生物多样性 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 22319.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022319

• 技术与方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于物种濒危状况评价与种群增长的一种新评估方法在水生野生动物保护司法中的应用

李钊丞1,2, 张燕雪丹2,*()   

  1. 1.上海海洋大学海洋科学学院, 上海 201306
    2.上海海洋大学海洋文化与法律学院, 上海 201306
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-11 接受日期:2022-08-31 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2022-11-25
  • 通讯作者: 张燕雪丹
  • 作者简介:* E-mail: yxdzhang@shou.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目(22ZDA109)

Applying a new valuation method for endangered species based on extinction risk evaluation and population growth to wildlife related judicial practice

Zhaocheng Li1,2, Yanxuedan Zhang2,*()   

  1. 1 College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306
    2 College of Marine Culture and Law, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306
  • Received:2022-06-11 Accepted:2022-08-31 Online:2023-03-20 Published:2022-11-25
  • Contact: Yanxuedan Zhang

摘要:

对野生动物物种按照珍贵、濒危程度等分类分级, 根据价值采取不同保护措施, 是我国野生动物保护的基本制度。价值评估的准确性对于实现保护目的、管理的有效性和处罚的公平性至关重要。我国于2019年制定《水生野生动物及其制品价值评估办法》(下称《评估办法》), 规定水生野生动物的基准价值和涉案个体价值核算方法。然而, 该方法对于2019年后新纳入名录的水生野生动物未规定基准价值, 只能依据物种间的种属接近程度确认价值。随着越来越多水生野生动物新进入名录, 这一方法的科学性受到质疑。鉴于此, 本文通过使用《评估办法》对2021年新纳入《国家野生动物保护名录》的236种(类)水生野生动物进行价值评估, 评价现行评估方法的合理性; 并结合IUCN物种濒危状况评价及生物学种群增长模型, 提出改进的价值评估方法。研究结果显示: (1) 2021年国家林业和草原局、农业农村部公布的《国家野生动物保护名录》新增的236种(类)水生野生动物中, 仅有30种(类)明确规定了基准价值, 8种(类)新增国家I级重点保护野生动物、131种(类)新增国家II级重点保护动物评估参照“其他种”, 价值评估存在明显偏差, 67种(类)新增保护动物则无明确可参照的基准价值, 评估存在不同程度的困难; (2)改进的评估方法通过设定保护系数和单个物种修复成本计算动物基准价值, 弥补了无基准价值的问题; 通过逻辑斯蒂模型模拟物种增长速率, 将破坏行为对种群增长速率的影响纳入价值评估, 推导出恢复原状及恢复到可持续发展水平两种可适用于司法的评估方法。本文提出的价值评估方法有效弥补了当前方法的不足, 提高了价值评估的精确性, 并通过简化数学计算, 可以应用于司法实践。基于该方法, 本文提出了修订法律并完善相关制度的建议。

关键词: 水生野生动物价值, 评估方法, 物种濒危状况, 种群增长模型, 司法应用

Abstract

Background: Classification and listing of wildlife in accordance with criteria of endangerment and preciousness etc., and adoption of different protecting measures pursuant to their value, is the fundamental of wildlife protection system in China. The accuracy of valuation is crucial in achieving protection objectives, effective management and fair punishment for illegal activities. In 2019, the “Valuation Method for Aquatic Species and their Products” (hereinafter referred to as “the Valuation Method”) was promulgated, providing the methods for evaluating the basic value of aquatic wildlife and the actual value of aquatic species in legal cases. However, the Valuation Method does not provide basic value for those newly added species after 2019, but requires that the evaluation should be based on the relatedness to species included in the valuation method classification. Along with more new species into the List of Protection, the Valuation Method is called into question.

Methods: (1) This paper assessed the Valuation Method in calculating the value of 236 newly added protected species and families in 2021; (2) Based on the findings, this paper used population growth model to established a new valuation method by incorporating extinction risk evaluation of IUCN for endangered species.

Results: (1) Among all 236 newly added species and families, only 30 species were found basic value in the Valuation Method. Eight species of Class I protection species and 131 species of Class II protection species could only be evaluated by referring to “other species” in the Valuation Method, which caused significant deviation from their true value; 67 other species could not be assigned basic value through the Valuation Method; (2) The proposed method resolved the problem of no basic value by setting a protection factor and costs for recovering individual in a species; Furthermore, we utilized logistic growth model to predict population growth, and applied this model in calculating the impact of illegal capture on growth rate of a certain species, and therefore derive valuation methods applied in legal context.

Conclusion: The improved valuation method makes up for inadequacy and inapplicability of current valuation method, increases the accuracy of valuation and simplifies the calculation which allows it to apply on legal practice. Based on this method, we also make some suggestions on the legislation and regulation of wildlife protection and valuation criteria.

Key words: value of aquatic species, valuation method, extinction risk evaluation, population growth model, judicial application