Biodiversity Science ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 681-688.doi: 10.17520/biods.2015158

• Orginal Article • Previous Article     Next Article

Conceptual framework and operational model of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

Cunzi Lan, Yu Tian*(), Jing Xu, Junsheng Li   

  1. Biodiversity Research Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012
  • Received:2015-06-09 Accepted:2015-07-16 Online:2015-10-12
  • Tian Yu

The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) was officially established in April 2012 as an independent intergovernmental body, with the goal of strengthening the science-policy interface for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, long-term human well-being and social sustainable development. A conceptual framework for the IPBES, recommended by the Multidisciplinary Expert Panel, was accepted during the 2nd Session of platform’s Plenary, in order to promote cooperation across different disciplines, knowledge systems, and stakeholders. In this paper, IPBES conceptual framework is introduced, including the main elements and their linkages, and the operational conceptual model between science and policy of IPBES, as well as the linkages between IPBES, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), International Mechanism of Scientific Expertise on Biodiversity (IMoSEB) and Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), and the experiences learned from these previous actions. The conceptual framework captures six elements of the relationships between the natural world and humankind: nature; nature’s benefits to people; good quality of life; anthropogenic assets; direct drivers of change; institutions and governance systems and other indirect drivers of change. This framework indicates the interactions of 6 elements at different spatial and temporal scales and the focus for assessment and knowledge generation. The operational model of IPBES demonstrates the dynamics between science and policy through IPBES. A continuous flow of knowledge from science and other knowledge systems filters to the interface after screening the analytical conceptual framework, and decision-making is then impacted through the realization of the functions and the work program of IPBES. The prospects and potential impacts of the conceptual framework and operational model, as well as a proposed corresponding strategy for China are discussed. We argue that IPBES is going to become a platform for nations to communicate, play political game and maximize the benefits, the embracement of different disciplines and knowledge systems in the multi-scaled assessments of the IPBES will have significant impacts on policy guiding and supporting in international community. China should become more proactive in participating and play a constructive role in the IPBES process, in order to ensure the application of the scientific research from China in the assessment, as well as improve the biodiversity conservation in China by incorporating international experience.

Key words: biodiversity, ecosystem services, human wellbeing, science, policy, assessment

Fig. 1

Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) conceptual framework (Adopted from IPBES/2/17 ("

Fig. 2

Operational conceptual model of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). The double sided arrows (thin and thick) indicate the relationships among science, IPBES and Policy. The one sided arrow indicates the conceptual framework influencing IPBES processes, functions and deliverables. The dotted arrow denotes that policy in turn influence science and other knowledge systems. (Adopted from IPBES/2/17 ( second/working/2_17/Final/IPBES_2_17_en.pdf))"

[1] Beck S, Borie M, Chilvers J, Esguerra A, Heubach K, Hulme M, Lidskog R, Lövbrand E, Marquard E, Miller C, Nadim T, Nesshoever C, Settele J, Turnhout E, Vasileiadou E, Goerg C (2014) Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise: the cases of the IPCC and the IPBES.Gaia Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23, 80-87.
[2] Bennet EM, Peterson CD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.Ecology Letters, 12, 1-11.
[3] Breidenich C, Magraw D, Rowley A, Rubin JW (1998) The Kyoto protocol to the United Nation’s framework convention on climate change.American Journal of International Law, 92, 315-331.
[4] Brooks TM, Lamoreux JF, Soberon J (2014) IPBES ≠ IPCC.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 543-545.
[5] Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Diaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte A (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 1305-1312.
[6] Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico Set al., (2015) The IPBES Conceptual Framework—connecting nature and people.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16.
[7] Díaz S, Demissew S, Joly CA, Lonsdale WM, Larigauderie A (2015) A rosetta stone for nature’s benefits to people. PLoS Biology, 13, 1-8.
[8] Duraiappah AK, Asah ST, Brondizio ES, Kosoy N, O’Farrell PJ, Prieur-Richard AH, Subramanian SM, Takeuchi K (2014) Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem services for human well-being: a conceptual framework for understanding the new commons.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 7, 94-100.
[9] Guo ZF (郭正府), Liu JQ (刘嘉麒), Chen XY (陈晓雨) (2007) The influence of volcanism on the biological existence environment in Miocene Shanwang of Shandong.Science in China(中国科学), 37, 1169-1175. (in Chinese)
[10] Hotes S, Opgenoorth L (2014) Trust and control at the science- policy interface in IPBES.BioScience, 64, 277-278.
[11] Hulme M, Mahony M, Beck S, Görg C, Hansjürgens B, Hauck J, Nesshöver C, Paulsch A, Vandewalle M, Wittmer H, Böschen S, Bridgewater P, Diaw MC, Fabre P, Figueroa A, Heong KL, Korn H, Leemans R, Lövbrand E, Hamid MN, Monfreda C, Pielke R, Settele J, Winter M, Vadrot ABM, Hove S, Sluijs JP (2011) Science-policy interface: beyond assessments.Science, 333, 697-698.
[12] Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (2013) IPBES/2/17: Report of the second session of the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
[13] Koetz T, Farrell KN, Bridgewater P (2012) Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics, 12, 1-21.
[14] Larigauderie A, Mooney HA (2010) The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity.Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 1-6.
[15] Lavoie M, Paré D, Bergeron Y (2005) Impact of global change and forest management on carbon sequestration in northern forested peatlands.Environmental Reviews, 13, 199-240.
[16] Loreau M, Oteng-Yeboah A, Arroyo MT, Babin D, Barbault R, Donoghue M, Gadgil M, Häuser C, Heip C, Larigauderie A, Ma K, Mace G, Mooney HA, Perrings C, Raven P, Sarukhan J, Schei P, Scholes RJ, Watson RT (2006) Diversity without representation.Nature, 442, 245-246.
[17] Ma KP (马克平) (2012) IPBES: Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES): an IPCC for biodiversity.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 20, 409-410. (in Chinese)
[18] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
[19] Perrings C, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A, Mooney H (2011) The biodiversity and ecosystem services Science-policy interface.Science, 331, 1139-1141.
[20] Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.Science, 325, 419-422.
[21] Rampino MR, Koeberl C (2006) Comparison of Bosumtwi impact crater (Ghana) and Crater Lake volcanic caldera (Oregon, USA): implications for biotic recovery after catastrophic events. In: Biological Processes Associated with Impact Events (eds Cockell CS, Koeberl C, Gilmour I), pp. 101-120. Springer Heidelberg, Berlin.
[22] Scheffer M, Carpenter CS, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems.Nature, 413, 591-596.
[23] Tian Y (田瑜), Li JS (李俊生), Lan CZ (兰存子), Li XS (李秀山) (2015) Interpretation of the work programme of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the period 2014-2018.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 23, 543-549. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] Turnhout E, Bloomfield B, Hulme M, Vogel J, Wynne B (2012) Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience.Nature, 488, 454-455.
[25] Zhang YM (张永民), Zhao SD (赵士洞) (2010) The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Follow-up: a global strategy for turning knowledge into action.Journal of Natural Resources(自然资源学报), 25, 522-528. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] Zhao-Zhong FENG Xiangyang Yuan Li Pin Bo Shang Qin Ping Tingjian Hu Shuo Liu. (2020) Progress in the Effects of Elevated Ground-Level Ozone on Terrestrial Ecosystem . Chin J Plant Ecol, 44(全球变化与生态系统专辑): 0-0.
[2] Lintao Huang Hui Huang Lei Jiang. (2020) A revised taxonomy for Chinese hermatypic corals . Biodiv Sci, 28(4): 515-523.
[3] zuo jianru Xiao-Quan QI Wang LeiLei chong chongkang 王台. (2020) Achievements and Advance in Chinese Plant Sciences in 2019 . Chin Bull Bot, 55(3): 0-0.
[4] Kai Wang,Jinlong Ren,Hongman Chen,Zhitong Lyu,Xianguang Guo,Ke Jiang,Jinmin Chen,Jiatang Li,Peng Guo,Yingyong Wang,Jing Che. (2020) The updated checklists of amphibians and reptiles of China . Biodiv Sci, 28(2): 189-218.
[5] Xiongwei Yang,Ankang Wu,Qixian Zou,Guangrong Li,Mingming Zhang,Canshi Hu,Haijun Su. (2020) Field monitoring of mammals and birds using infrared cameras in Mayanghe National Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China . Biodiv Sci, 28(2): 219-225.
[6] Haiou Liu,Fengchun Zhang,Fuwei Zhao,Leshan Du,Dayuan Xue. (2020) Biodiversity sensitive issues from changes in the strategic objectives of the financial mechanism for the Convention on Biological Diversity . Biodiv Sci, 28(2): 244-252.
[7] Yisheng Ma,Qingqing Ma,Nianjun He,Dapeng Zhu,Kaihui Zhao,Hongcai Liu,Shuai Li,Liang Sun,Liubin Tang. (2020) Camera-trapping survey of mammals and birds in the Foping National Nature Reserve, China . Biodiv Sci, 28(2): 226-230.
[8] Zhenyuan Liu,Xingliang Meng,Zhengfei Li,Junqian Zhang,Jing Xu,Senlu Yin,Zhicai Xie. (2020) Diversity assessment and protection strategies for the mollusk community in the southern Dongting Lake . Biodiv Sci, 28(2): 155-165.
[9] Wenying Zhuang,Yi Li,Huandi Zheng,Zhaoqing Zeng,Xincun Wang. (2020) Threat status of non-lichenized macro-ascomycetes in China and its threatening factors . Biodiv Sci, 28(1): 26-40.
[10] Ke Wang,Dongmei Liu,Lei Cai,Haijun Wu,Yi Li,Tiezheng Wei,Yonghui Wang,Hongmei Wu,Xiaodan Wei,Binbin Li,Junsheng Li,Yijian Yao. (2020) Methods and procedures of the red list assessment of macrofungi in China . Biodiv Sci, 28(1): 11-19.
[11] Yi Li,Zhiyao Tang,Yujing Yan,Ke Wang,Lei Cai,Jinsheng He,Song Gu,Yijian Yao. (2020) Incorporating species distribution model into the red list assessment and conservation of macrofungi: A case study with Ophiocordyceps sinensis . Biodiv Sci, 28(1): 99-106.
[12] Xinli Wei,Hong Deng,Jiangchun Wei. (2020) Threatened categories assessment of lichens in China . Biodiv Sci, 28(1): 54-65.
[13] WANG Yu-Bing,SUN Yi-Han,DING Wei,ZHANG En-Tao,LI Wen-Huai,CHI Yong-Gang,ZHENG Shu-Xia. (2020) Effects and pathways of long-term nitrogen addition on plant diversity and primary productivity in a typical steppe . Chin J Plant Ecol, 44(1): 22-32.
[14] Ke Wang,Mingjun Zhao,Jinhe Su,Liu Yang,Hong Deng,Yonghui Wang,Haijun Wu,Yi Li,Hongmei Wu,Xiaodan Wei,Tiezheng Wei,Lei Cai,Yijian Yao. (2020) The use of Checklist of Fungi in China database in the red list assessment of macrofungi in China . Biodiv Sci, 28(1): 74-98.
[15] Shun Li,Liang Zou,Yinan Gong,Haitao Yang,Tianming Wang,Limin Feng,Jianping Ge. (2019) Advances in LiDAR technology in the field of animal ecology . Biodiv Sci, 27(9): 1021-1031.
Full text