Biodiv Sci ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 51-63. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018182
Special Issue: 钱江源国家公园生物多样性保护与管理
• Original Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Sun Xiaoping1,Li Shuang1,Yu Jianping3,Fang Yanjun4,Zhang Yinlong1,*(),Cao Mingchang2,*(
)
Received:
2018-07-02
Accepted:
2018-12-24
Online:
2019-01-20
Published:
2019-03-15
Contact:
Zhang Yinlong,Cao Mingchang
Sun Xiaoping,Li Shuang,Yu Jianping,Fang Yanjun,Zhang Yinlong,Cao Mingchang. Evaluation of ecosystem service value based on land use scenarios: A case study of Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(1): 51-63.
土地利用类型 Land use type (ha) | 2015 | 自然发展情景 Business as usual | 规划情景 Strategic planning | 生态保护情景 Ecological protection | 开发利用情景 Development |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
阔叶林 Broad-leaved forest | 17,166.9 | 17,369.7 | 17,962.9 | 19,074.8 | 17,123.6 |
针叶林 Coniferous forest | 4,670.1 | 4,655.0 | 4,634.3 | 4,383.9 | 4,652.9 |
针阔混交林 Mixed broadleaf-conifer forest | 1,412.2 | 1,409.2 | 1,286.7 | 1,248.8 | 1,404.1 |
灌木林 Shrubbery | 957.3 | 953.3 | 665.8 | 124.4 | 937.6 |
园地 Garden | 24.2 | 23.6 | 11.1 | 13.3 | 18.9 |
草丛 Grassland | 159.9 | 158.4 | 154.8 | 39.7 | 151.1 |
水田 Paddy field | 388.4 | 234.9 | 142.0 | 13.1 | 306.2 |
旱地 Dry land | 98.6 | 96.9 | 13.8 | 3.8 | 79.9 |
水域 Water area | 148.0 | 120.4 | 148.5 | 148.0 | 148.0 |
建设用地 Built-up land | 57.3 | 59.3 | 65.3 | 36.4 | 263.5 |
裸地 Unused land | 4.1 | 6.3 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
合计 Total | 25,087 | 25,087 | 25,087 | 25,087 | 25,087 |
Table 1 Land use/land cover of the Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot between 2015 and 2025
土地利用类型 Land use type (ha) | 2015 | 自然发展情景 Business as usual | 规划情景 Strategic planning | 生态保护情景 Ecological protection | 开发利用情景 Development |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
阔叶林 Broad-leaved forest | 17,166.9 | 17,369.7 | 17,962.9 | 19,074.8 | 17,123.6 |
针叶林 Coniferous forest | 4,670.1 | 4,655.0 | 4,634.3 | 4,383.9 | 4,652.9 |
针阔混交林 Mixed broadleaf-conifer forest | 1,412.2 | 1,409.2 | 1,286.7 | 1,248.8 | 1,404.1 |
灌木林 Shrubbery | 957.3 | 953.3 | 665.8 | 124.4 | 937.6 |
园地 Garden | 24.2 | 23.6 | 11.1 | 13.3 | 18.9 |
草丛 Grassland | 159.9 | 158.4 | 154.8 | 39.7 | 151.1 |
水田 Paddy field | 388.4 | 234.9 | 142.0 | 13.1 | 306.2 |
旱地 Dry land | 98.6 | 96.9 | 13.8 | 3.8 | 79.9 |
水域 Water area | 148.0 | 120.4 | 148.5 | 148.0 | 148.0 |
建设用地 Built-up land | 57.3 | 59.3 | 65.3 | 36.4 | 263.5 |
裸地 Unused land | 4.1 | 6.3 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
合计 Total | 25,087 | 25,087 | 25,087 | 25,087 | 25,087 |
Fig. 2 Land use types of the Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot in 2025. (a) Business as usual; (b)Strategic planning; (c) Ecological protection; (d) Development.
核心保护区 Core protection area | 生态保育区 Ecological conservation area | 游憩展示区 Recreation area | 传统利用区 Traditional utilization area | |
---|---|---|---|---|
供给服务 Provisioning services | ||||
水资源供给 Water yield (×104 m3) | 6,721.613 | 19,460.106 | 682.811 | 4,457.063 |
调节服务 Regulating services | ||||
涵养水源 Water conservation (×104 m3) | 639.814 | 840.122 | 59.338 | 136.947 |
土壤保持 Soil conservation (×104 t) | 546.608 | 721.516 | 29.546 | 96.026 |
固碳量 Carbon sequestration (×104 t) | 183.773 | 258.128 | 13.635 | 34.921 |
释氧量 Oxygen release (×104 t) | 135.294 | 190.033 | 10.038 | 25.708 |
环境净化 Environment purification | ||||
SO2吸收 SO2 absorption (t) | 996.312 | 1,504.517 | 104.472 | 225.932 |
滞尘清理 Clean detaining dust (×104 t) | 11.553 | 22.016 | 0.738 | 1.874 |
N输出量 Nitrogen output (t) | 11.198 | 31.121 | 12.083 | 59.054 |
P输出量 Phosphorus output (t) | 0.466 | 1.411 | 0.418 | 2.262 |
栖息地服务 Supporting services | ||||
生境质量得分 Habitat quality | 0.936 | 0.888 | 0.855 | 0.815 |
最优生境质量面积 Area of the optimal habitat quality (km2) | 70.633 | 89.032 | 3.845 | 8.933 |
Table 2 The quality of ecosystem services of different functional areas in 2015
核心保护区 Core protection area | 生态保育区 Ecological conservation area | 游憩展示区 Recreation area | 传统利用区 Traditional utilization area | |
---|---|---|---|---|
供给服务 Provisioning services | ||||
水资源供给 Water yield (×104 m3) | 6,721.613 | 19,460.106 | 682.811 | 4,457.063 |
调节服务 Regulating services | ||||
涵养水源 Water conservation (×104 m3) | 639.814 | 840.122 | 59.338 | 136.947 |
土壤保持 Soil conservation (×104 t) | 546.608 | 721.516 | 29.546 | 96.026 |
固碳量 Carbon sequestration (×104 t) | 183.773 | 258.128 | 13.635 | 34.921 |
释氧量 Oxygen release (×104 t) | 135.294 | 190.033 | 10.038 | 25.708 |
环境净化 Environment purification | ||||
SO2吸收 SO2 absorption (t) | 996.312 | 1,504.517 | 104.472 | 225.932 |
滞尘清理 Clean detaining dust (×104 t) | 11.553 | 22.016 | 0.738 | 1.874 |
N输出量 Nitrogen output (t) | 11.198 | 31.121 | 12.083 | 59.054 |
P输出量 Phosphorus output (t) | 0.466 | 1.411 | 0.418 | 2.262 |
栖息地服务 Supporting services | ||||
生境质量得分 Habitat quality | 0.936 | 0.888 | 0.855 | 0.815 |
最优生境质量面积 Area of the optimal habitat quality (km2) | 70.633 | 89.032 | 3.845 | 8.933 |
Fig. 3 The value and percentage of ecosystem services of different functional areas in 2015. (a) The value of ecosystem services of different functional areas; (b) The percentage of ecosystem services of different functional areas
2015 | 自然发展情景 Business as usual | 规划情景 Strategic planning | 生态保护情景 Ecological protection | 开发利用情景 Development | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
供给服务 Provisioning services | |||||
水资源供给 Water yield (×104 m3) | 31,321.593 | 31,306.852 | 31,199.755 | 30,900.282 | 31,355.505 |
调节服务 Regulating services | |||||
涵养水源 Water conservation (×104 m3) | 1,676.222 | 1,682.344 | 1,687.435 | 1,665.958 | 1,674.278 |
土壤保持 Soil conservation (×104 t) | 1,393.696 | 1,394.248 | 1,394.778 | 1,395.213 | 1,394.026 |
固碳释氧 Carbon fixation and oxygen release | |||||
固碳量 Carbon sequestration (×104 t) | 490.457 | 492.860 | 499.544 | 514.359 | 488.556 |
释氧量 Oxygen release (×104 t) | 361.073 | 362.841 | 367.762 | 378.669 | 359.673 |
环境净化 Environment purification | |||||
SO2吸收 SO2 absorption (t) | 2,831.233 | 2,853.432 | 2,902.315 | 3,005.724 | 2,822.379 |
滞尘清理 Clean detaining dust (×104 t) | 36.181 | 36.328 | 36.548 | 36.689 | 36.059 |
N输出量 Nitrogen output (t) | 113.456 | 90.301 | 59.424 | 42.602 | 94.647 |
P输出量 Phosphorus output (t) | 4.557 | 3.507 | 2.206 | 1.463 | 3.700 |
栖息地服务 Supporting services | |||||
生境质量得分 Habitat quality | 0.938 | 0.941 | 0.954 | 0.968 | 0.934 |
最优生境质量面积 Area of the optimal habitat quality (km2) | 172.443 | 174.480 | 179.253 | 190.691 | 170.635 |
Table 3 The quality of ecosystem services under various land use scenarios
2015 | 自然发展情景 Business as usual | 规划情景 Strategic planning | 生态保护情景 Ecological protection | 开发利用情景 Development | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
供给服务 Provisioning services | |||||
水资源供给 Water yield (×104 m3) | 31,321.593 | 31,306.852 | 31,199.755 | 30,900.282 | 31,355.505 |
调节服务 Regulating services | |||||
涵养水源 Water conservation (×104 m3) | 1,676.222 | 1,682.344 | 1,687.435 | 1,665.958 | 1,674.278 |
土壤保持 Soil conservation (×104 t) | 1,393.696 | 1,394.248 | 1,394.778 | 1,395.213 | 1,394.026 |
固碳释氧 Carbon fixation and oxygen release | |||||
固碳量 Carbon sequestration (×104 t) | 490.457 | 492.860 | 499.544 | 514.359 | 488.556 |
释氧量 Oxygen release (×104 t) | 361.073 | 362.841 | 367.762 | 378.669 | 359.673 |
环境净化 Environment purification | |||||
SO2吸收 SO2 absorption (t) | 2,831.233 | 2,853.432 | 2,902.315 | 3,005.724 | 2,822.379 |
滞尘清理 Clean detaining dust (×104 t) | 36.181 | 36.328 | 36.548 | 36.689 | 36.059 |
N输出量 Nitrogen output (t) | 113.456 | 90.301 | 59.424 | 42.602 | 94.647 |
P输出量 Phosphorus output (t) | 4.557 | 3.507 | 2.206 | 1.463 | 3.700 |
栖息地服务 Supporting services | |||||
生境质量得分 Habitat quality | 0.938 | 0.941 | 0.954 | 0.968 | 0.934 |
最优生境质量面积 Area of the optimal habitat quality (km2) | 172.443 | 174.480 | 179.253 | 190.691 | 170.635 |
Fig. 4 The value of ecosystem services under different land use scenarios. (a) The value of multiple ecosystem services under different land use scenarios (×104 RMB yuan); (b) The total value of ecosystem services under different land use scenarios (×104 RMB yuan)
[1] | Bai Y, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Xu WH, Jiang B, Fang Y ( 2011) Evaluation of the forest ecosystem services in Haihe River Basin, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 2029-2039. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 白杨, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 徐卫华, 江波, 方瑜 ( 2011) 海河流域森林生态系统服务功能评估. 生态学报, 31, 2029-2039.] | |
[2] |
Bai Y, Zheng H, Zhuang CW, Ouyang ZY, Xu WH ( 2013) Ecosystem services valuation and its regulation in Baiyangdian basin: Based on InVEST model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 711-717. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 白杨, 郑华, 庄长伟, 欧阳志云, 徐卫华 ( 2013) 白洋淀流域生态系统服务评估及其调控. 生态学报, 33, 711-717.]
DOI URL |
|
[3] | Bao R, Liu F, Zhang JP, Duan YL, Zhao S, Yan XY, Liu Y ( 2018) Multi-objective linear programming-based trade-off and optimization of the ecosystem services in Jiajiyu small watershed in the Loess Plateau, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 812-828. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 包蕊, 刘峰, 张建平, 段颖琳, 赵帅, 严晓亚, 刘英 ( 2018) 基于多目标线性规划的甲积峪小流域生态系统服务权衡优化. 生态学报, 38, 812-828.] | |
[4] |
Butler JRA, Wong GY, Metcalfe DJ ( 2013) An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 180, 176-191.
DOI URL |
[5] |
Cao W, Li R, Chi X, Chen N, Chen J, Zhang H, Zhang F ( 2017) Island urbanization and its ecological consequences: A case study in the Zhoushan Island, East China. Ecological Indicators, 76, 1-14.
DOI URL |
[6] |
Delphin SF, Escobedo J, Elrahman AA, Cropper WP ( 2016) Urbanization as a land use change driver of forest ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 54, 188-199.
DOI URL |
[7] |
Fu B, Xu P, Wang YK, Peng Y, Ren J ( 2013) Spatial pattern of water retention in Dujiangyan County. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 789-797. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 傅斌, 徐佩, 王玉宽, 彭怡, 任静 ( 2013) 都江堰市水源涵养功能空间格局. 生态学报, 33, 789-797.]
DOI URL |
|
[8] |
Fu BJ, Zhang LW ( 2014) Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geograpy, 33, 441-446. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 傅伯杰, 张立伟 ( 2014) 土地利用变化与生态环境服务: 概念、方法与进展. 地理科学进展, 33, 441-446.]
DOI URL |
|
[9] | Fu MD, Li JS, Zhang RA, Gao XQ, Xiao NW ( 2016) Valuation of the ecosystem services in southern mountain of Zhejiang Province. Ecological Economy, 32, 189-193. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 付梦娣, 李俊生, 章荣安, 高晓奇, 肖能文 ( 2016) 浙江省南部山区生态系统服务价值评估. 生态经济, 32, 189-193.] | |
[10] |
Gao J, Li F, Gao H, Zhou C, Zhang X ( 2017) The impact of land-use change on water-related ecosystem services: A study of the Guishui River Basin, Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 148-155.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Goldstein J, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G, Polasky S, Wolny S, Daily GC ( 2015) Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 7565-7570.
DOI URL PMID |
[12] |
Gong X, Cao MC, Sun XP, Le ZF, Li S, Xu HG ( 2017) Valuation of ecosystem services in Wuyishan City. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 33, 1094-1101. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 龚溪, 曹铭昌, 孙孝平, 乐志芳, 李双, 徐海根 ( 2017) 武夷山市生态系统服务价值评估. 生态与农村环境学报, 33, 1094-1101.]
DOI URL |
|
[13] |
He S, Su Y, Wang L, Gallagher L, Cheng H ( 2018) Taking an ecosystem services approach for a new national park system in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 137, 136-144.
DOI URL |
[14] | Huang HC, Yun YX, Miao ZT, Hao C, Li HY ( 2013) Multi-scenario and prediction of ecosystem services as affected by urban expansion: A case study in coastal area of Tianjin, North China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 697-704. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 黄焕春, 运迎霞, 苗展堂, 郝翠, 李洪远 ( 2013) 城市扩张影响下生态系统服务的多情景模拟和预测——以天津市滨海地区为例. 应用生态学报, 24, 697-704.] | |
[15] | Huang J, Zhang XM, Zhang JC ( 2010) Comprehensive evaluation on soil and water conservation function of main forest types of ecological protection forest in Kaihua County. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 17, 88-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 黄进, 张晓勉, 张金池 ( 2010) 开化生态公益林主要森林类型水土保持功能综合评价. 水土保持研究, 17, 88-90.] | |
[16] | Jiang B, Ouyang ZY, Miao H, Zheng H, Bai Y, Zhuang CW, Fang Y ( 2011) Ecosystem services valuation of the Haihe River Basin wetlands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 2236-2244. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 江波, 欧阳志云, 苗鸿, 郑华, 白杨, 庄长伟, 方瑜 ( 2011) 海河流域湿地生态系统服务功能价值评价. 生态学报, 31, 2236-2244.] | |
[17] |
Jiang W, Chen Z, Lei X, He B, Jia K, Zhang Y ( 2016) Simulation of urban agglomeration ecosystem spatial distributions under different scenarios: A case study of the Changsha- Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration. Ecological Engineering, 88, 112-121.
DOI URL |
[18] |
Lacher IL, Ahmadisharaf E, Fergus C, Akre T, McShea WJ, Benham BL, Kline KS ( 2018) Scale-dependent impacts of urban and agricultural land use on nutrients, sediment, and runoff. Science of Total Environment, 652, 611-622.
DOI URL |
[19] |
Li C, Zheng H, Li S, Chen X, Li J, Zeng W, Liang Y, Polasky S, Feldman MW, Ruckelshaus M, Ouyang ZY, Daily GC ( 2015) Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 7396-7401.
DOI URL PMID |
[20] |
Li LY, Xing H, Wu YJ, Gong XF, Li L ( 2012) Assessment of forest ecosystem services value based on MA—Taking Suichang County in Zhejiang Province as the case. Issues of Forestry Economics, 32, 317-322. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 李兰英, 邢红, 吴英俊, 龚笑飞, 李浪 ( 2012) 基于MA的森林生态系统服务价值评价——以浙江省遂昌县为例. 林业经济问题, 32, 317-322.]
DOI URL |
|
[21] |
Li YF, Luo YC, Liu G, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H ( 2013) Effects of land use change on ecosystem services: A case study in Miyun Reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 726-736. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 李屹峰, 罗跃初, 刘纲, 欧阳志云, 郑华 ( 2013) 土地利用变化对生态系统服务功能的影响——以密云水库流域为例. 生态学报, 33, 726-736.]
DOI URL |
|
[22] | MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press/World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. |
[23] |
Mukul SA, Sohel MSI, Herbohn J, Inostroza L, K?nig H ( 2017) Integrating ecosystem services supply potential from future land-use scenarios in protected area management: A Bangladesh case study. Ecosystem Services, 26, 355-364.
DOI URL |
[24] |
Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J ( 2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 4-11.
DOI URL |
[25] |
Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D ( 2011) The impact of land- use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: A case study in the State of Minnesota. Environmental & Resource Economics, 48, 219-242.
DOI URL |
[26] |
Qian YF, Yi LT, Dou PM, Zhu GL, Ying BG, Yu SQ ( 2012) Biomass and carbon fixation with oxygen release benefits in an ecological service forest of Jinyun County, China. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 29, 257-264. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 钱逸凡, 伊力塔, 钭培民, 朱国亮, 应宝根, 余树全 ( 2012) 浙江缙云公益林生物量及固碳释氧效益. 浙江农业大学学报, 29, 257-264.]
DOI URL |
|
[27] | Ramachandra TV, Bharath S, Gupta N ( 2018) Modelling landscape dynamics with LST in protected areas of Western Ghats, Karnataka. Journal of Environment Management, 206, 1253-1262. |
[28] |
Shao XY, Zhang ZF, Liu Z, Jing CW, Qi JG, Jiang JG, Cai XM, Liu QK ( 2018) Effects of land use change and planning regulation on ecosystem service values of islands: A case study of Putuo District, Zhoushan Archipelago. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37, 514-522. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 邵小云, 张则飞, 刘中, 荆长伟, 齐家国, 蒋锦刚, 蔡秀敏, 刘乾坤 ( 2018) 土地利用变化及规划结构对海岛生态系统服务价值的影响——以舟山市普陀区为例. 生态学杂志, 37, 514-522.]
DOI URL |
|
[29] |
Sun X, Lu Z, Li F, Crittenden JC ( 2018) Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs to support the supply of multiple ecosystem services in Beijing, China. Ecological Indicators, 94, 117-129.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Swetnam RD, Fisher B, Mbilinyi BP ( 2011) Mapping socio- economic scenarios of land cover change: A GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 563-574.
DOI URL PMID |
[31] | Tallis H, Ricketts T, Guerry A ( 2011) InVEST 2.4.4 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford. |
[32] |
Trisurat Y, Eawpanich P, Kalliola R ( 2016) Integrating land use and climate change scenarios and models into assessment of forested watershed services in Southern Thailand. Environment Research, 147, 611-620.
DOI URL PMID |
[33] |
Wang J, Peng J, Zhao M, Liu Y, Chen Y ( 2017) Significant trade-off for the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services in North-western Yunnan, China. Science of Total Environment, 574, 57-64.
DOI URL PMID |
[34] |
Xiao Q, Xiao Y, Ouyang ZY, Xu WH, Xiang S, Li YZ ( 2014) Value assessment of the function of the forest ecosystem services in Chongqing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 216-223. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 肖强, 肖洋, 欧阳志云, 徐卫华, 向轼, 李勇志 ( 2014) 重庆市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估. 生态学报, 34, 216-223.]
DOI URL |
|
[35] | Zhang J, Yuan WG, Ge Y, Jiang B, Zhu JR, Shen AH, Chang J ( 2010) Carbon storage and its sequestration potential by ecological service forest in Zhejiang. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 3839-3848. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张骏, 袁位高, 葛滢, 江波, 朱锦茹, 沈爱华, 常杰 ( 2010) 浙江省生态公益林碳储量和固碳现状及潜力. 生态学报, 30, 3839-3848.] | |
[36] | Zhang Y ( 2015) Forest Ecological Benefit Evaluation and Construction of Balance Sheet. China Economic Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 张颖 ( 2015) 生态效益评估与资产负债表编制. 中国经济出版社, 北京.] | |
[37] |
Zheng H, Li Y, Robinson BE, Liu G, Ma D, Wang F, Lu F, Ouyang Z, Daily GC ( 2016) Using ecosystem service trade-offs to inform water conservation policies and management practices. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 527-532.
DOI URL |
[38] |
Zheng H, Li YF, Ouyang ZY, Luo YC ( 2013) Progress and perspectives of ecosystem services management. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 702-710. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 郑华, 李屹峰, 欧阳志云, 罗跃初 ( 2013) 生态系统服务功能管理研究进展. 生态学报, 33, 702-710.]
DOI URL |
|
[39] |
Zhu KW, Li YC, Zhou MT ( 2015) Land use scenario simulation of the main city of Chongqing based on the CLUE-S model. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 24, 789-797. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 朱康文, 李月臣, 周梦甜 ( 2015) 基于CLUE-S模型的重庆市主城区土地利用情景模拟. 长江流域资源与环境, 24, 789-797.]
DOI URL |
|
[40] | Zhu YB, Shi YJ ( 2018) Value evaluation and pricing of water resources in major cities in China. Resources Science, 40, 1040-1050. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 朱永彬, 史雅娟 ( 2018) 中国主要城市水资源价值评价与定价研究. 资源科学, 40, 1040-1050.] |
[1] | Yang Wu, Yu Tian, Fengbin Dai, Ziyuan Li. Realization, development trend and enlightenment of Nature’s contributions to people [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(5): 21549-. |
[2] | Guanzheng Hu, Weihua Zeng, Bingran Ma. Roadmap for coordinated development of economic construction and ecological protection in protected areas: Take Sanjiangyuan area as an example [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(2): 21225-. |
[3] | Jing Xu, Jinzhou Wang, Junsheng Li. Progress, pathways and suggestions on business engagement in biodiversity mainstreaming [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(11): 22078-. |
[4] | Shenglei Fu, Manqiang Liu, Weixin Zhang, Yuanhu Shao. A review of recent advances in the study of geographical distribution and ecological functions of soil fauna diversity [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(10): 22435-. |
[5] | Zusheng Yi, Yuanjun Huang, Hui Yi, Xinwang Zhang, Wenjun Li. Biodiversity of macrozoobenthos in the Chebaling National Nature Reserve, Guangdong Province [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(5): 680-687. |
[6] | Ming Cao, Junsheng Li, Wei Wang, Juyi Xia, Chunting Feng, Gang Fu, Wenjie Huang, Fangzheng Liu. Assessing the effectiveness of water retention ecosystem service in Qinling National Nature Reserve based on InVEST and propensity score matching model [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(5): 617-628. |
[7] | Fengbin Dai, Yang Wu, Yuxue Pan, Boya Zhang, Yu Tian. Work efficiency of IPBES and the effectiveness of scientific functions [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(5): 688-692. |
[8] | Wei Wang, Junsheng Li. In-situ conservation of biodiversity in China: Advances and prospects [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(2): 133-149. |
[9] | Xiaoming Zheng, Qingwen Yang. Progress of agricultural biodiversity conservation in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(2): 167-176. |
[10] | Yang Wu, Yuxue Pan, Boya Zhang, Fengbin Dai, Yu Tian. Regional assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services and policy experience within the IPBES framework [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(7): 913-919. |
[11] | Xiang Liu, Lifan Chen, Shurong Zhou. The relationship between biodiversity and infectious disease: Progress, challenge and perspective [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(11): 1376-1390. |
[12] | Yuxue Pan, Boya Zhang, Yang Wu, Fengbin Dai, Yu Tian. The latest developments of IPBES and China’s countermeasures [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(10): 1286-1291. |
[13] | Richard Corlett. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: Towards ecological security in tropical and subtropical East Asia [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(7): 766-774. |
[14] | Yu Zhang, Zhenggao Xiao, Linhui Jiang, Lei Qian, Xiaoyun Chen, Fajun Chen, Feng Hu, Manqiang Liu. Nitrogen levels modify earthworm-mediated tomato growth and resistance to pests [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(12): 1296-1307. |
[15] | Boya Zhang, Yuxue Pan, Jing Xu, Yu Tian. IPBES thematic assessment on land degradation and restoration and its potential impact [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(11): 1243-1248. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn