Biodiversity Science ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 51-63.doi: 10.17520/biods.2018182

• Original Papers • Previous Article     Next Article

Evaluation of ecosystem service value based on land use scenarios: A case study of Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot

Sun Xiaoping1, Li Shuang1, Yu Jianping3, Fang Yanjun4, Zhang Yinlong1, *(), Cao Mingchang2, *()   

  1. 1 Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037
    2 Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, Nanjing 210042;
    3 Center of Ecology and Resources, Qianjiangyuan National Park, Kaihua, Zhejiang 324300
    4 Kaihua Environmental Protection Bureau, Kaihua, Zhejiang 324300
  • Received:2018-07-02 Accepted:2018-12-24 Online:2019-03-15
  • Zhang Yinlong,Cao Mingchang E-mail:ecoenvylz@163.com;caomingc@163.com

Land use change is one of the main drivers to change of biodiversity and ecosystem services. It is important for decision-making of government to assess impacts of land use change on biodiversity and ecosystem service. The Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot (QNPP), located at the headwaters of the Qiangtang River, covers 252 km 2, and it is also a National Key Ecological Function Zone. In this study, We designed four land use change scenarios in 2025 for QNPP, i.e., business as usual, strategic planning, ecological protection, and development. Furthermore, the change in ecosystem services and its value in QNPP were evaluated under four scenarios by InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs) model and CLUE-S (Conversions of Land Use and its Effects at Small Regional Extent) model. The ecosystem services in this assessment include water yield, water conservation, carbon sequestration and oxygen release, soil conservation, environmental purification, and habitat quality. Our results show that: (1) the value of ecosystem services in core protected areas and ecological conservation areas accounts for 88.30% of total value of QNPP; (2) the value of ecosystem services of QNPP in the ecological protection scenario is the highest (12.917 billion RMB yuan), and ranks the second in the strategic planning scenario (12.692 billion RMB yuan); and (3) the water yield in the strategic planning scenario is superior to that in the ecological protection scenario, while other ecosystem services are inferior to that in the ecological protection scenario. Strategic planning scenario is an optimal land use strategy in 2025 since QNPP play a key role in providing water resources for the downstream.

Key words: ecosystem service, land use change scenarios, InVEST model, CLUE-S Model

Fig. 1

Land use and land cover of the Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot. (a) 2010; (b) 2015."

Table 1

Land use/land cover of the Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot between 2015 and 2025"

土地利用类型
Land use type (ha)
2015 自然发展情景
Business as usual
规划情景
Strategic planning
生态保护情景
Ecological protection
开发利用情景
Development
阔叶林 Broad-leaved forest 17,166.9 17,369.7 17,962.9 19,074.8 17,123.6
针叶林 Coniferous forest 4,670.1 4,655.0 4,634.3 4,383.9 4,652.9
针阔混交林 Mixed broadleaf-conifer forest 1,412.2 1,409.2 1,286.7 1,248.8 1,404.1
灌木林 Shrubbery 957.3 953.3 665.8 124.4 937.6
园地 Garden 24.2 23.6 11.1 13.3 18.9
草丛 Grassland 159.9 158.4 154.8 39.7 151.1
水田 Paddy field 388.4 234.9 142.0 13.1 306.2
旱地 Dry land 98.6 96.9 13.8 3.8 79.9
水域 Water area 148.0 120.4 148.5 148.0 148.0
建设用地 Built-up land 57.3 59.3 65.3 36.4 263.5
裸地 Unused land 4.1 6.3 1.8 0.8 1.2
合计 Total 25,087 25,087 25,087 25,087 25,087

Fig. 2

Land use types of the Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot in 2025. (a) Business as usual; (b)Strategic planning; (c) Ecological protection; (d) Development."

Table 2

The quality of ecosystem services of different functional areas in 2015"

核心保护区
Core protection area
生态保育区
Ecological
conservation area
游憩展示区
Recreation area
传统利用区
Traditional utilization area
供给服务 Provisioning services
水资源供给 Water yield (×104 m3) 6,721.613 19,460.106 682.811 4,457.063
调节服务 Regulating services
涵养水源 Water conservation (×104 m3) 639.814 840.122 59.338 136.947
土壤保持 Soil conservation (×104 t) 546.608 721.516 29.546 96.026
固碳量 Carbon sequestration (×104 t) 183.773 258.128 13.635 34.921
释氧量 Oxygen release (×104 t) 135.294 190.033 10.038 25.708
环境净化 Environment purification
SO2吸收 SO2 absorption (t) 996.312 1,504.517 104.472 225.932
滞尘清理 Clean detaining dust (×104 t) 11.553 22.016 0.738 1.874
N输出量 Nitrogen output (t) 11.198 31.121 12.083 59.054
P输出量 Phosphorus output (t) 0.466 1.411 0.418 2.262
栖息地服务 Supporting services
生境质量得分 Habitat quality 0.936 0.888 0.855 0.815
最优生境质量面积 Area of the optimal habitat quality (km2) 70.633 89.032 3.845 8.933

Fig. 3

The value and percentage of ecosystem services of different functional areas in 2015. (a) The value of ecosystem services of different functional areas; (b) The percentage of ecosystem services of different functional areas"

Table 3

The quality of ecosystem services under various land use scenarios"

2015 自然发展情景
Business as usual
规划情景
Strategic planning
生态保护情景
Ecological protection
开发利用情景
Development
供给服务 Provisioning services
水资源供给 Water yield (×104 m3) 31,321.593 31,306.852 31,199.755 30,900.282 31,355.505
调节服务 Regulating services
涵养水源 Water conservation (×104 m3) 1,676.222 1,682.344 1,687.435 1,665.958 1,674.278
土壤保持 Soil conservation (×104 t) 1,393.696 1,394.248 1,394.778 1,395.213 1,394.026
固碳释氧 Carbon fixation and oxygen release
固碳量 Carbon sequestration (×104 t) 490.457 492.860 499.544 514.359 488.556
释氧量 Oxygen release (×104 t) 361.073 362.841 367.762 378.669 359.673
环境净化 Environment purification
SO2吸收 SO2 absorption (t) 2,831.233 2,853.432 2,902.315 3,005.724 2,822.379
滞尘清理 Clean detaining dust (×104 t) 36.181 36.328 36.548 36.689 36.059
N输出量 Nitrogen output (t) 113.456 90.301 59.424 42.602 94.647
P输出量 Phosphorus output (t) 4.557 3.507 2.206 1.463 3.700
栖息地服务 Supporting services
生境质量得分 Habitat quality 0.938 0.941 0.954 0.968 0.934
最优生境质量面积 Area of the optimal habitat quality (km2) 172.443 174.480 179.253 190.691 170.635

Fig. 4

The value of ecosystem services under different land use scenarios. (a) The value of multiple ecosystem services under different land use scenarios (×104 RMB yuan); (b) The total value of ecosystem services under different land use scenarios (×104 RMB yuan) "

[1] Bai Y, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Xu WH, Jiang B, Fang Y ( 2011) Evaluation of the forest ecosystem services in Haihe River Basin, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 2029-2039. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 白杨, 欧阳志云, 郑华, 徐卫华, 江波, 方瑜 ( 2011) 海河流域森林生态系统服务功能评估. 生态学报, 31, 2029-2039.]
[2] Bai Y, Zheng H, Zhuang CW, Ouyang ZY, Xu WH ( 2013) Ecosystem services valuation and its regulation in Baiyangdian basin: Based on InVEST model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 711-717. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201203270417
[ 白杨, 郑华, 庄长伟, 欧阳志云, 徐卫华 ( 2013) 白洋淀流域生态系统服务评估及其调控. 生态学报, 33, 711-717.]
doi: 10.5846/stxb201203270417
[3] Bao R, Liu F, Zhang JP, Duan YL, Zhao S, Yan XY, Liu Y ( 2018) Multi-objective linear programming-based trade-off and optimization of the ecosystem services in Jiajiyu small watershed in the Loess Plateau, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38, 812-828. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 包蕊, 刘峰, 张建平, 段颖琳, 赵帅, 严晓亚, 刘英 ( 2018) 基于多目标线性规划的甲积峪小流域生态系统服务权衡优化. 生态学报, 38, 812-828.]
[4] Butler JRA, Wong GY, Metcalfe DJ ( 2013) An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 180, 176-191.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.017
[5] Cao W, Li R, Chi X, Chen N, Chen J, Zhang H, Zhang F ( 2017) Island urbanization and its ecological consequences: A case study in the Zhoushan Island, East China. Ecological Indicators, 76, 1-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.001
[6] Delphin SF, Escobedo J, Elrahman AA, Cropper WP ( 2016) Urbanization as a land use change driver of forest ecosystem services. Land Use Policy, 54, 188-199.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.006
[7] Fu B, Xu P, Wang YK, Peng Y, Ren J ( 2013) Spatial pattern of water retention in Dujiangyan County. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 789-797. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201203260410
[ 傅斌, 徐佩, 王玉宽, 彭怡, 任静 ( 2013) 都江堰市水源涵养功能空间格局. 生态学报, 33, 789-797.]
doi: 10.5846/stxb201203260410
[8] Fu BJ, Zhang LW ( 2014) Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Progress in Geograpy, 33, 441-446. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
[ 傅伯杰, 张立伟 ( 2014) 土地利用变化与生态环境服务: 概念、方法与进展. 地理科学进展, 33, 441-446.]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.001
[9] Fu MD, Li JS, Zhang RA, Gao XQ, Xiao NW ( 2016) Valuation of the ecosystem services in southern mountain of Zhejiang Province. Ecological Economy, 32, 189-193. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 付梦娣, 李俊生, 章荣安, 高晓奇, 肖能文 ( 2016) 浙江省南部山区生态系统服务价值评估. 生态经济, 32, 189-193.]
[10] Gao J, Li F, Gao H, Zhou C, Zhang X ( 2017) The impact of land-use change on water-related ecosystem services: A study of the Guishui River Basin, Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 148-155.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.049
[11] Goldstein J, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G, Polasky S, Wolny S, Daily GC ( 2015) Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 7565-7570.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201040109 pmid: 22529388
[12] Gong X, Cao MC, Sun XP, Le ZF, Li S, Xu HG ( 2017) Valuation of ecosystem services in Wuyishan City. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 33, 1094-1101. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2017.12.005
[ 龚溪, 曹铭昌, 孙孝平, 乐志芳, 李双, 徐海根 ( 2017) 武夷山市生态系统服务价值评估. 生态与农村环境学报, 33, 1094-1101.]
doi: 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2017.12.005
[13] He S, Su Y, Wang L, Gallagher L, Cheng H ( 2018) Taking an ecosystem services approach for a new national park system in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 137, 136-144.
doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.030
[14] Huang HC, Yun YX, Miao ZT, Hao C, Li HY ( 2013) Multi-scenario and prediction of ecosystem services as affected by urban expansion: A case study in coastal area of Tianjin, North China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 697-704. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 黄焕春, 运迎霞, 苗展堂, 郝翠, 李洪远 ( 2013) 城市扩张影响下生态系统服务的多情景模拟和预测——以天津市滨海地区为例. 应用生态学报, 24, 697-704.]
[15] Huang J, Zhang XM, Zhang JC ( 2010) Comprehensive evaluation on soil and water conservation function of main forest types of ecological protection forest in Kaihua County. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 17, 88-90. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 黄进, 张晓勉, 张金池 ( 2010) 开化生态公益林主要森林类型水土保持功能综合评价. 水土保持研究, 17, 88-90.]
[16] Jiang B, Ouyang ZY, Miao H, Zheng H, Bai Y, Zhuang CW, Fang Y ( 2011) Ecosystem services valuation of the Haihe River Basin wetlands. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 2236-2244. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 江波, 欧阳志云, 苗鸿, 郑华, 白杨, 庄长伟, 方瑜 ( 2011) 海河流域湿地生态系统服务功能价值评价. 生态学报, 31, 2236-2244.]
[17] Jiang W, Chen Z, Lei X, He B, Jia K, Zhang Y ( 2016) Simulation of urban agglomeration ecosystem spatial distributions under different scenarios: A case study of the Changsha- Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration. Ecological Engineering, 88, 112-121.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.12.014
[18] Lacher IL, Ahmadisharaf E, Fergus C, Akre T, McShea WJ, Benham BL, Kline KS ( 2018) Scale-dependent impacts of urban and agricultural land use on nutrients, sediment, and runoff. Science of Total Environment, 652, 611-622.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.370
[19] Li C, Zheng H, Li S, Chen X, Li J, Zeng W, Liang Y, Polasky S, Feldman MW, Ruckelshaus M, Ouyang ZY, Daily GC ( 2015) Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 7396-7401.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406486112 pmid: 26082546
[20] Li LY, Xing H, Wu YJ, Gong XF, Li L ( 2012) Assessment of forest ecosystem services value based on MA—Taking Suichang County in Zhejiang Province as the case. Issues of Forestry Economics, 32, 317-322. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9709.2012.04.007
[ 李兰英, 邢红, 吴英俊, 龚笑飞, 李浪 ( 2012) 基于MA的森林生态系统服务价值评价——以浙江省遂昌县为例. 林业经济问题, 32, 317-322.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9709.2012.04.007
[21] Li YF, Luo YC, Liu G, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H ( 2013) Effects of land use change on ecosystem services: A case study in Miyun Reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 726-736. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201205280787
[ 李屹峰, 罗跃初, 刘纲, 欧阳志云, 郑华 ( 2013) 土地利用变化对生态系统服务功能的影响——以密云水库流域为例. 生态学报, 33, 726-736.]
doi: 10.5846/stxb201205280787
[22] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press/World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
[23] Mukul SA, Sohel MSI, Herbohn J, Inostroza L, K?nig H ( 2017) Integrating ecosystem services supply potential from future land-use scenarios in protected area management: A Bangladesh case study. Ecosystem Services, 26, 355-364.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.001
[24] Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J ( 2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 4-11.
doi: 10.1890/080023
[25] Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D ( 2011) The impact of land- use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: A case study in the State of Minnesota. Environmental & Resource Economics, 48, 219-242.
doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9407-0
[26] Qian YF, Yi LT, Dou PM, Zhu GL, Ying BG, Yu SQ ( 2012) Biomass and carbon fixation with oxygen release benefits in an ecological service forest of Jinyun County, China. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 29, 257-264. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.02.016
[ 钱逸凡, 伊力塔, 钭培民, 朱国亮, 应宝根, 余树全 ( 2012) 浙江缙云公益林生物量及固碳释氧效益. 浙江农业大学学报, 29, 257-264.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2012.02.016
[27] Ramachandra TV, Bharath S, Gupta N ( 2018) Modelling landscape dynamics with LST in protected areas of Western Ghats, Karnataka. Journal of Environment Management, 206, 1253-1262.
[28] Shao XY, Zhang ZF, Liu Z, Jing CW, Qi JG, Jiang JG, Cai XM, Liu QK ( 2018) Effects of land use change and planning regulation on ecosystem service values of islands: A case study of Putuo District, Zhoushan Archipelago. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37, 514-522. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201802.018
[ 邵小云, 张则飞, 刘中, 荆长伟, 齐家国, 蒋锦刚, 蔡秀敏, 刘乾坤 ( 2018) 土地利用变化及规划结构对海岛生态系统服务价值的影响——以舟山市普陀区为例. 生态学杂志, 37, 514-522.]
doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201802.018
[29] Sun X, Lu Z, Li F, Crittenden JC ( 2018) Analyzing spatio-temporal changes and trade-offs to support the supply of multiple ecosystem services in Beijing, China. Ecological Indicators, 94, 117-129.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.049
[30] Swetnam RD, Fisher B, Mbilinyi BP ( 2011) Mapping socio- economic scenarios of land cover change: A GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 563-574.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.007 pmid: 20932636
[31] Tallis H, Ricketts T, Guerry A ( 2011) InVEST 2.4.4 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford.
[32] Trisurat Y, Eawpanich P, Kalliola R ( 2016) Integrating land use and climate change scenarios and models into assessment of forested watershed services in Southern Thailand. Environment Research, 147, 611-620.
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.019 pmid: 26915561
[33] Wang J, Peng J, Zhao M, Liu Y, Chen Y ( 2017) Significant trade-off for the impact of Grain-for-Green Programme on ecosystem services in North-western Yunnan, China. Science of Total Environment, 574, 57-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.026 pmid: 27623527
[34] Xiao Q, Xiao Y, Ouyang ZY, Xu WH, Xiang S, Li YZ ( 2014) Value assessment of the function of the forest ecosystem services in Chongqing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 216-223. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201306261782
[ 肖强, 肖洋, 欧阳志云, 徐卫华, 向轼, 李勇志 ( 2014) 重庆市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估. 生态学报, 34, 216-223.]
doi: 10.5846/stxb201306261782
[35] Zhang J, Yuan WG, Ge Y, Jiang B, Zhu JR, Shen AH, Chang J ( 2010) Carbon storage and its sequestration potential by ecological service forest in Zhejiang. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 30, 3839-3848. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 张骏, 袁位高, 葛滢, 江波, 朱锦茹, 沈爱华, 常杰 ( 2010) 浙江省生态公益林碳储量和固碳现状及潜力. 生态学报, 30, 3839-3848.]
[36] Zhang Y ( 2015) Forest Ecological Benefit Evaluation and Construction of Balance Sheet. China Economic Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[ 张颖 ( 2015) 生态效益评估与资产负债表编制. 中国经济出版社, 北京.]
[37] Zheng H, Li Y, Robinson BE, Liu G, Ma D, Wang F, Lu F, Ouyang Z, Daily GC ( 2016) Using ecosystem service trade-offs to inform water conservation policies and management practices. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 527-532.
doi: 10.1002/fee.1432
[38] Zheng H, Li YF, Ouyang ZY, Luo YC ( 2013) Progress and perspectives of ecosystem services management. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 702-710. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.5846/stxb201205280786
[ 郑华, 李屹峰, 欧阳志云, 罗跃初 ( 2013) 生态系统服务功能管理研究进展. 生态学报, 33, 702-710.]
doi: 10.5846/stxb201205280786
[39] Zhu KW, Li YC, Zhou MT ( 2015) Land use scenario simulation of the main city of Chongqing based on the CLUE-S model. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 24, 789-797. (in Chinese with English abstract)
doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201505011
[ 朱康文, 李月臣, 周梦甜 ( 2015) 基于CLUE-S模型的重庆市主城区土地利用情景模拟. 长江流域资源与环境, 24, 789-797.]
doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201505011
[40] Zhu YB, Shi YJ ( 2018) Value evaluation and pricing of water resources in major cities in China. Resources Science, 40, 1040-1050. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 朱永彬, 史雅娟 ( 2018) 中国主要城市水资源价值评价与定价研究. 资源科学, 40, 1040-1050.]
[1] Richard Corlett. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: Towards ecological security in tropical and subtropical East Asia [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(7): 766-774.
[2] Yu Zhang, Zhenggao Xiao, Linhui Jiang, Lei Qian, Xiaoyun Chen, Fajun Chen, Feng Hu, Manqiang Liu. Nitrogen levels modify earthworm-mediated tomato growth and resistance to pests [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(12): 1296-1307.
[3] Boya Zhang,Yuxue Pan,Jing Xu,Yu Tian. IPBES thematic assessment on land degradation and restoration and its potential impact [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(11): 1243-1248.
[4] Yuxue Pan,Yu Tian,Jing Xu,Boya Zhang,Junsheng Li. Methodological assessment on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services and impacts on China within the IPBES framework [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(1): 89-95.
[5] Leshan Du,Junsheng Li,Gaohui Liu,Fengchun Zhang,Jing Xu,Lile Hu. Progress in the researches on the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2016, 24(6): 686-693.
[6] TANG Hai-Ping,CHEN Jiao,XUE Hai-Li. Ecological thresholds: Concept, Methods and research outlooks [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2015, 39(9): 932-940.
[7] Cunzi Lan,Yu Tian,Jing Xu,Junsheng Li. Conceptual framework and operational model of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2015, 23(5): 681-688.
[8] Yu Tian,Junsheng Li,Cunzi Lan,Xiushan Li. Interpretation of the work programme of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the period 2014-2018 [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2015, 23(4): 543-549.
[9] BAI Yong-Fei, HUANG Jian-Hui, ZHENG Shu-Xia, PAN Qing-Min, ZHANG Li-Xia, ZHOU Hua-Kun, XU Hai-Liang, LI Yu-Lin, and MA Jian. Drivers and regulating mechanisms of grassland and desert ecosystem services [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2014, 38(2): 93-102.
[10] XIAO Yu, XIE Gao-Di, AN Kai, and LU Chun-Xia. A research framework of ecosystem services based on functional traits [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2012, 36(4): 353-362.
[11] XIE Gao-Di, XIAO Yu, LU Chun-Xia. STUDY ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: PROGRESS, LIMITATION AND BASIC PARADIGM [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2006, 30(2): 191-199.
[12] XIAO Yu, XIE Gao-Di, LU Chun-Xia, DING Xian-Zhong, Lü Yao. THE IMPACT OF UREA AMENDMENTS ON ATMOSPHERIC GAS REGULATION SERVICES IN RICE PADDY ECOSYSTEMS AND THEIR VALUATION [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2005, 29(4): 577-583.
[13] GUO Zhong-Wei, GAN Ya-Ling. Some scientific questions for ecosystem services [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2003, 11(1): 63-69.
[14] JIANG Yan-Ling, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Estimation of Ecosystem Services of Major Forest in China [J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1999, 23(5): 426-432.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Qi Zhou, Jun Liu, Jingyi Wang, Sufen Chen, Lijuan Chen, Jinfa Wang, Hong-Bin Wang and Bing Liu. The juxtamembrane domains of Arabidopsis CERK1, BAK1, and FLS2 play a conserved role in chitin-induced signaling[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 0, (): 0 .
[2] Li Hanxi, Huang Xuena, Li Shiguo, Zhan Aibin. Environmental DNA (eDNA)-metabarcoding-based early monitoring and warning for invasive species in aquatic ecosystems[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(5): 491 -504 .
[3] Hsu Hsiang-Hao. Two New Species of Sterculiaceae from China[J]. J Syst Evol, 1975, 13(1): 107 -110 .
[4] Liang Shi-chu. A Preliminary Study on the Structure and Dynamics of Pubescent Hornbeam Population in Karst Mountain of Guiyang[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1992, 16(2): 108 -117 .
[5] Tsi Zhan-Huo. Nothodoritis Tsi—A New Genus of Orchidaceae from China[J]. J Syst Evol, 1989, 27(1): 58 -61 .
[6] XU Li, WANG Yi-Ling, WANG Xu-Mei, ZHANG Lin-Jing, YUE Ming, GU Feng-Xue, PAN Xiao-Ling, ZHAO Gui-Fang. Genetic Structure of Reaumuria soongorica Population in Fukang Desert, Xinjiang and Its Relationship with Ecological Factors[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2003, 45(7): 787 -794 .
[7] Zhang Changxiang, Jin Hungzhi. The Synopsis of Symposium on the Construction and Ecological Balance of the Mountainous Region in the Tropics and Subtropics[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1981, 5(2): 149 -150 .
[8] . [J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1994, 11(专辑): 45 .
[9] Li Deng-Ke. New taxa of the genus Plagiothecium from Xizang[J]. J Syst Evol, 1981, 19(2): 264 -266 .
[10] LUAN Ri-Xiao, ZHANG Shu-Mei. Three Species of Cladophoraceae New to China[J]. J Syst Evol, 1998, 36(1): 84 -86 .