Biodiversity Science ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 66-75.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.10171

;

• Methodologies • Previous Article     Next Article

Criteria and methods for assessing the threat status of ecosystem

Guoke Chen, Keping Ma*   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093
  • Received:2011-09-26 Revised:2011-11-27 Online:2012-02-14
  • Keping Ma E-mail:kpma@ibcas.ac.cn

Assessing the threat status of ecosystems is a useful tool for understanding biodiversity loss on Earth. In 2008, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) established a working group at the fourth World Conservation Congress to develop quantitative categories and criteria for assessing ecosystem threat status. These categories and criteria were similar to those used to assess extinction risk for species. This working group strove to establish red lists of ecosystems by applying these criteria to ecosystems at local, regional, and global scales. Ecosystem red lists were designed to be complementary to species red lists for use in creating biodiversity conservation policies. The criteria used for assessment were grouped into four classes: short-term decline in distribution or ecological function, historical declines in distribution or ecological function, small current distribution with decline in distribution or ecological function, or very restricted current distribution. In this paper, we illustrate the use of these criteria for assessing ecosystem threat status; we used literature data on the areas of occupancy for four ecosystems in China’s Liaohe Delta in 1988 and 2006 to evaluate the threat status of these four ecosystems. We also discuss challenges that lie ahead for this method of assessment. Measures of ecosystem distribution and area of occupancy should be based on proper spatial scales. Appropriate quantitative methods are also needed to measure changes in ecosystem function. The final proposed assessment protocol will be presented for further discussion at the 2012 World Conservation Congress.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Liu Xiang-dong. Discussing on the Concept of a Few Fruits[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1997, 14(04): 57 -58 .
[2] Chen Zheng. Arabidopsis thaliana as a Model Species for Plant Molecular Biology Studies[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(01): 6 -11 .
[3] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2013, 48(3): 354 -356 .
[4] Wang Zi-chun and Luo Gui-hua. The Recognition of the Evil Consequence After Deforestation in Ancient China[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1985, 3(03): 17 -20 .
[5] GUAN Jun-FengFAN Xiu-Cai FENG Chen-Jing WANG Yu-Tao LI Guang-Min. Changes of Cellular Ca2+-ATPase Activity During Maturation of Strawberry Fruits[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2003, 20(03): 325 -329 .
[6] Peng Shao-lin Fang Wei. Dynamics of Community Composition Structure of Secondary Evergreen Broadleafed Forest in Baiyunshan of Guangzhou[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1995, 12(专辑2): 49 -54 .
[7] WANG Ming-YanMENG Li-JunZHANG Xiu-Jun. Resin_Casting Method for Investigating Three Dimensions of Apoplastic Spaces of Plant[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2000, 17(05): 470 -472 .
[8] WU Jin-Song CHONG Kang. The Molecular Biology Research on the Action of Jasmonates[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2002, 19(02): 164 -170 .
[9] Zumeng Tan;Yunchang Li;Qiong Hu*;Desheng Mei;Jihua Cheng. Advances in Molecular Marker Techniques for Heterosis Application in Rapeseed[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2008, 25(02): 230 -239 .
[10] Wu Luo-jqing. Rapid Propagation of Rosa rugosa by Tissue Culture[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1988, 5(04): 238 -239 .