生物多样性 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 89-95. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017228
收稿日期:
2017-08-28
接受日期:
2017-11-05
出版日期:
2018-01-20
发布日期:
2018-05-05
通讯作者:
田瑜
作者简介:
# 共同第一作者
基金资助:
Yuxue Pan, Yu Tian*(), Jing Xu, Boya Zhang, Junsheng Li
Received:
2017-08-28
Accepted:
2017-11-05
Online:
2018-01-20
Published:
2018-05-05
Contact:
Tian Yu
About author:
# Co-first authors
摘要:
随着国际社会对生物多样性保护关注度的提升, 生物多样性和生态系统服务情景和模型方法逐渐成为国际进程和条约关注的焦点问题。生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学-政策平台(Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, IPBES)将“生物多样性和生态系统服务情景和模型方法评估”列入2014-2018年工作方案, 作为IPBES首批评估活动之一, 其评估报告及决策者摘要已在IPBES第四次全体会议上获得通过。本文概述了该评估报告的主要内容和结论, 探讨了报告与其他国际进程的关系及其可能对中国的影响。该报告梳理了国际上现有的生物多样性和生态系统服务相关情景和模型方法, 综合分析了它们的优缺点、适用范围和限制条件, 提出了使用过程中应对数据和知识空缺的方法, 为制定、使用及优化情景和模型提供了指导。IPBES的一系列评估报告将引领生物多样性和生态系统服务相关科学领域的发展, 为各国在生物多样性领域进行对话、权衡与博弈, 实现本国利益最大化提供一个高效的平台。中国作为一个发展中的生物多样性大国, 积极参与、发声必然是应对IPBES未来发展的最优方式。
潘玉雪, 田瑜, 徐靖, 张博雅, 李俊生 (2018) IPBES框架下生物多样性和生态系统服务情景和模型方法评估及对我国的影响. 生物多样性, 26, 89-95. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017228.
Yuxue Pan,Yu Tian,Jing Xu,Boya Zhang,Junsheng Li (2018) Methodological assessment on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services and impacts on China within the IPBES framework. Biodiversity Science, 26, 89-95. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017228.
不同空间尺度的应用 Application at different spatial scales | 全球 Global | 国家: 英国 National: United Kingdom | 区域: 涵盖柬埔寨、中国、老挝、泰国和越南 Regional: analysis covers Cambodia, China, Laos, Thailand and Viet Nam | 国家: 南非 National: Coastal fisheries of South Africa |
---|---|---|---|---|
使用情景和模型解决的问题 Issues addressed using scenarios and models | 爱知目标能否在2020年前完成?达成2050年《生物多样性公约》的战略远景需要什么? Are the Aichi Biodiversity Targets likely to be attained by 2020? What is needed to achieve the strategic vision for 2050 of the Convention on Biological Diversity? | 50年后, 英国的生态系统、生态系统服务和服务价值将会出现怎样的变化? What changes might occur in ecosystems, ecosystem services and the values of these services over the next 50 years in the United Kingdom? | 评估大坝工程, 特别是湄公河干流的工程造成的社会和环境影响 Evaluating social and environmental impacts of dam construction, especially in the main stream of the Mekong River | 可持续渔业管理政策的实施 Implementation of policy on sustainable management of fisheries |
开展的项目 Projects | 《全球生物多样性展望第四版(2014)》 Global Biodiversity Outlook 4 (2014) | 《英国国家生态系统评估(2011)》 United Kingdom National | 《湄公河干流水电建设战略性环境评估》 Strategic Environmental Assessment of Hydropower on the Mekong Mainstream | 《南非渔业管理》 South African Fisheries Management |
时间范围 Time horizons | 至2020年、2050年 Present-2020, 2050 | 2060年 2060 | 2030年 2030 | 至2034年, 每2-4年更新一次 Present-2034, updated every 2-4 years |
决策支持工具 Decision-support tools | 无 None | 无, 但正在开发工具 None, but tools are being developed | 战略性环境评估方法 Strategic environmental assessment methods | 管理战略评估 Management strategy evaluation |
优势 Strengths | (1)在短期项目中创造性使用推断方法 ; (2) 清晰的决策背景和授权环境。 (1) Novel use of extrapolations for nearterm projections; (2) Clear decision context and authorizing environment | 重点关注生态系统服务之间的协同增效和权衡取舍以及价值评估 Focusing on synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services and on monetary evaluation | (1)清晰的决策背景和授权环境; (2)利益攸关方的大力参与(1) Clear decision context and authorizing environment; (2) Strong involvement of stakeholders | (1)清晰的决策背景和授权环境; (2)政策和管理建议清晰, 且定期更新 (1) Clear decision context and authorizing environment; (2) Policy and management advice clear and updated regularly |
劣势 Weaknesses | (1)重点关注全球尺度评估, 不适于国家和地方决策背景; (2)缺乏普适性的情景和驱动因素模型, 难以开展跨目标分析 (1) Focusing on global scale limits applicability to many national and local decision contexts; (2) Lack of common scenarios and models of drivers makes analysis across targets difficult | (1)严重依赖驱动因素影响的定性评估; (2)未充分体现物种水平上的生物多样性(仅有鸟类) (1) Heavy reliance on qualitative estimates of impacts of drivers; (2) Biodiversity at species level weakly represented (only birds) | (1)情景过于特殊, 尤其是使用的经验模型, 因此很难推广或外推到更大尺度; (2)湄公河委员会的建议不具备约束力 (1) Highly context-specific, especially the empirical models used, and therefore difficult to generalize or extrapolate to larger scales; (2) Mekong River Commission recommendations non-binding | (1)情景过于特殊; (2)未考虑若干关键驱动因素(如气候变化) (1) Highly context-specific; (2) Several key drivers (e.g., climate change) not considered |
表1 生物多样性和生态系统服务情景和模型应用实践(修改自Ferrier et al, 2016)
Table 1 Application practices of scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services (adopted from Ferrier et al, 2016)
不同空间尺度的应用 Application at different spatial scales | 全球 Global | 国家: 英国 National: United Kingdom | 区域: 涵盖柬埔寨、中国、老挝、泰国和越南 Regional: analysis covers Cambodia, China, Laos, Thailand and Viet Nam | 国家: 南非 National: Coastal fisheries of South Africa |
---|---|---|---|---|
使用情景和模型解决的问题 Issues addressed using scenarios and models | 爱知目标能否在2020年前完成?达成2050年《生物多样性公约》的战略远景需要什么? Are the Aichi Biodiversity Targets likely to be attained by 2020? What is needed to achieve the strategic vision for 2050 of the Convention on Biological Diversity? | 50年后, 英国的生态系统、生态系统服务和服务价值将会出现怎样的变化? What changes might occur in ecosystems, ecosystem services and the values of these services over the next 50 years in the United Kingdom? | 评估大坝工程, 特别是湄公河干流的工程造成的社会和环境影响 Evaluating social and environmental impacts of dam construction, especially in the main stream of the Mekong River | 可持续渔业管理政策的实施 Implementation of policy on sustainable management of fisheries |
开展的项目 Projects | 《全球生物多样性展望第四版(2014)》 Global Biodiversity Outlook 4 (2014) | 《英国国家生态系统评估(2011)》 United Kingdom National | 《湄公河干流水电建设战略性环境评估》 Strategic Environmental Assessment of Hydropower on the Mekong Mainstream | 《南非渔业管理》 South African Fisheries Management |
时间范围 Time horizons | 至2020年、2050年 Present-2020, 2050 | 2060年 2060 | 2030年 2030 | 至2034年, 每2-4年更新一次 Present-2034, updated every 2-4 years |
决策支持工具 Decision-support tools | 无 None | 无, 但正在开发工具 None, but tools are being developed | 战略性环境评估方法 Strategic environmental assessment methods | 管理战略评估 Management strategy evaluation |
优势 Strengths | (1)在短期项目中创造性使用推断方法 ; (2) 清晰的决策背景和授权环境。 (1) Novel use of extrapolations for nearterm projections; (2) Clear decision context and authorizing environment | 重点关注生态系统服务之间的协同增效和权衡取舍以及价值评估 Focusing on synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services and on monetary evaluation | (1)清晰的决策背景和授权环境; (2)利益攸关方的大力参与(1) Clear decision context and authorizing environment; (2) Strong involvement of stakeholders | (1)清晰的决策背景和授权环境; (2)政策和管理建议清晰, 且定期更新 (1) Clear decision context and authorizing environment; (2) Policy and management advice clear and updated regularly |
劣势 Weaknesses | (1)重点关注全球尺度评估, 不适于国家和地方决策背景; (2)缺乏普适性的情景和驱动因素模型, 难以开展跨目标分析 (1) Focusing on global scale limits applicability to many national and local decision contexts; (2) Lack of common scenarios and models of drivers makes analysis across targets difficult | (1)严重依赖驱动因素影响的定性评估; (2)未充分体现物种水平上的生物多样性(仅有鸟类) (1) Heavy reliance on qualitative estimates of impacts of drivers; (2) Biodiversity at species level weakly represented (only birds) | (1)情景过于特殊, 尤其是使用的经验模型, 因此很难推广或外推到更大尺度; (2)湄公河委员会的建议不具备约束力 (1) Highly context-specific, especially the empirical models used, and therefore difficult to generalize or extrapolate to larger scales; (2) Mekong River Commission recommendations non-binding | (1)情景过于特殊; (2)未考虑若干关键驱动因素(如气候变化) (1) Highly context-specific; (2) Several key drivers (e.g., climate change) not considered |
1 | Christensen V, Walters CJ, Pauly D (2005) Ecopath with Ecosim: A User’s Guide. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. |
2 | Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J (2015a) The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16. |
3 | Díaz S, Demissew S, Joly C, Lonsdale WM, Larigauderie A (2015b) A Rosetta Stone for nature’s benefits to people. PLoS Biology, 13, e1002040. |
4 | Ferrier S, Ninan KN, Leadley P, Alkemade R, Acosta LA, Akcakaya HR, Brotons L, Cheung WWL, Christensen V, Harhash KA, Kabubo-Mariara J, Lundquist C, Obersteiner M, Pereira HM, Peterson G, Pichs-Madruga R, Ravindranath N, Rondinini C, Wintle BA (2016) The Methodological Assessment Report on Scenarios and Models of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany. |
5 | Fu BJ, Yu DD, Lü N (2017) An indicator system for biodiversity and ecosystem services evaluation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 341-348.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[傅伯杰, 于丹丹, 吕楠 (2017) 中国生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标体系. 生态学报, 37, 341-348.] | |
6 | Hotes S, Opgenoorth L (2014) Trust and control at the Science-Policy Interface in IPBES. BioScience, 64, 277-278. |
7 | Hove SVD, Chabason L (2009) The Debate on an Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Exploring Gaps and Needs. Institut Du Développement Durable Et Des Relations Internationales, |
8 | O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Riahi K, Ebi KL, Hallegatte S, Carter TR, Mathur R, Vuuren DPV (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change, 122, 401-414. |
9 | Peh KSH, Balmford A, Bradbury RB, Brown C, Butchart SHM, Hughes FMR, Stattersfield A, Thomas DHL, Walpole M, Bayliss J, Gowing D, Jones JPG, Lewis SL, Mulligan M, Pandeya B, Stratford C, Thompson JR, Turner K, Vira B, Willcock S, Birch JC (2013) TESSA: a toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosystem Services, 5, 51-57. |
10 | Sharp R, Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N, Vigerstol K, Pennington D, Mendoza G, Aukema J, Foster J, Forrest J, Cameron D, Arkema K, Lonsdorf E, Kennedy C, Verutes G, Kim CK, Guannel G, Papenfus M, Toft J, Marsik M, Bernhardt J, Griffin R, Glowinski K, Chaumont N, Perelman A, Lacayo M, Mandle L, Hamel P, Vogl AL (2015) InVEST + VERSION + User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund. |
11 | Stehfest E, Vuuren D, Kram T, Bouwman A, Alkemade R, Bakkenes M, Biemans H, Bouwman A, Elzen M, Janse J, Lucas P, van Minnen J, Müller M, Prins A (2014) Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change With IMAGE 3.0: Model Description and Policy Applications. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague. |
12 | Thaman R, Lyver P, Mpande R, Perez E, Cariño J, Takeuchi K (2013) The Contribution of Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems to IPBES: Building Synergies With Science. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris. |
13 | Tian Y, Lan CZ, Xu J, Li XS, Li JS (2016), Assessment of pollination and China’s implementation strategies within the IPBES framework. Biodiversity Science, 24, 1084-1090.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[田瑜, 兰存子, 徐靖, 李秀山, 李俊生 (2016) IPBES框架下的全球传粉评估及我国对策. 生物多样性, 24, 1084-1090.] | |
14 | Tian Y, Li JS, Lan CZ, Li XS (2015) Interpretation of the work programme of Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for the period 2014-2018. Biodiversity Science, 23, 543-549.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[田瑜, 李俊生, 兰存子, 李秀山 (2015) 生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学-政策平台2014-2018年工作方案解析. 生物多样性, 23, 543-549.] | |
15 | Trisurat Y (2013) Ecological Assessment: Assessing Conditions and Trends of Ecosystem Services of Thadee Watershed, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. Final Report Submitted to the ECO-BEST Project. Bangkok, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University. (in Thai with English abstract) |
16 | Tucker GM, Mcconville AJ, Mccoy K, Brink P, Braat LC, Arets E, Bräuer I, Gerdes H, Grunig M (2009) Scenarios and models for exploring future trends of biodiversity and ecosystem services changes. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Environment on Contract. Nuclear Fusion, 16, 16-17. |
17 | Villa F, Bagstad KJ, Voigt B, Johnson GW, Portela R, Honzák M, Batker D (2014) A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. PLoS ONE, 9, e91001. |
18 | Villarreal ML, Norman LM, Boykin KG, Wallace CSA (2013) Biodiversity losses and conservation trade-offs: assessing future urban growth scenarios for a North American trade corridor. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 9, 90-103. |
19 | Yu DD, Lü N, Fu BJ (2017) Indicator systems and methods for evaluating biodiversity and ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 349-357.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[于丹丹, 吕楠, 傅伯杰 (2017) 生物多样性与生态系统服务评估指标与方法. 生态学报, 37, 349-357.] | |
20 | Yue TX (2017) Principles and Methods for Simulating Earth’s Surface Systems. Science Press, Beijing.(in Chinese) |
[岳天祥 (2017) 地球表层系统模拟分析原理与方法. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
21 | Yue TX, Liu Y, Zhao MW, Du ZP, Zhao N (2016) A fundamental theorem of Earth’s surface modelling. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 751. |
22 | Yue TX, Wang YF, Du ZP, Zhao MW, Zhang LL, Zhao N, Lou M, Larocqued GR, Wilson J (2016) Analyzing the uncertainty of estimating forest carbon stocks in China. Biogeosciences, 13, 3991-4004. |
[1] | 何智荣, 吴思雨, 时莹莹, 王雨婷, 江艺欣, 张春娜, 赵娜, 王苏盆. 壶菌及其感染对两栖动物种群影响的研究现状与挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23274-. |
[2] | 彭昀月, 靳彤, 张小全. 生物多样性信用的概念、原则、交易和挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23300-. |
[3] | 吴相獐, 雷富民, 单壹壹, 于晶. 上海城市公园苔藓植物多样性分布格局及其环境影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23364-0. |
[4] | 张飞飞, 杨天凤, 陈莉荣, 刘冬梅, 杨柳园, 杨杜宇, 鞠鹏, 陆露. 被子植物花粉颜色多样性及应用研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23346-. |
[5] | 刘昱齐, 刘晶岚, 樊晓丽, 胡宜深, 郭鸿筱, 薛凡. 鸟鸣多样性感知与声景感知恢复性: 鸟鸣音频和科普的干预[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23230-. |
[6] | 杜宇晨, 刘蓓萌, 陈俊峰, 王浩, 谢屹. 基于结构方程模型的农户保护意愿影响因素分析:以东北虎豹国家公园珲春片区为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23155-. |
[7] | 韩丽霞, 王永健, 刘宣. 外来物种入侵与本土物种分布区扩张的异同[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23396-. |
[8] | 陈进. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》与国家植物园体系建设[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23257-. |
[9] | 冯晨, 张洁, 黄宏文. 统筹植物就地保护与迁地保护的解决方案: 植物并地保护(parallel situ conservation)[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23184-. |
[10] | 陈慧妹, 李文军, 邱娟, 马占仓, 李波, 杨宗宗, 闻志彬, 孟岩, 曹秋梅, 邱东, 刘丹辉, 金光照. 新疆野生维管植物名录[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23124-. |
[11] | 罗正明, 刘晋仙, 张变华, 周妍英, 郝爱华, 杨凯, 柴宝峰. 不同退化阶段亚高山草甸土壤原生生物群落多样性特征及驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23136-. |
[12] | 邓晶, 李艺, 侯一蕾. 城市生物多样性保护: 基于中欧对比视角下的经验借鉴[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23070-. |
[13] | 董廷玮, 黄美玲, 韦旭, 马硕, 岳衢, 刘文丽, 郑佳鑫, 王刚, 马蕊, 丁由中, 薄顺奇, 王正寰. 上海地区金线侧褶蛙种群的潜在空间分布格局及其景观连通性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 22692-. |
[14] | 刘志发, 王新财, 龚粤宁, 陈道剑, 张强. 基于红外相机监测的广东南岭国家级自然保护区鸟兽多样性及其垂直分布特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 22689-. |
[15] | 杜红. “物种”与“个体”: 究竟谁是生物多样性保护的恰当对象?[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23140-. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn