Biodiv Sci ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 1279-1287. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021319
• Special Feature: Ecosystem Authenticity and Integrity • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yafang Jiang1, Jing Tian1, Jingbo Zhao2, Xiaoping Tang1,*()
Received:
2021-08-15
Accepted:
2021-10-20
Online:
2021-10-20
Published:
2021-10-20
Contact:
Xiaoping Tang
Yafang Jiang, Jing Tian, Jingbo Zhao, Xiaoping Tang. The connotation and assessment framework of national park ecosystem integrity:A case study of the Amur Tiger and Leopard National Park[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(10): 1279-1287.
一级指标 Level-1 index | 二级指标 Level-2 index | 权重 Weight |
---|---|---|
1. 生态系统结构和过程 Ecosystem structure and processes | 食物链(网)完整性 Food chain (web) integrity | 0.15 |
伞护种、旗舰种栖息地完整性 Habitat integrity of umbrella and flagship species | 0.15 | |
2. 生态系统功能 Ecosystem functions | 生物多样性保护 Conservation of biodiversity | 0.3 |
3. 生态系统空间格局 Ecosystem spatial patterns | 代表性生态系统 Typical ecosystems | 0.2 |
生态区位重要性 Importance of regional ecological value | 0.2 |
Table 1 The assessment framework of national park's ecosystem integrity
一级指标 Level-1 index | 二级指标 Level-2 index | 权重 Weight |
---|---|---|
1. 生态系统结构和过程 Ecosystem structure and processes | 食物链(网)完整性 Food chain (web) integrity | 0.15 |
伞护种、旗舰种栖息地完整性 Habitat integrity of umbrella and flagship species | 0.15 | |
2. 生态系统功能 Ecosystem functions | 生物多样性保护 Conservation of biodiversity | 0.3 |
3. 生态系统空间格局 Ecosystem spatial patterns | 代表性生态系统 Typical ecosystems | 0.2 |
生态区位重要性 Importance of regional ecological value | 0.2 |
指标 Index | 等级划分规则 Ranking rules | ||
---|---|---|---|
优秀 Excellent (Score: 1) | 良好 Good (Score: 0.6) | 一般 Fair (Score: 0.3) | |
1. 生态系统结构和过程 Ecosystem structure and processes | |||
食物链(网)完整性 Food chain (web) integrity | 具有至少一条包含顶级食肉动物的完整食物链, 各类生态系统间构成复杂食物网; 生态系统结构极稳定 At least one complete food chain with top carnivore, complex food web among various ecosystems; ecosystem structure highly stablized | 缺少包含顶级食肉动物的完整食物链, 但各类生态系统间构成食物网复杂; 生态系统结构较稳定 No complete food chain with top carnivore, but there is a complex food web among various ecosystems; ecosystem structure fairly stablized | 缺少包含顶级食肉动物的完整食物链, 且各生态系统间仅构成简单的食物网; 生态系统结构稳定性一般 No complete food chain with top carnivore, with very simple food web among ecosystems; ecosystem structure not stablized |
伞护种、旗舰种栖息地完整性 Habitat integrity of umbrella and flagship species | 90%-100%的自然栖息地; 连通性极高 90%-100% natural habitat; extremely high connectivity | 60%-90%的自然栖息地; 连通性较高 60%-90% natural habitat; relatively high connectivity | 20%-60%的自然栖息地; 连通性低 20%-60% natural habitat; low connectivity |
2. 生态系统功能 Ecosystem functions | |||
生物多样性 Conservation of biodiversity | 物种多样性/丰富度在参考值范围内; 指示物种未消失 Species diversity/richness within the reference standards; indicator species present | 物种多样性/丰富度接近参考值; 人类活动对原生种构成威胁; 一些指示物种消失 Species diversity/richness near the reference standards; human activities pose a threat to native species; some indicator species absent | 物种多样性/丰富度远低于参考值; 很多指示物种消失 Species diversity/richness are far lower than the reference standards; many indicator species absent |
3. 生态系统空间格局 Ecosystem spatial patterns | |||
代表性生态系统 Typical ecosystems | 80%以上为区域代表性生态系统 Over 80% area covered with regional typical ecosystems | 50%?80%为区域代表性生态系统50%?80% area covered with regional typical ecosystems | 不足50%为区域代表性生态系统Less than 50% area covered with regional typical ecosystems |
生态区位重要性 Importance of regional ecological value | 同时位于国家“两屏三带”生态安全战略区和国家重点生态功能区, 生态区位极重要 Located in both National ecological security strategic area and National key ecological functional area, the importance regional ecological value is extremly high | 位于国家“两屏三带”生态安全战略区或国家重点生态功能区中的一个, 生态区位较重要 Located in either National ecological security strategic area or National key ecological functional area, the importance of regional ecological value is fairly high | 不位于国家“两屏三带”生态安全战略区或国家重点生态功能区, 生态区位不重要 Located in neither National ecological security strategic area nor National key ecological functional area, the importance of regional ecological value is low |
Table 2 The scoring system of ecosystem integrity assessment of national parks*
指标 Index | 等级划分规则 Ranking rules | ||
---|---|---|---|
优秀 Excellent (Score: 1) | 良好 Good (Score: 0.6) | 一般 Fair (Score: 0.3) | |
1. 生态系统结构和过程 Ecosystem structure and processes | |||
食物链(网)完整性 Food chain (web) integrity | 具有至少一条包含顶级食肉动物的完整食物链, 各类生态系统间构成复杂食物网; 生态系统结构极稳定 At least one complete food chain with top carnivore, complex food web among various ecosystems; ecosystem structure highly stablized | 缺少包含顶级食肉动物的完整食物链, 但各类生态系统间构成食物网复杂; 生态系统结构较稳定 No complete food chain with top carnivore, but there is a complex food web among various ecosystems; ecosystem structure fairly stablized | 缺少包含顶级食肉动物的完整食物链, 且各生态系统间仅构成简单的食物网; 生态系统结构稳定性一般 No complete food chain with top carnivore, with very simple food web among ecosystems; ecosystem structure not stablized |
伞护种、旗舰种栖息地完整性 Habitat integrity of umbrella and flagship species | 90%-100%的自然栖息地; 连通性极高 90%-100% natural habitat; extremely high connectivity | 60%-90%的自然栖息地; 连通性较高 60%-90% natural habitat; relatively high connectivity | 20%-60%的自然栖息地; 连通性低 20%-60% natural habitat; low connectivity |
2. 生态系统功能 Ecosystem functions | |||
生物多样性 Conservation of biodiversity | 物种多样性/丰富度在参考值范围内; 指示物种未消失 Species diversity/richness within the reference standards; indicator species present | 物种多样性/丰富度接近参考值; 人类活动对原生种构成威胁; 一些指示物种消失 Species diversity/richness near the reference standards; human activities pose a threat to native species; some indicator species absent | 物种多样性/丰富度远低于参考值; 很多指示物种消失 Species diversity/richness are far lower than the reference standards; many indicator species absent |
3. 生态系统空间格局 Ecosystem spatial patterns | |||
代表性生态系统 Typical ecosystems | 80%以上为区域代表性生态系统 Over 80% area covered with regional typical ecosystems | 50%?80%为区域代表性生态系统50%?80% area covered with regional typical ecosystems | 不足50%为区域代表性生态系统Less than 50% area covered with regional typical ecosystems |
生态区位重要性 Importance of regional ecological value | 同时位于国家“两屏三带”生态安全战略区和国家重点生态功能区, 生态区位极重要 Located in both National ecological security strategic area and National key ecological functional area, the importance regional ecological value is extremly high | 位于国家“两屏三带”生态安全战略区或国家重点生态功能区中的一个, 生态区位较重要 Located in either National ecological security strategic area or National key ecological functional area, the importance of regional ecological value is fairly high | 不位于国家“两屏三带”生态安全战略区或国家重点生态功能区, 生态区位不重要 Located in neither National ecological security strategic area nor National key ecological functional area, the importance of regional ecological value is low |
生态系统完整性等级 Ecosystem integrity level | 生态系统完整性得分 Ecosystem integrity score | 生态系统完整性状况 Ecosystem integrity condition |
---|---|---|
优秀 Excellent | > 0.8 | 生态系统的结构和过程都在自然扰动范围内变化, 生态系统功能极强, 连通性极好, 生态区位极为重要; 生态系统完整性极高 Changes of ecosystem structure and process are within the natural disturbance range, excellent ecosystem functions, extremely high connectivity, extremely important ecological niche; extremely high ecosystem integrity |
良好 Good | 0.6?0.8 | 生态系统的组成结构和过程都在自然扰动范围内变化, 生态功能稳定, 连通性良好, 生态区位较为重要; 生态系统完整性高 Changes of ecosystem structure and process are within the natural disturbance range, stabilized ecosystem functions, good connectivity, important ecological niche; high ecosystem integrity |
中等 Fair | 0.4?0.6 | 生态系统的组成结构和过程都在自然扰动范围内变化, 生态功能部分受损, 连通性一般, 生态区位重要性一般; 生态系统完整性需提高 Changes of ecosystem structure and process are within the natural disturbance range, part of ecosystem functions are damaged, fair connectivity, less important ecological niche; ecosystem integrity need to be improved |
较差 Poor | < 0.4 | 生态系统的组成结构和过程的变化超出自然扰动范围, 生态功能受损严重, 破碎化程度高, 生态区位不重要; 生态系统完整性低 Changes of ecosystem structure and process are beyond the natural disturbance range, part of ecosystem functions are seriously damaged, low connectivity, not important ecological niche; ecosystem integrity low |
Table 3 The rank of ecosystem integrity assessment of national parks
生态系统完整性等级 Ecosystem integrity level | 生态系统完整性得分 Ecosystem integrity score | 生态系统完整性状况 Ecosystem integrity condition |
---|---|---|
优秀 Excellent | > 0.8 | 生态系统的结构和过程都在自然扰动范围内变化, 生态系统功能极强, 连通性极好, 生态区位极为重要; 生态系统完整性极高 Changes of ecosystem structure and process are within the natural disturbance range, excellent ecosystem functions, extremely high connectivity, extremely important ecological niche; extremely high ecosystem integrity |
良好 Good | 0.6?0.8 | 生态系统的组成结构和过程都在自然扰动范围内变化, 生态功能稳定, 连通性良好, 生态区位较为重要; 生态系统完整性高 Changes of ecosystem structure and process are within the natural disturbance range, stabilized ecosystem functions, good connectivity, important ecological niche; high ecosystem integrity |
中等 Fair | 0.4?0.6 | 生态系统的组成结构和过程都在自然扰动范围内变化, 生态功能部分受损, 连通性一般, 生态区位重要性一般; 生态系统完整性需提高 Changes of ecosystem structure and process are within the natural disturbance range, part of ecosystem functions are damaged, fair connectivity, less important ecological niche; ecosystem integrity need to be improved |
较差 Poor | < 0.4 | 生态系统的组成结构和过程的变化超出自然扰动范围, 生态功能受损严重, 破碎化程度高, 生态区位不重要; 生态系统完整性低 Changes of ecosystem structure and process are beyond the natural disturbance range, part of ecosystem functions are seriously damaged, low connectivity, not important ecological niche; ecosystem integrity low |
指标 Index | 权重 Weight | 赋值 Score | 总分 Total score | 完整性评级 Integrity level |
---|---|---|---|---|
食物链(网)完整性 Food chain (web) integrity | 0.15 | 1 | 0.81 | 优秀 Excellent |
伞护种、旗舰种栖息地完整性 Habitat integrity of umbrella and flagship species | 0.15 | 0.7 | ||
生物多样性保护 Conservation of biodiversity | 0.3 | 0.7 | ||
代表性生态系统 Typical ecosystems | 0.2 | 0.7 | ||
生态区位重要性 Importance of ecological niche | 0.2 | 1 |
Table 4 Ecosystem integrity scoring diagram of the Amur Tiger and Leopard National Park
指标 Index | 权重 Weight | 赋值 Score | 总分 Total score | 完整性评级 Integrity level |
---|---|---|---|---|
食物链(网)完整性 Food chain (web) integrity | 0.15 | 1 | 0.81 | 优秀 Excellent |
伞护种、旗舰种栖息地完整性 Habitat integrity of umbrella and flagship species | 0.15 | 0.7 | ||
生物多样性保护 Conservation of biodiversity | 0.3 | 0.7 | ||
代表性生态系统 Typical ecosystems | 0.2 | 0.7 | ||
生态区位重要性 Importance of ecological niche | 0.2 | 1 |
[1] |
Chen Z (2019) Spatiotemporal variation of productivity and carbon use efficiency of forests in Northeast China from 2000 to 2015. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 1625-1632. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI PMID |
[陈智 (2019) 2000-2015年中国东北森林生产力和碳素利用率的时空变异. 应用生态学报, 30, 1625-1632.]
PMID |
|
[2] |
Dai YC, Xue YD, Zhang YY, Li DQ (2019) Summary comments on assessment methods of ecosystem integrity for national parks. Biodiversity Science, 27, 104-113. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[代云川, 薛亚东, 张云毅, 李迪强 (2019) 国家公园生态系统完整性评价研究进展. 生物多样性, 27, 104-113.]
DOI |
|
[3] | Deng R, Shao HY, Huang BR, Zhang CL, Zhou ZR, Fan J (2021) Remote assessment on ecosystem integrity of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and research on National Parks Group construction sequence. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 847-860. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[邓冉, 邵怀勇, 黄宝荣, 张丛林, 周中仁, 樊杰 (2021) 青藏高原生态系统完整性远程评价与国家公园群建设时序研究. 生态学报, 41, 847-860.] | |
[4] |
Fraser RH, Olthof I, Pouliot D (2009) Monitoring land cover change and ecological integrity in Canada's national parks. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 1397-1409.
DOI URL |
[5] | GB/T 39737-2021 (2021) Specification for National Park Establishment. Standards Press of China, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ GB/T 39737-2021 (2021) 国家公园设立规范. 中国标准出版社, 北京.] | |
[6] | GB/T 39739-2020 (2020) Specification for Assessment of the National Park. Standards Press of China, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ GB/T 39739-2020 (2020) 国家公园考核评价规范. 中国标准出版社, 北京.] | |
[7] |
Hector A, Bagchi R (2007) Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature, 448, 188-190.
DOI URL |
[8] | Hou M, Tang XP, Huang GL, Li RQ (2020) Identification of the priority conservation areas of national park: A case study of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 2332-2340. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[侯盟, 唐小平, 黄桂林, 李仁强 (2020) 国家公园优先保护区域识别--以浙江丽水为例. 应用生态学报, 31, 2332-2340.] | |
[9] | Huang BR, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Wang XK, Miao H (2006) Connotation of ecological integrity and its assessment methods: A review. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 17, 2196-2202. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[黄宝荣, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 王效科, 苗鸿 (2006) 生态系统完整性内涵及评价方法研究综述. 应用生态学报, 17, 2196-2202.] | |
[10] | Li X, Tian W (2012) Dynamic evaluation of ecological integrity based on landscape pattern index. Journal of Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 29, 780-785. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李鑫, 田卫 (2012) 基于景观格局指数的生态完整性动态评价. 中国科学院研究生院学报, 29, 780-785.] | |
[11] | Lin C, Gong MH, Liu Y, Pan X, Piao ZY (2018) Spatial heterogeneity of biodiversity value based on dominant species: Changbaishan Ecological Function Zone as a case study. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 4677-4683. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[蔺琛, 龚明昊, 刘洋, 潘旭, 朴正言 (2018) 基于优势种的生物多样性保护价值空间异质性研究--以长白山生态功能区为例. 生态学报, 38, 4677-4683.] | |
[12] | Liu XN, Liu CL, Zhang CL, Wei Y, Huang BR (2021) Ecosystem integrity and authenticity assessment framework in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Cluster. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41, 833-846. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘晓娜, 刘春兰, 张丛林, 魏钰, 黄宝荣 (2021) 青藏高原国家公园群生态系统完整性与原真性评估框架. 生态学报, 41, 833-846.] | |
[13] | Sun HY (2015) China's Amur Tiger Conservation Research. Northeast Forestry University Press, Harbin. (in Chinese) |
[孙海义 (2015) 中国东北虎保护研究. 东北林业大学出版社, 哈尔滨.] | |
[14] | Tang XP, Jiang YF, Zhao ZC, Liang BK, Ma W (2020) Study on standards for establishing national parks in China. Forest Resources Management, (2), 1-8, 24. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[唐小平, 蒋亚芳, 赵智聪, 梁兵宽, 马炜 (2020) 我国国家公园设立标准研究. 林业资源管理, (2), 1-8, 24.] | |
[15] | Unnasch RS, Braun DP, Comer PJ, Eckert GE (2018) The Ecological Integrity Assessment Framework: A Framework for Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Biological and Ecological Resources of the National Park System. Report to National Park Service. |
[16] |
Wang TM, Andrew Royle J, Smith JLD, Zou L, Lü X, Li T, Yang HT, Li ZL, Feng RN, Bian YJ, Feng LM, Ge JP (2018) Living on the edge: Opportunities for Amur tiger recovery in China. Biological Conservation, 217, 269-279.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Wang TM, Feng LM, Mou P, Wu JG, Smith JLD, Xiao WH, Yang HT, Dou HL, Zhao XD, Cheng YC, Zhou B, Wu HY, Zhang L, Tian Y, Guo QX, Kou XJ, Han XM, Miquelle DG, Oliver CD, Xu RM, Ge JP (2016) Amur tigers and leopards returning to China: Direct evidence and a landscape conservation plan. Landscape Ecology, 31, 491-503.
DOI URL |
[18] |
Wei Y, Lei GC (2019) From biocenosis to ecosystem: The theory trend of conserving ecosystem integrity in national parks. Journal of Natural Resources, 34, 1820-1832. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[魏钰, 雷光春 (2019) 从生物群落到生态系统综合保护: 国家公园生态系统完整性保护的理论演变. 自然资源学报, 34, 1820-1832.] | |
[19] | Woodley S (2010) Ecological Integrity and Canada's National Parks. The George Wright Forum, 27(2), 151-160. |
[20] | Zhang MY, Wang KL, He P (2005) Advances in assessment of ecosystem integrity. Tropical Geography, 25, 10-13, 18. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张明阳, 王克林, 何萍 (2005) 生态系统完整性评价研究进展. 热带地理, 25, 10-13, 18.] | |
[21] | Zhao GJ, Gong YN, Yang HT, Xie B, Wang TM, Ge JP, Feng LM (2019) Study on habitat use and activity rhythms of wild boar in eastern region of Northeast Tiger and Leopard National Park. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 39, 431-441. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[赵国静, 宫一男, 杨海涛, 谢冰, 王天明, 葛剑平, 冯利民 (2019) 东北虎豹国家公园东部的野猪生境利用和活动节律初步研究. 兽类学报, 39, 431-441.] |
[1] | Yihui Jiang, Yue Liu, Xu Zeng, Zheying Lin, Nan Wang, Jihao Peng, Ling Cao, Cong Zeng. Fish diversity and connectivity in six national marine protected areas in the East China Sea [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(6): 24128-. |
[2] | Yu Tian, Junsheng Li. Analysis of the connotation and implementation path for the 30 by 30 target in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(6): 24086-. |
[3] | Biyu Ma. Summary of amendments to India’s Biological Diversity Act and enlightenments for improving China’s legal system of biodiversity conservation [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 23412-. |
[4] | Yingli Cai, Hongge Zhu, Jiaxin Li. Biodiversity conservation in China: Policy evolution, main measures and development trends [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 23386-. |
[5] | Yanyu Ai, Haixia Hu, Ting Shen, Yuxuan Mo, Jinhua Qi, Liang Song. Vascular epiphyte diversity and the correlation analysis with host tree characteristics: A case in a mid-mountain moist evergreen broad-leaved forest, Ailao Mountains [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 24072-. |
[6] | Dekui Yan. Common elements, deficiencies, and optimization suggestions of biodiversity conservation policies in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 23293-. |
[7] | Fuwei Zhao, Yingshuo Li, Hui Chen. Reflections on biodiversity legislation in China’s new era [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 24027-. |
[8] | Jingzhou Liu, Yixin Qian, Yanxuedan Zhang, Feng Cui. Research progress and implications of flagship species paradigms based on latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(4): 23439-. |
[9] | Lejie Wu, Zekang Liu, Xing Tian, Qun Zhang, Bo Li, Jihua Wu. Effects of genotypic diversity on vegetative growth and reproductive strategies of Scirpus mariqueter population [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(4): 23478-. |
[10] | Xuemeng Li, Jibao Jiang, Zenglu Zhang, Xiaojing Liu, Yali Wang, Yizhao Wu, Yinsheng Li, Jiangping Qiu, Qi Zhao. Earthworm biodiversity and its influencing factors in Baotianman National Nature Reserve [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(4): 23352-. |
[11] | Cao Hao, Donghui Wu, Lingzi Mo, Guoliang Xu. A review on gut microbial diversity and function of overwintering animals [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(3): 23407-. |
[12] | Haiou Liu, Leshan Du, Wenhui Liu, Ziyuan Li, Libo Pan, Lei Liu. Analysis and enlightenment on Global Biodiversity Framework Fund management policy [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(3): 23334-. |
[13] | Jiaxin Wei, Zhiguo Jiang, Linsen Yang, Huanhuan Xiong, Jiaojiao Jin, Fanglin Luo, Jiehua Li, Hao Wu, Yaozhan Xu, Xiujuan Qiao, Xinzeng Wei, Hui Yao, Huiliang Yu, Jingyuan Yang, Mingxi Jiang. Community composition and structure in a 25 ha mid-subtropical mountain deciduous broad-leaved forest dynamics plot in Shennongjia, Hubei, China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(3): 23338-. |
[14] | He Zhirong, Wu Siyu, Shi Yingying, Wang Yuting, Jiang Yixin, Zhang Chunna, Zhao Na, Wang Supen. Current status and challenges on the effects of chytrid infection on amphibian populations [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(2): 23274-. |
[15] | Peng Yunyue, Jin Tong, Zhang Xiaoquan. Biodiversity credits: Concepts, principles, transactions and challenges [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(2): 23300-. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn