北热带喀斯特季节性雨林土壤和6个常见树种凋落物的C、N、P化学计量学特征

doi:10.17520/biods.2017148

生物多样性 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 1085-1094.DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017148

• 研究报告: 植物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

北热带喀斯特季节性雨林土壤和6个常见树种
凋落物的C、N、P化学计量学特征

郭屹立^1,², 李冬兴^1,², 王斌^1,², 白坤栋^1,², 向悟生^1,², 李先琨^1,^2,^*()

1 广西壮族自治区中国科学院广西植物研究所广西喀斯特植物保育与恢复生态学重点实验室, 广西桂林 541006
2 广西友谊关森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站, 广西凭祥 532699

收稿日期:2017-05-17 接受日期:2017-10-16 出版日期:2017-10-20 发布日期:2018-05-05
通讯作者: 李先琨
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31500342, 31660130)、广西重点研发计划项目(桂科AB16380256)、广西自然科学基金(2015GXNSFBA139050)和中国科学院西部之光项目(人字﹝2014〕91号)

C, N and P stoichiometric characteristics of soil and litter fall for six common tree species in a northern tropical karst seasonal rainforest in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China

Yili Guo^1,², Dongxing Li^1,², Bin Wang^1,², Kundong Bai^1,², Wusheng Xiang^1,², Xiankun Li^1,^2,^*

1 Guangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin, Guangxi 541006
2 Guangxi Youyiguan Forest Ecosystem National Research Station, Pingxiang, Guangxi 532699

Received:2017-05-17 Accepted:2017-10-16 Online:2017-10-20 Published:2018-05-05
Contact: Li Xiankun

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

凋落物是森林生态系统的有机质和养分储藏库, 是土壤和植物间物质交换的枢纽, 是森林土壤肥力的主要来源之一。本文选取弄岗喀斯特季节性雨林15 ha森林动态监测样地中布设的90个凋落物收集器自2014年3月至2015年2月收集的6个常见种的凋落叶, 结合2014年7月沿海拔梯度(185-368 m)采集的50个土壤样品, 研究了土壤和凋落物的C、N、P化学计量学特征及其沿海拔梯度的变化趋势。结果表明, 除P含量在高坡位及峰顶较低外, 土壤中的C、N、P含量均达到了全国第二次土壤普查分类标准中的一级水平; 土壤的C、N含量及C : P和N : P与海拔呈正比, P含量和C : N与海拔呈反比。因本文采样的海拔差异较小, 推测上述土壤养分含量与海拔的关系主要是由于微地形引起的土壤差异而不是海拔差引起的气象因子差异所致。与其他森林生态系统相比, 这6个常见种凋落叶的C、N、P含量的平均值呈现出高C和N、低P的格局; 而不同海拔凋落叶的C、N、P并未表现出类似土壤中的变化规律; 6个常见种凋落叶均表现出春季较高的C含量和夏季较高的N、P含量。虽然桂西南喀斯特季节性雨林中土壤的C、N、P含量总体水平较高, 但其单位面积内的胸高断面积之和却远低于其他森林生态系统, 表现为生物承载量较低; 受个体生长环境差异的影响, 同种凋落叶的C、N、P化学计量学特征可能会存在个体间差异。研究结果将为我国西南地区典型喀斯特生态脆弱区的生态功能恢复与植被重建提供科学依据。

关键词: 喀斯特季节性雨林, 化学计量学特征, 土壤, 凋落叶, 海拔梯度, 季节性变化

Abstract

Litter fall provides organic matter and nutrients to forest ecosystems and is central to the exchange of substances between soil and plants. It plays a vital role in the maintenance of soil organic matter and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems and it is one of the main sources of soil fertility. We used litter fall data for six common tree species collected between March 2014 and February 2015 from 90 litter fall traps, and fifty soil samples collected in July 2014 along an altitudinal gradient from 185 to 368 m in a tropical karst forest in Guangxi, China. We studied the C, N and P stoichiometric characteristics of soil and litter fall, and their trends along an altitudinal gradient. Soil C and N contents were all positively associated with altitude, while P content was negatively associated with altitude. Soil C : N was negatively associated with altitude, while C : P and N : P were positively associated with altitude. Due to the narrow altitudinal range of the soil samples, we speculate that the association of soil nutrients with altitude is due to the effect of micro-topography and not a climatic effect. Apart from the higher slope and summit, the soil C, N, P contents reached the first classification level of the national criterion of soil nutrients. Compared with other forest ecosystems, we found greater C and N contents and lower P content than the average value of C, N, P contents for litter fall of six common species. There were no trends for C, N and P stoichiometric characteristics of the mixed sample of leaf litter for the six common tree species along an altitudinal gradient. The six common tree species have higher C content in spring and higher contents of N and P in summer. The per unit total basal area of trees in this forest was much lower than other forest ecosystems, indicating its low biomass stock. This study provides useful information for ecological restoration of a typical vulnerable karst ecosystem in China.

Key words: karst seasonal rainforest, stoichiometric characteristics, soil, litter fall of leaves, altitude gradient, seasonal variation

郭屹立, 李冬兴, 王斌, 白坤栋, 向悟生, 李先琨 (2017) 北热带喀斯特季节性雨林土壤和6个常见树种
凋落物的C、N、P化学计量学特征. 生物多样性, 25, 1085-1094. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017148.

Yili Guo, Dongxing Li, Bin Wang, Kundong Bai, Wusheng Xiang, Xiankun Li (2017) C, N and P stoichiometric characteristics of soil and litter fall for six common tree species in a northern tropical karst seasonal rainforest in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China. Biodiversity Science, 25, 1085-1094. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017148.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2017148

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2017/V25/I10/1085

图/表 6

参考文献 33

[1]	Cao KF, Fu PL, Chen YJ, Jiang YJ, Zhu SD (2014) Implications of the ecophysiological adaptation of plants on tropical karst habitats for the ecological restoration of desertified rocky lands in southern China. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 44, 238-247. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[曹坤芳, 付培立, 陈亚军, 姜艳娟, 朱师丹 (2014) 热带岩溶植物生理生态适应性对于南方石漠化土地生态重建的启示. 中国科学: 生命科学, 44, 238-247.]
[2]	Chen P (1988) A report on the soil investigation of the Longgang Natural Reserve. Guihaia, 8(Suppl.1), 52-73. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[陈平 (1988) 弄岗自然保护区土壤考察报告. 广西植物, 8(增刊1), 52-73.]
[3]	Cole DW (1986) Nutrient cycling in world forests. In: Forest Site and Productivity (ed. Gessel SP), pp. 103-125. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
[4]	Condit R (1998) Tropical Forest Census Plots: Methods and Results from Barro Colorado Island, Panama and A Comparison with Other Plots. Springer, Berlin.
[5]	Crous KY, Ósvaldsson A, Ellsworth DS (2015) Is phosphorus limiting in a mature Eucalyptus woodland? Phosphorus fertilisation stimulates stem growth. Plant and Soil, 391, 293-305.
[6]	Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Kerkhoff AJ, Swenson NG, Enquist BJ (2010) Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change. New Phytologist, 186, 593-608.
[7]	Guo K, Liu CC, Dong M (2011) Ecological adaptation of plants and control of rocky-desertification on karst region of Southwest China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 991-999. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郭柯, 刘长成, 董鸣 (2011) 我国西南喀斯特植物生态适应性与石漠化治理. 植物生态学报, 35, 991-999.]
[8]	Guo YL, Li DX, Wang B, He YL, Xiang WS, Li XK (2017) Composition and spatio-temporal dynamics of litter fall in a northern tropical karst seasonal rainforest in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China. Biodiversity Science, 25, 265-274. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郭屹立, 李冬兴, 王斌, 何运林, 向悟生, 李先琨 (2017) 北热带喀斯特季节性雨林凋落物组分构成及时空动态. 生物多样性, 25, 265-274.]
[9]	Guo YL, Wang B, Mallik AU, Huang FZ, Xiang WS, Ding T, Wen SJ, Lu SH, Li DX, He YL, Li XK (2017) Topographic species-habitat associations of tree species in a heterogeneous tropical karst seasonal rain forest, China. Journal of Plant Ecology, 10, 450-460.
[10]	Guo YL, Wang B, Xiang WS, Ding T, Lu SH, Huang FZ, Wen SJ, Li DX, He YL, Li XK (2016) Responses of spatial pattern of woody plants’ basal area to topographic factors in a tropical karst seasonal rainforest in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China. Biodiversity Science, 24, 30-39. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郭屹立, 王斌, 向悟生, 丁涛, 陆树华, 黄甫昭, 文淑均, 李冬兴, 何运林, 李先琨 (2016) 喀斯特季节性雨林木本植物胸高断面积分布格局及其对地形因子的响应. 生物多样性, 24, 30-39.]
[11]	Guo YL, Wang B, Xiang WS, Ding T, Lu SH, Huang YS, Huang FZ, Li DX, Li XK (2015) Spatial distribution of tree species in a tropical karst seasonal rainforest in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China. Biodiversity Science, 23, 183-191. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[郭屹立, 王斌, 向悟生, 丁涛, 陆树华, 黄俞淞, 黄甫昭, 李冬兴, 李先琨 (2015) 广西弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林监测样地种群空间点格局分析. 生物多样性, 23, 183-191.]
[12]	Han WX, Fang JY, Guo DL, Zhang Y (2005) Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China. New Phytologist, 168, 377-385.
[13]	Herbert DA, Williams M, Rastetter EB (2003) A model analysis of N and P limitation on carbon accumulation in Amazonian secondary forest after alternate land-use abandonment. Biogeochemistry, 65, 121-150.
[14]	Hogan EJ, Minnullina G, Smith RI, Crittenden PD (2010) Effects of nitrogen enrichment on phosphatase activity and nitrogen: phosphorus relationships in Cladonia portentosa. New Phytologist, 186, 911-925.
[15]	Kang HZ, Xin ZJ, Breg B, Burgess PJ, Liu QL, Liu ZC, Li ZH, Liu CJ (2010) Global pattern of leaf litter nitrogen and phosphorus in woody plants. Annals of Forest Science, 67, 811.
[16]	Pallardy SG (2010) Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press, Amsterdam.
[17]	Pan FJ, Zhang W, Wang KL, He XY, Liang SC, Wei GF (2011) Litter C : N : P ecological stoichiometry character of plant communities in typical karst peak-cluster depression. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 335-343. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[潘复静, 张伟, 王克林, 何寻阳, 梁士楚, 韦国富 (2011) 典型喀斯特峰丛洼地植被群落凋落物C : N : P生态化学计量特征. 生态学报, 31, 335-343.]
[18]	Peng BX, Han XJ, Chen J (2009) Seasonal changes in nutrient content of the litter layers in seven plantation forests. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, (10), 97-99. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[彭彬霞, 韩锡君, 陈军 (2009) 七种林分凋落物的养分季节性变化研究. 广东农业科学, (10), 97-99.]
[19]	R Core Team (2015) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. (accessed on 2015-12-01)
[20]	Rinnan R, Michelsen A, Bååth E, Jonasson S (2007) Mineralization and carbon turnover in subarctic heath soil as affected by warming and additional litter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 3014-3023.
[21]	Rinnan R, Michelsen A, Jonasson S (2008) Effects of litter addition and warming on soil carbon, nutrient pools and microbial communities in a subarctic heath ecosystem. Applied Soil Ecology, 39, 271-281.
[22]	Runyan CW, D’Odorico P, Vandecar KL, Das R, Schmook B, Lawrence D (2013) Positive feedbacks between phosphorus deposition and forest canopy trapping, evidence from Southern Mexico. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 118, 1521-1531.
[23]	Townsend AR, Cleveland CC, Asner GP, Bustamante MM (2007) Controls over foliar N : P ratios in tropical rain forests. Ecology, 88, 107-118.
[24]	Wang B, Huang YS, Li XK, Xiang WS, Ding T, Huang FZ, Lu SH, Han WH, Wen SJ, He LJ (2014) Species composition and spatial distribution of a 15 ha northern tropical karst seasonal rain forest dynamics study plot in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China. Biodiversity Science, 22, 141-156. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王斌, 黄俞淞, 李先琨, 向悟生, 丁涛, 黄甫昭, 陆树华, 韩文衡, 文淑均, 何兰军 (2014) 弄岗北热带喀斯特季节性雨林15 ha监测样地的树种组成与空间分布. 生物多样性, 22, 141-156.]
[25]	Wang JY, Wang SQ, Li RL, Yan JH, Sha LQ, Han SJ (2011) C : N : P stoichiometric characteristics of four forest types’ dominant tree species in China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 587-595. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王晶苑, 王绍强, 李纫兰, 闫俊华, 沙丽清, 韩士杰 (2011) 中国四种森林类型主要优势植物的C : N : P化学计量学特征. 植物生态学报, 35, 587-595.]
[26]	Wang LJ, Sheng MY, Du JY, Wen PC (2017) Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon and its influence factors in the karst rocky desertification ecosystem of Southwest China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 1358-1365. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王霖娇, 盛茂银, 杜家颖, 温培才 (2017) 西南喀斯特石漠化生态系统土壤有机碳分布特征及其影响因素. 生态学报, 37, 1358-1365.]
[27]	Wang SJ, Liu QM, Zhang DF (2004) Karst rocky desertification in southwestern China: geomorphology, landuse, impact and rehabilitation. Land Degradation and Development, 15, 115-121.
[28]	Wang WQ, Xu LL, Zeng CS, Tong C, Zhang LH (2011) Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus ecological stotichiometric ratios along live plant-litter-soil systems in estuarine wetland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 7119-7124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[王维奇, 徐玲琳, 曾从盛, 仝川, 张林海 (2011) 河口湿地植物活体-枯落物-土壤的碳氮磷生态化学计量特征. 生态学报, 31, 7119-7124.]
[29]	Wardle DA, Walker LR, Bardgett RD (2004) Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences. Science, 305, 509-513.
[30]	Yuan DX (1991) Karst of China. Geological Publishing House, Beijing.
[31]	Zeng ZX, Wang KL, Liu XL, Zeng FP, Song TQ, Peng WX, Zhang H, Du H (2015) Stoichiometric characteristics of plants, litter and soils in karst plant communities of North-west Guangxi. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 682-693. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[曾昭霞, 王克林, 刘孝利, 曾馥平, 宋同清, 彭晚霞, 张浩, 杜虎 (2015) 桂西北喀斯特森林植物-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征. 植物生态学报, 39, 682-693.]
[32]	Zhao YF, Xu FL, Wang WL, Wang LL, Wang GX, Sun PY, Bai XF (2014) Seasonal variation in contents of C, N and P and stoichiometry characteristics in fine roots, stems and needles of Larix principis-rupprechtii. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 49, 560-568. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[赵亚芳, 徐福利, 王渭玲, 王玲玲, 王国兴, 孙鹏跃, 白小芳 (2014) 华北落叶松根茎叶碳氮磷含量及其化学计量学特征的季节变化. 植物学报, 49, 560-568.]
[33]	Zhang W, Wang KL, Chen HS, Zhang JG (2012) Use of satellite information and GIS to predict distribution of soil organic carbon in depressions amid clusters of karst peaks. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 49, 601-606. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[张伟, 王克林, 陈洪松, 张继光 (2012) 典型喀斯特峰丛洼地土壤有机碳含量空间预测研究. 土壤学报, 49, 601-606.]

编号 No.	种名 Species	个体数 No. of individuals	平均胸径 Mean DBH (cm)	2014年凋落量 Litter fall in 2014 (kg/ha)	偏好生境 Preferred habitat	海拔 Altitude (m)
SP1	海南椴 Diplodiscus trichosperma	1,982	6.65	425.1	上坡位 Upper slope	290.2
SP2	闭花木 Cleistanthus sumatranus	11,982	4.57	694.3	上坡位 Upper slope	279.2
SP3	广西牡荆 Vitex kwangsiensia	9,403	7.87	542.5	中坡位 Middle slope	253.9
SP4	苹婆 Sterculia monosperma	9,066	5.00	470.9	中坡位 Middle slope	244.1
SP5	中国无忧花 Saraca dives	194	13.67	161.3	低坡位 Lower slope	211.0
SP6	广西棋子豆 Archidendron guangxiensis	507	7.76	127.9	低坡位 Lower slope	207.9

编号 No.	种名 Species	个体数 No. of individuals	平均胸径 Mean DBH (cm)	2014年凋落量 Litter fall in 2014 (kg/ha)	偏好生境 Preferred habitat	海拔 Altitude (m)
SP1	海南椴 Diplodiscus trichosperma	1,982	6.65	425.1	上坡位 Upper slope	290.2
SP2	闭花木 Cleistanthus sumatranus	11,982	4.57	694.3	上坡位 Upper slope	279.2
SP3	广西牡荆 Vitex kwangsiensia	9,403	7.87	542.5	中坡位 Middle slope	253.9
SP4	苹婆 Sterculia monosperma	9,066	5.00	470.9	中坡位 Middle slope	244.1
SP5	中国无忧花 Saraca dives	194	13.67	161.3	低坡位 Lower slope	211.0
SP6	广西棋子豆 Archidendron guangxiensis	507	7.76	127.9	低坡位 Lower slope	207.9

生境类型 Habitat category	C (g/kg)	N (g/kg)	P (g/kg)	C : N	C : P	N : P
峰顶 Hilltop	141.82 ± 7.97^a	9.25 ± 0.58^a	0.70 ± 0.04^a	15.44 ± 0.42^a	207.67 ± 13.90^a	13.59 ± 1.05^a
高坡位 Upper slope	121.01 ± 8.38^b	7.77 ± 0.45^ab	0.79 ± 0.08^a	15.93 ± 1.33^a	159.75 ± 13.30^b	10.70 ± 1.16^ab
中坡位 Middle slope	103.56 ± 6.69^c	6.63 ± 0.36^b	1.18 ± 0.102^ab	15.65 ± 0.56^a	93.332 ± 9.10^c	6.00 ± 0.58^b
低坡位 Lower slope	103.66 ± 4.67^c	6.32 ± 0.37^b	1.67 ± 0.11^b	16.59 ± 0.56^a	63.57 ± 3.818^d	3.87 ± 0.26^c
洼地 Depression	90.38 ± 6.68^d	5.26 ± 0.38^c	2.40 ± 0.19^c	17.54 ± 1.25^ab	40.77 ± 4.96^e	2.32 ± 0.25^cd

生境类型 Habitat category	C (g/kg)	N (g/kg)	P (g/kg)	C : N	C : P	N : P
峰顶 Hilltop	141.82 ± 7.97^a	9.25 ± 0.58^a	0.70 ± 0.04^a	15.44 ± 0.42^a	207.67 ± 13.90^a	13.59 ± 1.05^a
高坡位 Upper slope	121.01 ± 8.38^b	7.77 ± 0.45^ab	0.79 ± 0.08^a	15.93 ± 1.33^a	159.75 ± 13.30^b	10.70 ± 1.16^ab
中坡位 Middle slope	103.56 ± 6.69^c	6.63 ± 0.36^b	1.18 ± 0.102^ab	15.65 ± 0.56^a	93.332 ± 9.10^c	6.00 ± 0.58^b
低坡位 Lower slope	103.66 ± 4.67^c	6.32 ± 0.37^b	1.67 ± 0.11^b	16.59 ± 0.56^a	63.57 ± 3.818^d	3.87 ± 0.26^c
洼地 Depression	90.38 ± 6.68^d	5.26 ± 0.38^c	2.40 ± 0.19^c	17.54 ± 1.25^ab	40.77 ± 4.96^e	2.32 ± 0.25^cd

物种 Species	C (g/kg)	N(g/kg)	P (g/kg)	C : N	C : P	N : P
海南椴 Diplodiscus trichosperma	586.24 ± 47.25^b	16.37 ± 2.71^b	0.63 ± 0.11^c	36.43 ± 1.33^b	941.69 ± 34.37^b	26.12 ± 1.21^b
闭花木 Cleistanthus sumatranus	624.66 ± 32.53^a	13.30 ± 4.47^c	0.41 ± 0.08^cd	50.71 ± 3.70^a	1,582.98 ± 92.82^a	32.32 ± 2.08^b
广西牡荆 Vitex kwangsiensia	581.99 ± 56.14^b	20.42 ± 3.06^a	1.08 ± 0.15^ab	28.88 ± 1.09^c	545 ± 23.32^c	18.97 ± 0.70^c
苹婆 Sterculia monosperma	578.50 ± 33.51^b	16.31 ± 2.06^b	1.23 ± 0.27^a	36.04 ± 1.58^b	501.37 ± 39.61^c	13.84 ± 0.77^d
中国无忧花 Saraca dives	578.49 ± 19.74^b	13.94 ± 2.23^bc	1.33 ± 0.31^a	42.64 ± 2.34^ab	450.20 ± 23.11^c	10.87 ± 0.81^d
广西棋子豆 Archidendron guangxiensis	649.00 ± 51.29^a	21.24 ± 2.54^a	0.48 ± 0.08^cd	31.00 ± 1.31^c	1,397.22 ± 88.93^a	45.10 ± 2.02^a

北热带喀斯特季节性雨林土壤和6个常见树种
凋落物的C、N、P化学计量学特征

C, N and P stoichiometric characteristics of soil and litter fall for six common tree species in a northern tropical karst seasonal rainforest in Nonggang, Guangxi, southern China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

物种 Species	季节 Season	C (g/kg)	N (g/kg)	P (g/kg)	C : N	C : P	N : P
海南椴 Diplodiscus trichosperma	春季 Spring	631.96 ± 38.12^a	17.63 ± 0.12^ab	0.65 ± 0.06^a	35.83 ± 2.09^ab	984.01 ± 56.99^a	27.63 ± 2.11^a
	夏季 Summer	606.89 ± 8.12^ab	19.40 ± 1.33^a	0.73 ± 0.09^a	31.65 ± 2.66^b	853.47 ± 34.03^ab	27.48 ± 4.53^a
	秋季 Autumn	546.15 ± 5.891^b	13.75 ± 0.87^c	0.58 ± 0.05^ab	40.00 ± 2.27^a	949.01 ± 76.93^a	23.70 ± 1.20^a
	冬季 Winter	559.95 ± 11.48^b	14.71 ± 0.87^c	0.57 ± 0.03^ab	38.24 ± 1.64^a	980.29 ± 44.97^a	25.66 ± 0.87^a
闭花木 Cleistanthus sumatranus	春季 Spring	644.94 ± 35.61^a	13.01 ± 0.87^b	0.43 ± 0.02^ab	50.12 ± 4.18^ab	1,501.64 ± 150.05^b	30.17 ± 2.54^b
	夏季 Summer	636.59 ± 5.45^a	19.48 ± 2.67^a	0.50 ± 0.02^a	33.93 ± 4.57^b	1,284.62 ± 38.53^b	39.70 ± 7.00^a
	秋季 Autumn	599.37 ± 2.92^a	11.20 ± 0.35^b	0.39 ± 0.02^b	53.64 ± 1.98^ab	1,519.62 ± 84.76^b	28.32 ± 0.96^b
	冬季 Winter	617.74 ± 3.67^a	9.50 ± 0.32^b	0.31 ± 0.02^c	65.13 ± 1.99^a	2,026.05 ± 101.94^a	31.10 ± 1.13^b
广西牡荆 Vitex kwangsiensia	春季 Spring	621.14 ± 37.60^a	20.91 ± 0.63^a	0.96 ± 0.03^b	29.88 ± 2.78^a	646.18 ± 25.58^a	21.84 ± 1.20^a
	夏季 Summer	604.61 ± 23.11^a	24.87 ± 0.13^a	1.28 ± 0.05^a	24.31 ± 0.99^ab	474.81 ± 34.03^b	19.48 ± 0.64^a
	秋季 Autumn	568.00 ± 3.49^a	18.62 ± 0.15^b	1.05 ± 0.02^b	30.51 ± 0.34^a	541.27 ± 9.08^ab	17.75 ± 0.49^a
	冬季 Winter	534.22 ± 39.44^ab	17.29 ± 0.47^b	1.04 ± 0.10^b	30.84 ± 1.72^a	517.75 ± 45.97^ab	16.80 ± 1.15^a
苹婆 Sterculia monosperma	春季 Spring	612.08 ± 26.03^a	14.98 ± 0.73^b	0.97 ± 0.06^b	41.13 ± 3.21^a	635.44 ± 60.17^a	15.41 ± 0.25^a
	夏季 Summer	556.00 ± 15.59^a	19.44 ± 0.60^a	1.49 ± 0.05^a	28.63 ± 0.75^b	373.98 ± 16.39^c	13.05 ± 0.31^a
	秋季 Autumn	562.55 ± 3.54^a	15.23 ± 0.48^b	1.22 ± 0.12^ab	37.01 ± 1.35^a	470.92 ± 44.59^b	12.84 ± 1.68^a
	冬季 Winter	583.38 ± 13.02^a	15.61 ± 0.19^b	1.24 ± 0.23^ab	37.38 ± 0.60^a	525.13 ± 103.88^b	14.06 ± 2.84^a
中国无忧花 Saraca dives	春季 Spring	589.41 ± 9.94^a	14.64 ± 0.69^a	1.39 ± 0.28^a	40.47 ± 2.52^b	405.08 ± 67.98^a	10.15 ± 2.07^a
	夏季 Summer	589.05 ± 7.66^a	15.95 ± 0.47^a	1.55 ± 0.20^a	37.04 ± 1.54^b	440.75 ± 58.67^a	12.07 ± 2.12^a
	秋季 Autumn	566.74 ± 2.26^a	14.16 ± 0.58^a	1.19 ± 0.10^ab	40.14 ± 1.54^b	484.56 ± 41.07^a	12.09 ± 1.06^a
	冬季 Winter	568.74 ± 17.89^a	11.01 ± 1.22^b	1.21 ± 0.04^ab	52.90 ± 5.95^a	470.40 ± 11.80^a	9.15 ± 1.15^a
广西棋子豆 Archidendron guangxiensis	春季 Spring	704.78 ± 13.80^a	21.20 ± 0.48^a	0.42 ± 0.06^b	33.31 ± 1.38^a	1,723.53 ± 216.60^a	51.83 ± 6.35^a
	夏季 Summer	614.27 ± 47.98^b	24.84 ± 0.59^a	0.57 ± 0.02^a	24.79 ± 2.17^ab	1,074.73 ± 58.67^b	43.66 ± 1.75^ab
	秋季 Autumn	637.85 ± 4.48^ab	19.08 ± 0.54^a	0.44 ± 0.03^b	33.48 ± 1.09^a	1,476.42 ± 108.41^ab	43.97 ± 1.86^ab
	冬季 Winter	639.11 ± 6.37^ab	19.84 ± 1.08^a	0.49 ± 0.01^ab	32.42 ± 2.01^a	1,314.19 ± 19.96^ab	40.92 ± 3.12^ab

[1]	王爱霞, 马婧婧, 龚会蝶, 范国安, 王茂, 赵红梅, 程军回. 北疆一年生早春短命植物物种丰富度分布格局及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 735-745.
[2]	王楠, 黄菁华, 霍娜, 杨盼盼, 张欣玥, 赵世伟. 宁南山区不同植被恢复方式下土壤线虫群落特征:形态学鉴定与高通量测序法比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(11): 1513-1529.
[3]	潘玉梅, 张乃莉. 亚热带森林树种多样性对凋落叶分解胞外酶活性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(11): 1447-1460.
[4]	朱杰, 吴安驰, 邹顺, 熊鑫, 刘世忠, 褚国伟, 张倩媚, 刘菊秀, 唐旭利, 闫俊华, 张德强, 周国逸. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林树木多样性与生物量和生产力的关联及其影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(11): 1435-1446.
[5]	刘鑫, 荣晓莹, 张元明. 古尔班通古特沙漠生物土壤结皮对氨氧化微生物生态位的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 43-52.
[6]	孙思邈, 陈吉欣, 冯炜炜, 张昶, 黄凯, 管铭, 孙建坤, 刘明超, 冯玉龙. 植物氮形态利用策略及对外来植物入侵性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 72-80.
[7]	王亚, 王玮倩, 王钦克, 李晓霞, 刘延, 黄乔乔. 土壤养分对菊科一年生入侵种和本地种繁殖性状的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 1-9.
[8]	李世雄, 王彦龙, 王玉琴, 尹亚丽. 土壤细菌群落特征对高寒草甸退化的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(1): 53-64.
[9]	王宇彤, 牛克昌. 青藏高原高寒草甸土壤环境对线虫功能多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(6): 707-717.
[10]	靳新影, 张肖冲, 金多, 陈韵, 李靖宇. 腾格里沙漠东南缘不同生物土壤结皮细菌多样性及其季节动态特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(6): 718-726.
[11]	李婷婷, 张西美. 全球变化背景下内蒙古草原土壤微生物多样性维持机制研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(6): 749-758.
[12]	黄庆阳, 曹宏杰, 谢立红, 罗春雨, 杨帆, 王立民, 倪红伟. 五大连池火山熔岩台地草本层物种多样性及环境解释[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(6): 658-667.
[13]	魏慧玉,陈凯,王备新. 澜沧江流域水生昆虫群落分类多样性和功能多样性海拔格局的空间尺度依赖性[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(4): 504-514.
[14]	贾梦可,郭屹立,李冬兴,王斌,向悟生,王爱龙,刘晟源,丁涛,黄甫昭,文淑均,陆树华,李先琨. 桂西南喀斯特季节性雨林叶凋落量的时空动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(4): 455-462.
[15]	李明家, 吴凯媛, 孟凡凡, 沈吉, 刘勇勤, 肖能文, 王建军. 西藏横断山区溪流细菌beta多样性组分对气候和水体环境的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(12): 1570-1580.