一种非传粉榕小蜂的繁殖策略及其对榕—蜂互利共生系统的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08341

生物多样性 ›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (2): 168-173. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08341 cstr: 32101.14.SP.J.1003.2009.08341

所属专题：传粉生物学；昆虫多样性与生态功能

一种非传粉榕小蜂的繁殖策略及其对榕—蜂互利共生系统的影响

王振吉¹^,², 张凤萍¹^,², 彭艳琼¹, 杨大荣¹^,^*()

1 中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园, 昆明 650223
2 中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2008-12-22 接受日期:2009-02-18 出版日期:2009-03-20 发布日期:2009-03-20
通讯作者: 杨大荣
作者简介:* E-mail: yangdr@xtbg.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程青年人才领域前沿项目(08LY051K01);国家自然科学基金(30571507);国家自然科学基金(30670358)

Reproductive strategy and impact on the fig-pollinator mutualism of one non-pollinating fig wasp species

Zhenji Wang¹^,², Fengping Zhang¹^,², Yanqiong Peng¹, Darong Yang¹^,^*()

1 Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223
2 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received:2008-12-22 Accepted:2009-02-18 Online:2009-03-20 Published:2009-03-20
Contact: Darong Yang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了解非传粉榕小蜂与榕树—传粉榕小蜂互利共生系统的作用方式和作用强度, 从而揭示它们长期稳定共存的原因, 作者于2008年在西双版纳热带植物园研究了钝叶榕(Ficus curtipes)非传粉榕小蜂Walkerella sp.与榕—蜂互利共生系统的相互关系。我们野外直接观察Walkerella sp.的产卵繁殖行为, 并对Walkerella sp.和传粉榕小蜂进行控制放蜂实验。实验包括4类处理榕果: 传粉榕小蜂单种放蜂果, Walkerella sp.单种放蜂果, Walkerella sp.与传粉榕小蜂混合放蜂果, 自然果。结果表明, Walkerella sp.在榕果外产卵, 并且可以将卵产在多个榕果上。单因素方差分析结果表明: 混合放蜂果和自然果内传粉榕小蜂后代数量差异不大(P = 0.46), 但都显著低于传粉榕小蜂单种放蜂果(P < 0.01); 在传粉榕小蜂单种放蜂果以及混合放蜂果内种子数量不存在显著差异(P = 0.33), 但都显著高于自然果(P < 0.01)。自然果内Walkerella sp.后代数量与传粉榕小蜂数量呈显著的相关关系, 而在混合放蜂果内两者呈低度负相关。Walkerella sp.与种子数量在自然果和混合放蜂果都不存在显著的相关关系。单因素方差分析结果表明, Walkerella sp.单种放蜂果、混合放蜂果及自然果中Walkerella sp.数量不存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。对自然果内所有种类小蜂的相关分析表明: Walkerella sp.与其他非传粉榕小蜂都不存在显著的相关关系, 这说明不存在寄居或复寄生的非传粉榕小蜂种类控制Walkerella sp.的数量。而Walkerella sp.之所以没有完全利用榕果内的小花资源繁殖后代, 是由于产卵量有限和后代必须依靠传粉榕小蜂雄虫打开苞片口才能离开榕果, 必须给传粉小蜂留下一些繁殖资源。

关键词: 互利共生, Ficus curtipes, 榕小蜂, 繁殖策略, Walkerella sp.

Abstract

In order to understand the nature and intensity of interactions between non-pollinating fig wasps and fig-pollinator mutualist wasps, and consequently shed light on why they coexist, we studied interactions between Walkerella sp. and the Ficus curtipes fig-pollinator mutualism in Xishuangbanna Botanical Garden in 2008. The reproductive behaviour of Walkerella sp. was studied by means of observation, and a controlled experiment was applied to study interspecies relationships. Figs only with pollinator, figs only with Walkerella sp., figs with both pollinator and Walkerella sp. and natural figs were compared in this research. Walkerella sp. was observed ovipositing on the outside of the fig. One Walkerella sp. can oviposit on many figs. ANOVA showed that the number of pollinator in figs with both pollinator and Walkerella sp. is significantly lower than that in figs only with pollinator (P < 0.01), while the number of seed did not differ between figs with only pollinators and figs with both Walkerella sp. and pollinator (P = 0.33). The number of Walkerella sp. did not differ among figs with only Walkerella sp., figs with both pollinator and Walkerella sp. and natural figs. Our results support the hypothesis that Walkerella sp. affects pollinator number, but not seed number and there is no inquiline or parasitoid affecting the number of Walkerella sp. The requirement of male pollinators to dig a hole in the fig wall may limit the number of Walkerella sp. eggs in the figs.

Key words: mutualism, Ficus curtipes, fig wasp, reproductive strategy, Walkerella sp.

王振吉, 张凤萍, 彭艳琼, 杨大荣 (2009) 一种非传粉榕小蜂的繁殖策略及其对榕—蜂互利共生系统的影响. 生物多样性, 17, 168-173. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08341.

Zhenji Wang, Fengping Zhang, Yanqiong Peng, Darong Yang (2009) Reproductive strategy and impact on the fig-pollinator mutualism of one non-pollinating fig wasp species. Biodiversity Science, 17, 168-173. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08341.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08341

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2009/V17/I2/168

图/表 3

图1 不同处理榕果内传粉榕小蜂后代和种子数量的比较 (相同的字母表示差异不显著, 不同的字母表示差异显著, 平均值±标准误)。Ⅰ: 仅放传粉榕小蜂; Ⅲ: 传粉榕小蜂 + Walkerella sp.; Ⅳ: 自然果。

Fig. 1 Comparison of pollinator offspring and seed number of different treatments. Different letters indicate significant difference at P = 0.05 level, mean ± S.E. Ⅰ, Pollinator only; Ⅲ, Pollinator + Walkerella sp.; Ⅳ, Natural fig.

图2 不同处理榕果内Walkerella sp.后代数量比较 (相同的字母表示差异不显著, 不同的字母表示差异显著, 平均值±标准误)。II: 仅放非传粉榕小蜂; III: 传粉榕小蜂 + Walkerella sp.; IV: 自然果。

Fig. 2 Comparison of Walkerella sp. offspring number of different treatments. Different letters indicate significant difference at P=0.05 level, mean ± S.E. II, Nonpollinator only; III, Pollinator + Walkerella sp.; IV, Natural fig.

表1 钝叶榕自然果内Walkerella sp.与其他种类小蜂的相关关系

Table 1 The correlation between Walkerella sp. and other fig wasps in natural figs

小蜂种类 Fig wasps	相关系数 Correlation coefficient	P
Walkerella sp. vs Eupristina sp.	-0.566***	0.001
Walkerella sp. vs Sycobia sp.	0.022^ns	0.455
Walkerella sp. vs Lipothymus sp.	-0.160^ns	0.208
Walkerella sp. vs Ficomila sp.	0.202^ns	0.127
Walkerella sp. vs Diaziella yangi	-0.325*	0.046
Walkerella sp. vs Philotrypesis sp.	-0.144^ns	0.232

参考文献 20

[1]	Abdurahiman UC (1986) Biology and behaviour of Philotrypesis pilosa Mayr (Torymidae: Hymenoptera). Bulletin of Entomology, 27, 121-127.
[2]	Bronstein JL (1991) The non-pollinating wasp fauna of Ficus pertusa: exploitation of a mutualism? Oikos, 61, 175-186.
[3]	Compton SG, Hawkins BA (1992) Determinants of species richness in southern African fig wasp assemblages. Oecologia, 91, 68-74. URL PMID
[4]	Cook JM, Power SA (1996) Effects of within-tree flowering asynchrony on the dynamics of seed and wasp production in an Australian fig species. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 487-493.
[5]	Guan JM (管俊明), Peng YQ (彭艳琼), Yang DR (杨大荣) (2007) Host sanctions in fig-fig wasp mutualism. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 15, 626-632. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Janzen DH (1979) How to be a fig? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, 13-51.
[7]	Janzen DH (1985) The natural history of mutualism. In: The Biology of Mutualism: Ecology and Evolution (ed. Boucher DH), pp. 40-99, Oxford University Press, New York.
[8]	Kerdelhué C, Rossi J-P, Rasplus J-Y (2000) Comparative community ecology studies on Old World figs and fig wasps. Ecology, 81, 2832-2849.
[9]	Peng YQ, Yang DR, Wang QY (2005) Quantitative tests of interaction between pollinating and non-pollinating fig wasps on dioecious Ficus hispida. Ecological Entomology, 30, 70-77.
[10]	Proffit M, Schatz B, Borges RM, Hossaert-Mckey M (2007) Chemical mediation and niche partitioning in non-pollinating fig-wasp communities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 76, 296-303.
[11]	Ramirez BW (1970) Host specificity of fig wasps (Agaonidae). Evolution, 24, 680-691.
[12]	Weiblen GD (2002) How to be a fig wasp? Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 299-330.
[13]	West SA, Herre EA, Windsor DM, Green RS (1996) The ecology and evolution of the New World non-pollinating fig wasp communities. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 447-458.
[14]	Wiebes JT (1979) Co-evolution of figs and their insect pollinators. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, 1-12.
[15]	Yang DR (杨大荣), Zhao TZ (赵庭周), Wang RW (王瑞武), Zhang GM (张光明), Song QS (宋启示) (2001) Study on pollination ecology of fig wasp (Ceratosolen sp.) in the tropical rainforest of Xishuangbanna, China. Zoological Research (动物学研究), 22, 125-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Yang DR (杨大荣), Peng YQ (彭艳琼), Zhao TZ (赵庭周), Wang QY (王秋艳), Xu L (徐磊) (2005) Relationship between activity of Ceratosolen fusciceps and seasonal changes of the seed number of Ficus racemosa. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 41(1), 25-29. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	Yu DW (2001) Parasites of mutualisms. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 72, 529-546.
[18]	Zhai SW (翟树伟), Yang DR (杨大荣), Peng YQ (彭艳琼), Xu L (徐磊), Bai LF (白莉芬) (2007) Compare of style length of female florets and relationship with their fig pollinating wasps in monoecious Ficus racemosa and dioecious Ficus auriculata. Scientia Silvae Sinicae (林业科学), 43(6), 67-71. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	Zhang FP, Peng YQ, Guan JM, Yang DR (2008) A species of fig tree and three unrelated fig wasp pollinators. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 10, 1-10.
[20]	Zhen WQ (甄文全), Huang DW (黄大卫), Yang DR (杨大荣), Xiao H (肖晖), Zhu CD (朱朝东) (2004) Oviposition behaviour of Philotrypesis pilosa Mayr (Hymenoptera: Agaonidae). Acta Entomologica Sinica (昆虫学报), 47, 365-371. (in Chinese with English abstract)

一种非传粉榕小蜂的繁殖策略及其对榕—蜂互利共生系统的影响

Reproductive strategy and impact on the fig-pollinator mutualism of one non-pollinating fig wasp species

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 20

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	谢华, 杨培, 李宗波. 鸡嗉子榕传粉榕小蜂表皮碳氢化合物的性二型及季节变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 24001-.
[2]	冯志荣, 陈明波, 杨小芳, 王刚, 董乙乂, 彭艳琼, 陈华燕, 王波. 榕树繁育系统及榕小蜂资源利用塑造了榕小蜂群落[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(3): 23307-.
[3]	黄曼娟, 汪雪敏, 苗白鸽, 彭艳琼. 栉颚榕小蜂在雌花期榕果内产卵及主动传粉行为的多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 23060-.
[4]	董乙乂,彭艳琼,王波. 垂叶榕榕小蜂群落及种间互作网络季节动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(4): 496-503.
[5]	陈欢欢, 李竹梅, 唐利洲. 榕小蜂温度耐受性及其对种间共存关系的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(10): 1222-1228.
[6]	黄建峰, 徐睿, 彭艳琼. 榕树种间杂交研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(4): 457-467.
[7]	黄建峰, 徐睿, 彭艳琼. 榕-传粉榕小蜂非一对一共生关系的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(3): 295-303.
[8]	杨培, 李宗波, 彭艳琼, 杨大荣. 同种榕小蜂在木瓜榕两种地理型上的繁殖及传粉特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2012, 20(4): 437-442.
[9]	路程, 耿宇鹏, 王瑞武. 榕树-榕小蜂协同进化中的非对称性相互作用及其集合种群效应[J]. 生物多样性, 2012, 20(3): 264-269.
[10]	顾丁, 彭艳琼, 杨大荣. 传粉榕小蜂与非传粉小蜂间寄主识别行为的趋同进化[J]. 生物多样性, 2012, 20(3): 324-329.
[11]	彭德力, 张志强, 牛洋, 杨扬, 宋波, 孙航, 李志敏. 高山植物繁殖策略的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2012, 20(3): 286-299.
[12]	隆沂峄, 杨丽媛, 廖万金. 利用PCR-RFLP技术鉴定传粉榕小蜂隐种混合样品的物种组成[J]. 生物多样性, 2010, 18(4): 414-419.
[13]	穆宏平, 陈贻竹, 曹洪麟, 叶万辉. 不同来源AM真菌对朱砂根生长和生理特征的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2010, 18(1): 83-89.
[14]	孙宝发, 王瑞武, 胡忠. 榕小蜂食性分化与榕树―榕小蜂系统稳定性[J]. 生物多样性, 2008, 16(6): 525-532.
[15]	徐磊, 杨大荣. 榕树及其传粉榕小蜂的系统发育和协同进化研究现状及展望[J]. 生物多样性, 2008, 16(5): 446-453.