样性日, 生态环境部和中国科学院联合发布了“中国生物多样性红色名录——大型真菌卷”, 对9,302种大型真菌的受威胁现状进行了评估。根据大型真菌的生物学特性, 此次评估还对IUCN红色名录评估等级标准体系进行了适当调整。本文总结了评估过程中发现的问题: (1)部分物种的分类学地位存在争议, 缺少汉语学名; (2)大量物种的地理分布、种群数量及动态变化等信息缺乏; (3) IUCN的部分评估标准在大型真菌中难以使用; (4)物种的受威胁因素不明确, 缺乏科学定量的分析。针对以上问题, 我们建议: (1)加强真菌分类学研究, 按命名规范拟定物种的汉语学名; (2)加强大型真菌的资源调查, 对重要物种和多样性热点区域进行长期定点监测; (3)引入物种分布建模等定量分析方法, 完善IUCN的评估标准, 使之更适用于大型真菌的评估; (4)鼓励公众参与, 建立交流互动平台, 扩大红色名录工作的影响, 加强大型真菌多样性保护。

关键词: 大型真菌, 红色名录, IUCN, 真菌保护, 濒危

On the International Day for Biological Diversity in 2018, the Red List of China’s Biodiversity—Macrofungi was officially released by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The List assessed the threatened status of 9,302 macro-fungal species. To better fit the evaluation of macrofungi, adjustments have been made to IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. This study assessed the main problems in the assessment, which can be summarized as follows: (1) taxonomic problems and the lack of available Chinese scientific names for part of species, (2) insufficient geographic distribution, population, and ecological information for various investigated species, (3) difficulty in IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria usage, and (4) uncertainty and missing data for threatening factors of macrofungi. For the mentioned problems, we suggest: (1) an improvement in fungal taxonomic studies, utilizing Chinese scientific names for fungal species, (2) encouragement for continuous field monitoring of fungal resources, (3) utilization of species distribution models to improve the IUCN Red List assessment for fungal red-listing, and (4) the use of public platforms to encourage communication and interaction to access information and increase the social impact of the List.

Key words: macrofungi, red list, IUCN, fungal conservation, endangered

[1] Ainsworth AM, Canteiro C, Dahlberg A, Douglas B, Furci G, Minter D, Mueller GM, Scheidegger C, Senn-Irlet B, Wilkins T, Williams E (2018) Conservation of fungi. In: State of the World’s Fungi 2018(ed. Willis KJ), pp. 70-77. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
[2] Ainsworth AM, Smith JH, Boddy L, Dentinger BTM, Jordan M, Parfitt D, Rogers HJ, Skeates SJ (2013) Red List of Fungi for Great Britain: Boletaceae: A Pilot Conservation Assessment Based on National Database Records, Fruit Body Morphology and DNA Barcoding. Joint Nature Conservation Committee,Peterborough.
[3] Cao L, Zhang E, Zang CX, Cao WX (2016) Evaluating the status of China’s continental fish and analyzing their causes of endangerment through the red list assessment. Biodiversity Science, 24, 598-609. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 曹亮, 张鹗, 臧春鑫, 曹文宣 (2016) 通过红色名录评估研究中国内陆鱼类受威胁现状及其成因. 生物多样性, 24, 598-609.]
[4] Chinese Society of Botanist and Mycologist (1987) Nomenclature Code of Fungal Chinese Names of Mycology & Lichenology. Acta Mycologica Sinica, 6, 61-64. (in Chinese)
[ 中国植物学会真菌学会 ( 1987) 真菌、地衣汉语学名命名法规. 真菌学报, 6, 61-64.]
[5] Dahlberg A, Mueller GM ( 2011) Applying IUCN red-listing criteria for assessing and reporting on the conservation status of fungal species. Fungal Ecology, 4, 147-162.
[6] Dai YC, Cui BK, Yuan HS, Wei YL ( 2010) A red list of polypores in China. Mycosystema, 29, 164-171. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 戴玉成, 崔宝凯, 袁海生, 魏玉莲 (2010) 中国濒危的多孔菌. 菌物学报, 29, 164-171.]
[7] Dai YC, Yang ZL ( 2018) Notes on the nomenclature of five important edible fungi in China. Mycosystema, 37, 1572-1577. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 戴玉成, 杨祝良 ( 2018) 中国五种重要食用菌学名新注. 菌物学报, 37, 1572-1577.]
[8] Dong SY, Zuo ZY, Yan YH, Xiang JY ( 2017) Red list assessment of the lycophytes and ferns in China. Biodiversity Science, 25, 765-773. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 董仕勇, 左政裕, 严岳鸿, 向建英 ( 2017) 中国石松类和蕨类植物的红色名录评估. 生物多样性, 25, 765-773.]
[9] Egli S, Peter M, Buser C, Stahel W, Ayer F ( 2005) Mushroom picking does not impair future harvests—Results of a long-time study. Biological Conservation, 129, 271-276.
[10] Fan YG, Bau T (2008) Quantity evaluation on priority conservation of macrofungi in Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 36(11), 86-87, 91. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 范宇光, 图力古尔 (2008) 长白山自然保护区大型真菌物种优先保护的量化评价. 东北林业大学学报, 36(11), 86-87, 91.]
[11] Fang R, Kirk PM, Wei JC, Li Y, Cai L, Fan L, Wei TZ, Zhao RL, Wang K, Yang ZL, Li TH, Li Y, Phurbu-Dorji , Yao YJ (2018) Country focus: China. In: State of the World’s Fungi 2018(ed. Willis KJ), pp. 48-55. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
[12] He Q, Jia Y ( 2017) Assessing the threat status of China’s bryophytes. Biodiversity Science, 25, 774-780. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 何强, 贾渝 ( 2017) 中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则和评估结果. 生物多样性, 25, 774-780.]
[13] Hong DY, Zhou SL, He XJ, Yuan JH, Zhang YL, Cheng FY, Zeng XL, Wang Y, Zhang XX ( 2017) Current status of wild tree peony species with special reference to conservation. Biodiversity Science, 25, 781-793. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 洪德元, 周世良, 何兴金, 袁军辉, 张延龙, 成仿云, 曾秀丽, 王雁, 张秀新 ( 2017) 野生牡丹的生存状况和保护. 生物多样性, 25, 781-793.]
[14] Hopping KA, Chignell SM, Lambin EF (2018) The demise of caterpillar fungus in the Himalayan region due to climate change and overharvesting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, 11489-11494.
[15] Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences(1976) A Glossary of Terms and Names of Fungi. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[ 中国科学院微生物研究所 ( 1976) 真菌名词及名称. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[16] IUCN ( 2016) Rules of Procedure for IUCN Red List Assessment 2017-2020 (Version 3.0). https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/rules-of-procedure/. ( accessed on 2018-05-02)
[17] IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee ( 2010) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 8.1. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee in March 2010. 2010) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 8.1. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee in March 2010.
[18] Li Y, Tang ZY, Yan YJ, Wang K, Cai L, He JS, Gu S, Yao YJ ( 2020) Incorporating species distribution model into the red list assessment and conservation of macrofungi: A case study with Ophiocordyceps sinensis. Biodiversity Science, 28, 99-106. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 李熠, 唐志尧, 闫昱晶, 王科, 蔡磊, 贺金生, 古松, 姚一建 ( 2020) 物种分布模型在大型真菌红色名录评估及保护中的应用: 以冬虫夏草为例. 生物多样性, 28, 99-106.]
[19] Senn-Irlet B, Heilmann-Clausen J, Genney D, Dahlberg A ( 2007) Guidance for the Conservation of Macrofungi in Europe. Document prepared for the Directorate of Culture and Cultural Heritage, Council of Europe. https://www.wsl.ch/
eccf/Guidance_Fungi.pdf/. ( accessed on 2018 -02-09)
[20] Smith ML, Bruhn JN, Anderson JB ( 1992) The fungus Armillaria bulbosa is among the largest and oldest living organisms. Nature, 356, 428-431.
[21] Svensson S ( 1993) Red data lists, mapping, monitoring and conservation of fungi in Sweden. In: Conservation of Fungi in Europe: Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the European Council for the Conservation of Fungi (eds Arnolds EJM, Kreisel H), pp. 31-34. Ernst Moritz Arndt Universität, Vilm.
[22] Venturella G ( 2006 2006 2006) Pleurotus nebrodensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2006: e.T61597A12506882.
[23] Wang JR, Liu Y, Bau T ( 2015) Evaluation of endangered status and conservation priority of macrofungi in Shandong Province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 837-848. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 王建瑞, 刘宇, 图力古尔 ( 2015) 山东省大型真菌物种濒危程度与优先保育评价. 生态学报, 35, 837-848.]
[24] Wang K, Liu DM, Cai L, Wu HJ, Li Y, Wei TZ, Wang YH, Wu HM, Wei XD, Li BB, Li JS, Yao YJ ( 2020 a) Methods and procedures of the red list assessment of macrofungi in China. Biodiversity Science, 28, 11-19. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 王科, 刘冬梅, 蔡蕾, 吴海军, 李熠, 魏铁铮, 王永会, 吴红梅, 卫晓丹, 李斌斌, 李俊生, 姚一建 ( 2020 a) 中国大型真菌红色名录评估方法和程序. 生物多样性, 28, 11-19.]
[25] Wang K, Zhao MJ, Su JH, Yang L, Deng H, Wang YH, Wu HJ, Li Y, Wu HM, Wei XD, Wei TZ, Cai L, Yao YJ ( 2020 b) The use of Checklist of Fungi in China database in the red list assessment of macrofungi in China. Biodiversity Science, 28, 74-98. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 王科, 赵明君, 苏锦河, 杨柳, 邓红, 王永会, 吴海军, 李熠, 吴红梅, 卫晓丹, 魏铁铮, 蔡磊, 姚一建 ( 2020 b) 中国菌物名录数据库在大型真菌红色名录编制中的作用. 生物多样性, 28, 74-98.]
[26] Wei JC, Jiang YM, Guo SY ( 2000) Lichen conservation biology and sustainable utilization of resources. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Cross-Strait Symposium on Biodiversity and Conservation (eds Zhou WH, Lin JY), pp. 307-316. Museum of Natural Science, Taizhong. (in Chinese)
[ 魏江春, 姜玉梅, 郭守玉 ( 2000) 地衣保育生物学及其资源的持续利用. 见: 2000年海峡两岸生物多样性与保育研讨会论文集(周文豪, 林俊义主编), 307-316页. 自然科学博物馆, 台中.]
[27] Wei TZ, Yao YJ ( 2012) A proposal on fungal red list of China. In: Advances in Biodiversity Conservation and Research in China IX—Proceedings of the Ninth National Symposium on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biodiversity in China, pp. 213-219. China Meteorological Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[ 魏铁铮, 姚一建 ( 2012) 中国菌物红色名录编制设想. 见: 中国生物多样性保护与研究进展IX——第九届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集, 213-219页. 气象出版社, 北京.]
[28] Willis KJ ( 2018) State of the World’s Fungi 2018. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
[29] Zhuang WY, Li Y, Zheng HD, Zeng ZQ, Wang XC ( 2020) Threat status of non-lichenized macro-ascomycetes in China and its threatening factors. Biodiversity Science, 28, 26-40.
[ 庄文颖, 李熠, 郑焕娣, 曾昭清, 王新存 (2020) 中国非地衣型大型子囊菌受威胁现状评估及致危因素 (2020) 中国大型真菌受威胁物种名录. 生物多样性, 28, 26-40.]
[1] 姚一建,魏江春,庄文颖,蔡蕾,刘冬梅,李俊生,魏铁铮,李熠,王科,吴海军. (2020) 中国大型真菌红色名录评估研究进展. 生物多样性, 28(1): 4-10.
[2] 庄文颖,李熠,郑焕娣,曾昭清,王新存. (2020) 中国非地衣型大型子囊菌受威胁现状评估及致危因素. 生物多样性, 28(1): 26-40.
[3] 王科,赵明君,苏锦河,杨柳,邓红,王永会,吴海军,李熠,吴红梅,卫晓丹,魏铁铮,蔡磊,姚一建. (2020) 中国菌物名录数据库在大型真菌红色名录编制中的作用. 生物多样性, 28(1): 74-98.
[4] 王科,刘冬梅,蔡蕾,吴海军,李熠,魏铁铮,王永会,吴红梅,卫晓丹,李斌斌,李俊生,姚一建. (2020) 中国大型真菌红色名录评估方法和程序. 生物多样性, 28(1): 11-19.
[5] 魏鑫丽,邓红,魏江春. (2020) 中国地衣的濒危等级评估. 生物多样性, 28(1): 54-65.
[6] 李熠,唐志尧,闫昱晶,王科,蔡磊,贺金生,古松,姚一建. (2020) 物种分布模型在大型真菌红色名录评估及保护中的应用: 以冬虫夏草为例. 生物多样性, 28(1): 99-106.
[7] 魏铁铮,王科,于晓丹,李熠,吴海军,吴红梅,王永会,卫晓丹,李斌斌,蒋岚,姚一建. (2020) 中国大型担子菌受威胁现状评估. 生物多样性, 28(1): 41-53.
[8] 杨蕾蕾, 王文广, 郎校安, 张苏州, 姚张秀, 徐婷, 李远球, 严丹峰, 杨建芬, 王亚玲, 张寿洲. (2019) 极小种群广东含笑野外资源现状. 生物多样性, 27(9): 1016-1020.
[9] 曹槟, 李国杰, 赵瑞琳. (2019) 大小兴安岭地区红菇属物种多样性及其地理成分. 生物多样性, 27(8): 854-866.
[10] 单章建,赵莉娜,杨宇昌,谢丹,覃海宁. (2019) 中国植物受威胁等级评估系统概述. 生物多样性, 27(12): 1352-1363.
[11] 刘冬梅, 蔡蕾, 王科, 李俊生, 魏铁铮, 姚一建. (2018) 中国野生大型真菌受威胁程度评估、问题和对策. 生物多样性, 26(11): 1236-1242.
[12] 任海. (2017) 植物园与植物回归. 生物多样性, 25(9): 945-950.
[13] 覃海宁, 赵莉娜, 于胜祥, 刘慧圆, 刘博, 夏念和, 彭华, 李振宇, 张志翔, 何兴金, 尹林克, 林余霖, 刘全儒, 侯元同, 刘演, 刘启新, 曹伟, 李建强, 陈世龙, 金效华, 高天刚, 陈文俐, 马海英, 耿玉英, 金孝锋, 常朝阳, 蒋宏, 蔡蕾, 臧春鑫, 武建勇, 叶建飞, 赖阳均, 刘冰, 林秦文, 薛纳新. (2017) 中国被子植物濒危等级的评估. 生物多样性, 25(7): 745-757.
[14] 杨永, 刘冰, Dennis M. Njenga. (2017) 中国裸子植物物种濒危和保育现状. 生物多样性, 25(7): 758-764.
[15] 何强, 贾渝. (2017) 中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则和评估结果. 生物多样性, 25(7): 774-780.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed