生物多样性 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (11): 1243-1248.doi: 10.17520/biods.2018117

• 保护论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

IPBES土地退化和恢复专题评估报告及其潜在影响

张博雅, 潘玉雪, 徐靖, 田瑜*()   

  1. 中国环境科学研究院生物多样性研究中心, 北京 100012
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-13 接受日期:2018-06-27 出版日期:2018-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 田瑜 E-mail:tianyu@craes.org.cn
  • 作者简介:

    # 共同第一作者

  • 基金项目:
    生态环境部生物多样性调查与评估专项(2096001006)

IPBES thematic assessment on land degradation and restoration and its potential impact

Boya Zhang, Yuxue Pan, Jing Xu, Yu Tian*()   

  1. Biodiversity Research Center, Chinese Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012
  • Received:2018-04-13 Accepted:2018-06-27 Online:2018-11-20
  • Contact: Tian Yu E-mail:tianyu@craes.org.cn
  • About author:

    # Co-first authors

随着国际社会对生物多样性保护和人类福祉关注度的提升, 土地退化作为全球面临的重要问题逐渐成为国际公约和进程关注的热点问题。生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台(Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES)将“土地退化和恢复”列入2014-2018年工作方案, 开展评估。2018年3月, 该评估报告在IPBES第六次全体会议上获得通过。本文概述了评估报告的主要内容和结论, 探讨了对其他国际进程的可能影响。评估报告在IPBES概念框架的基础上, 厘清了土地退化的概念与内涵, 全面梳理了土地退化对人类生活质量的影响, 阐明了土地退化的现状和进程, 分析了直接和间接驱动因素与土地退化的作用, 揭示了土地退化与人类福祉的关系, 提出了土地退化和恢复的对策建议。该项评估将为各国决策者制定政策工具提供最有效的技术支撑, 为相关国际进程谈判提供重要的科学参考。中国作为生物多样性大国, 应重视IPBES的评估机制并积极参与, 加强促进生物多样性和生态系统服务领域的科学成果转化, 适时针对国内关键问题启动相关评估, 促进我国生态文明建设和山水林田湖草系统治理, 实现美丽中国的建设目标。

关键词: 土地退化和恢复, 生物多样性, 生态系统服务, 人类福祉, IPBES

With increasing international concern for biodiversity and human well-being, land degradation has increasingly become the foci of international conventions and processes. In the 2014-2018 Work Program of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), “Land degradation and restoration” was included as one of the three major thematic assessment activities. The assessment report was completed by three hundred experts around the world in three years and adopted at the sixth plenary meeting of IPBES in March 2018. This article outlines the main contents and conclusions of the assessment, discusses possible impacts on other international processes, and proposes future work within our country. Based on the conceptual framework of IPBES, the assessment report comprehensively clarified the impact of land degradation on human life quality, the status and progress of land degradation, the role of direct and indirect drivers on land degradation, the relationship between land degradation and human well-being, and proposed suggestions for mitigating land degradation and promoting restoration. The assessment will provide policy makers in various countries with effective technical support for formulating policy tools and scientific references for negotiation of relevant international processes. As a country with rich biodiversity, China should accord importance to IPBES assessment mechanism and actively participate in strengthening the promotion of scientific achievements in the field of conserving biodiversity, initiate assessment on key domestic issues related to biodiversity and ecosystem services in a timely manner, to promote the construction of ecological civilization in our country, adopt a holistic approach to conserving our mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, and grasslands, achieve the construction goal of beautiful China.

Key words: land degradation and restoration, biodiversity, ecosystem services, human well-being, IPBES

[1] Cowie AL, Penman TD, Gorissen L, Winslow MD, Lehmann J, Tyrrell TD, Twomlow S, Wilkes A, Lal R, Jones JW (2011) Towards sustainable land management in the drylands: Scientific connections in monitoring and assessing dryland degradation, climate change and biodiversity. Land Degradation & Development, 22, 248-260.
[2] Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, Polasky S, Church A, Lonsdale M, Larigauderie A, Leadley PW, Oudenhoven APE, Plaat F, Schröter M, Lavorel S, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Bukvareva E, Davies K, Demissew S,Erpul G,Failler P, Guerra CA, Hewitt CL, Keune H, Lindley S, Shirayama Y (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people: Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. Science, 359, 270-272.
[3] ELD Initiative (2015) The Value of Land: Prosperous Lands and Positive Rewards Through Sustainable Land Management. (accessed on 2018-07-26)
[4] Eswaran H, Lal R, Reich PF (2001) Land degradation: An overview. In: Responses to Land Degradation (eds Bridges EM, Hannam ID, Oldeman LR, Pening de Vries FWT, Scherr SJ, Sompatpanit S), pp. 20-35. Oxford Press, New Delhi, India.
[5] Hotes S, Opgenoorth L (2014) Trust and control at the Science-Policy Interface in IPBES. BioScience, 64, 389-393.
[6] Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (2013) Report of the Second Session of the Plenary of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, pp. 1-96. Antalya, Turkey. (accessed on 2018-03-28)
[7] Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) (2018) Summary for Policymakers of the Thematic Assessment of Land Degradation and Restoration of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. (accessed on 2018-12-14)
[8] Jiang ZH (2013) Research on comprehensive monitoring and evaluation index system of land degradation in China’s arid areas. World Forestry Research, 26(6), 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[江泽慧 (2013) 全球变化背景下土地退化防治的挑战与创新发展. 世界林业研究, 26(6), 1-4.]
[9] Lan CZ, Tian Y, Xu J, Li JS (2015) Conceptual framework and operational model of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Biodiversity Science, 23, 681-688. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[兰存子, 田瑜, 徐靖, 李俊生 (2015) 生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学-政策平台的概念框架和运作模式. 生物多样性, 23, 681-688.]
[10] Ma KP (2012) Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES): An IPCC for biodiversity. Biodiversity Science, 20, 409-410. (in Chinese)
[马克平 (2012) IPBES: 生物多样性领域的IPCC. 生物多样性, 20, 409-410.]
[11] Stavi I, Lal R (2015) Achieving zero net land degradation: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Arid Environments, 112, 44-51.
[12] Sun XZ (2016) China’s strategy to participating in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. China Population, Resources and Environment, 26(1), 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[孙新章 (2016) 中国参与2030年可持续发展议程的战略思考. 中国人口·资源与环境, 26(1), 1-7.]
[13] Tian Y, Lan CZ, Xu J, Li XS, Li JS (2016) Assessment of pollination and China’s implementation strategies within the IPBES framework. Biodiversity Science, 24, 1084-1090. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[田瑜, 兰存子, 徐靖, 李秀山, 李俊生 (2016) IPBES框架下的全球传粉评估及我国对策. 生物多样性, 24, 1084-1090.]
[14] Tian Y, Li JS, Lan CZ, Li XS (2015) Interpretation of the work programme of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the period 2014-2018. Biodiversity Science, 23, 543-549. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[田瑜, 李俊生, 兰存子, 李秀山 (2015) 生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学-政策平台2014-2018年工作方案解析. 生物多样性, 23, 543-549.]
[15] United Nations (2015) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. . (accessed on 2018-03-28)
[16] Vitousek PM, Naylor R, Crews T, David MB, Drinkwater LE, Holland E, Johnes PJ, Katzenberger J, Martinelli LA, Matson PA (2009) Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science, 324, 1519-1520.
[17] Zhou XB, Zhang YM (2009) Review on the ecological effects of N deposition in arid and semi-arid areas. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29, 3835-3845. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[周晓兵, 张元明 (2009) 干旱半干旱区氮沉降生态效应研究进展. 生态学报, 29, 3835-3845.]
[1] 黄林韬 黄晖 江雷. (2020) 中国造礁石珊瑚分类厘定. 生物多样性, 28(4): 515-523.
[2] 刘海鸥,张风春,赵富伟,杜乐山,薛达元. (2020) 从《生物多样性公约》资金机制战略目标变迁解析生物多样性热点问题. 生物多样性, 28(2): 244-252.
[3] 马亦生,马青青,何念军,朱大鹏,赵凯辉,刘红彩,李帅,孙亮,唐流斌. (2020) 基于红外相机技术调查佛坪国家级自然保护区兽类和鸟类多样性. 生物多样性, 28(2): 226-230.
[4] 王剀,任金龙,陈宏满,吕植桐,郭宪光,蒋珂,陈进民,李家堂,郭鹏,王英永,车静. (2020) 中国两栖、爬行动物更新名录. 生物多样性, 28(2): 189-218.
[5] 耿宜佳,田瑜,李俊生,徐靖. (2020) “2020年后全球生物多样性框架”进展及展望. 生物多样性, 28(2): 238-243.
[6] 王玉冰,孙毅寒,丁威,张恩涛,李文怀,迟永刚,郑淑霞. (2020) 长期氮添加对典型草原植物多样性与初级生产力的影响及途径. 植物生态学报, 44(1): 22-32.
[7] 李熠,唐志尧,闫昱晶,王科,蔡磊,贺金生,古松,姚一建. (2020) 物种分布模型在大型真菌红色名录评估及保护中的应用: 以冬虫夏草为例. 生物多样性, 28(1): 99-106.
[8] 杨锐,彭钦一,曹越,钟乐,侯姝彧,赵智聪,黄澄. (2019) 中国生物多样性保护的变革性转变及路径. 生物多样性, 27(9): 1032-1040.
[9] 李顺,邹亮,宫一男,杨海涛,王天明,冯利民,葛剑平. (2019) 激光雷达技术在动物生态学领域的研究进展. 生物多样性, 27(9): 1021-1031.
[10] 李永民,吴孝兵. (2019) 安徽省两栖爬行动物名录修订. 生物多样性, 27(9): 1002-1011.
[11] 杨云卉, 白可喻, Devra Jarvis, 龙春林. (2019) 西双版纳黄瓜农家品种及其传统知识. 生物多样性, 27(7): 743-748.
[12] 孙蓓蓓, 俞存根, 刘惠, 颜文超, 张文俊, 戴冬旭. (2019) 南麂列岛东侧海域春秋季虾蟹类生物多样性. 生物多样性, 27(7): 787-795.
[13] 丁陆彬, 马楠, 王国萍, 何思源, 闵庆文. (2019) 生物多样性相关传统知识研究热点与前沿的可视化分析. 生物多样性, 27(7): 716-727.
[14] 孔嘉鑫, 张昭臣, 张健. (2019) 基于多源遥感数据的植物物种分类与识别: 研究进展与展望. 生物多样性, 27(7): 796-812.
[15] 曹宁, 薛达元. (2019) 论壮族传统文化对生物多样性的保护: 以广西靖西市为例. 生物多样性, 27(7): 728-734.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed